User talk:FriyMan/Archive 2

Latest comment: 6 years ago by TommyGu in topic Can I please be adopted by you
Archive 1Archive 2

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

Requesting reassessment of Oleg Bezuglov

Dear FriyMan,

I noticed that you've been active in reviewing new pages and also a member of the Wiki Russia editorial community. I wanted to ask you to review Oleg Bezuglov article. It was initially assessed as Start and Low shortly after creation and was missing a good amount of data and sources. It was even nominated for deletion and was kept after AfD. Since the article was substantially improved, I thought the review might give assign a better ranking to it now. I initially put the request in the Wiki projects: Russia Assessment requests section, but it didn't call anyone's attention so far.

Thank you for your consideration, --Fiddler11 18:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for a delay Fidler11 but I have checked your article. I graded it as C-class and low on importance scale. I believe that you have the power to improve this article even further. Cheers, FriyMan talk 12:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks much, FriyMan! I will keep working on it --Fiddler11 04:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

23:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
28   Proto-Indo-European particles (talk) Add sources
2,945   Naamkarann (talk) Add sources
81   Proto-Indo-European society (talk) Add sources
40   Proto-Indo-European numerals (talk) Add sources
34   Proto-Indo-European pronouns (talk) Add sources
470   Greek royal family (talk) Add sources
13   Star Wars Rollinz toys (talk) Cleanup
5,398   Ishqbaaaz (talk) Cleanup
93   God (male deity) (talk) Cleanup
81   Middle Dutch (talk) Expand
53   Proto-Indo-European verbs (talk) Expand
72   Indo-European sound laws (talk) Expand
5,016   Kumkum Bhagya (talk) Unencyclopaedic
154   Dyeus (talk) Unencyclopaedic
43   Galactic Civil War (Star Wars) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
103   Baltic mythology (talk) Merge
150   Proto-Slavic (talk) Merge
35   Hierophylakes (talk) Merge
372   Hot sauce (talk) Wikify
22   EditDroid (talk) Wikify
872   Chutney (talk) Wikify
175   Chocolate bhutlah (talk) Orphan
7   Endoscopic laser cordectomy (talk) Orphan
5   Arytenoid Adduction (talk) Orphan
619   Poblano (talk) Stub
32   Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (talk) Stub
54   Subglottic stenosis (talk) Stub
53   Los Gatos (band) (talk) Stub
429   Naga Viper pepper (talk) Stub
24   Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Hey, thanks for the comments/advice you left on my peer review request for Tracer. I added the alt text (my first time doing so for any article, so I'm not certain if I did it correctly) and the see also section. For your 3rd suggestion, I already included her real name, Lena Oxton, in the lead section. But are you suggeting I include it immediately after her Tracer pseudonym? Thanks again for all the help & have a great day :^) Soulbust (talk) 19:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, Soulbust, I meant you would put it immediately after the pseudonym. I will check the alt texts for you. Good luck. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 19:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

P.S. I think the last alt text is not appropriate, since I believe captions are not voiced over, when the article is read through.

  Done I fixed these issues. Soulbust (talk) 20:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to MILHIST

RfA

  Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

15:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  AnarchyteGeneralizationsAreBadCullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
  CpromptRockpocketRambo's RevengeAnimumTexasAndroidChuck SMITHMikeLynchCrazytalesAd Orientem

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news


The Signpost: 5 August 2017

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Plastic colorant

  Hello! Your submission of Plastic colorant at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ―Biochemistry🙴 03:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

from artist fuoco9, ( rob camp fuoco) ,

dear friend friman,

this is a request to ask for mentoring and assistance.

i find the wikipedia system a bit confusing , and i think i have a simple request. I'm wondering if you could give me the pathway to accomplish what I'm trying to do.

two years ago i wanted to catalogue some of my achievements as an artist and historic gardens consultant. i produced a very logical history of my work. i submitted it to wikipedia and subsequently learned that we can't create our own autobiography on wikipedia. i have no problem with that at all.

however , the article was deleted. and now i would simply like to retrieve it so that i can use all the information for a reference.

can you help me to retrieve the information? it was done under my wikipedia name Fuoco9. i am actually rob camp fuoco.

thanks for your help.

rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuoco9 (talkcontribs) 19:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Fuoco9! I would be happy to assist you with anything you need help with. For now, if you want to grasp the most basic ways of editing I suggest you go through the great guide for beginner editors, The Wikipedia Adventure. If you have questions, message me here. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 10:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Supermarine Spitfire

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Supermarine Spitfire has been completed.

