User talk:Buidhe/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Buidhe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
DYK for Alternative law in Ireland
On 6 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alternative law in Ireland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Land League's "rival government" surpassed the power of the British government in many parts of Ireland during the late 19th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alternative law in Ireland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alternative law in Ireland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I've made improvements to the page to fill it out with more content and add citations. Does it look good to move back to mainspace? I'd like to get it up ahead of the premiere on Friday. Let me know what else I can do to improve it to meet mainspace quality. Timdorr (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Timdorr, It looks much better now, so I moved it back to mainspace. Thanks for adding sources! buidhe 23:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland
On 8 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nearly half of paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland have occurred since the official end of the conflict? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Moves to draft of newly created barangays
Thanks for the move here for the underdeveloped and newly created article Draft:San Angel, San Jose de Buenavista. You may want to do the same at the dozens of other nearly-identical articles also created by User:Fabianmunoz07 (e.g. San Fernando, San Jose de Buenavista, San Pedro, San Jose de Buenavista, Supa, San Jose de Buenavista, Barangay 3, San Jose de Buenavista, Barangay 2, San Jose de Buenavista, Barangay 1, San Jose de Buenavista, Badiang, San Jose de Buenavista, Atabay, San Jose de Buenavista, Maybato Sur). — MarkH21talk 08:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Why did you delete my article? There is no reference in such summary articles, for example see Belgium at the Olympics. Sczipo (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Sczipo, Per WP:V, all information on Wikipedia needs to have a source. (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale). If you submitted this through Articles for creation, it would have been rejected as needing more sources. Please, just reference all information when you are adding content to Wikipedia and you will not have any hassles from New Page Patrol. buidhe 14:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe, Okay then please delete for example the following pages: Armenia at the Olympics, Austria at the Olympics, Belgium at the Olympics, Bulgaria at the Olympics, Croatia at the Olympics, Czech Republic at the Olympics, Denmark at the Olympics, Estonia at the Olympics, France at the Olympics, Georgia at the Olympics, Lithuania at the Olympics, Moldova at the Olympics, Monaco at the Olympics, Montenegro at the Olympics, Poland at the Olympics, Portugal at the Olympics, Benin at the Olympics, Botswana at the Olympics, Burundi at the Olympics, Cameroon at the Olympics, Cape Verde at the Olympics, Central African Republic at the Olympics, Chad at the Olympics, Antigua and Barbuda at the Olympics, Aruba at the Olympics, Bahamas at the Olympics, Barbados at the Olympics, Belize at the Olympics, Bermuda at the Olympics, British Virgin Islands at the Olympics, because as these pages don't contain any references. ;). Thank you! Sczipo (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Sczipo, They're not recently created so draftification would not apply. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument. buidhe 15:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe, Okay then please delete for example the following pages: Armenia at the Olympics, Austria at the Olympics, Belgium at the Olympics, Bulgaria at the Olympics, Croatia at the Olympics, Czech Republic at the Olympics, Denmark at the Olympics, Estonia at the Olympics, France at the Olympics, Georgia at the Olympics, Lithuania at the Olympics, Moldova at the Olympics, Monaco at the Olympics, Montenegro at the Olympics, Poland at the Olympics, Portugal at the Olympics, Benin at the Olympics, Botswana at the Olympics, Burundi at the Olympics, Cameroon at the Olympics, Cape Verde at the Olympics, Central African Republic at the Olympics, Chad at the Olympics, Antigua and Barbuda at the Olympics, Aruba at the Olympics, Bahamas at the Olympics, Barbados at the Olympics, Belize at the Olympics, Bermuda at the Olympics, British Virgin Islands at the Olympics, because as these pages don't contain any references. ;). Thank you! Sczipo (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Are there any guidelines for what sources would be necessary in order to make this draft suitable for review? I tried to model it after the page for the previous book in the series, The Habitation of the Blessed. Wobbuvahi (talk) 06:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Wobbuvahi, when writing about fiction it's important not just to give a plot summary but also critical reception of the book. If you add a reception section summarizing the reviews and citing them, that would be great. See here for an example. Thanks for your contributions! buidhe 07:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
A Life of Napoleon
I published the draft version I was working on last night thinking I was in my sandbox... thanks for the wake up call! :) Best, Aeengath (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Aeengath, please do not upload copyvios in any namespace, per Wikipedia:Copyright violations. buidhe 23:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Did you know nominations/Dęblin–Irena Ghetto
Hi, I'm reviewing this DYK nomination. Should the number here be a comma, or is that a range? "At 14:00, 1,000 Jews who already had work assignments were separated, and local employers began recruiting an additional 2–500 Jews." Is this authorized or something else? "Authoried engineer Kozak brought food to the Jews he worked with." --mikeu talk 17:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Mu301, Thanks for the review! I edited to clarify "200–500 Jews" and Authoried is the name of a company. buidhe 23:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Ahh, ok. I'd be tempted to include an {{efn}} given that it is a GA nom and an uncommon word isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. In any case fantastic work on an important story that needs to be told. Good luck with the GA. --mikeu talk 23:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Re:Jean-Claude Cros
