EwanHowe27
Welcome
edit
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Inverlane (November 23)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SS Inverlane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SS Inverlane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, EwanHowe27!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 01:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Inverlane has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 06:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Kirkwall Sector Operations Room moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Kirkwall Sector Operations Room, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 02:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirkwall Sector Operations Room (January 15)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kirkwall Sector Operations Room and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kirkwall Sector Operations Room, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
February 2019
editHello, I'm Crouch, Swale. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of EHowe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC) |
EwanHowe27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
mistakenly accused of sock puppetry
Decline reason:
It doesn't seem like it is a mistake. If it is, you will need to explain the reason your username is similar to EHowe and the reason both of these accounts were editing about similar subjects. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request
editEwanHowe27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
using different accounts on different computers
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry block. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. You will need to deal with all the issues associated with all of your accounts, such as unsourced edits. Also, this would appear to be block evasion. Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
EwanHowe27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23941 was submitted on Feb 13, 2019 21:40:27. This review is now closed.
Delete
editDelete
edit{{db-u1}} EwanHowe27 (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:DELTALK user talk pages generally aren't deleted and this page may still be useful to the project (especially since you still have a pending AFC). Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Unblock reason
editEwanHowe27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe this block is no longer necessary, as I understand what I was blocked for, and won’t do it again, and in future will make productive contributions. I also have a pending AFC which is incomplete.
Decline reason:
This sockpuppet account currently has three open unblock requests on their sockmaster account. They are forum-shopping here. I have revoked talk page access here. Shame on you, EwanHowe27. Yamla (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.