User talk:Amkgp/Archive 20
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Amkgp. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
Help me review my draft before I resubmit it for approval
Thanks for correcting me.
I've updated my userpage to reflect the changes you requested of me. Please help me check the draft and let me know what areas to improve on specifically.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MBH_Corporation_Plc Leckson (talk) 17:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Leckson58, Thanks for declaring the WP:PAYDISCLOSE. Regarding your article, you can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and Teahouse. Thank you. ~ Amkgp ✉ 17:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
I already asked for help and the points noted have all been fixed. The first reviewer noted that the draft uses too much press releases which I got rid of. The subject is discussed in depth in my references. Please help me check and let me know. Thanks in anticipation. Leckson (talk) 17:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Leckson58, I would leave it for the next reviewer for an independent review. Thank you. ~ Amkgp ✉ 17:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, so should I resubmit it again or what exactly should I do now. Leckson (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Resubmitting might lead to declining. I've done all that was required of me by the former reviewer and I don't know what to do next. You're a respected Wikipedian and a veteran at that, please help me look at the draft and reference and suggest next steps so I will know where to look at and improve. Thanks for your time. Leckson (talk) 17:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Leckson58, The best place to your queries is at Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself ! ~ Amkgp ✉ 17:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
I'll repost my request there again. Thanks so much for your time. I appreciate the kind gesture. One last thing, after I improve the draft can I notify you to take a look at it for me before I resubmit. Thanks once again. Leckson (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Beethoven 250 years
Beethoven in 1803 |
---|
Thank you so much for contribs to the birthday display! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, You deserve more. Thanks — Amkgp 💬 16:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Tropical Storm Merbok (2017)
On 17 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tropical Storm Merbok (2017), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Tropical Storm Merbok flooded 13,000 hectares (32,000 acres) of crops in 2017 and led to an economic loss of CN¥600 million (US$88.3 million) in China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tropical Storm Merbok (2017). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thank you
Amkgp Greetings of the day! Please accept my sincere thanks for reviewing Pathani suit. Best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 06:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks!
Added citation as you suggested. It should be all-good now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordZangar (talk • contribs) 07:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Request
Amkgp May I request you to review Kimkhwab. Thanks and best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 10:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi Amkgp. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Please see the comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard bibliography
Hi, a user is saying that you have approved this article, I have disputed the notability. He is referring to your approval. Please clarify your position on the talk page. Please see the comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard bibliography. --Walrus Ji (talk) 17:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Walrus Ji, Responded at the appropriate venue. — Amkgp 💬 17:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Amkgp, thank you. I appreciate the quick response. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding this comment by you. Actually I found your name from here. If that action was unintentional, then may be you can undo your action. I believe an admin worth his salt should delete / redirect it. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Walrus Ji, You are right currently its showing un-patrolled, as it was recreated after you turned it to be a redirect. I patrolled the old version in anticipation that something soon will be added and it had no flaws but now I find your reasons for delete or redirect correct. You may proceed whatever you think right. I find WP:AFD the best as its being recreated/reverted without proper justification. — Amkgp 💬 18:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Amkgp, ok. I think it is not appropriate to approve article in anticipation of page improvements. The approval decision should be based on the notability and the present condition of the article. This is a straight forward case which is why I boldly merged it. I have followed the PROD procedure for now. If the author disagrees then I will mark it for AfD, as you have suggested. Thank you for the guidance. I have also installed the reply link tool, it was in your edit summary and I find this tool to be very useful. Saves lot of clicks. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Walrus Ji, You are right currently its showing un-patrolled, as it was recreated after you turned it to be a redirect. I patrolled the old version in anticipation that something soon will be added and it had no flaws but now I find your reasons for delete or redirect correct. You may proceed whatever you think right. I find WP:AFD the best as its being recreated/reverted without proper justification. — Amkgp 💬 18:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding this comment by you. Actually I found your name from here. If that action was unintentional, then may be you can undo your action. I believe an admin worth his salt should delete / redirect it. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Amkgp, thank you. I appreciate the quick response. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Glad!!
Thankfully all was resolved and quickly too I might add. Celestina007 (talk) 19:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (December 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 19th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
- Voting in the m:Community Wishlist Survey 2021 is ongoing until December 21, 2020. There are 15 proposals in the "bots and gadgets" category that may be of interest.
- A script to help list discussions at WP:ANRFC (request)
- A script to allow undoing edits despite conflicting intermediary edits (request)
- ...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests
- The Watchlist Expiry feature worked on by the Community Tech team has been enabled on Wikipedia. For scripts that include watching or unwatching pages, developers may want to update their code to take advantage of the new functionality. See the documentation on mediawiki.org.
- As noted in the prior issue, Enterprisey's links-in-logs script has now been implemented as part of MediaWiki core. By my count, this is his third script that was replaced by implementing the code in MediaWiki core or an extension, along with link-section-edits and abusefilter-hide-search. Additionally, his reply-link script is being converted in part to mw:Extension:DiscussionTools. Are there any other scripts that might be worth integrating directly in MediaWiki? Thoughts would be welcome at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++.
As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, and happy holidays! --DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Open queues
Hi, the reason I used to leave notes at WT:DYK was because we were running 2 sets a day and we needed to open up prep sets to fill them. But now that we're running 1 set a day we're on a more leisurely pace. There's no need to rush to fill queues when empty prep sets are available for filling.
Thanks for promoting the last entry in Prep 4. Best, Yoninah (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, OK — Amkgp 💬 17:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, every morning we can count on Cwmhiraeth filling a queue. So unless things are really out of hand, with almost all the queues empty and almost all the preps filled, there's really no need to remind administrators. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Could you do another promotion? Template:Did you know nominations/Erfreue dich, Himmel, erfreue dich, Erde is ready to go into Prep 6. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, Done ALT4 (201 words) as ALT3 is around 230 words long — Amkgp 💬 18:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- A double-hook nomination can be longer than 200 char. ALT3 is a better hook IMO, it also mentions the writer's name. Yoninah (talk) 18:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, swapped the hook — Amkgp 💬 18:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Yoninah (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, swapped the hook — Amkgp 💬 18:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- A double-hook nomination can be longer than 200 char. ALT3 is a better hook IMO, it also mentions the writer's name. Yoninah (talk) 18:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, Done ALT4 (201 words) as ALT3 is around 230 words long — Amkgp 💬 18:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Could you do another promotion? Template:Did you know nominations/Erfreue dich, Himmel, erfreue dich, Erde is ready to go into Prep 6. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, every morning we can count on Cwmhiraeth filling a queue. So unless things are really out of hand, with almost all the queues empty and almost all the preps filled, there's really no need to remind administrators. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of They Live on The Land
Hello! Your submission of They Live on The Land at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Amkgp Sir, Kindly make an assessment of the subject. I shall be obliged. Kind regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 15:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you and best regardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations
Congratulations! With 9,540 views, your King Ludwig Oak hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Even more impressive given that it appeared in a 12-hour queue. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 20:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2020)
Hello, Amkgp. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Christmas ham • Bengali cuisine Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 11 January 2021.
Recent changes
- The
{{citation needed}}
template shows when a statement in a Wikipedia article needs a source. If you click on it when you edit with the visual editor there is a popup that explains this. Now it can also show the reason and when it was added. [1]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week.
Future changes
- You can propose and discuss what technical improvements should be done for geographic information. This could be coordinates, maps or other related things.
- Some wikis use LanguageConverter to switch between writing systems or variants of a language. This can only be done for the entire page. There will be a
<langconvert>
tag that can convert a piece of text on a page. [2] - Oversighters and stewards can hide entries in Special:AbuseLog. They can soon hide multiple entries at once using checkboxes. This works like hiding normal edits. It will happen in early January. [3]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Amkgp sir, Kindly review the subject. Thanks and best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 07:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- RAJIVVASUDEV, You don't need to request individually every time. Reviewers other than me are also there and they will review and 'mark' your page patrolled if everything is OK. You just need to wait patiently. — Amkgp 💬 10:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sir It is noted. Thanks and regardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just approved this and I think it would fit well into Prep 2 (in-between U.S. hooks). Would you be able to promote it? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yoninah, Done — Amkgp 💬 19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Question
Doctorine Dark (talk) 06:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Bro, why did you delete my article? I have warned you that it was my first time doing an article.
Yo Ho Ho
Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Amkgp, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Christmas is all about creating happy memories that will last a lifetime. Wishing Merry Christmas to you and your family!RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Nucleoside-modified messenger RNA
On 28 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nucleoside-modified messenger RNA, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that modified mRNA (mRNA translation depicted) is a key technology in the Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer vaccines against COVID-19? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nucleoside-modified messenger RNA. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
This week's article for improvement (week 53, 2020)
Fish processing is a significant part of the fishing industry. Pictured is frozen Tuna being cut using a band saw in the Tsukiji fish market in Tokyo.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Edible • Christmas ham Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
DYK for They Live on the Land
On 29 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article They Live on the Land, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the social study They Live on the Land was based on interviews with nearly the entire population of a rural Alabama town during the Great Depression? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Blocked
As ST47 has previously warned you about editing logged out in project space in violation of our policy on using multiple accounts, and you have continued to do so, I have blocked you for a week. You may appeal this block by following the procedures at WP:GAB. The next time this occurs, the block will likely be indefinite. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Amkgp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Will never ever edit without logging. Sorry for not able to comply the guidelines regarding this. I will follow the policy strictly. I completely misunderstood IP editing. I again went through all the points of WP:PROJSOCK policy and found where I was doing wrong and I promise that this will never ever occur next time. Please unblock my account — Amkgp 💬 04:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Reduced to 36 hours per below. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni and ST47: Please unblock me. Its really a shame for doing editing without logging when I have an account. I assure this will never ever again like this. Thank you. — Amkgp 💬 04:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- But why did you continue doing this after being warned? Why were you "
not able to comply
"? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)- NinjaRobotPirate - I think that he meant to say that he failed at complying, not that he was unable to do so. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, I feel that I was
not able to comply
because I misunderstood the IP editing in main-space by registered users is considered as WP:BADSOCK — Amkgp 💬 06:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)- This wasn’t in mainspace. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- TonyBallioni, I wanted to say that my violation applies everywhere. And I committed mistake at Wikipedia noticeboard — Amkgp 💬 06:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- This wasn’t in mainspace. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, I feel that I was
- NinjaRobotPirate - I think that he meant to say that he failed at complying, not that he was unable to do so. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- But why did you continue doing this after being warned? Why were you "
Okay. If you’re agreeable to it, I’m fine reducing the block to 36 hours from now. 1 week is my default for minor socking issues, but I’m also not set on that if someone is fine talking through it. Does that sound okay to you? TonyBallioni (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- TonyBallioni, OK I agree with you and request it to make it to 24 hours as I have violated after warning — Amkgp 💬 06:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)