Welcome

edit

Hello, Da'HoodedBeast, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


December 2023

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Novena have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Novena was changed by Da'HoodedBeast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865286 on 2023-12-19T15:44:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Da'HoodedBeast! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (February 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (March 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 06:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 01:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Palindrome Dates

edit

  Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palindrome Dates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Litanies Podcast

edit

Hello HoodedBeast09,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Litanies Podcast for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Safari Scribe,
I made a Wikipedia page called Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast). Do you know how long it'll take to get approved or disapproved?
Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blanking pages

edit

Hello @HoodedBeast09, when you create a page in error like you did to Litanies Podcast, do not blank it, rather, tag it with {{db-g7}}. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
I think I made that by accident, is it possible to delete it? Same with the tag "Uncovering the Litanies," I made that by accident is it possible that that mistake could be deleted?
Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uncovering the Litanies

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Uncovering the Litanies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (card game) (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please use an edit summary

edit

Hey HoodedBeast09, Welcome to Wikipedia. I undid a bunch of stuff you did recently because you didn't explain why you made the changes. Edit summaries are how us editors communicate with each other. Without that it's harder to tell if an editor is trying to make the encyclopedia better or just messing around. I hope to see you around doing good work, and I wanted to tell you why I undid some of your work which I couldn't tell was good. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨  00:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi HoodedBeast09. Thank you for your work on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation). Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I'm not sure there's a need for this page, as "St. John Paul the Great" is exclusively used to refer to Pope John Paul II.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moriwen (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, that's fine.
Thanks for letting me know! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Moriwen:Okay, that's fine.
Thanks for letting me know! Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
For sure! And please feel free to create a redirect from St. John Paul the Great to Pope John Paul II, you're totally right that that's a plausible search term.— Moriwen (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

(That one's an automated message, lol.) — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 21st century has been accepted

edit
 
List of saints canonized in the 21st century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast)

edit

Hello HoodedBeast09, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 02:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, is there anyway to undelete my article, Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) so I can edit it?
Thanks!
HoodedBeast09 (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bright Lights

edit

Hi, you had created a draft article for "Bright Lights". It had been declined twice but you still decided to move it to mainspace yourself despite the concerns presented to you. You then attempted to create two identical versions with non-standard naming conventions which were redirected back to the draft page and removed from mainspace. Please attempt to revise the draft using more reliable sources, and let a reviewer assess the article and perform the move if accepted. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good! Thank you! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Five Crowns (card game)

edit
 

The article Five Crowns (card game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, is reliant on primary sources (i.e. PlayMonster, and Amazon.com) or unreliable sources (i.e. YouTube, Ludiologists.com, and Bar Games 101).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 20th century has been accepted

edit
 
List of saints canonized in the 20th century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (September 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can I delete my Uncovering the Litanies page?

edit

Hi, my page Uncovering the Litanies was deleted recently. However, when you search, Uncovering the Litanies on Google, it still comes up as a Wikipedia page. But when you click on it, it says that the page doesn't exist. Is it possible to delete that from the search engines? I just want to make Wikipedia fully usable for all and don't want any dead end pages for your website. Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pints with Aquinas

edit

  Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pints with Aquinas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

  You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you changed the personal pronouns of an individual in the article Dylan Mulvaney. Wikipedia refers to all people, including transgender and nonbinary people, by the pronouns they have most recently requested for themselves; this applies to all phases of their lives, unless they have requested otherwise. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm DanielRigal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of religion and spirituality podcasts have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Do you have a conflict of interests here? I saw that you have uploaded an image of the presenter of the same podcast tagged as your "own work". DanielRigal (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, HoodedBeast09,
I just wanted to let you know that posting questions on your own User talk page will not result in any responses. What are the chances that another Wikipedia editor has your talk page on their Watchlist? Practically zero. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, go to a forum like the Teahouse where editors are available to respond to your queries. I only happened to see your question because I came here about an expiring draft you have but that was purely by coincidence. Try the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Field Goals (November 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 04:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Games (November 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Remsense was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Consider integrating into an existing article, like Overtime (sports)#Longest games.
Remsense ‥  06:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Remsense
Hi, it looks like my article was declined. They said it was too much like the Overtime (sports) article but it only has a couple of overtime games in its article. I have all the double overtime games in my article. I believe my article should be accepted because it has more info for a different purpose. Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
It is not substantial enough to be its own article. Like I directly told you above, the amount of information it does have can be added to another article instead. Remsense ‥  13:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Remsense
Oh, gotcha. Thanks for your time! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply