User talk:Dep. Garcia/Talk Page Archive/3

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic New deal for page patrollers
Dep. Garcia's - Talk Page Archive: 03
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Links to my Wikispace
Go To My User page
Go To My Talk Page
Go To My Complaints Department
Go To My Help Desk
Talk Page Archives: 00, 01, 02, 03
Go To My Template Page
Go To My Award Page
Go To My Cheat Sheet



Help Desk

Thank you for adding the date header for the 9th, unfortunately RefDeskBot only knows how to read headers that are formatted as follows = June 9 =. Thank you again--VectorPotentialTalk 23:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on VectorPotential user talk page

Thanks

for the cuff's I allready arrested a few people. I'll give you this off the record reward. Peacekeeper II 09:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on Peacekeeper II user talk page

Thank You

Thank you very much for you greeting into the Law Enforcement wikiproject. I'm a law enforcement explorer and therefor am still new to the law enforcement world. Im also new to the world of wiki editing. Between the two I doubt there is much I can do help here. Ive already edited the Law Enforcement Explorers page, but besides that I'm, not sure what else I can do. I'll keep looking though.

Thanks again and PS. I linked your clip-on tie page in my edit before I even got your greeting. lol

Have a great weekend. Stay safe.

thekingbeav 22:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on thekingbeav user talk page

Re: my complaint

Honestly, you are waaaay intimidating. For starters, your required procedures for filing a complaint with you are about as difficult as filing a tax return. Secondly, your involvement in law enforcement, whether it be actual criminal law enforcement as an occupation or within some or other Wikiprojects should really have no bearing on anything but your user name or your home page. Now, while you may disagree, your little police cap in the URC of your user page and your excessive conditions related to other people posting on your user page, making a complaint, returning to respond to your response, etc. give the appearance as though you are more than just another individual using Wikipedia. It is as though you are an official enforcer, working on behalf of Wikipedia more so than the rest of us. We are all working to make this place a better place, but when you post on someone's page and they try to respond to you and find that they need to download a template within which to properly receive a response from you, I think that this is being overly pretentious. How can you expect someone who has made only a few edits to articles and been here less than 10 minutes decipher your user page. You need more than a user page and a talk page, and you send people to your complaints department? Don't you think this is a bit too much? You may feel that I am being excessive and that you have the right to do whatever it is you like in terms of how people respond to your postings on their pages, and that is why I am merely talking to you about it and not reporting you or something, but I think it's important to take a step back and think about what it is that a message from you does to whomever it is directed. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 18:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on DRosenbach user talk page

Image

Dep, I volunteered you here to supply a new image for law enforcement in the united kingdom. Slap on the aviators I'm sure you could take your gun into one of those photo booths! :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by SGGH (talkcontribs)

I have replied on SGGH user talk page
It doesn't have to be firearms, actually to more accurately represent the majority of uk officers it might actually be better to have an unarmed officer in the image? What do you think? I put on the uniform for the firts time on Sunday by the way, uniform fitting! SGGH speak! 16:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have replied on SGGH user talk page
It was actually 17th July and there had been a mixup, oh well, still not that far away! :D SGGH speak! 17:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have replied on SGGH user talk page
A wonderous Tuesday SGGH speak! 18:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have replied on SGGH user talk page
Cool, thanks Dep. SGGH speak! 18:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oh yeah, don't forget to mark out any collar numbers. SGGH speak! 18:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have replied on SGGH user talk page
Someone has self-confidence issues :P just kidding SGGH speak! 18:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
It's quite good but a higher quality camera might be of better use. Suggestion: Keep informative...ity... in mind, use photographs that show the most about a uk police officer. SGGH speak! 15:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah, and you're the chief of the project now for 6 months, or until you decide to "retire", enjoy! And let me know if you have any questions but it is pretty self-explanatory. Take the project where you want to go! SGGH speak! 16:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thats a good one, I wish I had all my kit :( I'd just wear the stuff and practise and look at how cool I looked :P

Cuffs

I wish I had all my kit now :(

I want to ask you a policing question, how specifically do the handcuffs work? Are they automatically locked as soon as they close so you only use the key to unlock them, or do you have to lock them on a suspect with the keys? (the latter seems unlikely). Are they locked when on your belt so you have to unlock them with key to use them, or are do they rest on your belt unlocked somehow?

I'm assuming the rest on your belt unlocked, lock into place when closed, and the key unlocks them. SGGH speak! 20:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on SGGH user talk page
So they sit unlocked on your belt, you cuff a resisting suspect and they automatically lock. You then either:

a) Use the key to unlock him because you dearrested him for some reason b) Use the key to double lock them before throwing him in the van

Those are the only two times you use the key? Use the pin on the end of the key to unlock from normal or to double lock, or to unlock from double lock by twisting one way then t'other? Right?

Okay, I think I have it. Next we move on to ASPs and CS. Cheapest police education ever :P SGGH speak! 20:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

How do you store your stabbie? Becuase I'm going to be at Uni for the first 3 years of my specials career and I'm wondering about storage space. The station ("nick" :P) doesn't have the locker space for it to stay there. SGGH speak! 20:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
We take everything home bar CS, due to the lack of lockers, it's the same for a number of regs too. SGGH speak! 14:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

WPLE

Hi, this particular change just creates a shortcut for those using this template, which I have been doing a lot. This is just a mechanic change, not really one that affects the template or use of either name itself. Both still work, just as {{Wikiproject Japan}} and {{WPJ}} get the same effect. Chris 21:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on Chris user talk page

HELP!

HELP! THE ARCHIVES OF THE RESPONSE CENTER WILL BE DELETED! HELP!!! --Defender 911 17:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply



Thanks for your help! You are a great emergency-response worker, and were promoted!! :) --Defender 911 19:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I promoted you again for a speedy response to the Wikihermit incident. You were elevated from Responseman Basic to Responseman at the Crisis Center. --Defender 911 13:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Law enforcement in Ghana

Your edit summary says this article is Start class but the Talk page shows it is a Stub. Which is which?--Natsubee 09:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on Natsubee user talk page

Police duty belt

Is there any relevance for including things about specialised duty belts for SWAT et al? Or is that more of a kevlar jacket vest type thing with hooks and buttons attached? SGGH speak! 21:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on SGGH user talk page.

Crisis Center

Joe Sewell has left Wikipedia. WE HAVE TO HELP! --Defender 911 17:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Horrible news...Joe Sewell said on Answers.com that he wasn't coming back. I'm not sure if there is much we can do. --Defender 911 10:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Promotion!

You got promoted! To Responseman 1st class

Signed,

Defender 911

20:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

New to WikiProject Criminal Biography

I am a fairly new member to this project. I am trying to start a Serial Killer task force. I have found a few members who would like to join. Any suggestions on how to start one? What are your interests as far as Crime goes? Jmm6f488 23:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Signature

Hello. I really like your signature however it is to long according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SIGNATURE . Please shortern it for the comfort of other editors. Thanks and happy editing. Djminisite - Talk | Sign 19:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Uniform fitting

Had it today! I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it!!!! The uniform is awesome every cm of it! I love the stabbie and the reflective jackets with POLICE on them! What is that above about promotion? SGGH speak! 13:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have replied on SGGH user talk page
Not used equipment yet, not until September :(. The stabbie was comfortable! I was shocked SGGH speak! 20:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Okay Dep, have a good time working! SGGH speak! 21:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Crisis center

Double crisis! H has left Wikipedia and his talk page is protected. I'll go to an admin to unprotect it. --Defender 911 (Leave a message!) 16:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

HELP!

HELP! THE CRISIS CENTER WILL BE DELETED! --Defender 911 (Leave a message!) 19:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WAAHHHHHHH!

I've faced massive opposition distrust here on Wikipedia. My intentions are misjudged and ignored. My efforets are unrewarded. I have little if any choice but to leave. --Defender 911 (Leave a message!) 19:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Manchester - FA push

Hello fellow WikiProject Greater Manchester participant! T=You may or may not be aware that our Manchester article has recently obtained official good article status! This is a great acheievement, but we don't want to stop there! We're hoping to spend the next few weeks as a team to raise the standard of this article to featured standard! It will only be possible if we work together, and hope you can take a moment to look both at the FA criteria, and the Manchester article and aid us in this feat! Any problems, feel free to raise them at Talk:Manchester! Good luck! Jza84 23:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Police duty belt

I have added a photo of myself onto the above to help out, as well as one to Policing in the United Kingdom, Custodian helmet and Police notebook. Where are you anyway? The project is quiet when you aren't around SGGH speak! 22:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Haven't had PPE yet, thats October 5October 7 SGGH speak! 13:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WPGM New Monthly Newsletter

Onnaghar talk ! ctrb ! er 16:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)If you do not wish to receive this monthly distribution please put two * by your username on the project mainpageReply

RE: PPE

Oh went fine, loads of fun but harder than we all expected. Done radio as well, going back next weekend for the 5th of 7 modules in total. Been enforcing the law all over the place! SGGH speak! 12:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WPGM Newsletter - November 2007


Rudget Contributions 17:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

To be (police)or not to be...

God evening, Deputy.A have a little problem. I'm a brazilian municipal guard and I to make some contributions in Wikipedia.Some months ago I had a "discussion" with a user called Sparks1979 and he sad my corporation is a security force but isn't a aunonomal police unity, and if you read the article about municipal guards in wikipedia, it's written the term "security police".But, wait a minute, brazilian municipal guards are accepted by International Police Association as members, so , what is wrong, the municipal guards or the brazilian laws? Gimmie an answer, please!TKS {{Bryard (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)}}Reply

Hey!

Hello

Are you a Police Officer? I really want to join and am going to have a crack at it as soon as i'm 18 its something i've always wanted to do. Also an ambition of mine is to get into Force Firearms, have you had any experiance with the Firearms Unit. If you dont mind me asking?

Merry Christmas!

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 21:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello

Thank you for answering, yeah I dont blame you not wanting to be where the bullets are if your thinking of starting a family. Yeah I dont think i'm going to try and join at 18 iridescent suggested that it might be an idea to be a PCSO first, and that sounds pretty good because your sort of already "in" if that makes sense, I know you wouldnt be a PO but still its second best to gain experiance. Anyway thanks for answering. I hope you dont think i'm being rude by asking this but what rank are you if you dont mind me asking? As i'm just really interested in this subject. Thanks.

Police,Mad,Jack

Hey, Oh right. I heard that 3 Quarters of the UKPS are made up of them. Everyone bangs on about them but the public would be in a rut without them.

Police,Mad,Jack

Firearms unit conflict

Speaking to you as a 'Project Co-ordinator' of the Law Enforcement WikiProject.

Please compare this revision with the current one. Police,Mad,Jack has reverted the first revision, I believe he thought I had deleted his text when all I had done was move it from the opening paragraph and alter minor parts of it for grammar and style. I am unwilling to start a revert war, so I appeal to you to speak to him and explain what happened.

______________________

In response to Firearms Unit "Conflict" above by user Ninetyone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Police,Mad,Jack (talkcontribs) 18:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Calm it down a minute. Your munging this into something it isnt, I made the point that Its ok with me if you add things to it. But I just dont want my text deleted especially as its accurate.

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 17:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just checked my revision - the only text I actually deleted was some pretty obvious stuff about the fact that a navigator navigates... :p I also missed a sentance about crewing levels which I will be happy to add into the first sentance. Ninetyone (talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

All right mate fair enough, As far as i'm concerned you can add etc and clean it up just dont delete what I have done.

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 19:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, and good to have this sorted out :) Ninetyone (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discussion closed, me and Ninetyone have both come to an agreement as of 28th December 2007.

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 11:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some help

Dear GM

Im a expert in the law enforcement sector and would like to assit in your project www.tmtservices.co.za we build state of the art speed cameras and are exporting to other country`s

ps the picture of the brazilian radar is infact a laser Not a radar

Chris Olivier Manager Operations TMT Gauteng Traffic Management Technologies Mobile: +27 [0] 82 657 6680 Tel: +27 [0] 11 832 2135 / 2139 Fax: +27 [0] 86 609 0953 / +27 [0] 11 832 2186 Email: colivier@tmtservices.co.za www.tmtservices.co.za —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.212.57.134 (talk) 10:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ummm...

Hey! I saw your welcome template placed on a new user yesterday and thought I'd try welcoming a new user myself - but in doing so, I tried editing the message I put on the user's page so that it would mention you in the third person, instead of in the first. However, I somehow ended up editing your template itself. Dunno how that happened - ne'er happened to me before; and I've undone that edit. So - this is just to explain my actions. Really sorry - no harm intended. aJCfreak yAk 08:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gudluck

So where do you work in oldham? Sounds like you're liking your job! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.128.228 (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Law enforcement agency article chaos ?

Hello,

I am looking for some advice and wikiquette direction:

I have been looking at law enforcement agency articles and many of them seem to be overlapping, poorly organised, the catogries seem to be incestuous, some of the article content is just plain wrong, etc. I am a first time Wiki editor, completely redoing the Law enforcement agency article - still a work in progress, in terms of both content and Wiki facilities etc.

I now want to remove / redirect articles likes Federal police and National police and combine various lists of LEAs into one list which actually adds some knowledge value about the LEAs other than just a list of links.

So, have I approached the rewrite of Law enforcement agency appropriately ?

And, how do I go about removing and redirecting Federal police and National police both from a Wikiquette point of view and technically ?

Also, what is the protocol, as far as the Wiki law enforcement project is concerned to work on rationalising the whole brad category ? Pee Tern (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

And the law enforcemen categories seem all over the place. It looks like people have mixed up article names with catogory names, articles and sub catogories are seem to be "categorised" together. Trying to use the categories as way of replacing "list articles" lloks like a nightmare, without a huge amount of clean up work in the process, or have I missed something ? Pee Tern (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, you have approached it all very well, you have thought everything through. What I would suggest is to start a discussion on Federal police, National police and WT:LE where you outline what you wish to do and invite discussion, then you will be able to move with the support of concensus, which is always good. I have created this page for you to do so. Go there and start your discussion, and then copy the following onto the talk pages I mentioned above (don't click the + button, just edit the whole page and place this at the end):

== Merge proposal == Hello, with the go ahead of the [[WP:LE|Law enforcement wikiproject]] I have opened [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Pee Tern's discussion|this page]] for the discussion of a number of merge and redirect proposals concerning, among others, this page. I would appreciate any thoughts you might have, please click on the link and give them there. Many thanks! ~~~~


Create the discussion page first, then sent the above to all the relevant talk pages, and soon your discussion should be flowing! Make sure you explain clearly what you wish to do. SGGH speak! 10:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks SGGH. This is done now. Sorry but I was still getting ready . . . Pee Tern (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

And by the way why does my user name show as broken link ? Pee Tern (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simply because you haven't put anything on your userpage yet :) SGGH speak! 10:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I had not realised an explicit page was necessary, thinking that it was the "account" that was what was linked to. Pee Tern (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy Valentine's Day!


greetings, i am trying to stop a article about a police department from being deleted, and i amd wondering if you would have any advice to keep it going. Article: Floral Park Police Department . Should i just let it go? Cherokee40 (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Council roll call

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.

MelonBot (STOP!) 22:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RJ45

What is RJ45? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.189.143.43 (talk) 16:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll


--Mifter (talk) 20:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add link?

Good morning,

I have been a frequent user of Wikipedia for many years & often use not just the inforamation included in the text, but external liks also. As an organization that provides numerous no-cost resources to in the areas of crime prevention, I would like to add a link to the resource page of the community development & crime prevention institute (http://www.cdcpi.us/References.html) to the CPTED & crime prevention pages - is this acceptable?

Thank you,

rotterstatter

rotterstatter@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotterstatter (talkcontribs) 12:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

New WikiProject

A New WikiProject has been proposed as a sub-project of Medicine. Your opinion would be appreciated as you are listed as a "intrested User" on the Project page. Please take part in the discussion, located here. Exit2DOS2000TC 03:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy Halloween!

Have a good one! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 11:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A kind request of the removal of attempted visual depictions of The Beautiful and Beloved Prophet MUHAMMAD(Peace Be Upon Him)

Dear Dep. Garcia,

I would like to kindly request the removal of the attempted visual depictions and offensive cartoons attempted on The Beautiful and Beloved Prophet MUHAMMAD(Peace Be Upon Him). I am a muslim and myself and another 55,267 (most .likely figure still growing) individuals on a particular website are unhappy with Wikipedia displaying such illustrations.

The illustrations are deeply offensive and if you could be respectfully withdraw the visual depictions, we would be very grateful.

Thank you for your time.

Servant123 (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Character Merge Proposal

Hi, I've made a proposal on The Bill Project talk page that I'd appreciate your thoughts on. You can see the proposal here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Bill#Merge of The Bill Characters --Deadly∀ssassin 09:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Magnum Boots

Hi,

My name is James Campbell and I work for Hi-Tec Sports.

Were are currently about to launch a new Magnum site and while doing some research we came across this page. Its a great asset to have a wikipedia page and even better if it has been created by someone who is external from the company.

There is a lot more information that may be useful to those who seek out Magnum boots and I would be happy to provide you with some information for the page, which you could upload.

Please let me know if you are happy to do this?


Kind Regards,


James —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.137.50 (talk) 08:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ref editing of English Defence League wiki page

hi Garcia,

I came across you complaint page after being accused of Edit warring by another editor on wiki (Verbal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Verbal and also Ghmyrtle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ghmyrtle) and wondered if you would be able to advise/help me in some way. On the EDL wiki page the group has been labelled as far right by 2 members and this labelling has been applied because some members of the British press have said the group has far right leanings. Does this therefore mean that it is correct to label the Group far right or should the group be described as Right wing(which is what the group states it is) or far right which is what the press have claimed but has always been denied? I ask this question because i feel it may not be worth adding a complaint if i am in the wrong and i am quite new to editing wiki to may concede if i find im am the latter.

Any info or help will do and if you could reply to my page it would be a brilliant help. Many thanks

Johnsy88 (talk) 14:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:WikiProject The Bill

I'm trying to generate a discussion and stir some fresh interest at the talk page of the Bill's Wikiproject. As a member of the project, I hoped you might have some input, so I hope to see you there. Regards, HJMitchell You rang? 17:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Magnum Boot.gif

 

Thanks for uploading File:Magnum Boot.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

IRC Channel for WikiProject Law Enforcement

I've proposed an IRC channel on the Freenode IRC network for WikiProject Law Enforcement. Several WikiProjects have done this (seeWP:IRC). My comments are located on the Project discussion page,[1]. Thanks! --→James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 07:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Stripsearch

I was arrested in 9-22-09. I fell into ditch becuase my car was onn an angle, I had just gotten out of the boot 4wks earlierthere was no alcohole in my car & it was the night of the flooding here in ga. the officer did a handheld device I —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.89.99 (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Law enforcement in Brazil

Dude, who creates the Law enforcement in Brazil article? Or the guy is a idiot, or is a fascist


Do I change the article, using wikipedia etics padrons?


Gimma answer ASAP.


TKS.


--Bryard 22:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Law enforcement in Brazil

Dude, who creates the Law enforcement in Brazil article? Or the guy is a idiot, or is a fascist


Do I change the article, using wikipedia etics padrons?


Gimma answer ASAP.


TKS.


--Bryard 22:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryard (talkcontribs)

File:GMP Police.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GMP Police.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Another Duty Belt.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Another Duty Belt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

hey

can i join this group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanschlake (talkcontribs) 18:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Clip-On Tie.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

DEGREDATION OF WIKIPEDIA

I AM SORRY TO SAY THAT I CAN NOT CONTRUBUTE MY YEARLY USUAL $100.00 TO WIKIPEDIA, BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEMIC BIAS TOWARDS DOWNGRADING WOMEN. IF COURSE I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS. I AM DEEPLY SORRY THAT WIKIPEDIA HAS BECOME A PLAYGROUND FOR LITTLE BOYS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.227.149 (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

LIZARD LICK TOWING IS NOT CANCELLED!!!!!!!!!!!

I JUST TALKED TO RONNIE SHIRLEY OF LIZARD LICK TOWING.HE TOLD ME THE SHOW ISNT CANCELLED.I DONT KNOW WHERE YOU ALL GOT YOUR INFORMATION BUT ITS FALT.THANK YOU64.28.57.156 (talk) 19:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article for deletion from WikiProject Law Enforcement

Could you guys ask members of the WikiPrject Law Enforcement to take a look at the article about Morganza Police Department and weigh in on its nomination for deletion? Sf46 (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Toe tag.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toe tag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. El Grafo (talk) 09:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Toe tag.jpg

 

A tag has been placed on File:Toe tag.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 21:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Editing 'The Bill'

Hi, my name is Alex from Australia and I have been trying my best to correct the sometimes bizarre summaries and guest star lists that have been added to Series 6 and 7 of The Bill pages. I am new to Wikipedia and as a regular contributor to Discogs.com, I am finding the syntax and methods used on Wikipedia rather alien. My question surrounds the inconsistent use of rank titles used in episode summaries. My own opinion is that using these titles is superfluous, however I am loathe to delete them as I might be contravening guidelines. Do you know if this subject has been canvassed at some stage? Best regards, Alex TedRoach (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Dep. Garcia/Talk Page Archive,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply