Welcome

edit

Hello, InilanNahklia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Vaughan (June 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, InilanNahklia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Vaughan (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Vaughan (Chief constable) has been accepted

edit
 
James Vaughan (Chief constable), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Laplorfill (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as James Vaughan (police officer), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.dorset.police.uk/news-information/about-dorset-police/departments-sections/force-structure/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:James Vaughan (police officer) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 10mmsocket (talk) 22:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of InilanNahklia/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, InilanNahklia/sandbox, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Brascoian (talk to me) 16:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Date formatting

edit

See MOS:DATE on how to properly format dates in articles. Keep up the good work. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Also, note that references go after punctuation with no spaces, not before punctuation. --10mmsocket (talk) 20:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello InilanNahklia! Your additions to Martin Baker (police officer) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've also removed copied non-free content from Debbie Simpson (police officer). Is there any copied content on your large edit to Throop, Dorset? If so, please mention it here on this page (with the source(s) you took from) so that that too can be cleaned up. And ... please take care not do any more of this. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Justlettersandnumbers - yes there is definitely copyvio. For example the sentence "On 1st April 2019, a petition with nearly 300 signatures...." looks like an almost exact copy/paste from here. It looks like there is other copyvio in the latter parts of the edit. I'd suggest reverting and striking the whole edit. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

No need to strike the whole edit, I'll amend it myself, apologies for the error.

edit

18 months ago you were warned about copyright violation. Why have you done the exact same thing again today with virtually direct copy/paste of text from Dorset Police's website, together with photographs that are clearly not released under a commons compatible licence? Please re-read the section above about copyright violation. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

InilanNahklia, I see that you've made some effort to rearrange the words of the text you copied – thanks for at least trying to avoid copyright violation. Unfortunately just changing a few words and moving a few others does not solve the problem – that is what we call close paraphrasing, and may in some circumstances create a derivative work which still infringes copyright. For example, if the source reads:

Our neighbourhood policing teams are split into two local policing areas

it's not going to be OK to write:

Dorset Police's neighbourhood policing teams are split between two local policing areas

.
That whole paragraph was obviously the same text with minor alterations (and still complete with the illiterate use of "closer" as the comparative of "closely"). Text you write here must be entirely in your own words. And by the way it also needs to be supported by independent reliable sources, so adding stuff from the website of the force is not really helpful. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Stela Domador-Kuzma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder of Simon Shotton for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Simon Shotton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Simon Shotton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder of Thomas Roberts for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Thomas Roberts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Thomas Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are developing a large article in your sandbox

edit

Before you expend any more effort on it please stop, step back, and consider the question: "Is this list really a miscellaneous collection of material unrelated by anything except murder and a large county for location?"

WP:MISCELLANY applies to this in my view.

I don't want you to head off on a wild goose chase, so I suggest you check at WP:TEAHOUSE whether I am correct by asking the neutral question, in whatever words you choose: "I have been developing an article on "a list of unlawful deaths, in the form of murders and manslaughters, that occurred in the county of Dorset, in the south of the United Kingdom, between the year 2000 and the present day. in User:InilanNahklia/sandbox. A editor has expressed a concern to me that I should take advice here before working more on it, Please may I have your thoughts?" I've tried hard to ensure that the suggested question is neutral so that you do not bias your advisors for or against the draft article.

I don't want to discourage you from editing, though my nomination of some of your articles for deletion may feel that way. I want to help you use your energy and enthusiasm in a way that will benefit both you and Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

A really nice answer for someone new to editing such as myself, thank you. I will take the feedback and research some more of what you've said. Thanks again. InilanNahklia (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on HM Prison Millsike

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page HM Prison Millsike, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Murder of Sir Richard Sutton

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Murder of Sir Richard Sutton, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Dorset Police

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dorset Police, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United Kingdom

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on John Patrick Hannan

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Patrick Hannan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blanking of Rizz (slang)

edit

Hi InilanNahklia! I just wanted to let you know that I’ve undone the edit you made to Rizz (slang), as it blanked the page and removed the redirect to List of Generation Z slang. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page, or ping me using {{u|A smart kitten}}. Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 15:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oops, sorry — just seen you created an article there. Apologies if I accidentally caused you any problems :) user:A smart kittenmeow 15:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
No worries InilanNahklia (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rizz (slang)

edit

On 1 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rizz (slang), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after popularizing the term rizz, Kai Cenat stopped using the term himself, saying that TikTok had butchered the word? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rizz (slang). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rizz (slang)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Death of Jon Egging

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Death of Jon Egging, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Death of Jon Egging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Throop. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, InilanNahklia. Thank you for your work on Death of Jon Egging. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Bournemouth Air Festival

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bournemouth Air Festival, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Eleanor Williams (criminal)

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eleanor Williams (criminal), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1860

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1860, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danilo Restivo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Throop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Old Bailey. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turn the Lights Back On, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parisi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Pedigree Chum dog food and Heinz extortion campaign

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pedigree Chum dog food and Heinz extortion campaign, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Pedigree Chum dog food and Heinz extortion campaign

edit

Hello, InilanNahklia,

Thank you for creating Pedigree Chum dog food and Heinz extortion campaign.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Inilan, nice work on your new article. It requires additional sourcing, as it currently relies on only two sources. It should also be added to relevant Wikiprojects and categories. No other articles link to it, so it will currently be hard to find.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Bastun, thank you for your note. I know there are additional sources to that I can cite, so leave it with me and I will sort it. Kind regards, Inilan. InilanNahklia (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Violent corrosive fluid attacks in the United Kingdom

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Violent corrosive fluid attacks in the United Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Death of DC Ian Morton

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Death of DC Ian Morton, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Danny D

edit

Hi! I moved your page to Draft:Danny D (pornographer) so it can go through Articles for Creation, and in the meantime the title Danny D should remain a redirect to D Mob. Thank you! BuySomeApples (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Jong-Ok Shin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BST and South Korean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Murder of Jong-Ok Shin

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Murder of Jong-Ok Shin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Danilo Restivo

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Danilo Restivo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Sarah Everard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Murder of Joanna Simpson moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Murder of Joanna Simpson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, InilanNahklia. Thank you for your work on Dangerousness (legal). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This page is very similar to Dangerous offender, so I've merged it there to help consolidate the material in one place. Note also that the UK law from 2003 seems to have been repealed and replaced in 2020, something discussed at the new target.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of unusual injuries or survived experiences for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unusual injuries or survived experiences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual injuries or survived experiences until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit
 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Killing of Simon Shotton

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Killing of Simon Shotton has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Amortias (T)(C) 16:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bournemouth body parts murder has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bournemouth body parts murder. Thanks! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bournemouth body parts murder (May 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, InilanNahklia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of offences in England and Wales with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bournemouth body parts murder has been accepted

edit
 
Bournemouth body parts murder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply