User talk:MFTP Dan/2016 Archives

The Open Door

Hi Danny; I noticed the section "Background, titling and artwork" uses a large proportion of direct quotations and I've templated it appropriately. Their number can be reduced by paraphrasing as needed, or removing / eliding the less-relevant and waffly ones. The problem also exists elsewhere in the article, but this section is the worst affected. quotations Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

This was also a problem on their self titled effort but I fixed a lot of that. This must've been something Petergriffin9901 was talking about when he reviewed it in 2011. Sorry to have put a tough problem like this one on you. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 02:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Guns N' Roses

Hi, yes I think he might have been replaced too, but I can't find any defenite proof of that yet. Do you have any defentite proof?

Davidgoodheart

RE: A Thousand Suns

Yes, but as far as I know, there's nothing prohibiting us from using genre tags like that at sites, just as long as it's not AllMusic. While the prose just says "experimental", also considered the term is also sometimes used as a shorter term for experimental rock, rather than experimental music. Just like how people sometimes say "alternative" instead of "alternative rock", even though a number of "alternative" genres exist. Kokoro20 (talk) 01:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

The Second Stage Turbine Blade

Hey, speaking of genres, I recently attempted to add some cited genres to The Second Stage Turbine Blade. However, it was reverted, because another editor didn't think that some of the sources are reliable and that others didn't support the genres in question explicitly enough. So feel free to add some input here: Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade#Genres - pop punk, emo, post-hardcore. Kokoro20 (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Some input

Hey Danny, can you leave your opinion about renaming Get Rich or Die Tryin' at the nomination page? Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the peer review request.

Sorry that I didn't submit it myself. I was busy figuring out how to upload audio files correctly and I also was improving the references/bibliography/further reading section of the nu metal article.

Statik N (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

No prob Statik! Might want to watchlist it if you haven't already. Speaking of bibliography, the accessdates are in an inconsistent format, I've noticed. Either put them all in yyyy-mm-dd format, or all in standard, when you have time of course. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 01:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Sound samples

I didn't remove the files "Engine No. 9" and "Sic". See this link.

I think what I'll do is reupload "Headup" and "Nookie" but put that number to 64 like I did with the "Falling Away from Me" audio. Someone will have to delete the "Headup" and "Nookie" audio files that have a number that's too high.

Statik N (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I did end up finding that after a while. Too bad we can't fix those. :/ dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 02:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Sure. I put the "Headup" sample in the history section.

Statik N (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

I uploaded the "Slipknot - Surfacing.ogg" file.

Statik N (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

“ “Don't belong! Don't exist!

Don't give a sh*t! Don't ever judge me!” Okay, so technically, Surfacing, the fifth track on Slipknot’s eponymous album, was released on 29 June, 1999 but the words above are ::the best encapsulation of the aggression, attitude, simplicity and indeed, the spirit of nü metal.

”

—Was that what you were talking about?

Statik N (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

If that wasn't the caption you wanted, then you can change it.

Statik N (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't going to put it exactly like that, but yes I was going to work with that. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 02:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

FA review

Hey Danny, can you and Statik N do a review on Ride the Lightning and post it to the nomination page? I've reviewed your request earlier, and I'd be very grateful if you check mine. All the best.--Retrohead (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

No prob! Working on a review on that right now. dannymusiceditor ^{~talk to me!~} 22:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Nu metal

Unfortunately I don't have the books. Statik N (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Nu metal books

I noticed that you posted something on the nu metal article's talk page, asking if anyone had one of the books in the nu metal article's furthering reading section. What sources do you need to look at? I don't have any of the books but I could order them on Amazon or something.

Statik N (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Statik, I was able to see a preview of Deena Weinstein's book, Rock'n America: A Social and Cultural History. The one I could not find a preview for, however, was Joel McIver's book that highlighted nu metal specifically. There might be more, so watchlist this to see if I have any more. dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 22:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I think the person who added the McIver book was on Wikipedia a few years ago and probably doesn't use Wikipedia anymore. They probably have that McIver book. I don't know who added the book and stuff like that on the nu metal article, though. I could try finding out who added that McIver book and stuff like that on the nu metal article. If I can't, then I'll probably order the McIver book on Amazon. Statik N (talk) 00:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Don't worry

I highly doubt I ever will need to again.  — Calvin999 18:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Fallen and "My Immortal" credits

Hello, DannyMusicEditor. I noticed you are an active user when it comes to Evanescence's articles. I was reading the linner notes of Fallen and I noticed that David Hodges does not have songwriting credits for "My Immortal", "Imaginary" and "Whisper". Also, Ben Moody is credited as the sole producer of "My Immortal". However, on the "My Immortal" Maxi single, David Hodges is credited as a songwriter and Dave Fortman is credited as a producer, along with Moody. What is the most reliable source? the album or the single?. Thank you so much. --Paparazzzi (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh, jeez. Thanks for the message, Paparazzzi. I have no idea which overpowers which. The people who made those booklets made stupid mistakes. The band did not choose good editors for their notes, that's for sure. You should probably make a note (i.e. the kind they use for Deftones' style section) that says that there are differences in the credits. I'm currently busy working on their newer material, but I will get to this eventually if you can't fix this. dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 18:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Danny :D. --Paparazzzi (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Thousand Suns

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Thousand Suns you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Thousand Suns

The article A Thousand Suns you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:A Thousand Suns for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evanescence (Evanescence album)

The article Evanescence (Evanescence album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Evanescence (Evanescence album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations :D Excellent article!. --Paparazzzi (talk) 00:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Thousand Suns

The article A Thousand Suns you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Thousand Suns for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 22:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

A Thousand Suns

Congrats on getting that to GA. I haven't had much time to edit here on Wikipedia lately (most of my edits for the past few months have been reverts), but I was thinking that if and when I get the chance, how about helping me get Meteora, Minutes to Midnight and Living Things to GA as well, now that it has been achieved with Linkin Park's other three albums? I'm thinking that Living Things currently has the most potential, so maybe I could do that one first, and then you can review it once I nominate it to GA. What do you think? Kokoro20 (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks, Kokoro. And that's a great idea. I would love to help, but now that my current GANs have passed, I'm taking a break from Wikipedia - school and my athletic program have been demanding on me lately (I run track). The last thing I'm doing before my WB is reviewing Give It All. However, if you'd like to nominate Living Things, I will help when its review comments arrive (hopefully I notice). Translations from the Russian GA version of that article might help so coverage can be ensured. If it's done when I decide to come back from my inactivity, I'll probably start work on Minutes to Midnight. dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 23:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Oops

Regarding this. Sorry about that! Must have been a brain fart on my end. I was confused by a lack of edit summary, and I somehow thought the reference was being removed rather than added, which was what you were doing, then I checked the source and quickly undid it without paying attention. My apologies. Good work on finding that source, though!  Adrian^[232] 18:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm hitting pots of gold in terms of citations today, having great luck right now. dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 18:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Beautiful People (song)

Has any other reliable sources call it a gothic rock rather than "goth"? 183.171.183.123 (talk) 08:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

A Lesson in Romantics

Hello DannyMusicEditor:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article A Lesson in Romantics has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#2). I suggest that you archive the rest of the URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the “Save Page Now” box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=13 February 2015}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist, thank you for the message. I had not gotten around to archiving, and I will do so when I have adequate time. Thanks again for the copyedit. dannymusiceditor ^{what'd I do now?} 14:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Fallen (Evanescence album) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: The Open Door

Thank you for the offer. As I am not that active on Wikipedia anymore I don't think I need credits for it. I will just add it to my user page where I make a collection of the articles I contributed to. P.S. Great job on the article. My love is love 13:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Lesson in Romantics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Lesson in Romantics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Signature

Your signature is broken; in the link to your username, you have the closing ''' and ]] the wrong way around, resulting in the timestamp being bolded. It also upsets WP:Syntaxhighlight, a program I use, causing it to mishighlight some parts of formatting. Thank you.--Launchballer 10:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

That's something I probably would've never noticed. I thought only I could see the bolded timestamp. Thank you! (won't sign now because of the problem) dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 14:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC) @Launchballer: (is that better?)

Yes, thank you.--Launchballer 15:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Lesson in Romantics

The article A Lesson in Romantics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Lesson in Romantics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fall Out Boy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fall Out Boy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Bring Me The Horizon

I saw your recent edit towards Bring Me The Horizon wasn't destructive or anything like that. But it has been shown that Lee has actually performed studio lead and rhythm guitar since Jona's departure. 321rematch (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fall Out Boy

The article Fall Out Boy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fall Out Boy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 00:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Paranoia (A Day To Remember song)

I saw your recent edit deleted my edit for the song being in a debate if Metalcore and Hardcore Punk. I can kinda say that the song is a mixture of both because Jeremy did say in the behind the scenes of making the music video they had the idea of a punk chorus then bringing it back in to their old a day to remember. So if there is anything about the genres it's most likely Hardcore Punk and Metalcore or one of the two. 321rematch (talk) 18:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Through Being Cool

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Through Being Cool has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Stop genre warring

I get you like your sources. IN at least one case, you went against a comment and added a source that was not supported. Stop it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Warring? I reverted one time. One. That does not constitute warring. I never go further than that without talk discussion, I promise. But you're missing the point anyway. That one "unsupported one" is the hard rock one? Electronic-tinged isn't the part that matters! You're missing the entire point! Please read the edit summary! dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 23:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Come As You Are

I am prepared to discuss this. First off, I don't think you should have the bit "Following the success of Smells Like Teen Spirit they were unsure as to the second single...." and so on because that makes it sound like it was the success of SLTS which made them unsure about which song should be the second single which is not the case. The success of SLTS had nothing to do with them being "unsure" about the second single, it was more to do with the likeness of the Killing Joke song.QuintusPetillius (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Is that right? I'd have fixed that once I delved deeper into that Swedish article. I am not using that as a source, I assure you. I'm just taking the sources given there and expanding any content not here yet. There must be some content in there I haven't added to the article's body yet, the lead was just the first step. There might be a translation mistake on my part too. Just give me time and if I don't actually find anything on that I'll scrap that lead.

Are you sure about that unsure part, though? Without looking in there, I'd have believed it. Teen Spirit had some crazy massive chart success. I'm sure after a dreary album like Bleach, a hit single like Teen Spirit would've come as a bit of a shock, and maybe they didn't plan to have another strong single like that. The Swedish FA says "they were unsure which single they wanted to launch next" right after "which the band had not expected", referring to SLTS' success.

Your argument is also likely, however. I'll think about that. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 19:48, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Yay!

Enjoy your vacation! (I'm envious) — Huntster (t @ c) 23:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh lolz, you saw that? ;) If you'd like, you can take care of the easy stuff if they review it for me. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 23:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Possible peer review

Hi there,

I noticed that you recently closed the Evanescence discography peer review page (it looks much better now btw). Would it be possible to return the favor and do a peer review of the Rise Against discography page? I listed that page a number of days ago, and no one is taking the bike. Famous Hobo (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Dystopia GA review

Hey, I appreciate you reviewing my nomination. That said, I probably won't be very active until Thursday or this weekend, so if you start reviewing and I don't reply or make any recommended changes right away, that's why. I will get to it though. Anyway, thanks again! --L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey, if you could take another look at the article now, that's be great. I don't think I have everything, but an updated assessment would be great. Thanks!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks! And as for about it being the second highest charting, its in both the lead and the charts section.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 22:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Results May Vary article

Hey. It's Statik N. I've been working on the Results May Vary article (Results May Vary is an album by Limp Bizkit) and I wanted to know if you could help me nominate it as a good article. Statik N (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

No matter how much I despise that album, Statik, I'm willing to help someone as dedicated to your cause as you. However, if I'm going to help with it, you'll need to nominate it yourself or wait a bit - I've got four GANs on queue right now (one for a song and three albums). Credit me as co-nominator in the note parameter of the template. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 19:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

How do I nominate an article for good article? Statik N (talk) 00:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Go to the talk page, and follow the instructions listed at WP:GAI. I'll post this back on your page, too. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I nominated it. How do I credit you as a co-nominator? Statik N (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, so it takes two edits to do it. The last parameter before the template ends should say "note=". Note that I'm co-nominating the article. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Ev discog edit

What were you wanting to do to the title that you alluded to in this edit? — Huntster (t @ c) 00:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

The title parameter is much wider in the promotional singles section than in the officials; I tried to adjust the scope row or whatever that was, and it made no difference. In the article's FLC, FrB.TG suggested that the two parameters be aligned the same. I agree, I just don't know how to fix that. If you know what to do, I'd greatly appreciate your help. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 21:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Take a look at the discog now, let me know what you think. I've standardised the layouts and column widths throughout for a more unified appearance. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

TOYC

Hey Danny. I just noticed this [1] edit in my watchlist and the same user started the review [2]. What should we do? Yeepsi (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

IDGAF really, let him nominate it. It might be a sock of this user, who did that to a couple BMTH-related pages (Oli Sykes and Sempiternal (album)). Those didn't have a chance in Hades' domain of passing, especially the laughably bad article on Oli, but this one is in good condition after what I put into it and it actually has a good chance of passing. I was planning on nomming that in my next few GANs anyway. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 18:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Viking metal FAC

I nominated Viking metal as a FAC. If you would like to comment, please do so. I wanted to help out with the Evanescence discog article, I'm glad that other editors were able to review and approve it. Thanks,--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bleed American

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bleed American you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California (Blink-182 album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article California (Blink-182 album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 03:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bleed American

The article Bleed American you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bleed American for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California (Blink-182 album)

The article California (Blink-182 album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:California (Blink-182 album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bleed American

The article Bleed American you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bleed American for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 06:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California (Blink-182 album)

The article California (Blink-182 album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:California (Blink-182 album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

GA review of Simple Plan

Hello, are you unfamiliar with the article Simple Plan? If you're unfamiliar then please review it and tell me on my talk page that it has pass or fail. Gerard Way (Talk to me!) 7:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

@GerardWay86: Hello, MCR-crazy emo fan. I have a few lessons for you about Wikipedia. I am familiar with Simple Plan's music AND Wikipedia article, but one is good and the other is not. Simple Plan's article is not professionally written or well-cited. I saw you nominate it initially, but if its current state is the way you want to nominate it, it would be a waste of the reviewer's time. So I removed it. For you to have done that again annoys me. Please, take a look at Fall Out Boy's article (a GA) and compare that to Simple Plan's and tell me if that's anywhere near that quality.

And second, please post at the bottom of talk pages. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 05:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

You know, I looked again and I guess it doesn't totally suck anymore. But nominating it in this state would still be a time waste and a failed nomination. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 05:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

GA review of Take Off Your Colours

Hi, please start review the article Take Off Your Colours for good article criteria and let me know that it has passed or fail or whatever. Thanks GerardWay86 (talk) 9:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

You see, you haven't learned how this process works yet. I can't. That would kill the point. It needs to be someone who hasn't made any major contributions or is unfamiliar with the article, and that can take months. I have like 70 edits on that page. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 14:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

I am going to review it Oliway (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Report to FBI

You have been reported to the FBI. 155.41.33.3 (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

What the hell is this? I should report you for a legal threat or something... dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 19:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Gee, calm down. Happy Halloween. 155.41.33.3 (talk) 00:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

You scared the fuck outta me. You got me alright. But please be careful, you can get blocked for that shit. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 01:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Don't hesitate to report if it happens again. That nonsense is not something to play around with. Anon, mind yourself. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Psychosocial (song)

According to WP:V, Wikipedia's content is "determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors." Just go by what professional critiques say when it comes to aesthetic opinions like genres. Well this revision, however we cite the subjectivity of notable critics or publications (WP:SUBJECTIVE) 123.136.107.249 (talk) 06:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

@123.136.107.249: I'm sorry, what are you trying to tell me? I apologize for being so late to reply. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 02:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

St. Anger

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article St. Anger has been completed. I'll leave it to you to archive the remaining URLs (where possible).

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Heart Is Broken

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Heart Is Broken you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Open Door

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Open Door you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Heart Is Broken

The article My Heart Is Broken you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:My Heart Is Broken for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Heart Is Broken

The article My Heart Is Broken you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:My Heart Is Broken for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Possible GA swaps?

Hi there,

I noticed that you've got quite a few album articles up for GAN (good job there). I just wanted to know if you'd be interested in doing a GA review swap with me? The Unraveling has been up for a while, and I'm close to nominating Revolutions per Minute. I can take one of your articles in exchange for one of mine. Famous Hobo (talk) 16:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Absolutely. If I had more time to do reviews, I'd have taken yours up, but I've been busy. But being that Thanksgiving break is approaching, I can do it then. You can take up one of the older co-noms I have on queue at GAN: Results May Vary or Take Off Your Colours. Thanks! dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 19:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All We Know Is Falling

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All We Know Is Falling you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jennica -- Jennica (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quid pro quo

Hi Danny. I have an open GAN for the album The Big Room. It is my first album GAN. I was wondering if you'd like trade something for reviewing it? I'd be happy to review something of yours in return. I already left some comments for at your Evanescence peer review, but just let me know if you'd like something else looked at in return for my GAN. Cheers. Freikorp (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

I would love to. But I have two GANs on review right now and I already promised a review above; so I can agree to do yours, and feel free to reserve one of my album-related ones, just don't review it yet or I might not get to them. Just do the one he doesn't end up choosing, really. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 21:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Sounds good. I'll keep an eye out, but feel free to ping me when one gets taken. Freikorp (talk) 00:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Danny. Just throwing it out there, I now have Shades of Purple, the predecessor to The Big Room, nominated for GA. I took your GAN comments for The Big Room into consideration before nominating it. If you'd like to trade reviews for it this time I will wait until you tell me which article you'd like me to review instead of picking one myself which might not be ready:), but no pressure if you've got too much on to look at this anytime soon. Don't forget i'm still happy to look at Call Me When You're Sober when it gets renominated in any case. Hope you've been well. Freikorp (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Open Door

The article The Open Door you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Open Door for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Call Me When You're Sober

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Call Me When You're Sober you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 09:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Call Me When You're Sober

The article Call Me When You're Sober you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Call Me When You're Sober for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Happy birthday!! Now I'm officially four years younger than you. Also, congratulations for all your work here on Wikipedia, for which I'm awarding you this. Best regards and congrats, Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Ayyyyy thanx! I never had a ton of time to write you for this, I've been working on finishing up the album article for you. I appreciate the star. My birthday was great, if you want to see more you can check my Instagram @dansanford dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 22:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

You can also check my YouTube channel if you want to. Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Call Me When You're Sober

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Call Me When You're Sober has been completed.

As you are no doubt aware the article is riddled with "Dead Links" because previous contributors did not bother to archive their citations. (Why this is not required for FA designation is a mystery to me.) In any event, it appears there's a lot of work to do to deal with the issues these raise.

Also, most song articles I have copy edited have a 20-30 second sample for the reader to play. It's a glaring omission from this article.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Deftones page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Open Door

The article The Open Door you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Open Door for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Call Me When You're Sober

The article Call Me When You're Sober you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Call Me When You're Sober for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

GAR request

Have you maybe got time to review this short article? It would help me finish the good topic around it. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Blink-182 Good Topic

Would you and your cohorts be interested in making the blink discography into a good topic? It looks mighty close, once the discography becomes a featured list (looks like you are going for that), it might be done. Not sure if you have to include the live, compilation, and video albums. Something to consider, you might have other bands that are close as well. Kees08 (talk) 00:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Funny you mention that. That's been my goal for a while, and I'll be doing it with Evanescence's albums and the songs from at least two of theirs. Maybe one day I'll restore the band's article. I would only need a live album for a topic titled "Blink-182 albums". If I do "Blink-182 studio albums" I think I'll be fine. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 02:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Help

Hello Danny! I wanted to ask for your help to help detect an issue we have on the Central Kurdish Wikipedia, we wanted to redesign the Arts Portal, we are trying to use the template random portal component, and are still testing on the portal to see how it is going, but there is this expression error that I can't figure out how to fix. I have read the help of the RPC template, and we also created one of the subpages here that the RPC template requires to work, but still there's an error that I can't fix. I would appreciate if you take a look at that for me. Thank you!—‎Lost Whispers _talk 14:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Just because I edited what today's featured article is to remove some extraneous information I saw doesn't mean I have any proficiency in the language, and that would get especially difficult in template work. I can't help you, I'm sorry. Or was that Turkish Wikipedia I did that? Anyway, I'm of no help. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 15:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

That's all right, I was just trying to figure out what was causing the error. Thanks anyway! —‎Lost Whispers _talk 17:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All We Know Is Falling

The article All We Know Is Falling you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All We Know Is Falling for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)