ů
Reports
edit- 129.205.24.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Schnitzlebang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 47.223.76.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 80.103.137.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Pixel 9 (diff): Repeated edit-warring on Pixel 9 and now iPhone 15 despite multiple warnings, ignoring WP:STATUSQUO and misinterpreting policies such as NPOV and "consensus". Disputed material is in clear violation of various policies, and there is rough consensus from multiple editors on the talk page against its inclusion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bundling 90.167.202.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) as well, clearly the same user. Perhaps a rangeblock. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 167.98.65.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On An Yu-jin (diff): vandalism after final warning. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. —Kusma (talk) 10:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2A04:4A43:981F:FE39:3D25:D8D7:E3B3:AF2F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Continued disruptive removal of band member after range block and protection on articles they vandalized were expired. Block evasion by User:RealtruestoryofMike. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- GimhaeBorn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) The user was edit warring in JYP Entertainment, because the user claimed the changes to the article is confusing. The article was missing information about solo artists and the editor was claiming to just follow the official website. The editor was also adamant that "sub unit groups" should be removed from the "groups" section.[1][2] [3][4] I tried to discuss things in the talkpage and I didn't revert the editor's last changes in article[5][6] to let things simmer. The editor was also given several warnings about edit disrupting through their talkpage. But today, the editor blanked my userpage.[7]Hotwiki (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- 222.234.140.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Multiple harassment claims against Magnolia677 without evidence from several IP accounts including 112.160.55.198 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
| CSD Defcon |
 Category:Candidates for speedy deletion currently contains 11 pages. |
| [all] [log] | [tag] [delete] |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 1 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 3 |
| Other candidates | 11 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 87 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 29 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Political article that appears to have had biased information on it. Moreover, the article appears ripe for an edit war and paid writers on it could be possible. Holyapple25 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism in recent days. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs and new user. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Highly obscene and unnecessary messages by IP - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thewikizoomer&oldid=1246488973. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued re-insertion by IPs of an image which is most likely a copyright infringement. TarnishedPathtalk 09:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: False information has been added to the page multiple times, including reference to a nonexistent 'Corporate Communication Manager' named Aidan Ashford and to a nonexistent sub-brand called 'Trade Republica'.
It looks like these changes are being made in order to lend credence to phishing campaigns targeting Trade Republic customers. The supposed 'Trade Republica' branding in particular is similar to phishing domains targeting customers that we have previously identified. We have already reverted these changes several times, but they are quickly added again by the same user, 'Roger Jason Bennett', who has also added a reference to an 'Aidan Ashford' to the page for the European Securities and Markets Authority. Endmost wiki (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent additions of Rapist to article and shortdesc. There's evidently reporting of this accusation given the current news cycle - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/19/mohamed-al-fayed-accused-bbc-documentary-raping-five-women - but they are just that, accusations. Golikom (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – multiple IPv6 no given sourced. Abrilando232 (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Very high lvl of IP vandalism Dushnilkin (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: "acts to promote awareness of Israel and the Middle East in the United Kingdom." is wholly misleading and accepts the purported purpose of the journal without quotes to indicate potential bias. The article has essentially no critique of what is a distinctly right-wing journal (IE: there is a major bias in the journal, regardless of left or right affiliation) except for an even more right-wing criticism. Given the clear bias and the unfinished nature of the page, it should really be opened up LordGigapiller (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a reliable source for such a critique, please post it here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessaery, because changes have been made to the company's structure, and edits are necessaery to the wiki. However one pending has already been made, and there is no such personnel who could accept it. 5.204.172.22 (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.
Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.
For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)
Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:
The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).
The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 19 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Village Pump (proposals) (6 threads) |
|---|
| Village Pump (idea lab) (8 threads) |
|---|
| Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
|---|
| Village Pump (miscellaneous) (7 threads) |
|---|
| Administrative action review (0 threads) Most recent:
|
|---|
| Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
|---|
| Bots noticeboard (3 threads) |
|---|
| Arbitration Committee noticeboard (5 threads) |
|---|
| Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (12 threads) |
|---|
Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 12:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) |