User talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive 068

click here to leave a new message for BrownHairedGirl
BrownHairedGirl's archives
+ Cumulative index

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on my current talk page

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Germany–Marshall Islands relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Germany–Marshall Islands relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Germany–Palau relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Germany–Palau relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1510s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1510s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1520s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1520s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1560s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1560s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1570s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1570s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1580s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1580s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1620s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1620s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1650s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1650s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1670s in education

A tag has been placed on Category:1670s in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:3rd century BC in education

A tag has been placed on Category:3rd century BC in education indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian forensic scientists

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian forensic scientists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

• See Zakaria Erzinçlioğlu, now reinstated in that category. PamD 18:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Federated States of Micronesia–Germany relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Federated States of Micronesia–Germany relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl: Surely there's a way to bundle these notifications so that you're not filling up her talk page with three dozen of them at a time. jp×g 11:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

@JPxG: Not really. It's hard to tell how many empty categories there will be beforehand, and I won't necessarily tag them all. It would be fairly easy to not add a talk page notice at all, however. ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, @Mark83!

Thanks very much doing that review. I was a little concerned that that the GA review might be undertaken by someone unfamiliar with STV elections and multi-party politics, which can lead to misunderstanding. But since you are from up the road, it should all be familiar to you.

My only comment at the outset is that the article is unusual for a GA in two respects:

1. not many Irish politics topics are nominated for GA
2. most GAs seem to be the product of a push by one editor, but this one was a collaboration between about 5 of us. I think that the result is remarkably coherent and NPOV, but see what you make of it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

No-reflinks websites -- some help?

I saw an edit summary in my watchlist where you'd added a page to one of your lists, and checked User:BrownHairedGirl/No-reflinks websites -- the lists there look fairly impressive. One thing that occurs to me is that it might be possible to write a Zotero module (or something similar) to address the unparseability of some sites. There are thousands of sites in your sets, though, so it'd take forever to just start cranking through them all. However, it occurs to me that if there were a frequency list of which sites were used most often in references, it'd probably be possible to identify which were causing the most problems and fix them that way. Do you have anything like that? (I don't think it would be too hard to write a program to count the occurrences of each URL if not.) And, at any rate, is there any logic to which sites appear in which sets (and which subsections of a set)? Set 2, for example, has just 95 sites, whereas Set 3 has 1,220. jp×g 10:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words, @JPxG. Happy new year!

The various sets of websites are just arbitrary chronological breaks. I add new websites to the sandbox when I encounter them, and then at some point finalise a list and add create a new live set. When I make that break is a bit random, but it's mostly a matter of time: when a bunch of sites has been tested in the sandbox for a week or two, and Reflinks has consistently failed to get a title, I move them to a live set.

A bot to do some of the analysis would be great. I have sketched out an outline of a way of doing this myself, and plan to get to it in a week or so ... but if someone else felt like doing the work, that would be great.

My plan:

1. take the list I make from the latest dump on articles with bare URLs which lack an inline tag. (That is the basis of the lists I make for Citation bot: see User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links and the history of that page).
2. Combine that with a list of articles which transclude {{Bare URL inline}}, removing duplicates.
3. Feed that list into AWB, passing each page in turn to an external program, which I plan to write in Perl.
   • That Perl script will scan each inline ref on the page, and make two lists: inline-tagged bare link URLs, and untagged bare link URLs. Each list gets added to a local file on my laptop.
4. Take those lists, and in each case, strip each URL down to the root domain name
5. For each list (the tagged and the untagged), write a simple hash-building script in Perl, to count the instances of each domain.
6. Compare those lists with my existing sets, by whacking them into a set of sandbox and keeping only those which my current setup doesn't tag.
7. Take thee remainder in batches of about 200 at a time (starting with the most heavily-used), and put them into my a final sandbox, testing them for a week until I have list where Reflinks has consistently failed to get any titles.
8. Take that final list, add it to my AWB setup, and run that on my articles-with-untagged-bare URLs from the latest database dump.

The lists made in step 6 should also be used as the basis for tests of Citation bot. There are some sites which it will never fill, and we should devise some way of tackling those.

As to which sites are most likely to have untagged refs, I know that already: Twitter is by far the most common. New bare links to Twitter are added at a rate of 20–50 per day. TweetCiteBot (run by @TheSandDoctor) can fix nearly all of them, but that bot runs intermittently, so there is usually a big backlog.

Next in line are reuters.com, cbc.ca, dsocogs.com, LA Times, Legacy.com, goal.com, mlb.com, theglobeandmail.com, and the sports-reference.com set of sites. Each has a backlog of hundreds of pages, with several new entries each day. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election

The article 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 Dublin Bay South by-election for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Mark83

I am on it now. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick note to thank you for such a prompt, through and methodical reply to my comments. I haven’t made any comments as I want to avoid edit conflicts that would slow you down. In the meantime I just want to reassure you that once I’ve had another look I think there will be nothing that will prevent the article being promoted today. There are a couple of things that I have a few comments on, but these are my opinions/preferences and therefore are nothing to do with whether it’s a GA or not. You can consider them (or not) at a later stage. Mark83 (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

*thorough. Mark83 (talk) 09:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

• Many thanks, @Mark83. It was a pleasure to respond to such a thorough and reasonable review. Nothing overlooked, but no grandstanding or point-scoring. Very fine work by you.

  I have now completed my responses for today, so over to you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Just getting ahead of the bot notification (hopefully), I have passed the nomination. Congratulations. Thanks again for your time and effort on this, it's been a pleasure to work with you. Mark83 (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election

The article 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Dublin Bay South by-election for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Administrator changes

Amalthea • Ihcoyc (deceased) • Kateshortforbob • Kirill Lokshin • Rifleman 82 • Ryan Norton • Wrp103

Interface administrator changes

Mr. Stradivarius

CheckUser changes

Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes

Opabinia regalis

Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Oversighter changes

Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes

Opabinia regalis

Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Guideline and policy news

• Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

• Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.

Arbitration

• Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.

Miscellaneous

• The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

reFill

Hello BrownHairedGirl, wondering if you would know how to tackle this result from reFill. The title (in Dutch) gives information about the cookies policy of the website. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into this, but there are more like that (unfortunately) Lotje (talk) 13:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Lotje

reFill often churns out crap, and needs to be checked very carefully before saving. I have reverted[1] that example. The ref will need to be filled manually. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Railway stations in countryname opened or closed in YYYY category header

This one doesn't have the resolve category redirect applied and it is near impossible to work out how to insert it correctly. Are you able to insert it? Timrollpickering (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Timrollpickering, and happy new year!

I probably can fix that ... but first, can you tell me which categories are causing trouble? BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:1841 establishments in Austria is one of the populated redirects. Timrollpickering (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointer, @Timrollpickering. I am currently head-down in responding to a by-election GA review, and won't get to work on this category issue until tomorrow.

If I haven't gotten back to you by Monday, please gimme a poke. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

A poke. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the poke, @Timrollpickering. The GA was passed, but it was lotta work.

I think that these two edits[2][3] have fixed the redirects for the year and decade categories respectively.

If anything blows up, please holler. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Edith Cowan University

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Edith Cowan University indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Not-edit-related, just a ZOMG and Thank You

I was checking an edit on a troublesome page (Country) and my mouse passed over your link... over 2 MILLION edits. *blink**roll mouse back to check again*"Ayup, over 2 million!"*checks a 3rd time*

Wow.

TY for all the work. Even using all the tools, that is a *LOT* of edits. Well done.Shajure (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, @Shajure. It's an embarrassingly high number. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Well. Each of us has exactly the same number of hours in every day. Some (meeeeee) spend a ridiculous number of those hours hunting up funny memes, jokes, puns, random pictures. Maybe that is frivolous. But. I have had random people I didn't know at all send me a note saying more-or-less "thanks for making me smile, I needed it". This project is painfully huge, painful in general, and I believe one of the most important "things" on the Internet. So... I hope it is only a tiny embarrass. *hat-tip*Shajure (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Physics

I really liked your page and thought to say thank you for your contribution. I like your humour. I recently got interested in physics and pure mathematics. May be do you want to guide me in a certain direction 84.241.197.23 (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)4337554bu@gmail.com

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Madagascar–Togo relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Madagascar–Togo relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Identification of articles with bare URLs

I just noticed your activities back in May 2021 adding tons of articles to the cleanup queue for bare URLs, and that you had made a script and everything. Thank you for your attention to detail and your programming work and caring that Wikipedia remains a reliable and verifiable source of information. You are awesome. -- Beland (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, @Beland! That's very kind.

My work on bare URLs has moved on a lot since May. After objections, I gave up tagging all bare URLs, and in July I began feeding all bare URLs to Citation bot. Since then, about 700,000 pages have been processed by the bot at my request.

There are some bare URLs which Citation bot can never fill, and on any one pass it may not fix a URL that it could fix on another pass. But even so this has roughly halved the number of articles which have one or more bare URL refs from ~600,000 to ~300,000.

Now I continue feeding Citation bot, building lists using scans of the twice-monthly WP:Database downloads. I have also developed some tools to inline tag bare URL refs which cannot be filled by WP:Reflinks, because there are many websites where that widely-used tool can never find a title, but since Reflinks doesn't support {{Bare URL inline}} I don't tag links which it might be able to fill.

So we are making good progress, but there is still a log way to go. Each database download shows that about 300 articles now have bare URLs when they had no bare URLs in the last download. So we have to work hard just to stand still. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Take a Heineken!

16 years, over 2 million edits, and still unstoppable! When you play the Game of Thrones, you win or you die 20:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, @Agnimandur! BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Editors like you are what make Wikipedia so great! The dedication to edit continuously for a time period nearly equal to my entire life is truly incredible. Agnimandur 23:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cat more if exists/core

Template:Cat more if exists/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Category pair/core

Template:Category pair/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Establishing common name

Good morning! I have seen you once involved in a methodological discussion to establish what the common name of a subject should be. You were telling another editor that he could not just use the number of hits in google as a criterion because of the large number of duplicates, and you knew a better method. Do you know if there is any help page or essay about this?

The specific discussion in which this plays a role is Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_7#Category:Gottfried_Leibniz. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Marcocapelle, and happy new year!

I have been involved in a lot of such discussions at WP:RM, trying to determine whether there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Sadly there are a lot of very poor uses of Google, and widespread misunderstandings of policy.

The guidance at WP:Search engine test is verbose, but for a good reason: doing this right is complicated. The two key points I commend are:

1. Use a search which concentrates reliable sources. Google web search picks up blogs and social media and other unreliable sources. So don't do that: use Gbooks, Gnewss, GScholar or JSTOR.
2. With any Google search, do not use the hit count displayed on the first page. It usually exaggerates by at least one order of magnitude, and more likely two orders. Instead, go to the last page of the search results, where you will a real total. See WP:Search engine test#Interpreting_results.

Hope that helps. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

16 Years on Wikipedia!

Happy First Edit Day, BrownHairedGirl, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 13:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, @Synoman Barris!

Sixteen years today. Gulp. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Nepalese film remakes has been nominated for discussion

Category:Nepalese film remakes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thank you for tagging all the bare URLs with "Bare URL Inline". I was recently able to fill in about 75% of the refs with the template transcluded. I even won a barnstar for my hard work. A significant amount of the links were dead, so I used Wayback to place an archived url as they have the biggest and oldest database. The ones I did not fill were either PDF or JPEG files, or Cloudflared sites. Some were sites like Twitter, where you said I should leave it for the Sand Doctor's bot. Some sites had bugs with the title, so I will work on fixing those. And some links were perma dead with no backup on Wayback, like some of the links on Mr Yipadee.

Keep on tagging the bare refs, and congrats on 16 years of consistent editing! You're one of my biggest "role models" and heros. Rlink2 (talk) 23:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Holy Moly, @Batman! You have your afterburners on.

I wasn't sure what that 75% was a percentage of, so I went to look at Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations. A few days ago, it had just over 39,000 pages, but now it has just over 17,091.

My current Citation bot jobs overlap with that set, but not heavily. So as far as I can see, in just a few days your good efforts have filled all the tagged bare URLs on about 20,000 pages. That is truly wonderful progress, and a massive boost to cleaning up the big backlog of bare URLs.

To give you some idea of the numbers: in the 20220101 database dump, there were 252,226 articles with untagged, non-PDF bare URLs, and 33,794 articles with inline-tagged bare URLs. The two sets overlap (because some pages had both tagged and untagged bare URLs), so the combined total of 286,020 articles included some duplicates. The total of unique pages was 272,928. So in just a few days, you have cleared over 7% of the total backlog. Wow!

I have long found that many of the bare URLs were in fact dead, and it is really wonderful that your tools are able to archive those. I can't say strongly enough what a big leap you have made. That barnstar is thoroughly well-deserved.

How do feel about taking this further, and setting your tools to tackle batches of untagged bare URLs? If you are interested, I have lists which I would be very happy to share with you. We could start with a set of I think about 50,000 bare URLs which have recently been analysed by Citation bot, but not filled.

Again, congratulations! And many many thanks for your kind words. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Yes, I will be continuing with my work with Bare URLs. I would like a list with the articles with the Bare URLs, do send them to me. Rlink2 (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1992 Indonesian television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:1992 Indonesian television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Citer Tool

Hi, I want to recommend the tool citer https://citer.toolforge.org/ to create cite templates from bare urls, doi, isbn, pmid, oclc. Hope that helps. Grimes2 (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

To interview you for a newspaper story

Hello BHG,

I'm writing this message as a fishing expedition, really. I am looking for a Wikipedia editor to interview for a newspaper story. I am a journalist in Nairobi, Kenya, and I am writing an article for Wikipedia Day this Saturday.

I've seen you edit a couple of pages relating to Kenyan personalities like Charles Njonjo, Richard Leakey, Daniel arap Moi, etc. Could you please spare some time to talk about editing Wikipedia? We can do the interview on email or WhatsApp?

My job address is eondieki@ke.nationmedia.com and my private address is ondiekielvis@gmail.com .

Thank you. Ondiekielvis (talk) 09:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Somalian expatriate sportspeople in Italy

A tag has been placed on Category:Somalian expatriate sportspeople in Italy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Somalian expatriate sportspeople in Switzerland

A tag has been placed on Category:Somalian expatriate sportspeople in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GaelicGamesByYear

Template:GaelicGamesByYear has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

By the way, thanks for putting up with these notifications as a group of us works to tidy up unused template pages. I know that you do a lot of great work in Category space, organizing and templating and otherwise gnoming away to keep the space working well. If we nominate something in error, please come on over and set us straight; I, for one, will be nice about it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election

On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at the 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election, voters were asked to bring their own pen or pencil? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Dublin Bay South by-election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Willie Mitchell (ice hockey)

I think you missed this sneaky piece of vandalism, just wanted to bring it to your attention [4] :) already removed it, no need to worry xRENEGADEx ^{(talk | contribs)} 09:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

I am trying to identify a senior Dublin police officer

Can anybody help me identify a long-dead senior Dublin police officer who was probably born in 1910 to 1920 and who died relatively young? I have a surname. I'd like to know more about this man, his record, illness, politucs etc. Hisnibs007@gmail.com 2A00:23C7:9081:5701:E5A8:DA83:630C:4F29 (talk) 07:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

No, I can't help. And I don't know why you are asking me. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Problem edit

Hello, just in case this is a general problem - in this edit the closing square bracket was left in the URL. Keith D (talk) 19:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Keith D. I'm onto it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Keith D: update. These errors were all fixed in these 1,916 edits.

Thanks again for alerting me to this glitch. It occurred when I expanded the range of articles being fixed, and stoopidly failed to re-check my regex. I have now update my AWB module to prevent both this and the leading-zero-in-date issue. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Another problem

Hello again, another problem, which is much more widespread, is this edit which adds a leading zero to the |archive-date= and causes "CS1 errors: dates" messages. Keith D (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again, @Keith D. I will fix that too. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Keith D: there were actually only 8 of these. I fixed your example first.[5] Then I set WB to work overnight to scan my last 10,000 edits for other instances, and today I fixed the remaining 7 in these 7 edits.

Thanks again for bringing this to my attention. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

There could have been more as I ran though the new date errors last night, to get the count down below yesterdays start figure. Will probably have got some from your script. Keith D (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

@Keith D: thanks for any that you caught and fixed. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:University of Canberra Capitals players

A tag has been placed on Category:University of Canberra Capitals players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Please take a look at Southend West By-Election, being "ruled" by Czello etc not adding, just being partisan. We need to know about candidates.

Please take a look at Southend West By-Election, being "ruled" by Czello etc not adding, just being partisan. We need to know about candidates. Parilla1954 (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC) soz. Not adding not talking, his usual MO judging by history. Assuming you are No2 editor, then not just narrowly elections coverage, and less likely to be biased IMHO. Parilla1954 (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@Parilla1954: link, please. And diffs would help too. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Southend_West_by-election</ref> Graham Moore represents the English Constitution Party, which fielded a candidate for the first time.[23] Critical of Anna Firth not being a local, working-class alternative to murdered David Amess. He describes something lacking from today's politicians, jobsworths going through the motions of democracy. Instead of Leaders, standing up for the ordinary voter, and ensuring rights are protected in England. The ECP prefers 'full english' Independence, over rival English Democrats, who prefer Devolution only. Ex-Conservative Mayor, John Lamb was critical of him, in the Southend Echo, calling him a "load of rubbish". However, John Lamb has been similarly critical to many rivals to fellow conservative Anna Firth. The new party has a website[24] and Graham Moore has a DaddyDragon channel on YouTube. ...Just UNDO everything... I added websites for new party, which has no article page yet. Logical thing would be to take "They have a webiste{Ref}", and just add it to Refs. But everything just rolled back. There is a long History file, he should be removed from this page, as too bossy. He deleted a press covered candidate pre-nominations, and many others, only doing minor mods, and not adding any detailed work. I would look across elections, he's in them all, removing people all over.Parilla1954 (talk) 15:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@Parilla1954: I am going to be blunt. You have charged into 2022 Southend West by-election like a bull in a china shop, showing no understanding of encyclopedic content, style or tone.

The problems with your edits include:

• use of WP:Primary sources (use reliable secondary sources
• addition of POV commentary
• terrible grammar

@Czello has acted quite correctly by reverting you, as has Wgullyn. I will now revert your latest edits to that article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: You should be aware that this user is almost certainly a sock of User:BillCaxton. Pinging @NinjaRobotPirate: who was involved with this editor before, and blocked KingJames80pc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Hoping this user can be blocked outright per WP:QUACK, if not I'll file an SPI. — Czello 16:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank, @Czello. I was assuming that @Parilla1954 was displaying a large surplus of enthusiasm over experience of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and that they needed help. But if they are just a sockpuppet of a blocked menace, then a prompt block is in order.

I suggest you file that SPI. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Also pinging @ToBeFree: who has been helpful on this case. — Czello 16:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks BrownHairedGirl and Czello; sorry to see you having had to deal with this person. Yeah, filing an SPI is usually the best idea; one can still link to the SPI afterwards. Twinkle's "ARV->Sockpuppeteer" menu makes it relatively comfortable to create one. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Help

Can you please solve the on List of active Indian military aircraft 's reference no 13 I ame Shears (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

@I ame shears: Done.[6] BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Alternate logos has been nominated for deletion

Category:Alternate logos has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country by time category navigation

Template:Country by time category navigation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DisestcatCountry/old

Template:DisestcatCountry/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Foo–Bar relations category/parentcountry

Template:Foo–Bar relations category/parentcountry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Retail companies (dis)established in decade cat/core

Hey, it seems you didn't connect Template:Retail companies (dis)established in decade cat/core to Template:Retail companies (dis)established in decade cat. Is this still planned? Gonnym (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Ambiguous categories

Do you think you should run User:BrownHairedGirl/Non-disambiguation categories with eponymous disambiguation page in article space again to look for new cases as the last time it was run was June 2020. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Southeast Missouri State Redhawks women's basketball navigational boxes

A tag has been placed on Category:Southeast Missouri State Redhawks women's basketball navigational boxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1992 in Indonesian television

A tag has been placed on Category:1992 in Indonesian television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Rlink2

You may wish to know that there is an ANI discussion about Rlink2. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @John Maynard Friedman. It looks like an unevidenced pile-on. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Archived copy

Archived copy is a bad reference title. Whatever out of date editing tools you and many other editors are using continues to do this anyway adding many more Category:CS1 maint: archived copy as title errors to articles, like this editdiff. Please manually fix the reference titles if you are going to continue to use broken editing tools. I have fixed[7] the error in this case. -- 109.76.204.243 (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

My tools are not broken. The broken thing here is your description: you have encountered a series of incomplete improvement, and you have mislabelled them as errors.

"Archived copy" is not an error. It is a placeholder title added by some tools in cases where the tool cannot determine the title. Use of this placeholder title is tracked in Category:CS1 maint: archived copy as title, which allows editors to identify the relevant articles.

In the case of the edit[8] which you complain about, I took a ref which was just a bare URL, and did three bit of tedious clerical work:

1. formatted it using {{Cite web}}, to ensure consistent presentation
2. split out the original URL from the archived URL, and filled those details in to {{Cite web}}
3. extracted the archive date from the URL, and filled those details in to {{Cite web}}

In my extensive experience, doing that work manually takes from one to two minutes for each reference if care is taken over accuracy. My AWB script can do this automatically in seconds for all the references in an article. Many of the articles I fixed had more than one ref with a bare URL link to an archived copy — the highest I saw was 28 such refs — so the time saving is even greater.

My AWB tool cannot determine the title of the linked article, so it added a placeholder.

Those three steps are of course far from a complete filling of the reference. More work needs to be done to such a ref, and in many cases that work will need to be done manually. In this case, you kindly that work, which is great ... and your task was made much easier by the preparatory work which I did.

I used AWB to perform similar fixes to (IIRC) about 4,000 articles. I could not possibly fill all those titles manually, so acceding your demand would mean not doing those incomplete improvements. So my answer to you is "no": I will continue to use the long-established placeholder, and continue to thank other editors who take the next step. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

PS Category:CS1 maint: archived copy as title was created 3½ years ago, by Trappist the monk. It contains over 168,000 articles, nearly all added by @InternetArchiveBot.

So this use of the placeholder is well-established. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

It's bad. You can call it "incomplete improvements" but you clearly know it is bad too. It is strange that AWB fails to read the information that is clearly in the HTML title tags of the target page, and that failure still looks like broken or out-of-date tools (IIRC WP:reFill can do it properly, but we shouldn't trust the robots/tools to get it right). You are clearly experienced enough to know better, it isn't an an unreasonable request for someone to remind you to preview your edits and check that work done by the automated tools isn't causing errors incomplete improvements. If you don't like doing "tedious clerical work" then it might be better to not bore yourself and choose not to do it at all and work on things you prefer to do. You can of course take it personally and choose to ignore this request entirely but (it isn't like I'm asking you to fix something as pedantic and invisible to readers as MOS:CURLY and) don't say no one ever asked. -- 109.76.204.243 (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

I repeat. I have been adding "Archived copy" not as an error but as an intentionally-chosen placeholder.

I wrote a long reply explaining what I am doing, but you show no sign of having read and understood it. And your tone is quite obnoxious.

So I wasted my time on you, and I won't waste more. Goodbye. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Oscar Leeser Article Assessment

I noticed that you recently edited the article I previously created on El Paso, Texas Mayor Oscar Leeser with the edit summary "Removed stub tag", and I was wondering if you could offer a second opinion regarding any of the WikiProject assessments on the article's Talk page.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi @TommyBoy, the removal of the stub tag was just an automatic function which WP:AWB added to my edit.[9] It did not involve any assessment by me or any criteria set by me.

Anyway, since're we are here, I took a peek at the article, and it's now definitely start-class. I re-rated it.[10]

Hope that helps. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for clarifying that, and offering a second opinion regarding the article assessment.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Random portal component/BHG-test

I've tagged Template:Random portal component/BHG-test for deletion as a test page. User:GKFX^talk 22:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:CountryAdjectiveDemonym/test

Module:CountryAdjectiveDemonym/test has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:FooBarHumMigNav

Module:FooBarHumMigNav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FooBarHumMigNav

Template:FooBarHumMigNav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet expatriates in Monaco

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet expatriates in Monaco indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 15:07, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Monaco–Soviet Union relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Monaco–Soviet Union relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 15:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Sheepish thanks

I've been here ages, like you, but templates, warnings, nominations, rfc's, all that gobbledygook has just never sunk in for me, and I'm rather glad if I take the long view. But it means I'm not immune to doing things incorrectly in my ignorance. Thanks for your speedy fix, and the 'edumacation'. cheers! Anastrophe (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Curaçao scholars and academics has been nominated for renaming

Category:Curaçao scholars and academics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Washington Huskies men's ice hockey

A tag has been placed on Category:Washington Huskies men's ice hockey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Thank you for voicing your opinions at the ANI thread Rlink2 (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome, @Rlink2. I call it like I see it, and the case being made against you didn't add up. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:YYYY drama films category header

Template:YYYY drama films category header has been nominated for merging with Template:YYYY comedy films category header. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:YYYY horror films category header

Template:YYYY horror films category header has been nominated for merging with Template:YYYY comedy films category header. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nahuatl+languages+language

A tag has been placed on Nahuatl+languages+language requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Obviously typo. And even though it is a typo of "Nahuatl languages language", I couldn't find any Google results about it

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 49.142.100.171 (talk) 10:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Igor Stagljar

Hi! Could you please help in settling the current edit war at Igor Stagljar? I ask you since you contributed to the article and seem to have sufficient experience in Wikipedia.

On 15 Jan, I changed "Croatia" to "Yugoslavia" several times and gave a justifying edit summary. After that, Cola 63 reverted my edit (except for my flag removal) without any comment or justification; and since then we change back and forth. My explicit request at User talk:Cola 63#Recent edits at Igor Stagljar didn't help in obtaining a discussion.

Many thanks in advance. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 22:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Jochen Burghardt

Sorry, but no. My only edit to the article was a technical edit[11] relating to WP:Bare URLs. I have no substantive interest in the topic, and no desire to get sucked into any dispute. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Do you have a suggestion whom I could ask for help in settling? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Jochen Burghardt: see WP:DR for suggestions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

• Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment

• News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election

• Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"

• Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?

• Deletion report: Ringing in the new year: Subject notability guideline under discussion

• WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured

• Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021

• Gallery: No Spanish municipality without a photograph

• Obituary: Twofingered Typist

• Op-Ed: Identifying and rooting out climate change denial

• Essay: The prime directive

• Opinion: Should the Wikimedia Foundation continue to accept cryptocurrency donations?

• In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing

• Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"

• Serendipity: Pooh entered the Public Domain – but Tigger has to wait two more years

• Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Schierbecker (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Misrepresentation

I saw your post at ANI and you are so correct. It happens a lot of course. Just sayin. -Roxy the dog. wooF 16:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Roxy the dog. Sadly, it seems to me be be almost endemic. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

I would have commented at ANI in my normal fashion, but wiser thoughts intruded! -Roxy the dog. wooF 16:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Haha! In this case, I doubt that even your customary barks could have made the discussion any less absurd.

Not for the first time, I wish that it was somehow possible to pour very large buckets of very cold water all over ANI. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw your comments at the signpost talk page. I didn't think you made any harrassing comments, even wizzito said that your comments weren't a big of a deal.

Regarding her posts at the Signpost, I have to agree with BHG here. I have worked with many African Americans and their history goes deep. They have a very large history so it may be easier for them to be angry when it appears someone is trying to undermine or supress the history and documentation of their struggles, even when the others may be working in good faith.

I would have made a comment supporting your actions and comments but by the time I saw the thread it was already closed. Rlink2 (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Rlink2. It was another of those festivals of folly which happen too often at ANI, and I am glad it was closed promptly before more people got sucked in.

The underlying phenomenon is common to any mob: people far too eager to take offence at any comments which may possibly be read as directed at them, while also showing no willingness to consider how their actions may look very different to the people at the receiving end.

Such unwillingness to see the opponent's perspective is what turns a disagreement into a mob seeking vengeance. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:YYYY in nationality sport category header/core

Template:YYYY in nationality sport category header/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:YYYY in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core

Template:YYYY in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:YYY0s in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core

Template:YYY0s in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kingsif (talk) 03:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Drop that nasty little game fast, please @Kingsif.

I was replying[12] to your post[13] in which you invented a quote, misunderstood a simple dictionary term and thereby contradicted yourself ... and yet had the rudeness to question my judgement.

Your latest reply[14] provides the actual quote the Signpost, which in no way resembles the phrase you had put in quote marks. But you make no apology for your misrepresentation. Shame on you.

When you choose to attack someone's else judgement on the basis of such basic errors, please have the decency and integrity to apologise for your errors rather coming here to post a templated warning which should you should have directed at yourself. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Ha! Shame on you. Please apologize to me. Please read the templated warning. I don't know what alternate mindspace you live in where things are flipped, but as I see it, I made an accurate summary of a quote, told you where it was, and you decided to not accept that and play the "literal" game where because I summarized the sentiment instead of directly quoting, you could claim I was lying. Ha! What a joke! And when I question your judgment for defending someone who on their talkpage claims they are as much of a victim as a child of whom they are the cause of harassment - and defending them to the point apparently nobody is allowed to express an opinion on the situation because you will hound them about it - you launch into a three-paragraph spiel on how I must be awful. Please, spare me. Kingsif (talk) 03:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Generally its not a good idea to message any experienced editor with a generic template, let alone the 2nd most active editor with 16 years of activity. I don't know how she feels about it, but I would certainly be a bit offended if someone left me a templated message accusing me of bad faith without going into any further detail. See Wikipedia:Don't_template_the_regulars for more info.

Also let's try to assume good faith. BHG is always cordial and respectful when messaging and posting their opinions and concerns, and is always willing to look at the other side of the argument. She literally said in her first (i think) response to you that she is happy to look at whatever evidence you can present. and in another response that I am still open to evidence. Your first response to her used the words ... I would question your judgment. Also avoid using quotes unless its exactly what they said, when i use quotes or tq template I rarely, if ever, change the words in them. If i need to add context, I will do so by adding stuff around the "tq" template or quote. Rlink2 (talk) 04:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Nonsense.

I asked you for a link to the tweet or post which you complained about. A simple polite request, but you did not provide that.

Instead you presented your words in quotes as if they were the original, and gave no indication that they were your words. You used that fabricated quote to question my judgement. You also contradicted yourself, by not understanding the word "delierately".

And now, instead of apologisng for your personal attack, you come back with another personal attack: I don't know what alternate mindspace you live in.

Yes, you, Kingsif attack me on the basis of a quote which you have have fabricated ... then having created this fabrication you accuse me of being in an alternate mindspace. Sheesh.

After that, I cannot see how any attempt at rational discussion with you about anything could be productive. Get off my talk, and stay off it. Permanently. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Food for thought

Hi BHG. I had only briefly participated in the ANI thread of which you were the subject. I am leaving you a note here on your talk page to say that what you said struck a chord with me. I do not consider myself part of the same "echo chamber" as you, if such an echo chamber exists. Nevertheless, the perspective that you shared made me think about how systemic bias combined with PAGs such as WP:N and WP:RS intersect to reduce visibility of issues pertinent to marginalized communities on Wikipedia. It is reasonably rare that I change my long-held views, but they are changing, and this had a positive impact in that direction. I therefore want to share with you that your words had an impact on more than just the people who already agreed with you to begin with. Thank you for speaking up. AlexEng^(TALK) 03:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati people

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Administrator changes

AustralianRupert • Cimon Avaro • Euryalus • Jehochman • Nunh-huh

28bytes

Bureaucrat changes

28bytes

Interface administrator changes

Evad37 • Galobtter

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
• The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

• Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
• The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
• A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Kingdom MPs by Parliament header

Template:United Kingdom MPs by Parliament header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Undead links

Hi! Instead of marking a link as dead, as you did at Kladruber, would it not be more useful to archive it (which I've done, btw)? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Justlettersandnumbers: One step at a time. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good!

My AWB job can't archive the links; it can only identify them as dead. But InternetArchiveBot can archive them, so I am feeding to InternetArchiveBot in batches. See e.g. https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=viewjob&id=9419 BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

but it doesn't look like your bot did this, it looks like you did this, and a quick historical search has found a link to a wayback that would answer the question, but then again, I did the search because you prompted me, so it's a win either way ? I just don't need to do the link and snark undo your edit because I did find a suitable link. also, time taken to write this v just fix it. ugh Dave Rave (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

"Unionism (Northern Ireland)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Unionism (Northern Ireland) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Unionism (Northern Ireland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Heanor (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2004 disestablishments in Croatia

A tag has been placed on Category:2004 disestablishments in Croatia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 19:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2009 disestablishments in Peru

A tag has been placed on Category:2009 disestablishments in Peru indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 19:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks?

I think I need to thank you for your edits on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Town,_Luton

I'm relatively new to all of this, compared to you, so could you explain the reasoning behind your 'cite web' additions? I am afraid that clicking on the term got me to a Wiki page that was supposed to explain, but seemed like gobbledygook to me. I could not find a video that could break it down either. I really struggle to get my head around some Wiki minutiae that are apparently simple to other people.

Furthermore, could you tell me why you added a 'dead url' tag re. the reference to Luton Borough Council's annual fireworks displays? In line with what I now know to be good practice, I used a web archive link. However, I checked and the original page is still live, so why the 'dead url' bit?

I am sure that this all needs attention, but I was just looking to understand why and then I might be able to improve my own practice in this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The genome (talk • contribs) 20:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi @The genome

Thanks for your message. Per WP:TALKNEW, I have moved it to the bottom of this page, which is where new messages should be placed.

I am sorry that you are struggling with the documentation, but since that's not helping you I will try to keep my reply simple.

I think it will be best if you start with the basics. You have been adding references as WP:Bare URLs, i.e. with only the link which you copied from your web browser's address bar, like <ref>http://example.com/foo</ref>. That is better than no refeence, but it still not very helpful because:

1. the reader has to follow the link to find what's there
2. if the link dies, it will be hard to replicate it

Here's an example to illustrate this. The article contains a ref to the URL https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-36009544 -- note how that bare URL tells the reader very little about what is there.

However, when it is wrapped in {{cite news}} template, it is much more helpful.

If the ref is formatted like this: {{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-36009544 |title=Luton Labour councillor suspended over Hitler tweet |work=BBC News |date=10 April 2016|access-date=13 November 2020}}

... then it displays as:

"Luton Labour councillor suspended over Hitler tweet". BBC News. 10 April 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2020.

See how much more useful that full citation is?

If you can learn how to use cite templates properly, then maybe I can answer the other questions in ways which might help. You will find plenty of help at WP:TEAHOUSE. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for this @User:BrownHairedGirl So many rules! But your explanation was exactly what I needed. I mean, I learnt about bare urls expiring, which is why I have been laboriously trawling through the High Town page to turn them into archive versions. However, I did not understand the cite web bit until you explained. I am not sure I have the gumption to go through the page and change all of those - that is a lot of work.

The genome (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@The genome: I am glad that helped.

However, bare URLs and archived URLs are separate issues. Related, bu separate. A bare URL can be archived or not archived, and an archived URL can be bare or not.

That work of properly citing the sources which you use is the fundamental part of editing Wikipedia. If you don't do it, somebody else will have to cleanup after you, which is not great. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@User:BrownHairedGirl Yup, and I totally get that distinction. As you can see, I have been assiduous in referencing anything that I have added, which is probably the more important component, as it goes to the heart of the information being reliable. The additions are 'nice to haves', no? There are people I know who are willing to work with me on this particular page, so I might have to rope them in to some of the drudgery too. Anyway, I thank you for bring this to my attention and explaining it so nicely.

The genome (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@The genome: yes, you have referenced everything, which is great.

However, the way in which you reference things is crucial, because it assists readers and editors to assess whether the refs are suitable. Unfortunately, the refs which you have used include a lot of WP:PRIMARYSOURCEs, WP:USERGENERATED websites and other forms of unreliable source ... and the poor style of referencing makes it hard to assess the refs.

Those sources are not acceptable, so a lot of the content you have added to the article should not be there. Some day, someone will rip a lot of out out, or if the additions are too hard to assess, they may revert the page back to a version before your edits. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@User:BrownHairedGirl Hehe. I think you're using show and tell to indicate I should try a citation bot. Nice one! I used an archive bot and that hoovered up most of the unarchived urls (although not all, strangely). So it looks like I need to try another.  :)

The genome (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

No. I used the bots to try to clean up some of the mess you created, without spending too much of my time cleaning up after you.

What I'm telling you is that whatever method you use, a) cite reliable secondary sources; b) format the refs so that others can see at a glance what sources are in use. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

{{vital article by topic by class}}

Hi! I hope you're doing well, I just wanted to check if you've started on this template (discussion). Happy editing! ― Qwerfjkltalk 12:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Nts templates with errors

Hello, BHG,

This category just popped up on the Empty Categories list. I'm not sure what it is for, or what Nts templates are, but should it have an empty category tag?

Thank you. I hope you are well! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It's referring to {{nts}} (now {{number table sorting}}), and should have an {{possibly empty category}} tag. I've added a short explanation and that template to the category. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liz

I am also not sure what it is for! It's one of the many thousands of categories which I created while patrolling Special:WantedCategories, and my approach to tracking categories was simply to create the cat if it was being populated.

To try to answer your question, I did a for "nts" in the template namespace, which found Template:Number table sorting plus a few hundred others. Some of them are in Category:Sorting templates, but it seems that most of them are not.

So it seems to me that:

1. I erred in making this a tracking cat. It should have been a template cat.
2. Some category like this is probably needed, but this one is poorly-named and badly structured, and not used. So pointless.

So I have tagged[15] it for speedy deletion as a G7. Hope this helps! BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gendered fooers from Northern Ireland

Template:Gendered fooers from Northern Ireland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the verified oldest people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Diario.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

I couldn't figure out how to disambiguate that one. Maybe someone else can manage it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

OK, I got it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:ViacomCBS navigational boxes has been nominated for discussion

Category:ViacomCBS navigational boxes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 16:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Unreliable source?

Hi, I noticed you marked the conference proceedings by Jack Cullen on Ann Eliza Young's page as an unreliable source. Would you mind explaining to me why you found this source unreliable? Thanks, Salem(BYU) (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@Salem(BYU): please don't make me hunt for it. Diff, please. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I just checked the page history again, and I see that you were fixing a formatting error and not commenting on my source. Sorry about that! --Salem(BYU) (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Archive links

Hello,

Just letting you know that I think a couple dead links you've saved by archiving with InternetArchiveBot are actually invalid archive URLs. Specifically, this edit and this other one. I believe the former links to an index of articles, not the PDF desired, while the latter links to a 404 page. Apologies if I've gotten anything wrong there; still relatively new to Wikipedia.

Best,

Lkb335 (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

"Bare URLs" vs linked PDFs

In Cost of Electricity by Source, you've undone deletions by justifying their references as "bare URLs". Typically a bare URL refers to a single, scrollable web page, where specifying page numbers is pointless.
Referencing a 99-page PDF without page numbers, however, makes an authors' claim(s) unverifiable; the reference, for all practical purposes, worthless. (?) Wtmusic (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@Wtmusic: please at least link to the page, and preferably to the diff of the edit which concersn you. Then I can examine your concerns ... but I m not going to go hunting. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Wtmusic: I found the article Cost of electricity by source (but please remember always to link to an article you are discussing, for the convenience of all other editors) and the source you found "worthless". Having opened the pdf file in my browser, Firefox, it was trivial to search for the text cited, and took just a few minutes more to refresh my memory of how to cite specific page numbers within a general source. Please don't remove content so hastily: if you find the level of detail in the reference inadequate, add a tag to ask for it to be improved such as {{Full citation needed}}. Thanks. PamD 08:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @PamD: Thank you for adding page numbers, and please excuse my frustration with incomplete references. With many PDFs texts are not searchable, however. And honestly, it's not the job of readers to "to go hunting", either. Wtmusic (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@Wtmusic: Even if a pdf source isn't searchable, it's more constructive to tag the content as needing better source / full citation than to just remove it (unless it's BLP, or seriously controversial). Just WP:AGF in the editor who added the ref, and tag it. It looks from the edit history as if you know the article well, so you could probablyl identify quickly the editor who added the ref, and ask them to add the page numbers. PamD 17:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@PamD: "...or seriously controversial..." Cost of electricity by source is indeed a seriously controversial topic. This article is rife with references to entities (Bloomberg New Energy Finance, Lazard) with $billions invested in promoting solar and wind power. They are among the least independent of sources, are rarely cited in academia, and claims made therein are often flat-out wrong. For example: Bloomberg's claim that "renewables are the cheapest power option for 71% of global GDP and 85% of global power generation" apparently refers to wholesale, marginal costs, ignoring significant "market matching" costs paid by consumers described earlier in the article: "Grids with very large amounts of intermittent power sources, such as wind and solar, may incur extra costs associated with needing to have storage or backup generation available."

The fact that both Bloomberg and Lazard do not disclose the source of their own information, i.e., "disclose the detailed methodology and LCOE calculation assumptions, apart from declaring it was 'derived from selected public sources'", is a conflict-of-interest red flag - and without any peer review, their "studies" can be safely dismissed as advertising for their own investments, or those of their clients.

Wikipedia: "Non-independent sources should never be used to support claims of notability, but can with caution be used to fill in noncontroversial details." Wtmusic (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

It would have been bad enough if @Wtmusic had just removed refs. But now that I found the article, I see that my edit[16] was to restore refs which had been mangled by Wtmusic in this edit. So it's not great that Wtmusic came here to complain to me, rather than thank me for fixing their error. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

(yet another talk page watcher) @Wtmusic: PamD is right. In most cases we don't even delete material that is completely uncited, unless there is a genuine reason to believe it's inaccurate, so removing something that is cited but just with an uncertain page number is definitely not a good idea. Again, unless you believe there's something actually wrong with the text in question beside its source.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I agree with both @Amakuru and @PamD.

@Wtmusic: please improve refs rather than removing them. And esp, please do not break the URLs. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)