Thank you for the Barnstar - very much appreciated. The article was in very good shape. Sometimes all that is needed is one set of eyes to go over a longer article to correct the anomalies that inevitably "creep in" over the years. It certainly does deserve its "Good Article" status.

I ran a Bot to add archival links to the URLs used in the article which will prevent "link rot" issues.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Your work is appreciated. Right now I am trying to bring this article to the A-class. Thank you, once again. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 03:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Marcus Bosch

Thank you for the review Template:Did you know nominations/Marcus Bosch. As it's closed, I put my answers here:

  1. No, most readers of such a topic will know, and be bored by an explanation, and the others can read the linked article.
  2. "Other recordings", - tried to avoid repetition.
  3. It's like that in all sources, sorry. Other conductors come from being a singer, but he went the tedious path of first doing assistant jobs.
  4. Do we need commas in "He conducted as a guest orchestras"? He conducted, as a guest, orchestras?
  5. I haven't checked if that's yearly. Does it matter?
  6. Fixed, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

22:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  NakonScott
  SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

  Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

IRL account owner confirmation

Did you ever find out how this works? I am about a month behind in The Teahouse.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Sadly, Vchimpanzee, I didn't. I question its existence now. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 03:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't know how to help you. Maybe try asking again?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK

  Hello! Your submission of Plastic colorant at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 15:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Final call for a response. The nomination has been marked for closure, so you need to go there right away if you wish it to continue. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

19:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Boing! said ZebedeeAnsh666Ad Orientem
  TonywaltonAmiDanielSilenceBanyanTreeMagioladitisVanamonde93Mr.Z-manJdavidbJakecRam-ManYelyosKurt Shaped Box

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

HEY GREETINGS FRY I NEED YOUR HELP BUD

I HAVE SOME QUESTION FOR YA THANKS (Redranger007 (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC))

Ok, Redranger007, what do you want to ask me? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

HEY bud sorry im 2 days late Fry i was wondering if you had a email address? I have a article that its all good to post. it passes all wikipedia guidelines but just needs to probly be and posted! Thanks soo much (Redranger007 (talk) 06:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC))

(talk page watcher) -alsofortunavelut luna 07:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Redranger007, why don't you publish your article in the draft namespace! To do that, use Wikipedia:Article wizard. It will guide you through all of the necessary steps and will publish your article for review. It can be reviewed by me or other experienced editor and can be published as a good article. If there are any flaws, your article will not be deleted, but rather you will be given feedback, so that you can improve it. Does that sound good? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, thanks. I knew you were watching my talk all along... Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

THAANKS SOOO FREAKING MUCH FRY MAN I THOUGHT THAT WOULD TAKE FOREVER I WOULD RATHER POST STRAIGHT TO THE MAINSPACE..BUT IF IT WOULD BE LOOKED AT BY YOU OR SOMEONE LIKE YOU I WOULD LOVE THAT! ESPECIALLY IF YOU GIVE ME FEED BACK INSTEAD OF STRAIGHT UP DELETING! THANKS BUD (Redranger007 (talk) 07:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

Ok, Redranger007. Can you give me the link to the article in Draft: namespace, so that I could review it and give you feedback? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

YES I SURE CAN BUD..THO I WAS WONDERING WHEN I CREATE THE ARTICLE SHOULD I FIRST USE A INFOBOX OR POST THE WHO THING? INCLUDING THE WHOLE ARTICLE??? IVE SEEN OTHER START WITH JUST A SIMPLE INFOBOX? THANKS FRY MAN (Redranger007 (talk) 07:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

Redranger007, you might want to paste in what you have already and let me take a look. Infoboxes may be later added later, if needed. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

OHH OK GOOD I WILL DO THAT BECAUSE I HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION AND ITS IN FORMAT! THANKS BUD (Redranger007 (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

Great! I am waiting for the link! Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

HEY BUD HERE YA GO LOL I JUST NOTICED I HAD SOME KNUCKLE HEAD BANNED ME FROM WIKICOMMONS LOL SO ONE OF THE IMAGES MIGHT HAVE TO BE RE UPLOADED BUT HERE IS THE LINK TO THE ARTICLE FRY MAN HOPE EVERYTHING CHECKS OUT! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Redranger007/Fly_Fierra_San THANKS! (Redranger007 (talk) 07:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

@Redranger007: Hey Red Rider, you might wanna think about unsticking your CAPSLOCK some time this year ;) — fortunavelut luna 09:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

lol ikr i be so excited lol bt thanks fortune for looking out for me right alone with fry man yall are the best! Thanks! (Redranger007 (talk) 10:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

Hey, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, you might want to take a look here! Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 14:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Where's that, F-Man? No link! — fortunavelut luna 14:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Lol hows the article guys does everything check out??? thanks (Redranger007 (talk) 15:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC))

Hey, F-man, wouldn't you mind taking another look at the subject's notability, here is the link: Draft:Fly Fierra San. Thank you in advance. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Oops, seems like I filed a SPI case agains this poor editor. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Heh Friyman, so the review should consist of one letter (G) and one number (5)...? ;) — fortunavelut luna(Currently not receiving pings, sorry) 2:10 pm, Today (UTC+3)
That's a good humour barnstar! But seriously, I think this will be a snow block. I will contact some admins or something. Is this considered canvassing, F-Guy? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 14:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No not at all- it's a legitimate way of bringing issues to their attention- remember WP:NOTBURO and all- if it can be done unofficially, all the better  :) Thanks for the BS by the way! — fortunavelut luna(Currently not receiving pings, sorry) 14:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

LOL THANKS SOO MUCH GUYS LOL I LOVE THE FACT WE ALL ABBREVIATED EACH OTHERS NAMES LOL....FRIYMAN WENT FROM FRY MAN TO F-MAN LOL FORTUNA TO FORTUNE...AND REDRANGER TO RED RIDER LOL TOGETHER WE MAKE/FORM TEAM WIKI!!! LOL anyways enough caps and thanks again guys for continuing to follow through and help me out thanks (Redranger007 (talk) 10:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC))

HEY FRY MAN WHAT GIVES WITH THE SPEEDY DELETION TAGG??? LOL (Redranger007 (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC))

Sorry, Redranger007, I believe you just happen to be a sockppuppet of Jake Smooth and you will most likely be blocked in the next couple of days. The draft will be deleted per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, as the article with similar content has been deleted per a deletion discussion. I hope this is understandable. See you! Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 15:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

??? What no i dont even know who that is...And why would you try and go as far as to get me blocked??? your not a administrator for one so you basically had to go out of your way to make this bogus statement...just because im trying to upload a notable article that just so happen someone else tryed to post doesnt mean anything thats just naive...dont be fooled by the articles back log history...But i guess you only been on wikipedia for a little over 10 months so i dont expect you to know much of anything..i see you basically suck up to other official wikipedians and do anything they say..smh i though you was cool fry man guess not (Redranger007 (talk) 15:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC))

Aaaaand there you have it :) Good, work, F-Man!!! ;) — fortunavelut luna(Currently not receiving (most) pings, sorry) 16:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Let's end the peaceful chat here, I do not want to hear any personal attacks. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 16:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I can imagine some stupid cliche from a movie, where I think about his words way later and become a sockpuppet myself... Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 16:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Alexandru I. Lapedatu

Dear FriyMan, thanks for your answer. I understand the policy, and it makes sense. It is true that the name of this person has been written in various forms, and recently several publications tend to use the simplified form of his name, omitting the father initial (I.). The prime references we use, like the volume published in his (and his twin brother's honour) in 1936 names him Alexandru I. Lapedatu (reference Crăciun, I.: “Alex. I. Lapedatu. Note bio-bibliografice / Alex. I. Lapedatu. Bio-Bibliographical Notes). Likewise, the medal minted in 1936 in his honour is also writing his name "Alexandru I. Lapedatu" - we intend to add it as an illustration at some point. Furthermore, the article in his native language (Romanian) uses as title the form "Alexandru I. Lapedatu". Interestingly enough, his twin brother conserved the father's initial even in Wikipedia, and is named "Ion I. Lapedatu" even in recent publications, probably because his father was also Ioan Lapedatu - the initial helps keeping them apart. Our strong preference is obviously to write the names of the two twin brothers in a similar manner, and would appreciate if you would agree with us - but we understand that this is not the only possible viewpoint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ioana Maior (talkcontribs) 19:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello once again, Ioana Maior! Firstly, I recommend to respond to threads on your own talk. Secondly, sadly, I think Huon has the point here. You are right, our page on Ion Lapedatu is named Ion I. Lapedatu to distingush from his father. But once again, Huon is right. Sources do refer to him as Alexandru Lapedatu and, according to the WP:UCRN, we will have to keep the page as Alexandru Lapedatu. I hope your question has been resolved. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 03:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks--Ioana Maior (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Article under review

I wrote an article and it is in draft: 10-Minute Walk; thought you may find that decent progress!! Fingers crossed it goes well, though already got some helpful feedback on it. Thought you may find it interesting, @FriyMan:! FULBERT (talk) 13:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi FULBERT! I love your new article. I will take time to review it, if you don't mind. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 19:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
As well as that, I might nominate the article for DYK. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 19:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Fantastic, FriyMan. Thanks in advance for your time with this! FULBERT (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  LonghairMegalibrarygirlTonyBallioniVanamonde93
  Allen3Eluchil404Arthur RubinBencherlite

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

How can I donate $50 USD toward WW2 Pacific coverage?

Let me know, then delete this once done.

Such harsh metal courage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedKnight7 (talkcontribs) 10:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Joe Roe
  JzG
  EricorbitPercevalThinggTristanbVioletriga

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FriyMan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Find something better to do

Stop leaving garbage on my talk page. Asaturn (talk) 07:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry Asaturn, I have not looked at the situation properly. Later I have undone my contributions as per WP:OWNTALK. Sorry. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
I still suggest, that you should archive threads, rather than delete them. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Adoption

Hello there, I am a slightly inexperienced user looking for a mentor to help learn things about Wikipedia. I have been unblocked very recently with a special 1 Revert Rule which must be noted. I also have a topic ban as well. Could you please consider adopting me so that I can get better at using Wikipedia. I am particularly interested in counter-vandalism. Please get back to me as soon as possible. Thank you in advance. Pablothepenguin (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Pablothepenguin, Do not worry, I can adopt you. If you are interested in Counter-Vandalsim, I can help you, too. Let's begin. I will make a dedicated subpage for you, where you can ask me any questions you want. Firstly, read a few pages, such as WP:5P, WP:CIV and WP:EW. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 06:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
I have now read the pages and am ready to begin the process now. Pablothepenguin (talk) 20:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
And what have you learned, dear Pablothepenguin? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
As well as that, what timezone are you in? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I have a great deal there. I have learned many things about what Wikipedia is not and what Edit Warring involves. Also my time zone is UTC (Greenwich Mean Time). Pablothepenguin (talk) 12:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

  Keep on! SerialNumber54129...speculates 21:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep on what, Serial Number 54129? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Well. Eating cheesburgers? -maybe. Annoying me? -maybe! But most of all, the good work you do here! Re. your Spitfire below, may I suggest peer review? People might look like they're ripping it to shreds, but they give you a laundry-list of things to do which make it almost certain (hopefully!) that you then sail through FAR because all the things that would usually be thrown at you have already been dealt with. This isn't any sort of criticism, just that that way you hae a central page that lots of people watch, rather than waiting for people to come here  :) Best of luck with it though, and I hope you don't think I'm being rude! Take care! SerialNumber54129...speculates 07:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
A peer review has already happened, I believe I can manage fixing the references in the page. Thank you for care though. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, @MilHist, always solid of course. But PR will get you a broader range of views, that's all- remember, FAR isn't project specific, so it's probably worth getting views from outside MH. Amyway. SerialNumber54129...speculates 07:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Of course, of course. After the A-class review is done. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Supermarine Spitfire

Hello:

I copy edited the article to the end of the Speed and altitude records section.

I have come across the following "issues" so far which I'm drawing to your attention.

Origins

"The Type 224 was a big disappointment to Mitchell and his design team" – needs elaboration

Airframe

I can see the confusion over the number of frames. The section begins stating there is a skeleton of 19 frames, but later says frame 20 was the last in the fuselage and then that the tail section included frames 21-23. I have added “vertical” for clarity. Could this issue be resolved by simply saying the skeleton had 23 frames?

Armament

I can’t figure out why there is a "but" in this sentence. "A variant on the Spitfire design with four 20 mm Oerlikon cannon had been tendered to specification F37/35, but the order for prototypes had gone to the Westland Whirlwind in January 1939.[5]"

By the way, I don't necessarily agree with, or understand some of the comments.

I will try to get back to the article as time allows. Have a look through what I've done so far and let me know if you see any issues.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Twofingered Typist. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 06:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Supermarine Spitfire - 2

Hello:

I've finished going through the article and found only one additional issue to draw to your attention.

Overview

The machine guns are converted so a .303 becomes a 7.7mm – surely they were never called 7.7mm guns? If not, the conversions are unnecessary.

Griffon-engined variants

Another cannon conversion.

I had some time so I added a few citations for you.

A few other thoughts:

  • I don't think the last paragraph in the Origins Section is too long. It's discussing the fixes made on one plane—these can be in a single paragraph.
  • "Although Morris Motors," ... "it was funded by government money." the use of "although" as in even though, or in spite of is fine.

Let me know if you have any concerns.

Regards

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks once again, Twofingered Typist! I will get working on references today. I have no more concerns. Thank you for your amazing work. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
You're welcome. Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Adoption

Hello, FriyMan. Are you still accepting adoptees? If you are, would you be willing to adopt me? I've been editing Wikipedia for a few months now, but I still don't have a very good understanding of how to do it. I think I would benefit from some mentorship. Thanks. Antrogh (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I think I am busy with one student right now. I think you can find another teacher. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

NikolaiHo☎️ 20:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Concerns with mentoring

Hi - I have a number of concerns about the mentoring you are attempting at User:FriyMan/AAU/Pablothepenguin.

  • You described edits where the editor had "forgot the sources or maybe he added superfluous information not realising that it wasn’t strictly necessary" as "test edits". They are not.
  • You suggested a recently unblocked editor, who is currently on a 1RR restriction, should apply for rollback. It should have been obvious to you such a request would fail.
  • You describe IAR as an important policy the editor should follow ("So, here is the most important one: WP:IAR") - the editor was blocked for either edit warring or violating topic bans. Encouraging the editor to IAR isn't helpful.
  • You tell the editor "P.S. You have the right to violate 1RR when reverting obvious vandalism!". I note you asked at ANI if an editor could violate a 1RR restriction. Do you truly believe that the editor in question has the competency to identify "blatant vandalism", especially given the repeated blocks and inability to understand block reasons?

My advice would be to stop mentoring and allowing a more experienced editor to take over. I personally don't think Pablothepenguin is going to benefit from any mentoring (that ship has sailed), let alone help which is fundamentally poorly executed -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

  Cheer up, there's plenty to be doing! >SerialNumber54129...speculates 10:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Serial Number 54129, I couldn't last 5 days. By the way, have you noticed, that Coffee came back? Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 15:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello FriyMan, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Muboshgu
  AnetodeLaser brainWorm That Turned
  None

  Bureaucrat changes

  Worm That Turned

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

Cheers, [[User:FriyMan|<font color="#000000">'''Friy'''</font><font color="#FFA500">'''Man'''</font>]] [[User talk:FriyMan|<sup>Per aspera ad astra</sup>]] : Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra

to

Cheers, [[User:FriyMan|<b style="color: #000000">Friy</b><b style="color: #FFA500">Man</b>]] [[User talk:FriyMan|<sup>Per aspera ad astra</sup>]] : Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra

Anomalocaris (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for a warning in time! Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 08:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your support! —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

Adopt-a-user - your availability

Hello. Could I ask you to check and, if necessary, update your availability details at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters, please?

I've been updating that page, plus the list of over 100 people seeking adoption (which I've now stripped down to around 20 active editors genuinely seeking help.

I've been working to identify those Adopters who are currently available, and those who haven't been active on Wikipedia for a while. But I don't think the bot has been updating correctly, so a manual check from you would be really helpful. I've also made some suggestions and a few edits to make life easier for newcomers. I've put some of my observations down in answer to a recent post about inactivity of some Adopt-a-User Project contributors. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  BlurpeaceDana boomerDeltabeignetDenelson83GrandioseSalvidrim!Ymblanter

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

  Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Can I please be adopted by you

i'd love to be adopted and hang out together! TommyGu (talk) 04:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)