The article is not done yet, i will have to search some sources. This was because i was translating it from the French Wikipedia. KoreanDragon (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- KoreanDragon, if you have an in-progress article it's often best to start in draft space. Onco the article is in mainspace it shows up in our queue and we don't know if you're about to fix the problem or not. buidhe 22:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Perfect. I added some sources. KoreanDragon (talk) 09:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC) I also submitted the article for review after adding sources. KoreanDragon (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Hello Buidhe, many thanks for your interest in my edit on the Éire page you gave the reason for the edit as "Pure OR" I'm sorry you have gone too technical for me there. What does that (OR) stand for or when you get a chance could you please point me to where I can research my error. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eimhin de Róiste (talk • contribs) 12:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Eimhin de Róiste, sorry, I was referring to original research. There needs to be a citation for "Sometimes the incorporation is used for humorous or ironic effect", and that each of the examples you gave is meant for humorous or ironic effect—otherwise it's original research. buidhe 12:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much (OR got it). The most worrying thing is I hadn't made any edit (deliberately to that line) obviously wikipedia say I have. Is it Devileire and all that stuff? I totally agree with you eliminate all that joke junk. Should I be concerned about why the system flags me as editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eimhin de Róiste (talk • contribs) 12:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Eimhin de Róiste, you were pinged because another editor undid your previous edit here. It had nothing to do with me. buidhe 12:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much Buidhe gottcha I was simply pinged because I have a page alert on all changes on the page or something. Wow it might have taken me awhile to get that. Could I just say your edit is awesome what you deleted was bordering on offensive is PS an abbreviation for primary source your "Pure OR" was very restrained I would like to have written something closer to "Pure PS" maybe one letter different. Thanks for clearing that up for me and your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eimhin de Róiste (talk • contribs) 13:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much (OR got it). The most worrying thing is I hadn't made any edit (deliberately to that line) obviously wikipedia say I have. Is it Devileire and all that stuff? I totally agree with you eliminate all that joke junk. Should I be concerned about why the system flags me as editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eimhin de Róiste (talk • contribs) 12:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
GAN for Paradisus Judaeorum
Perhaps you'd be interested in reviewing this, GAN since September. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Piotrus, Sorry, but it's not really my area of interest or expertise. I hope you find a reviewer soon. As an aside, in places it's not clear whether you're referring to the full 1606 epigram or the shorter Latin phrase, such as the first sentence of "Controversy over use at POLIN" section. buidhe 11:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Nástup
On 13 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nástup, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Slovak periodical Nástup blamed Jews for both communism and "immoral capitalism"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nástup. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nástup), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Acceptable level of violence
On 14 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acceptable level of violence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hugh Orde, the head of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, has been criticized for using the phrase "acceptable level of violence"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Acceptable level of violence. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Acceptable level of violence), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Porcupine review
Hi Buidhe, you seem to have forgetten about Talk:Porcupine (Cheyenne)/GA2. I believe I responded to your review comments about six weeks ago and am now waiting for you. SpinningSpark 10:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Spinningspark, I already closed the review. See the article talk page. buidhe 11:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Really? You gave no indication that had happened on the review page. It's usual to close a review with an explanation of why it failed. You might have given me a chance to respond to the problems. SpinningSpark 11:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Newton (academic) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Newton (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Newton (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 14:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Gates of Tears
On 16 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gates of Tears, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gates of Tears is the first comprehensive study of the Holocaust in the Lublin District of Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gates of Tears. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gates of Tears), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Nomination of Mac-Talla (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mac-Talla (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac-Talla (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 10:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
User:Scope creep Revenge and disruptive editing
As you also seem to be a target of this, I wanted to let you know that I have filed this complaint on the Admin noticeboard Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Scope creep Revenge and disruptive editing which also mentions you. best regards Mztourist (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Willbb234. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, SCAN (auditory processing disorders), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 23:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Arijský boj
On 18 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arijský boj, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Czech-language fascist newspaper Arijský boj ('Aryan Struggle') claimed that the daughter of a former president kept a lesbian harem and lusted after Jewish men? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arijský boj), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Salzburg Conference
On 19 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salzburg Conference, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in order to bypass political changes demanded by Germany at the 1940 Salzburg Conference, Slovakia adopted the Führer principle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salzburg Conference. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salzburg Conference), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Dęblin–Irena Ghetto
On 20 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dęblin–Irena Ghetto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Dęblin–Irena forced-labor camp was one of the last forced-labor camps for Jews in the Lublin District? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dęblin–Irena Ghetto. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dęblin–Irena Ghetto), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine
On 21 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine will investigate alleged war crimes by Israel, Hamas, and Palestinian armed groups? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
You've got mail!
Message added 13:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
DYK for The Holocaust in the Sudetenland
On 22 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Holocaust in the Sudetenland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many survivors of the Holocaust in the Sudetenland lost their Czechoslovak citizenship after the war because they were deemed to be "Germans"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Holocaust in the Sudetenland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Holocaust in the Sudetenland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for another good one, and it's featured on Portal:Germany. I wonder about the "The" in the article title, though. Shouldn't that be bold in the lead sentence? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks for your kind comments. I have bolded the word as suggested. buidhe 13:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, and enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Blechhammer concentration camp
Hello! Your submission of Blechhammer concentration camp at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for List of Holocaust transports from Slovakia
On 23 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Holocaust transports from Slovakia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only a few hundred Jews survived out of the more than 57,000 who were deported from Slovakia in 1942? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Holocaust transports from Slovakia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of Holocaust transports from Slovakia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Gusen concentration camp
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gusen concentration camp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Michael Davitt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michael Davitt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Blechhammer concentration camp
On 26 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blechhammer concentration camp, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that five days after evacuating Blechhammer concentration camp in January 1945, German soldiers returned to murder prisoners who had been unable to leave? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blechhammer concentration camp. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Blechhammer concentration camp), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of The Holocaust in the Sudetenland
The article The Holocaust in the Sudetenland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Holocaust in the Sudetenland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Draft
I have added some sources to the article and then i sent it for review. KoreanDragon (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
FAR notifications template
Here is a template listing FAs (and dates) with talk page notifications that a Featured article review is needed. According to the FAR instructions, after waiting five to seven days to see if anyone engages to address the issues, anyone can bring an article to FAR, subject to a) no more than one nomination every two weeks; and b) no more than four nominations on the page at one time, unless permission for more is given by a FAR coordinator. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- @SandyGeorgia: I am a bit puzzled by this notice since none of them are my articles? buidhe 21:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Correct :) Because you have participated at FAR recently, I thought you might want to participate more. This template is to help get old FAs nominated. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate article
Thanks for reviewing Heinz Raether. Something strange must have happened as we were editing the same article at the same time. The article split into two articles, with the history also split.
I continued editing the original article, not knowing there was a duplicate. Does this problem need to be fixed?
Thanks for volunteering to page patrol.
Comfr (talk) 03:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Comfr: Thanks for adding sources to the article. The easiest way to fix this would be for you to nominate Draft:Heinz Raether article for speedy deletion (author request) or request an administrator to do a history merge. buidhe 04:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
John K. Pe-Ta deletion
Thanks for your explanation. Actually I hoped someone would have continued my stub proposal. Nevermind and sorry for the problem. --Wikit2006 (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikit2006: When you create biographies of living people it's crucial to cite good sources for all potentially controversial and/or negative claims. buidhe 04:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
List of Jinn
sorry but I will take many time on work
because somepeople vandalising on wikidata
Speedy deletion of CAIT Climate Data Explorer
CAIT is a not only a website but a collection of tools to visualise climate change data from various sources and is often referenced by other sources. Wouldn't this be enough for the significance demanded in A7? I would suggest to revert the deletion. Hedgehoque (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Hedgehoque: Suggest that you take this up with the admin who deleted the page. I am not an admin so cannot undelete anything. buidhe 23:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Gusen concentration camp
On 3 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gusen concentration camp, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the life expectancy at Gusen concentration camp was as short as six months? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gusen concentration camp. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gusen concentration camp), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Athour Komodo
Hi. I noticed that you moved Athour Komodo into a draft. It's the best that you deleted that draft because a futsal team with that name is not exist. The user created the article, Atok40 even get blocked in Indonesian Wikipedia because persistently created the article. Regards. Wira rhea (talk) 06:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Leitmeritz concentration camp
On 4 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leitmeritz concentration camp, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Leitmeritz concentration camp (memorial pictured) was not liberated, but dissolved by the German Instrument of Surrender? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leitmeritz concentration camp. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leitmeritz concentration camp), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Double Trouble Wrestling
Hi, Much Love as a friend, Double Trouble Wrestling is an independent promotion, My other partner Francine Fournier herself and Major Gunns herself from WCW World Championship Wrestling both confirmed on Twitter when Major Gunns Tweeted recently asking fans to sign up for them to watch Double Trouble Wrestling and watch her, Major Gunns ' porn movies she Major Gunns says she has coming out soon. She said that the other day on Twitter and to several independent circuit pro Wrestling promotions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 02:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TelleyTell: Since I'm not an admin, I can't undelete the article. Please contact the user who deleted the article if you disagree with the deletion. buidhe 02:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles for deletion
Hello you have nominated some of the pages I have created for deletion, they are a work in progress as I have not finished them yet and are currently working on them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leedsproject2019 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Dęblin–Irena Ghetto
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Dęblin–Irena Ghetto has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
DYK for KL (book)
On 7 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KL (book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to The Independent, KL: A History of the Nazi Concentration Camps "renders the unimaginable evil of the camps relatable"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, KL (book)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RE:Bargello
Thanks a lot! Actually I was going to add the sources and to expand the article in the next days. Should I come to you for the review? Alex2006 (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Alessandro57: Sure, let me know. In future it's best to start your article as a draft if you don't have the sources ready. As soon as it's published in mainspace it gets put in our queue. buidhe 20:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- OK, thanks! I'll do in the weekend! Alex2006 (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Buidhe, done! Alex2006 (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- OK, thanks! I'll do in the weekend! Alex2006 (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
The Barnstar of David | ||
For all your excellent work on Holocaust-related articles. A difficult subject area to work in on Wikipedia, not just because of the actual subject matter, but the restrictions and sanctions in place. Thanks also for your other work, particularly in providing source reviews. Keep up the good work, it's appreciated! :D Harrias talk 11:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome
Welcome My sister, I noticed you were turned 2020 Copa del Rey Final, whay.--عبد المغيث (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Milivoj Jugin
Hi, I improved the article. Can You please review and speed up the process? Wikipedia needs article on men such as Jugin more than articles on Selena Gomez or Superbowl ... -- Bojan Talk 03:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Collegium Carolinum move
I don't think there is a primary topic, so I would prefer plan Collegium Carolinum to be a disambig page like, for example, in German. Most mentions of "Collegium Carolinum" that I come across are in a historical context, and tend to be about Braunschweig or Kassel, but that is clearly related to the topics I am interested in... —Kusma (t·c) 10:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Kusma: For me it is the opposite, I come over many more mentions of the current institution. Most of the Google results are for it, but that could be recentism (they have a website and publish books, unlike the ones that don't exist anymore)! Anyway, since it is disputed I've moved it back. buidhe 16:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- As the only organisation currently using that name, I'm not surprised that they are much more Google-present. Thank you for moving the page back! —Kusma (t·c) 17:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the help! Deutschmark82 (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC) |
CfD closures
Thanks for helping to close WP:CFD discussions. When closing discussions, remember to update the category page to remove the CfD nomination template. feminist (talk) 03:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Feminist: Thanks for the heads-up. I thought that part was automated, but now I know it isn't. buidhe 03:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Concrning Review of the article List List of leaders of dependent territories in 2017
I must inform you with all due respect that this article is of the chronological list type. For such articles, it is not possible to insert citations, because such citations do not exist. I wrote this article starting from the data presented in the websites which I presented as External links and from the results of my own research on various websites of the authorities that appear for different entities. On the other hand, the sites Rulers and World Statesmen are the most reliable sources in the field of arkhontology which can be easily accessed. That is why I kindly ask you to accept my article as it was written, because it cannot fit within the criteria of articles that describe a personality, an event, etc Bogdan Uleia (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Bogdan Uleia: While I appreciate the work that went into creating this list, unfortunately lists are not exempt from WP:V. Have you looked for news coverage or official announcements about changes in leadership? The two sources listed in external links may or may not be accurate, but they do not meet the standard for WP:RS because they're both self-published. buidhe 14:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello Buidhe,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Miloslavov tent camp.png
Thanks for uploading File:Miloslavov tent camp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing!
I see you've rviewed several of the articles I've done on Province of Canada electoral districts. Thanks! That kind of quality control is essential for the health of Wikipedia! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Should I be adding the tag about text in public domain to all of them? I'm working my way through the list in alphabetical order and can certainly do that, if advisable? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Minor comment: the text in question in this article (the description of the boundaries) is from Statutes of Lower Canada, 1829, not the 1845 consolidated statutes. I can fix that? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: It's advisable to list whenever you are copying content from elsewhere, even if it's public domain. That way the text is attributed to the correct source, and reviewers are not alarmed when there's a match on Earwig. The best way to do it is apparently the {{Source-attribution}} template, which also places the article into the appropriate maintenance category. Thanks for your work on Canadian constituencies! buidhe 20:16, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Minor comment: the text in question in this article (the description of the boundaries) is from Statutes of Lower Canada, 1829, not the 1845 consolidated statutes. I can fix that? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain: Statutes of Lower Canada, 1829
- Thanks for your continued reviews! I'm working my way through the Canada East constituencies. Question: how does New Page Reviewing work? I might be interested in volunteering for it, but have no idea what's involved? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, See WP:NPP for details on what we do, which is basically checking if speedy deletion criteria are met, or else AfDing if the subject is unlikely to be notable. I specialize in articles that don't have inline citations to websites, which is why I've seen so many of your articles.
- There are three main ways to get the permission:
- You have a good amount of experience so I'd encourage you to apply directly at WP:PERM and learn as you go, as long as you're reasonably careful it won't be an issue. buidhe 03:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- By starting as an Articles for Creation reviewer
- By joining New Page Patrol School
- Asking directly at WP:PERM.
- Thanks for your continued reviews! I'm working my way through the Canada East constituencies. Question: how does New Page Reviewing work? I might be interested in volunteering for it, but have no idea what's involved? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Persecution of Czechs in the Slovak State
On 14 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Persecution of Czechs in the Slovak State, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that from 1938, the Slovak People's Party denounced Czechs as "enemies and pests" of the nation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Persecution of Czechs in the Slovak State. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Persecution of Czechs in the Slovak State), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jozef Tiso's speech in Holič, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Višňové (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Please don't do that
The move to the draft space was unwarranted. I have recreated the original article and have added some links and a couple of new references. I am currently adding pages for the entire republican contested primary. I have done this with hundreds of articles on US and World politics. Please don't do that again. Thank you. Arglebargle79 (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Arglebargle79, WP:V is a core content policy. It's advisable to start articles as drafts if you don't have references for all the information on hand. buidhe 22:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)