User talk:Gallileo2k/Archive 21

(Redirected from User:Gallileo2k/Archive 21)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Umran Chowdhury in topic Do i know you?

Happy Holidays

edit
  Greetings of the Season
A merry good morning I wish you, My friends both great and small.
When the world, for his fare, shall press you, may you n'er go to the wall. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Ragib! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Habibur Rahman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Kamal Hossain - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit war

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Biman Bangladesh Airlines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Mjroots (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I won't edit the article for the time being. Please check the note I put at ANB. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've fully protected the article for 24h to give you both time to discuss the issue and prevent either of you from being blocked for breaking the 3 revert rule. Concentrate on the issue, not who has the opposing opinion and keep it civil please. Mjroots (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
That's the right approach, thanks for that. Again, I was not going to edit the article anyway, and I think Zaps and I are reaching a way out in the discussion on his talk page. But thanks for your work. --Ragib (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article was already indefinitely move protected. I did not alter that. All I did was edit protect it for 24h, a perfectly reasonable action to get both sides in a dispute to talk to each other via the article talk page. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Ok, I seem to have misread the infinite-move protection to be infinite-edit protection. Sorry about that. Your action is fine and reasonable, thanks for that. Have a nice day. --Ragib (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Help on Continual Edit

edit

Ragib Bhai, I have created a page on Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin. Though I've not completed, the contents of this article is being changed repeatedly by someone. I think, I've given enough references supporting the content. I've undone the changes. But I'm afraid my IP will be blocked/I'll be punished for continual edits/undo's on the same content. What should I do now? I'm confused. Should I leave the article to that person who is changing the content as soon as I add any information? I need help. Thanks. NasrinatWiki (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for the useful links and also for the editing that you have done for Ferdausi Rahman's page. I would like to upload a picture of her, but finding it difficult. I need to thru the tutorial and help pages .. I guess.

Thanks.

Bhabona (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi - Please help needed for clean up

edit

Hi Ragib, Can you please help clean up this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Ahmed Thank you .

--Sonisona 10:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonisona (talkcontribs)


You have removed a complete section here, these were interviews done on all major newspapers around the world, Plus there were quotes mentioned by this person. Can you explain why this has been done, and if so, instead of deleting it... add them in the reference section.

An entire section is deleted, and they were important. --Sonisona 22:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonisona (talkcontribs)

Please refer to WP:NOT. --Ragib (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I did refer - but those are important news and quotes... where do you think that will come under....? All those were important links to show that the news papers have carried articles about the company and the president as well as the beauty queens...--Sonisona 08:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC) --67.204.3.201 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but you added the huge list of links to the point of spamming the page. Once again, please read WP:NOT once again, in particular, the section Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files. Also, it will be a conflict of interest in your part to continue editing the article. Please don't edit the page, rather make your suggestion in the talk page. --Ragib (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Biman Bangladesh Airlines

edit

Hi Ragib,

Could you give me a hand with this article. Having difficulty explain to some of the new editors what FA means.

Thanks. → AA (talk)13:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

a little more help needed

edit

first of all, i am extremely sorry for my words, i didn't know that you are a moderator and it's your job to clean up unnecessary additions from wiki. Secondly, I thank you for removing the controversial paragraph from the starting section of North South University. But I still have something to say: Keeping the referenced section named "2009 student rape controversy" just because it is referenced and wikipedia allows to add referenced controversy doesn't make any sense. You must be aware that millions of students around the worlds searches for universities in the Wikipedia before they search it in google. Some controversies shouldn't always be praised just because they are referenced. If you are Bangladeshi, then you must be aware that a lot of public universities have such controversial news about them. But can you show me a single university whose wiki page shows those controversies? NSU is a reputed private university of Bangladesh and that's why some people find it as their duty to spread every single controversial news around the world. And about the references, the newagebd's article also writes the same news for Dhaka University. So why don't we post the news in that wiki page too. So, please just think about it!

Nsuuser (talk) 3:15, 27 February 2010 (BD)

FAR

edit

I have nominated Shahbag for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 04:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


Kindly , please take a rest

edit

First , thank you for your all big efforts for all bangladesh pages. BUT, please consider to give the new generation a chance to give a new,fresh look for bangaldesh articles. i assume , u r smart and educated, so please take some holiday from wikipedia and try to do something else for bangladesh rather than making wikipedia your personal pedia. There are enough educated bangladeshis worldwide online to build bangladeshi wikipedia and you can come back few years later to see the progress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.65.231.123 (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

To put it bluntly, my reply to you would simply be "Mind your Own business". If you want to rant about domination of any country in Wikipedia, feel free to do whatever you want in your own time. I do not appreciate any unsolicited advice on how I should or should not spend my time. Besides, judging by your recent "work" here, giving you a free rein of wikipedia is not a good idea :). Also, please don't wave the "younger generation" flag ... there are plenty of well-meaning wikipedians from Bangladesh who are doing a very good job, and not spending time venting their personal issues or hate of other groups/countries.
So, Nada, no, I'll spend my time doing whatever I want, thank you. --Ragib (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

kindly please remove lock from article

edit

i am not sure why you have put a lock on the article. the article was in a proper summary now it has reduced to POV. you have placed a lock on the article in the current format. pls remove the lock from the article. thanksBangladeshPride (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, can't do that. You and another user were involved in an edit war (for which you were blocked). Please discuss what you want to say in the talk page. The page shall remain protected until you and others have reached a consensus. Also, admins always protect the wrong version. --Ragib (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
sorry i was actually going to ask you to look at my current discussion on the discussion page. let me know what you think. thanksBangladeshPride (talk) 05:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please add refugee number back to the article. thanks

edit

Please add the number of refugees under the notes section http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3452.htm 10 million bangladeshi hindus who have sought refuge in assam and west bengal during the bangladesh liberation war. Please add this back to the notes section. thanks BangladeshPride (talk) 05:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

mk.wiki inclusion

edit

See the developments of the argument about inclusion of mk.wiki, vis. measurement method. Cheers. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 13:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edits to be made to article

edit

Hi please remove lock as edits need to be made to article thanks. you can reference discussion page. date needs to be put in proper format and bangladeshi hindu refugees need to be added to infobox. BangladeshPride (talk) 04:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is pity that you have deleted the Dr.Syed Mehboob from the list and caused agony, anguish and dismay to millions of Hindkowans ivig across pakistan. You have deprived WIKIPEDIA millions of readers from a talented person who contributed alot in promiting Hindko language.


Shafique Khan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.209.118.245 (talk) 04:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mehboob to know why the article was deleted. --Ragib (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please place a finite full-protection on Bangladesh Liberation War

edit

According to the protection log for the article "Bangladesh Liberation War" your have fully-protected the article indefinitely, something that seems a bit much being that the two major people involved in the edit war about various subjects in the article will probably forget about it after a few weeks. It's generally not considered a healthy idea for any article on Wikipedia to be indefinitely protected, because it in effect eliminates any effective eddits to the article and dramatically slows down an articles rate of improvement. Thank You

Spitfire19 (Talk) 12:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Personal liking and disliking lead you to object some essentianl pages too !

edit

Mr. Ragib !

Its continuously observed that you are leading with personal likings or dislikings or personal interest rather than acquiring some historical knowledge on oriental poetry or the history of poetry. very sad. its very sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audittwa Shapla (talkcontribs) 16:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please proof your knowledge about oriental creative writings and history of poetry from charjyapada to The New Age Poetry of Bangladesh. Audittwa Shapla (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Audittwa Shapla (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


It is also sad to see a group of non notable poets trying to use Wikipedia for promoting their personal vanity autobiographies. As the person making the claim that these poets are notable, it is *you* who needs to furnish the proof. --Ragib (talk) 19:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit

Your undo of my edit was pure vandalism as I gave links to explain the history of this movement as without history no article is complete of this nature.--Surajcap (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you are the anon ip that added a large amount of text copied from a book, then I need to warn you about copyright violation problems. You cannot simply copy text off a book. If you re-insert that text, it will be removed, and continuous copyright violations will lead to bans. Hope you understand the rationale behind the revert. --Ragib (talk) 06:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


FYI, you copypasted the text from this book. If you redo the copyvio, you will be blocked. --Ragib (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hope the new 'History' article with the book as reference and no copies from any copyrighted material satisfies all criteria!--Surajcap (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bengali photos

edit

You have shown prejudice to people from West Bengal .only four photos .still ony 1 people from west bengal. There atleast 12 more legenadry people whom u missed out. Furthermore Great poets, entrepreneurs, Scientist from West bengal are ignored. Nobel lauretes .Oscar winner, Grammy winners,pulitzer winners are not included. it's very dissapointing and uncalled for attitude. please restore the photos which i created

bhalo thakben!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overvital1288 (talkcontribs) 06:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

content

edit

Among the entrepreneurs u have listed Seak dean, Jawed karim, amar bose. But the most succesful entrepreneur subroto roy , founder of 12 bn US$ Sahara Indiagroup is not included. I'm adding it there. anyway. a bit curious where do u reside? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overvital1288 (talkcontribs) 06:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Correcting you Netaji Subhas is the most Globally recognised political leader, while mujib is restricted among Bengalis only. you SHOULD know this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overvital1288 (talkcontribs) 07:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

block evasion by banned user

edit

I'm not an admin, just a regular editor, but thank you for letting me know, I will let the admins know. Thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for removing the vandalism on my talk page. Hekerui (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

System administrator

edit

Hello, Rajib

I would kindly draw you attention to this article system administrator, it has been under constant vandalism by IP hoopers previously it has been vandalized and had been block for three months or so after the block is expired, the IP hoopers again vandalizing and therefore its very difficult to look after this article. So pls block this article block this article indefinitely from further vandalizing.--Kkm010as© 06:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It seems that the vandalism has stopped, at least for the last 4 days. I'll put it in my watchlist. --Ragib (talk) 06:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks pls keep an eye.--Kkm010as© 06:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bengali Wikipedia

edit

I am familiar with Bengali Wikipedia, but as far as contributing goes, I am more comfortable with the English version. I am happy to see your interest in Bengali Wikipedia. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 04:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edits on Ganga

edit

Sorry, I just hate the willful and stupid British-enforced Sinicization of the REAL name of India's most sacred river, the Ganga. I'll let it be. We'll just let the world remain willfully misinformed, even though almost all Indians with a shred of pride say Ganga when speaking, even in English. My edits were a late protest against lingering colonialism.--LordSuryaofShropshire (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I sympathize with you, but in Wikipedia, we are here to report the world in its real, unjust self. Thanks for understanding. --Ragib (talk) 17:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Help reqd

edit

Hi Ragib, I am not being able to resize the logos in some articles. An example is Women's College, Silchar. Can you please help? Thnx. Shovon (talk) 05:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bible verses

edit

Following up on the noticeboard discussion, I think the best thing to do is start a new discussion on what the community thinks is best to do with pages like this. I've started a page at Wikipedia:Bible verses/2010. It's been five years since any of this was discussed at all. Most of the people from back then are gone, and the community and its standards have also changed. Hopefully a fresh discussion can result in a resolution everyone will be happy with, and it'd be great to have your participation. - SimonP (talk) 06:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi Ragib, the following image is a direct copy from Outlook, India. But the uploader claimed it to be his own work and released in to the PD. He did it earlier also, with an image of Arundhati Roy. The problem is, when I am trying to put a CSD tag on the photo for copyvio, it says that the file does not exist. Can you pls look into this? Thanks. Shovon (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Solved. It was in commons. Shovon (talk) 06:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Detroit schools

edit

Thank you very much! I will proceed to post the Bengali name in Commons:Category:Detroit Public Schools WhisperToMe (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the 1st para of the sports section,its written that "BCCI also conducts Ranjee trophy,Duleep trophy,Deodhar trophy,Irani trophy and the Challenger Series". Let me make myself clear."Challenger Series" is an ATP(tennis)tournament.It has nothing to do with BCCI and its a big error by somebody. So please do the needful changes in it.I hope you understood what I meant. And aslo there aren't articles like-"science & technology in india,transport,education & envirnment" and other stuff as well.If you go to countries like USA,China,Israel,Singapore,Russia and others,you'll find their profiles are well maintained and recorded.So please do make our country's profile like them as well.India's profile is very short & empty compared to other countries.So please do the needful changes. And India has the 2nd largest standing army not 3rd.The whole world know that India is 2nd to China in number of army troops.Only Wikipedia thinks its 3rd largest army.So here also please make a needful change at he introduction in 3rd para. PLEASE DO THESE NEEDFUL CHANGES,ITS MY HUMBLE REQUEST. Thank you.

EDIT REQUEST

edit

In the 1st para of the sports section,its written that "BCCI also conducts Ranjee trophy,Duleep trophy,Deodhar trophy,Irani trophy and the Challenger Series". Let me make myself clear."Challenger Series" is an ATP(tennis)tournament.It has nothing to do with BCCI and its a big error by somebody. So please do the needful changes in it.I hope you understood what I meant. And aslo there aren't articles like-"science & technology in india,transport,education & envirnment" and other stuff as well.If you go to countries like USA,China,Israel,Singapore,Russia and others,you'll find their profiles are well maintained and recorded.So please do make our country's profile like them as well.India's profile is very short & empty compared to other countries.So please do the needful changes. And India has the 2nd largest standing army not 3rd.The whole world know that India is 2nd to China in number of army troops.Only Wikipedia thinks its 3rd largest army.So here also please make a needful change at he introduction in 3rd para. PLEASE DO THESE NEEDFUL CHANGES,ITS MY HUMBLE REQUEST. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadRed94 (talkcontribs) 21:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

EDIT REQUEST

edit

In the 1st para of the sports section,its written that "BCCI also conducts Ranjee trophy,Duleep trophy,Deodhar trophy,Irani trophy and the Challenger Series".

Let me make myself clear."Challenger Series" is an ATP(tennis)tournament.It has nothing to do with BCCI and its a big error by somebody.So please do the needful changes in it.I hope you understood what I meant.

And aslo there aren't articles like-"science & technology in india,transport,education & envirnment" and other stuff as well.If you go to countries like USA,China,Israel,Singapore,Russia and others,you'll find their profiles are well maintained and recorded.So please do make our country's profile like them as well.India's profile is very short & empty compared to other countries.So please do the needful changes.

And India has the 2nd largest standing army not 3rd.The whole world know that India is 2nd to China in number of army troops.Only Wikipedia thinks its 3rd largest army.So here also please make a needful change at he introduction in 3rd para.

PLEASE DO THESE NEEDFUL CHANGES,ITS MY HUMBLE REQUEST. Thank you. --116.72.157.56 (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your ideas

edit

Well Thank You for contributing in my article, I dont want to change my user name, cos no need for that! and I am not advertising my family business (which is not family business either) I believe after ten years of success, why would we use advertising in wiki! we do not run any sort of business which require public attention, If you see carefully, my contribution towards the article is few (all referenced), most are written by some other local university students who use to contribute in this page, as we are so busy, we could not protect the page or develop, as we are not silly guy like you (wasting time in wikipedia) . If you want to do anything for the betterment of the article you are most welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahmid.zaman (talkcontribs) 07:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

LOL! whtever you think! haha! You keep on thinking what I do! You do what you want to do, send request or whatever! You can go ahead delete the article! Some one will again create it anytime, and btw, what will be your benefit? poor guy! If you think we are advertising, go ahead delete it! Tahmid.zaman 07:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahmid.zaman (talkcontribs)

I have fixed my article! You can check it! Regards, Tahmid Zaman —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahmid.zaman (talkcontribs) 08:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Ekobingsha

edit

Hello Ragib. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ekobingsha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to creative works such as literary journals. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Zaman Group of Industries

edit

I'd have no objection if you felt that {{db-a7}} was appropriate (or if you deleted it for any other reason). I offered the prod as I assumed Prince Rashik could find some more sources: I didn't realise until you mentioned the history that Prince Rashik was the article creator. TFOWR 16:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Assessment Drive Challenge: WikiProject U.S. Public Policy

edit

The first tagging and assessment drive challenge is starting now for WikiProject United States Public Policy. If you'd like to participate, start using the new assessment system and the project banner to tag and rate articles that are related to U.S. public policy. There's even a small prize for whoever does the most assessment this week.--Sross (Public Policy) (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

List of Companies in Bangladesh

edit

Hi Ragib Vai, sorry for some undo in List of Companies in Bangladesh. Actually, I followed Philippines' categories. It has a category for hotels and resorts. It is true that no hotel and resort of Bangladesh is currently available in Wikipedia (I am not sure). If it is the policy, then it is OK. I request some important guidelines from you though I am reading the Wikipedia policies rather slowly. Thanks Maqayum 23:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maqayum (talkcontribs)

Consumer Products- Philippines and some other countries included some MNC like TI, Analog devices; wiki link goes to main corporation description. As Unilever, P&G have significant presence in Bangladesh economy. May be we can include these, but in more formal ways though these are not local, but these are the biggest companies in Bangladesh. --Maqayum 00:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maqayum (talkcontribs)

Inviting to Join WikiProject

edit


Prince Rashik (talkcontribs) 07:58, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

edit

FYI: We're busy rediscovering what you found a year ago. WP:RSN#Circular references: Gyan Publishing and ISHA Books.   Will Beback  talk  00:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Sikdar Aminul Haq

edit

Hello Ragib. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sikdar Aminul Haq, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Different enough this time. I'll renom. Thank you. GedUK  21:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jana Gana Mana

edit

Plz see my discussion in talk-page of Jana Gana Mana. I also invite you to review my new article Jana Gana Mana (the complete song) SASSOTO (talk) 08:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hindu/Sindhu!!

edit

Hindu is derived from the Sanskrit word Sindhu!! in persian its Hindu! which is what is used but it originates from the word Sindhu which was first mentioned in the Rig Veda!! research it yourself! please before blindly blocking me and my edits.Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruvekhera (talkcontribs) 22:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arbitrary moves of Jana Gana Mana & Vande Mataram

edit

Hi Ragib, can you pls look in to this and advise? Thanks. Shovon (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ravi Shankar (spiritual leader)

edit

Hello. That was a 'protection conflict'. I'd prefer the reason and the move protection to remain, but are you still interested in semi-protection now that it's move-locked. I think maybe we can see how it goes without the semi. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Only autoconfirmed users can move pages, so autoconfirmed move protection doesn't actually do anything. It's so unusual to see it that I misread it as normal semi-protection. We are on the same page, so all's good. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't know what your qualification is but there have been new discoveries that point to the fact the The Vedas are much oloder than what the Europeans have been telling us during the last two hundred years. Read about the River Saraswati first before accusing me of vandalism.

I am not doing vandalism. You are following the wrong information provided by old historians like Max Mueller and William Jones about the Vedas. We know today that the River Saraswati existed more that 4000-5000 years ago. Therefore hymns ot River Saraswati are from much earlier. For your knowledge you can read the following website: http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/archaeology/site/archs0001.ht 22:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)22:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)22:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)BritishIndian (talk)

Indefinite protection of Rigveda

edit

This seems more than a little excessive for it to be semi-protected indefinitely - especially as there are good IP edits. Do you mind reconsidering? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 16:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you too for pointing out the protection duration. 1 day should be fine to thwart anon/newbie vandals. --Ragib (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here is one more web-site which talks about the River Saraswati, and what the Gujarat and Rajasthan Govts are doing to rediscover the 'Mighty Saraswati' on the banks of which the Vedic Civilisation was founded:

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/recent_research_on_the_sarasvati_river.htm

It is high time we start rubbishing the false-preaching of supremacist European historians from the last century. We have to start realising that The Vedic culture of Sindhu-Saraswati river valley is much older that any European culture. Europe was under miles of ice during 35000-7000 BCE anyway, which historians of the last century did not even know of. However much guys like you try, it will be ultimately proved that its Vedic culture which has civilised the people of the world, and Sanskrit has travelled all over the world from the Sindhu-Saraswati river civilisation. The fact the there are so many words in Europe that have evolved from Sanskrit prove the fact. For eg.- Dwar-door, danta-denta, naaw-vigyan- navigation, gau-cow, dwo-two, tri-three, pancha-penta, sasta-sexa, sapta-septa, ashta-octa, nava-nova, dasa-deca, deva/ devi-devine, etc etc.. Also know very well, there was no civilisation in Central Asia from where Vedic civilisation came to India. It was all under ice upto 7000 BCE. Indus Valley Civilisation (Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation) is at least 9000 years old. Research Mehrgarh for yourself! I don't know where you are from or who you are. But knowledge about ancient India cannot be subverted by guys like you for much longer. BritishIndian (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Nice rant. :). But wrong page. The talk page you are looking for is Talk:Rigveda. --Ragib (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you can be of help here. I think it obvious that this and the two related article subjects are notable, but we've got a novice editor, who doesnt know what links to use, or how to avoid copyvio. Can you perhaps find some references--I think you are more able to do so than I am. (And if they are all copyvio, could you simply stubbify them appropriately--again, you'll do it better than I will). Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

our edits seem to have crossed, and I see you do not agree with me as I seem to have assumed you would. We had better have the discussion there. DGG ( talk ) 07:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
BTW, I don't say that I disagree with you. The article is badly written, and makes false claims as of original writeup. The writer is a newbie and probably has poor grasp of English (another possibility is that he is the webmaster for all these institutions, and is simply using the same style used in the webpages). I dug up some refs below. Hope that will help show that the institution is real. Establishing notability is another issue, the school is (in)famous for its militant students, but the first item below shows that political leaders do give some reverence to it. --Ragib (talk) 08:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your message. The madrassah is real. It is also probably notable, at least regionally. I did a quick search in Bengali using the madrassah's common name (হাটহাজারী মাদ্রাসা "Hathazari Madrassah"), which shows some recent media mentions:
Hope this helps. Try searching with the madrassah's common name "Hathazari Madrassah" (use spelling variation of "madrassah"). --Ragib (talk) 07:43, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hai Regarding My edit on Persecution of Hindus

edit

Dear friend, I am a veteran editor of wiki who hail from Pondicherry UT. Most of my articles r related to Pondichery and french indian colonial history. When creating an article for Jeanne Dupleix, I have mentioned regarding destruction of a very sacred temple for Pondicherry Tamil Hindus. It was narrated by Ananda Ranga Pillai, the chief Dubash of then Governor Dupleix. I have kept that content here. Its upto you whether It can remain or not in this article. Obviously that content will remain in few of Pondicherry and French Indian related articles. I donno whether it will permitted here or not. Have a nice time friend. cya..tc.. Ellaa Pugazhum Iraivanukke - A.R.Rehaman
Bsskchaitanya (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Caste system among South Asian Muslims

edit

Since I quoted from a well established source; there is no reason that portion of the article should be removed. Wikipedia is a site of verifiable neutral articles. Removing those portions will dampen the whole point of the article i.e. the origin and revival of casteism in Indian subcontinent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Varanwal (talkcontribs) 16:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ragib, It's Pial here. I have changed some article of wikipedia of our university. Why aren't u accepting that and changing that previous thing again n again....Do u think am I writing any wrong informations? I just copied those thing from SMUCT'r leaflet.... Just let my editing go. Thank you....wish u are accepting my request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pial316 (talkcontribs) 00:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bhavashankari

edit

Yes its a scanned photo. Is there a problem in using scanned photo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BengaliHindu (talkcontribs) 18:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the clarification. Now, if the original author of the painting wants to release it in Wikipedia then he too has to scan it or take a photo. Then how does he prove that he is the original creator of the painting? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BengaliHindu (talkcontribs) 14:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Maulana Ahmed

edit

You cited ref name="dstar" in Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam for Maulana Ahmed being an alternate name of the director of the school, Allama Shah Ahmad Shafi. However, I cannot find the word Maulana at all in the source. I'm wondering if Maulana Ahmed might be somebody else, and that is what User:Bakrbinaziz is trying to remove. —CodeHydro 21:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Maulana" is not part of the director's name, rather it is an honorific/job title, equivalent to "Professor" or "Scholar". You can refer to the following sentence in the Daily Star article:
Director of Hathazari Boro Madrasa Ahmad Shafi, popularly known as Boro Huzur, and Chairman of a faction of Islami Oikya Jote (IOJ) Mufti Izharul Islam are its main founders.
So, the article is referring to Mr. Ahmad, also referred to as Maulana Ahmad for his job and role as a religious scholar. --Ragib (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, well that is confusing for those of us who don't know. I've linked Maulana to the article Mawlānā... hopefully that will make things slightly less confusing. —CodeHydro 21:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sock?

edit

Hi. I'm looking at copyright problems connected to Hetam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), and it leaves me wondering if he's been seen before, perhaps as Surajcap (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? Since you're familiar with him and the areas where he works, I thought I'd ask your opinion. Does his pattern look familiar? (I know he has also edited as 117.254.247.150 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 117.254.250.37 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 117.254.249.211 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 117.254.73.181 (talk · contribs · WHOIS); I'm sure there are others.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. He may also be connected to Bhurshut (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) ([1]). Do the patterns look similar to you? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see that they do. If you believe he is a sock puppet of Surajcap, why is he not blocked? Is there insufficient evidence? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
P.S. About this: I'm watching some of these articles now and may be able to help keep the activity down. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pro-Islamism

edit

You have consistenly shown an Islamic bias in your article selection and deletion. Please be warned or you may be blocked from editing in future.115.111.52.227 (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Gallileo2k. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Gallileo2k. You have new messages at Codehydro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Gallileo2k. You have new messages at Talk:Ganges#Ganga_vs_Ganges.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bangladesh FAR nom

edit

I have nominated Bangladesh for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 05:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Gallileo2k. You have new messages at 119.30.35.133's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sock again?

edit

Hi. Another admin came by to ask if Mangalkavya (talk · contribs) looked like Hetam (talk · contribs) who (of course) is blocked as a sock of Surajcap (talk · contribs). It's plausible, but I'm unsure. You're much more familiar with his work than I am; does he look like a sock to you? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh, yeah, this is almost definitely a surajcap/hetam sock (the modus operandi is to copy paste the same content (dubiously referenced) into multiple articles. As you can see, he has done this at Singur and Hooghly district and Hooghly River. --Ragib (talk) 18:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks. Off he goes then. Can you take a look at that page move he's done? I'm not sure if that should be undone, I'd initially asked Shovon since he and I worked on cleaning up some of the Hetam edits. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gallileo2k. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hmmm, that's tough ... while his preferred spelling may be a better representation of the Bengali pronunciation of the word, I am not sure how people in West Bengal spell it. So, Shovon will be the best person to answer this question. --Ragib (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

hello

edit

hi. you could have a look at Greater Bangladesh and the debate on its T:TDYK nomination? I would like to address the issue, but I'm tied up in some other on-wiki and off-wiki chores at the moment. I think the major fallacy at the moment is that the article doesn't treat the concept as a theory (or possibly, a conspiracy theory) and doesn't present any Bangladeshi views on the debate. If you don't have time, just let me know, thanks, --Soman (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have replied to your points on T:TDYK. In addition, I propose that if an independent reviewer there finds a problem based on WP:DYK policy, then I will withdraw the DYK nomination w/o hesitation. I don't have a problem with that - I don't covet DYK credit and I don't want any article appearing on DYK if there is a genuine problem involved. If the reason is serious enough, we can discuss the matter to the article talkpage and/or WP:INB and sort it out.
There is one thing though - I do take exception at the use of "conveniently off-line sources". That connotes some intention to deceive, and I would take offense to that if you are actually under that impression. How would you feel sir, if I said you are objecting because you are Bangladeshi yourself and taking personal offense at the possibility of elements in your country being involved in this design? It is true that I may not have evaluated the data through deeply enough, but several of those sources are available from Google books online - I guess I just didn't think it necessary to add the url in {{cite book}} if all publication details were provided anyway. Shiva (Visnu) 05:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Khan academy

edit

if salman khan is born to a bangladeshi family than why he is the senior member and speaker at Organization of Pakistani Entrepreneurs of North America?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talkcontribs) 00:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


You and your IP are continuously reinserting this. However, if you go to Khan's own website [2], it clearly states the following:


So, please stop inserting false information. Khan's membership in organizations does not matter, since he himself states (and also reiterated in the Fortune article) that his father is from Barisal, Bangladesh. --Ragib (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

his father is a bangladeshi i agree but at that time bangladesh was the part of Pakistan or known as East Pakistan, so please note that and thats why he is the part of Organization of Pakistani Entrepreneurs of North America

Salman khan at OPEN http://www.opensiliconvalley.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=584&Itemid=510 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talkcontribs) 00:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Salman Khan Educator

edit

his father is a bangladeshi i agree but at that time bangladesh was the part of Pakistan or known as East Pakistan, so please note that and thats why he is the part of Organization of Pakistani Entrepreneurs of North America —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talkcontribs) 00:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

At one time, my father and mother were in East Pakistan, and my grandfather was in British India, and many generations ago, was part of Mughal empire. That does not make myself Indian or Pakistani.
As for Salman Khan speaking at some conference, oh please!! Let me show who else also spoke in the conference: Tom Campbell, Former Dean Haas School of Business; six-term Congressman; Economist. And would you claim Congressman Campbell to be Pakistani as well, just because he spoke at that conference? LOL. --Ragib (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


So we should create a new category People from Indian mughal empire, that does not make any sense to me an indian or a bangaldeshi a senior speaker or member of OPEN ? if thats the case than why there are not anymore indians in the conference and KHAN is a pashtun sir name dont forget the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talkcontribs) 00:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
It really doesn't matter what you think, when Salman Khan himself states his origins very clearly. There are literally hundreds of people in Bangladesh who have the "Khan" surname. (not to mention the famous "Khan"s of Bollywood, who are Indians). Unless you also claim Congressman Campbell to be a Pakistani based on his attendance and being a senior speaker at OPEN, please don't wave the conference as Sal Khan's "Pakistani"ness. You are simply wasting everyone's time by claiming you know better than Mr. Khan what his national origins are. --Ragib (talk) 00:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
So,you are trying to say that KHAN is a bangladeshi sur name ? we all know the facts . i don't want to argue you on this but lets be just honest .All the khans came from north pakistan or from afghanistan even shahrukh khan has stated this , it is a fact that know one should deny it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talkcontribs) 01:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am saying that many people in Bangladesh have the "Khan" surname. Where they came from 5 generations ago does not matter. The hundreds of thousands of Khans living in Bangladesh are not Pakistani just because of their names. :) --Ragib (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hi, Ragib brother. Thanks for your message that you sent me some days ago. I have done so many changes in the article of [Chittagong Government High School]. A photo must be uploaded. What to do??? Mottakin Chowdhury (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what's up

edit

Given the previous sock issues at that article, this seems a bit odd. Since you're far more familiar with the sock's behavior and with that article than I, I thought I'd bring it to you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of articles when others are trying to improve upon it.

edit

Ragib, I have created some articles previously deleted.The reasons that they were deletd were they were poorly written without proper info but when we are working upon new articles to improve it why do you delete them without cause.You should understand what is notability.I wrote the articles from a nutral point of view.Wkipedia is no place for promotion.One can easily do that in the media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talkcontribs) 07:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sonnet, please don't keep creating your own autobiography on wikipedia. And even more, please don't claim you are a separate person ... you've been quite active in promoting your bio in many places. Your autobiography was deleted after a proper discussion, and recreating it is not allowed. --Ragib (talk) 07:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ragib, First of all I think you should find out Sonnet Mondal's address and match with my address.I am not Sonnet Mondal.Why are you changing my name?This is Rohit Pandey from Shibpur and about the article about Sonnet Mondal, I had added so many references from media clippings.I thought that the article may not have been properly written before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talkcontribs) 07:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Having spent a lot of time on Wikipedia, I am aware of how this type of promotion is conducted. So, please don't try to mislead. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 07:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't know why the hell you are going on with this.Anyways I will give you a long list of articles that you will have to edit properly.Their references donot cite any notability. First ex- Biplab Majee.See and let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talkcontribs) 07:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here you are again putting your nose into some contributors who are to improve wiki with the proper information of Bengali Poetry. Revision history of New Age Poetry of Bangladesh is now your headache! As I am searching through the wiki pages, I find you the hero of misdeed! I hope wiki finds this soon.--Aqute31 (talk) 02:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ha ha ha, :),please go ahead to find "misdeeds". I will also recommend creating a list of such "misdeeds". Good luck with your search. --Ragib (talk) 02:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Three more articles poorly referenced K.V.Dominic, Jaydeep Sarangi & Seema Gupta. Also about the 21 Line fusion Sonnet article I have added references that are no blogs & also as it has appeared in quite a few reliable sites of journals 7 newspapers which has mentioned it as a new form of poetry, so let it be there and in the mean time I will find out more resources to improve the article.Good day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talkcontribs) 05:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Muse India is quite renowned literary webzine Ragib, finaced by the Central Institute of Indian Languages and the Other Voices project is very selective one.This is an internet era and the sites are reputed ones.Though as per your I am searching for more references of print journals to add to this article to make this article a strong one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.86.87 (talk) 08:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC) These articles have not been properly referenced-Jan Oskar Hansen, Sarojini Sahoo,Ananda Lal.Reply

Preserve the content atleast

edit

Well then atleast preserve the new content. Bangladesh foreign policy is changing these days after all. I was about to add something on climate change.

Also, that image is an important indicator of our place in South Asia today. --122.248.0.10 (talk) 02:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note

edit

I have to admit I got a good laugh out of that one. My secret plan to mysteriously insult obscure Bengali poets has finally been revealed! --Kubigula (talk) 04:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

So Mr. Ragib, I truly pointed out the insult, it was not my "imagination" as you have noted. And it also proved that you guys are friends. Keep up your friendship and poison wiki as much as you could. I said earlier, and saying it again, wake administration will know this. And your fun will be done. So, I request you to put back the pages you deleted out of your misleading fun, such as Rahman Henry, history of New Age Poetry of Bangladesh, etc. Remember, you can't stop the flow of the Bengali Poetry.--Aqute31 (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
LOL, I rest my case. If this will satisfy you, you may also include here Darth Vader, and a few other bad guys, who have combined into an evil plan to take over the world via "misleading", socializing with people who secretly use their user names to insult poets in languages they don't even know and so on!! :) --Ragib (talk) 16:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: K.V.Dominic

edit

Hello Ragib. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of K.V.Dominic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Nancy talk 15:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

These articles have not been properly referenced-Jan Oskar Hansen, Sarojini Sahoo,Ananda Lal.Use of muse india in this article and no references-Subodh Sarkar and this one too uses muse india reference Mallika Sengupta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talkcontribs) 20:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello you are have not tagged the articles I had referred.

edit

Dear Ragib, You told it will be a great help if I provide you with unreferenced or poorly referenced articles. Now surprisingly, you have not cared to take a look at the articles I had listed here.As an editor you should be fair enough.We do not share personal enmities.KV Dominic still exists and I know it will exist without references and there are so many.Please be fair.I had just tried to improve articles seeing the reason y they were deleted before. --Poet009 (talk) 09:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

review

edit

Hi - I know we were in firm disagreement over Greater Bangladesh, but I will greatly appreciate your feedback on how I can improve myself. I just opened an editor review. Please do spare a moment and let me know if I said or did anything questionable. I especially request if you can point out the parts of our notability/reliable sources policies you feel I need to improve my understanding. I am interested in adminship, and I request you for some advice on how I can prepare myself. Shiva (Visnu) 15:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

What are your grounds for doubting my rights? This photo was obtained from The Times of India photographer at the time. --111.221.0.2 (talk) 20:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

on what grounds

edit

What are your grounds for doubting my rights? This photo was obtained from The Times of India photographer at the time. --111.221.0.2 (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

replied on your user page. --Ragib (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do i know you?

edit

How do you know i work in BEI?

And all right i get your point. I'll get a licence then...then you'll belive me : ) --Umran Chowdhury (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply