Science is already a wiki if you look at it a certain way. It’s just a highly inefficient one — the incremental edits are made in papers instead of wikispace, and significant effort is expended to recapitulate existing knowledge in a paper in order to support the one to three new assertions made in any one paper. — John Wilbanks. Illustration: papers and wikispace.
diffhistTimbuktu 20:44−454 Zaghas19talkcontribs (→History: blackpast.com is an awful source. The other sources (and nearly every realiable one I can find report a population size of 100,000 or less))Tag: references removed