Talk:Wuert Engelmann

Latest comment: 17 days ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk18:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jug Bennett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Bennett meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Zuver:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Zuver meets all the criteria (albeit barely, as the length is only a couple of letters over the limit - expansion would be nice but is not required). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Sturgeon:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Sturgeon meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Englemann:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Englemann meets all the criteria (just passes the length requirement - though further expansion is not required, I see a few additional details you might want to add from the German Wikipedia of all places, including that he narrowly missed qualifying for the 1928 Olympics and was inducted into the South Dakota Hall of Fame). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Schammel:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Schammel meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Hinte:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Hinte meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • For Butler:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Butler meets all the criteria (albeit barely, being seven characters over the limit). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wuert Engelmann/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 21:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Image review: A nice PD image was added by a nice editor (had to throw some levity into the review), so no issues there. Wizardman 00:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wizardman, just courtesy ping as a reminder. Thank you again for taking this review. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose looks good, don't see any issues there. Source review and double-check for anything on expansion that might've been missed to follow. Wizardman 22:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I checked each source and see no copyright issues, nor do I see anything the other way. I also did a look through on newspapers.com and on this one I don't see anything missed. I found a note of him having a couple conference records in track and field, but that feels like it's getting overly trivial so I won't require it (May 26, 1932 Sioux City Journal if you want to check). Since I don't see anything else and the only tweaks are ones that I just made myself, I'll pass this as a GA. Wizardman 23:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply