User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2014/Dec
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
NYCS crime section: possible plagiarism issue (resolved)
- Formerly titled "NYCS article - Crime section - Plagiarism?"
Please see the note I made on the talk page of NYCS: it looks like you took some liberties with copy/pasting text from nycsubway.org's 1970s and 1980s history pages when you edited the Crime section in April. I'm not an expert on the exact Wikipolicies wrt plagiarism, but I'm assuming the current version of the article doesn't follow the rules.
Level Crossing (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Level Crossing: The text, as with other text in NYC Subway articles, is used with prior permission from the NYCSubway.org website (so it's not plagiarism), but I have paraphrased it a little and also cited the website as a source. However, if it is indeed plagiarism, I will correct it. Thank you for pointing this out. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Lincoln and holland tunnel
Hi sorry for the edits but how can i add to these two pages. What I wrote is correct and a exsiting position in the PANYNJ. This group of emergency service people perform these duites everyday. I work for the PANYNJ in this position so what I wrote is accurate. Please guide me on how can I leave this info on those pages thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwb028 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- We can mention the text in a short sentence with a source. Epicgenius (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Battery Park City
- added a link pointing to Energy-efficient
- Crime in New York City
- added a link pointing to Blackout
- Delancey Street
- added a link pointing to Cuban Pete
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Square (IRT Flushing Line)|Times Square]] to [34th Street – Hudson Yards (IRT Flushing Line)|]] at 11th Avenue, with no intermediate stops planned (a station was originally to be built at [[
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
NYPD Misconduct
I see you have reverted again on New York City Police Department corruption and misconduct, I would suggest you self revert because although it is a contentious issue and I agree with you on a lot of points, you did violate 3RR and it won't help your argument by violating it, but the other user still needs to go to talk with the issue. - SantiLak (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- @SantiLak: And that I have just done. I also cleaned up the POV and integrated into the rest of the article. Epicgenius (talk) 01:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, there definitely was a pov in those sections that needed to be cleaned up, I appreciate it. - SantiLak (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. We may still need to use the talk page and the other user's talk, though, if any other reverts arise. Epicgenius (talk) 01:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's on my watchlist and I will keep a lookout for any reverts as I'm sure you will as well. - SantiLak (talk) 01:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. We may still need to use the talk page and the other user's talk, though, if any other reverts arise. Epicgenius (talk) 01:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, there definitely was a pov in those sections that needed to be cleaned up, I appreciate it. - SantiLak (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Grammercy Park / Sunnyside Park
Hi. You recently removed a reference from my recent edit. I would like to invite you to discuss a better reference. Thanks. 67.247.21.108 (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 7 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Wardenclyffe Tower page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014: edit summary usage, supposedly
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Epeefleche (talk) 04:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm already aware of this, but thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 04:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then kindly use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You, while aware of the request, failed to do so. Epeefleche (talk) 04:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- An edit summary is strongly recommended but surely not required. Epicgenius (talk) 04:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, we don't need that many words to express one idea in the article. That's what I fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 04:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- I find it curious that you followed me to a page I had edited, directly after I warned you above about another page, to undo (among others) edits I had made here. Please take this as a warning for wikihounding, and disruptive editing. I'm surprised -- you know better. If you continue in this behavior I'll have to ask that your behavior be looked at by others. For now, I'll simply ask you to stop wikihounding me, and stop editing disruptively. We all have better things to do than have your behavior here examined at AN/I. Epeefleche (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. Take me to ANI; I don't care. Your wikihounding claim will quickly be thrown out because it's a content dispute, not a behavior dispute, and you need more than one article to prove this. I didn't know you even edited the page, because it was by chance that I got there (and your last edit was on 14 September). Besides, if you actually had a civil discussion on the talk page rather than blatantly reverting, we wouldn't have this sort of mess. Epicgenius (talk) 04:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's obvious wikhounding. It's obvious -- after I warned you, my very next edit was as to whether a person lived in RC. Your follow-up edit? You deleted his image (along with others) from the RC article. That's not appropriate -- nor was your rationale anything close to a legitimate "content dispute" rationale, and nobody is fooled by the fact that of all articles you came to that one ... out of the millions here ... direct after my edit. Frankly, I don't appreciate it, and I don't appreciate your suggesting that it's just chance -- duckish behavior strips you of AGF. That's not allowed. You've been here long enough to know better, and have been called out for this as recently as earlier this year by another editor at AN/I. Just cut it out. Epeefleche (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- That other claim was false. But if you don't want me to do it, then OK. Epicgenius (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's obvious wikhounding. It's obvious -- after I warned you, my very next edit was as to whether a person lived in RC. Your follow-up edit? You deleted his image (along with others) from the RC article. That's not appropriate -- nor was your rationale anything close to a legitimate "content dispute" rationale, and nobody is fooled by the fact that of all articles you came to that one ... out of the millions here ... direct after my edit. Frankly, I don't appreciate it, and I don't appreciate your suggesting that it's just chance -- duckish behavior strips you of AGF. That's not allowed. You've been here long enough to know better, and have been called out for this as recently as earlier this year by another editor at AN/I. Just cut it out. Epeefleche (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. Take me to ANI; I don't care. Your wikihounding claim will quickly be thrown out because it's a content dispute, not a behavior dispute, and you need more than one article to prove this. I didn't know you even edited the page, because it was by chance that I got there (and your last edit was on 14 September). Besides, if you actually had a civil discussion on the talk page rather than blatantly reverting, we wouldn't have this sort of mess. Epicgenius (talk) 04:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- I find it curious that you followed me to a page I had edited, directly after I warned you above about another page, to undo (among others) edits I had made here. Please take this as a warning for wikihounding, and disruptive editing. I'm surprised -- you know better. If you continue in this behavior I'll have to ask that your behavior be looked at by others. For now, I'll simply ask you to stop wikihounding me, and stop editing disruptively. We all have better things to do than have your behavior here examined at AN/I. Epeefleche (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then kindly use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You, while aware of the request, failed to do so. Epeefleche (talk) 04:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Struggling with submitting a report (as you noticed)
Dear Epicgenious,
I am struggling to submit a report for repeated page vandalism. can you please help me? I'm being rather thick :(
Hope you can help Thank you kind regards
JA
Thank you :)
x — Preceding unsigned comment added by Journalist astronomist (talk • contribs) 16:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. Epicgenius (talk) 16:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Clason Point
Please stop editing the Clason Point page. This is public record information being posted and you constant removal is not appreicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only658 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Only658: Stop now! Your edits have been contested. Please use the article talk page and explain your revision. I have removed it. If you keep doing this without explanation and without context,, you may be blocked. Just because it is public material does not mean that it is worthy of mention in an encyclopedia, as countless other documents in the world are public record. Epicgenius (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Understanding
Who are you to decide the number of images that a page can have?
It is a quality image of the center of Midtown. Normally editors communicate, via talk pages to come to a consensus, but it looks like you seem to dominate this area of Wikipedia, so shall I ask for your permission to contribute to this area of Wiki in the future?
IMHO it is impolite and not in the spirit of good faith to not make an effort to communicate. Please use the talk pages before you simply revert my contributions. It looks like your edits, according to the talk chats above seem to be on the abrasive side, that is not necessary here mr genius. Thank you. ;) talk→ WPPilot 19:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Um, see your talk page. Epicgenius (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ditto please see my reply @ my talk page. talk→ WPPilot 19:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- That looks great, thanks that looks great. Sorry if I came across as a little gruff above. Have a great day! talk→ WPPilot 21:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
New York Cityscape Formatting
@Epicgenius: Hi, don't know if you're aware, but I lose the Cityscape caption (entirely) with your formatting. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Are you aware why this might be and how it can be (simply) fixed? If not, we'll have to go back to the other editor's formatting, because people should not be expected to alter their browsers in any significant way to accommodate this. Thanks. Best, Castncoot (talk) 23:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Castncoot: OK, I'll see what I can do. I thought that upgrading to div would fix the outdated center HTML tag problem. Epicgenius (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's an equals sign in the parameter. Whenever there is an equals sign in an unnamed parameter, it must then be numbered according to the order that the parameter appears. I fixed my typo. (SMH). Thanks for the notice, Epicgenius (talk) 23:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Works now, thanks! Castncoot (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Ho, ho, ho
Happy holidays. | ||
Hi Epicgenius, wishing you happy holidays and all the best in 2015. SW3 5DL (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC), ho, ho== |
- @SW3 5DL: Thanks! You, too! – Epicgenius (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Seventh Avenue Line (Manhattan surface)
- added links pointing to Chambers Street and Thompson Street
- Campus of New York University
- added a link pointing to Thompson Street
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
68th Street Hunter College
There is indeed a mezzanine at the 68th street station.I have placed a reference and there is also an image of the mezzanine on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebernardez (talk • contribs) 15:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- OK. I thought the template already had mezzanine. I will edit it. Epicgenius (talk) 16:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy holidays and happy new year
Happy holidays and happy new year to my Editing Wikipedia "WikiProject New York City Public Transportation", editing coleuge(I have trouble speeling this word, it means two people who work at the same place.). From, very friendly, Doorknob747 00:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC) here is a gift: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_interior_of_a_busy,_R160B_R_train.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. Epicgenius (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greets!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!! | |
Hello Epicgenius, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
- @The Herald: Thank you very much! Epicgenius (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
VisualEditor newsletter—December 2014
Did you know?
Basic table editing is now available in VisualEditor. You can add and remove rows and columns from existing tables at the click of a button.
The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on table editing and performance. Their weekly status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. Upcoming plans are posted at the VisualEditor roadmap.
VisualEditor was deployed to several hundred remaining wikis as an opt-in beta feature at the end of November, except for most Wiktionaries (which depend heavily upon templates) and all Wikisources (which await integration with ProofreadPage).
Recent improvements
Basic support for editing tables is available. You can insert new tables, add and remove rows and columns, set or remove a caption for a table, and merge cells together. To change the contents of a cell, double-click inside it. More features will be added in the coming months. In addition, VisualEditor now ignores broken, invalid rowspan
and colspan
elements, instead of trying to repair them.
You can now use find and replace in VisualEditor, reachable through the tool menu or by pressing ⌃ Ctrl+F or ⌘ Cmd+F.
You can now create and edit simple <blockquote>
paragraphs for quoting and indenting content. This changes a "Paragraph" into a "Block quote".
Some new keyboard sequences can be used to format content. At the start of the line, typing "* " will make the line a bullet list; "1. " or "# " will make it a numbered list; "==" will make it a section heading; ": " will make it a blockquote. If you didn't mean to use these tools, you can press undo to undo the formatting change. There are also two other keyboard sequences: "[[" for opening the link tool, and "{{" for opening the template tool, to help experienced editors. The existing standard keyboard shortcuts, like ⌃ Ctrl+K to open the link editor, still work.
If you add a category that has been redirected, then VisualEditor now adds its target. Categories without description pages show up as red.
You can again create and edit galleries as wikitext code.
Looking ahead
VisualEditor will replace the existing design with a new theme designed by the User Experience group. The new theme will be visible for desktop systems at MediaWiki.org in late December and at other sites early January. (You can see a developer preview of the old "Apex" theme and the new "MediaWiki" one which will replace it.)
The Editing team plans to add auto-fill features for citations in January. Planned changes to the media search dialog will make choosing between possible images easier.
Help
- Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
- Translations of the user guide for most languages are oudated. Ukrainian, Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Dutch translators are nearly current. Please help complete the current translations for users who speak your language.
- Talk to the Editing team during the office hours via IRC. The next session is on Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 22:00 UTC.
- File requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the character formatting menu in Phabricator.
- The design research team wants to see how real editors work. Please sign up for their research program.
If you would like to help with translations of this newsletter, please subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Subscribe or unsubscribe at Meta.
Thank you! WhatamIdoing (WMF) (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- South Street Seaport
- added links pointing to Diesel, Hunts Point, Freighter and Front Street
- Lorelei Fountain
- added links pointing to Republican Party and Melancholy
- Bronx Borough Hall
- added a link pointing to Tremont Avenue
- Culture of New York City
- added a link pointing to Mulberry Street
- Inwood, Manhattan
- added a link pointing to Broadway Bridge
- Little Italy, Manhattan
- added a link pointing to Mulberry Street
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Epicgenius. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for National September 11 Memorial & Museum at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 16:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC) |
- @Miniapolis: Thank you for all your work on that article. I really appreciate it. Epicgenius (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- As a native New Yorker, I was glad to help. Happy holidays and all the best, Miniapolis 00:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, and happy holidays to you too. Epicgenius (talk) 04:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- As a native New Yorker, I was glad to help. Happy holidays and all the best, Miniapolis 00:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lorelei Fountain
Hello! Your submission of Lorelei Fountain at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I am One of Many (talk) 08:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 10:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
2014 NYPD officer killings
Hey, I noticed you changed your vote from support to oppose at ITNC but didn't say why. Would you mind telling me why you changed your mind? Everymorning talk 16:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Everymorning: I saw that the candidate was getting heavily opposed. I read over the opposers' reasons, and decided that my reasoning was kind of off; I also realized that police shootings are actually quite common, and this shooting would be mostly ignored because it is one of hundreds or thousands of police killings this year, but just happens to be more heavily publicized. I'd still support ALT1 though. Best, Epicgenius (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
2015 goals for WikiProject NJ
Hey there, your feedback is welcome here. Tinton5 (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Tinton5: Noted; thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia! |
- @Davey2010: Thank you. You, too! Epicgenius (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014
Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
- —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greets!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello Epicgenius, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
- @K6ka: Thanks! Happy holidays to you, too! Epicgenius (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for North Shore Towers
On 26 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article North Shore Towers, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the North Shore Towers, a gated residential community in New York, generates its own electricity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Shore Towers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Editorial comment
(originally titled "Please don't play the fool...")
You know by now what "Better before" or "Not improvements" means. Other editors are not your teachers, we aren't here to educate you. If your edits are reverted because they do not improve the article, you should examine them to figure out why, and then ask specific questions if you are unsure. What you should never do is revert back in full, which is, as you very well know, the first step in edit warring.
You've come a long way since I first came across you as an editor, but you still must be aware that your judgment about layout is suspect, and your ability to write is not commensurate with a popular encyclopedia for the general public. Writing must be at a post-high school, early college quality, and you often do not reach that -- as with your use of the word "neighborhood" numerous times in the same sentence. Such writing is repetitive and boring to the reader, and good writers avoid it.
The next time an editor tells you that your edits do not improve the article, please don't assume that they're wrong, assume that you need to get better at what you're trying to do. BMK (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- @BMK: I am not trying to be antagonistic. Often, I fail to proofread my writing, which may have errors after I save the page (even though, contrary to what you may be assuming, my writing is not a puerile, high school quality). However, the content that I am adding to the article is not fictionalized, and although you are mostly correct in undoing the stylistic edits, you may fail to see the content or factual corrections that I added to the article on top of these. I'll stop reverting, but please remember that we're trying to achieve the same goal: to improve the encyclopedia.
On a side note, I will open discussions on these articles' talk pages, then you can discuss which stylistic faults need to be fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- On further examination, your edits with the summaries "Better before" or "Not improvements" are not actually that harmful. There's nothing wrong with adding columns to reflists (as you did in this edit to Triborough Bridge) and also to the popcult section of Delancey Street. Also, for stylistic changes that I make, please stop using WP:RBK for non-blatant vandalism or not clearly unhelpful edits like in this edit; if you have a problem, you should discuss it on the article's talk page, because while you may think it's unhelpful, others may not concur. While I may not be right in all cases, neither are you. Please, in cases like this, don't mass undo edits like these. Next time, we should first discuss on the talk page or on each other's user discussion pages. Thanks, Epicgenius (talk) 23:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Glendale, Queens
- added links pointing to Staples and Machpelah Cemetery
- Riverside Church
- added a link pointing to First Presbyterian Church
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Just FYI
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is a state agency, not a city one, and it's name is simply "Metropolitan Transportation Authority" with no preceding "New York" (or "New York City"). It was created from the merger of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the New York City Subway, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA), the Metro-North lines of Penn Central and various other agencies and facilities. BMK (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- I just noted that a lot of NYC subway articles make this error, not just the 181st Street Station article which I was editing, so if my assumption that you added it was incorrect, I apologize for jumping to conclusions. BMK (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. The "New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority" was added way before I started editing, though. You may want to bring the issue to WT:NYCPT. Epicgenius (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
OneClickArchiver new feature!
Hello there Epicgenius! I'm noticing that you comment out Technical 13's (Original by Equazcion) OneClickArchiver (Original) script when you are not using it. I've added a new feature today that allows you to toggle the script on or off directly from talk pages! The best part is that it will remember what the last state was! Please see the documentation for more details and happy archiving! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 00:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Lorelei Fountain
On 30 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lorelei Fountain, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that because of antisemitism, the Lorelei Fountain, honoring German poet Heinrich Heine, was placed in New York City instead of in Heine's hometown of Düsseldorf? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lorelei Fountain. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Fulton Street Layout
Hello Epicgenious. I noticed you reverted the layout of the Fulton Street Station complex. Although some of the lines are on the same level, a separating wall is not accurate on the layout of the station. For the Broadway-7th Avenue Line, is in fact on B2 level due to the fact that that station has a mezzanine [1]. Here is a photo of the mezzanine. [2]. Also each station is not separated by a separating wall, as opposed to say Lexington Ave-63 Street Station on the F line, rather each line is on its own independent tunnel. Hope this can clarify the layout a little better. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebernardez (talk • contribs) 21:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Ebernardez: Feel free to revert if you want. However, now with the completion of the Fulton Center, all of the levels are basically connected via the second-basement-level mezzanine, which is broken up by said walls. I think we can separate the first level's platforms and move Broadway-7 Av Line platforms to second-basement-level. Epicgenius (talk) 21:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Ok sounds good. Thanks. Ebernardez (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)