User talk:Antidiskriminator/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Antidiskriminator. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Category:Slovenian Chetniks has been nominated for discussion
Category:Slovenian Chetniks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Your opinion - List of Serbs?
I would like to hear your opinion on this matter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Serbians
Thank you.
- What would be the next step following the voting? I'm new with this and thus the question, but it seems that the majority is in for the change of name. Mm.srb (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.- Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Achziv
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Achziv. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Faisalabad
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Faisalabad. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Asia topic
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Asia topic. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Assamese people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assamese people. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Slavery
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Slavery. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Romania
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Romania. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1948 United States presidential election
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1948 United States presidential election. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.- Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.
Other notable performances were put in by 
Barkeep49 with six GAs, 
Ceranthor, 
Lee Vilenski, and 
Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 
MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Pahomije iz Reke
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Pahomije iz Reke".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Laosilika (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Serbia - GAN
Hello Antidiskriminator, I would like to ask for your help regarding Serbia's (I hope near) future GA nomination.
Which parts could be improved and all in all do you think that there are arguments in favour of the nomination?
One more thing, if you should ever need some literature or academia papers which are not available online, I am willing to get them and photograph them for you when I'm in Belgrade, taking in consideration that you have done a great work on Serbia-related themes on en.wikipedia.
Cheers, Mm.srb (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Solomon's Pools
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Solomon's Pools. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cossack Hetmanate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cossack Hetmanate. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Šadrvan
Thanks m8. Will do. ;) That whole topic (islamic heritage) is thinly covered on sr. wiki.
Btw, i'm a great fan of your work. I've read a whole bunch of articles, where accidentally saw u were the author :) I've quite by chance recently, when looking at the permanently blocekd list at sr.wiki, found out that u're on it. And for quite some time. Have any interest editing at sr.wiki again? I'll bet u'll be unblocked in a min if u want to. Kinda, always lacking good authors at sr.wiki, and especially glad to see when they share the same (editing) interests as i do :) --Ivan VA (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you Ivan VA.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Santa Claus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Santa Claus. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Osman Rastoder
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Osman Rastoder".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GlosyAbeki (talk) 10:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Hello, Antidiskriminator, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Hierodeacon Mojsije. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Is there any content that could be merged into the existing article Mojsije Dečanac? GretLomborg (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:George Washington
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Washington. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Populism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Populism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Demonisation of Russia
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Demonisation of Russia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Bua family
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Bua family".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Skenderbeg Ivanbegović
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Skenderbeg Ivanbegović".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Skanderbeg's rebellion
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Skanderbeg's rebellion".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Serbian uprising (1594)
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Serbian uprising (1594)".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Serbdom fallacy
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Serbdom fallacy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Sanjak of the Morea
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Sanjak of the Morea".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Antidiskriminator/Drafts of articles/Sanjak of Priština
Hello, Antidiskriminator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drafts of articles/Sanjak of Priština".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
They deleted your userspace entries and call it progress
The thing I have done to avoid this is use {{user sandbox}} instead of {{Userspace draft}}. The latter puts your sandbox into a category that well-meaning busy-bodies will clean out, ostensibly to help AfC. WP:G13 was meant to help empty the draft namespace but has been used in the userspace against well-established editors, against G13's remit. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bengal famine of 1943
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bengal famine of 1943. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of airliner shootdown incidents
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of airliner shootdown incidents. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington- Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics
Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:EOKA
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:EOKA. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Allegations of CIA drug trafficking
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Allegations of CIA drug trafficking. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Constantinople
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constantinople. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tel Aviv
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tel Aviv. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Demonization of Serbs draft
I don't know do you have any new plans with the draft on Serb bashing (which is solid as it is, in my opinion)? This book could be a fresh addition to the page - https://books.google.rs/books?id=RDq8b_8Q_gEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Serbs+as+a+nation&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjE2ujL_s7jAhUJ-aQKHaJWBpsQ6AEIQjAE#v=onepage&q&f=false
As well as - *http://www.nspm.rs/nspm-in-english/serb-demonization-as-propaganda-coup.html *https://www.politico.eu/article/serbia-croatia-hungary-orban-migrants-schengen-crisis/ *https://www.academia.edu/4239616/Vampire_Nation_Violence_as_Cultural_Imaginary._By_Tomislav_Z._Longinovic_Slavonica_1_2013 
Removed
Mm.srb (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Mm.srb I of course have plans with that draft, but I am quite busy in real life so I doubt I will do anything with it soon. My plan is to merge that text, or portion of it, into some other article about public opinion and propaganda during Yu wars. I will do it when I have some more time. Let me present you a quote attributed to Socrates, father of Western philosophy: “The secret of change is to focus all your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new.” All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kirkland & Ellis
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kirkland & Ellis. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Alt-right
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alt-right. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Operation Kopaonik, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Please comment on Talk:NYC Pride March
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:NYC Pride March. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Century
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Century. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Valrico, Florida
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Valrico, Florida. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:International Brigades
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International Brigades. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
"Left Deviations" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Left Deviations. Since you had some involvement with the Left Deviations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 22:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Papal diplomats
A tag has been placed on Category:Papal diplomats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks / Хвала
Thanks Anti, I very much appreciate it. Sadko (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sturmabteilung
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sturmabteilung. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Singapore
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Right-wing populism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Right-wing populism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Osman Rastoder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bihor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kate Dover
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Dover. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Manzanar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manzanar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Hapšenje Draže
Pošto vidim da baš pišeš ove članke, jel bi mogao da baciš pogled na ovaj članak trenutno kandidovan za sjajan. Na szr se već vodi debata. Elem, pošto si blokiran, možeš meni ovde da napišeš šta misliš o članku i to. Ako već nećeš da ti skidaju blok na sr.wiki. Pošto sam ja trenutno u pisanju nekog drugog velikog članka, i nisam najbliži sa celom ovom tematikom oko hapšenja/nisam toliko duboko kopao. A vidim ti pišeš o WWII dnevno ovde, pa tipujem da si verziran u tematiku. Inače, pišem i jer znam da je ova tematika prilično big deal na našem govornom području i da će članak biti čitan dosta, zato što više recenzija to bolje (da ne bude optuživanja za POV, što sam recimo već čuo od istoričara Mila Bjelajca za neke članke o WWI na sh.wiki). --Ivan VA (talk) 11:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Ivan VA. Thank you for inviting me to take a look at that article. I am unable to perform FA review of the article because I do not know enough about current guidelines and rules at sr.wiki. What I can say is that I agree with observations on the talkpage which can be summarized like:
- POV issues - not major but enough for article not to be FA
- issues with sources and their interpretation - not major but enough for article not to be FA. (i.e. Бојан Димитријевић и Коста Николић, имали су прилику да прегледају документа из архиве Безбедносно-информативне агенције (БИА), као и друга доступна документа везана за операцију хапшења Михаиловића, чиме су се уверили у њихову аутентичност. says the text of the article cited with three sources. The first source does not support the assertion, the second source says the contrary "Ranijim istraživanjima u Vojnom arhivu utvrdili smo da se dokumenti koji razrešavaju ovaj problem ne čuvaju. .... Uz činjenicu da je ova institucija bila nosilac operacije zarobljavanja i streljanja 1946, ovo je potvrđivalo da je takva građa morala da postoji i da je određeno vreme čuvana u ovoj instituciji.... Prema istraživanju u dokumentaciji BIA, obavljenom 26. maja 2009, ustanovili smo da je verodostojna verzija prema kojoj je general Mihailović zarobljen od strane grupe OZN-e za Srbiju uz „pomoć“ Nikole Kalabića. Raspoloživi dokumenti u posedu BIA nedvosmisleno potvrđuju verziju koja je u javnost došla putem literarno obrađenih iskaza pripadnika ove grupe." The only assertion about authenticity was confirmation of authenticity of official version based on the available documents in official security institution. The text of the article does not explain that many documents are missing, because somebody removed them leaving only the documents which confirm the official version.
- too long and detailed article - I think this is important issue.
- The clarity of the prose is not good. The text is difficult for reading because of too many details. Its difficult for reading and the main events are not clearly presented to the readers.
- I would only add that the article does not contain reactions of big powers, except Stalin. I think that representatives of big powers did react on the arrest of Mihailovic. That is much more important than who played what role in a movie about this arrest.
- Nevetheless, having in mind my previous interactions with main contributor to that article, I can see that they did their best to be neutral, though sometimes it was not enough. I wish you a good luck with writing the Islamic culture article. The medieval period of Ottoman history was my main subject of interest in first years of my engagement on en.wiki. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- The guidelines for notable/excellent articles on sr.wiki are the following ones.
- Glede Dimitrijevićevog i Nikolićevog članka, ja sam čitajući taj članak razumeo da su oni potvrdom autentičnosti dokumenata potvrdili zvaničnu, tj. jedinu/istinitu verziju priče. The text of the article does not explain that many documents are missing, because somebody removed them leaving only the documents which confirm the official version.. Ja ovo nisam mogao da nađem u članku. Građa koja fali je građa o streljanju i mestu streljanja. To je zaključak članka. Ali, kako sam ja pročitao, oni su kao objektivni istoričari, potvrdili verzije iz kojih je članak pisan, dakle ove knjige iz 70ih i 80ih. Oni su utvrdili istinu takoreći. (inače u onoj njihovoj biografiji iz 2004-e o Mihailoviću (imam ceo onaj set knjiga) su tad, pre uvida,, tvrdili da se ne zna istina šta se desilo)
- Ostale primedbe ću prenuti Pinkiju. --Ivan VA (talk) 19:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- The text of the source discuss two main questions: do danas nisu dokumentovano razjašnjena dva pitanja: 1) na koji način je OZN-a za Srbiju, uz pomoć OZN-e za Jugoslaviju i jedinica KNOJ-a i Narodne milicije, zarobila generala Mihailovića 1946. godine; 2) kojeg dana i na kojoj lokaciji je izvršena presuda (egzekucija) i gde su pokopani zemni ostaci generala Mihailovića i ostalih osuđenih? The source cocludes: Do najnovijih vremena srpska istoriografija nije došla do dokaza koji bi opisali i arhivskom građom dokumentovali razjašnjenje ova dva pitanja. Nijedan istoričar koji je istraživao ovu temu nije došao do relevantnih podataka koji bi razrešili ova pitanja.
- The chapter which directly referst to arrest says: Raspoloživi dokumenti u posedu BIA nedvosmisleno potvrđuju verziju and intervjuisali smo....oni su potvrdili autentičnost te verzije and u takođe su potvrdili autentičnost priče.
- Ivan VA, I apologize if I am wrong, but I think that the source does not support the assertion that two historians were able to see for themselves that the OZNA/BIA documents are authentic. The source clearly emphasizes that until today two questions are not resolved: how DM was arrested and when and where he was executed. I think that the source says that the available documents in BIA and three interviewed people (two of them members of OZNA, one of JVUO which does not guarantee his interview is more authentic) confirm the official version. Whether the documents are complete and authentic or not, that is not confirmed by two historians in question. It is of course of no surprise that available OZNA documents support the official version. Is that version authentic? Nobody knows. Best regards.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ivan VA I just saw a part of text which I overlooked, probably because it contradicts to above emphasized text: Prema istraživanju u dokumentaciji BIA, obavljenom 26. maja 2009, ustanovili smo da je verodostojna verzija prema kojoj je general Mihailovi� zarobljen od strane grupe OZN-e za Srbiju uz „pomo�“ Nikole Kalabi�a.. This means that I was wrong when I said that there is an issue with source interpretation. I apologize to you and Pinki as well. Best regards.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:EOKA
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:EOKA. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is 
Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:
- Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points- Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
- Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points- Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points
All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
- Casliber (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5.
Yashthepunisher (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall.- Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall.
- MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.- Ed! (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:India. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by area
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by area. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of states and territories of the United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of states and territories of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
League of Lezhe Edits
Why do you always change my edits?
-Kutlovci
(I dont know how this Talk page thing works :/)
Deleted them? I just corrected them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kutlovci (talk • contribs) 23:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Serbian Wikipedia
Hi, Antidiscriminator. I knew you were permanently blocked on the Serbian Wikipedia. However, I noticed that you are actively and correctly contributing here and I wanted to initiate the process of unblocking your account on sr.wiki. So I wonder, do you have the desire and the will to edit there? Best regards! --Zile (✉) 20:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Acamicamacaraca. Thank you for your message and desire to initiate the
process of unblocking
of my account. Yes, I would like to be able to edit sr.wiki. Will you please point to the link to the procedure at sr.wiki which describesprocess of unblocking
of someones account? All the best. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)- There is no precisely defined procedure :). I just wanted to start a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard to unblock your account. Greetings! --Zile (✉) 22:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, if there is no
process of unblocking
then your attempt to reach consensus to lift ban imposed to me might lead to your ban, like I was banned when I reached consensus of almost all uninvolved editors to lift Verlor's ban. I advise you not to push your luck. All the best. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)- Don't worry, everything will be fine. Verlor is the past and we should not look back. I'll start the discussion most probably tomorrow. I hope for the best. Best regards and happy holidays. --Zile (✉) 00:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, No. Especially not today. AFAIC, Verlor's and my ban are connected in circulus viciosus. I do not want my ban lifted without Verlor's ban lifted. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the conversation with you at Discord. It is much easier and faster to communicate. You can join here. Best regards! --Zile (✉) 03:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, I prefer public and transparent communication. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Antidiskriminator, I did a bit of digging and found out that Verlor abused multiple accounts and what not (while you did no such thing). I would firmly advice that you reconsider Aca's proposal. It seems both fair and rational. There are new admins on sr.wiki and it seems to me that they have a lot of good faith and energy. Those are the sort of people one can work with. cheers, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 16:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, I prefer public and transparent communication. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the conversation with you at Discord. It is much easier and faster to communicate. You can join here. Best regards! --Zile (✉) 03:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, No. Especially not today. AFAIC, Verlor's and my ban are connected in circulus viciosus. I do not want my ban lifted without Verlor's ban lifted. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Don't worry, everything will be fine. Verlor is the past and we should not look back. I'll start the discussion most probably tomorrow. I hope for the best. Best regards and happy holidays. --Zile (✉) 00:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Acamicamacaraca, if there is no
- There is no precisely defined procedure :). I just wanted to start a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard to unblock your account. Greetings! --Zile (✉) 22:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, No, you did not dig deep enough. If you were right about the situation being improved now, Verlor would already be unbanned. And me also, of course only after him. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)