Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Chhota Bheem and the throne of Bali

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Chhota Bheem and the throne of Bali

edit
(
)

Created/expanded by Manojasokan (talk), Bovineboy2008 (talk), Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Titodutta (talk) at 10:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC).

Per rules, "If the subject is a work of fiction or a fictional character, the hook must involve the real world in some way." Need another ALT to proceed. The mention of Bali, Indonesia is not applicable. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Is Rajiv Chilaka having any special recognition than any other directors? Every film is directed by some director. Not so hooky. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Why TOI reviews are special? They review lot of things. Why should we be giving them and their review a mention on the main page? - Vivvt (Talk) 11:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The name ToI can be removed from the hook! --Tito Dutta (contact) 11:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


--Tito Dutta (contact) 16:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Anything "second" is not hooky. - Vivvt (Talk) 03:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I am checking and will try to expand the article a bit more in next 1—2 days(s)! --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't know what to do, an editor has moved the article. But, I feel that move was inappropriate, so don't want to change anything here in this DYK. I have started an RM to move back. Now the editor is inactive! --Tito Dutta (contact) 21:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT4: ... that Chhota Bheem and the Throne of Bali (2013) was the second theatrical movie starring nine-year old Indian adventurer Chhota Bheem?
  • This is also not greatly hooky, but hey, it's verified. The article itself meets our criteria (though barely); let's move this one along. (The article retitle is minor and unproblematic.) Drmies (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Can we please have someone who isn't the hook writer be the one who reviews it? I've added the missing "that" (and fixed the formatting), but find the hook pretty dull myself. Also, the article is still classified as a stub, and should not be approved while this remains the case. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I have been waiting for original editor and nominator to suggest new hooks and have discarded all the hooks suggested till now. Drmies, you cannot suggest hook and approve yourself, I believe. Will wait till the original editor returns. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • User:Vivvt why did you strikethrough Drimes's hook? --Tito Dutta  (talk • contributions • email) 12:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
For the same reason as ALT 3. Anything "Second" does not sound hooky. We may have something "first" for the article or better than that. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
ALT5: ... that the Indian animation film Chhota Bheem and the throne of Bali (2013) released in three different languages— Hindi, Tamil, Telugu? --Tito Dutta  (talk • contributions • email) 13:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Finally...This ALT is better among all we had so far. GTG. @BlueMoonset: I believe, I am still eligible to pass this DYK being the first reviewer. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Chhota_Bheem_and_the_throne_of_Bali&oldid=1022406236"