Jagat jit singh
Welcome Jagat jit singh!
I'm Anoptimistix, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your userpage.Sincerely, Anoptimistix (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you.
Please do read this
edit- Hello mate, this page will guide you on how to write articles please see- WP:MOS,
- This is about inline citations (sourcing)
Help page WP:Cite sources
Jagat jit singh, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Jagat jit singh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome!
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maharaj singh
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maharaj singh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RazerTalk 12:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bhai Maharaj Singh
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bhai Maharaj Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Bhai_Maharaj_Singh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ KN2731 {talk} 09:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please note that while text from the SikhiWiki is licensed under the GNU Free Public Documentation licence, GFDL-only text added after 1 November 2008 is no longer validly licensed for use on Wikipedia. That is why I had to delete the article. De728631 (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I have created your userpage and sandbox
editHello mate, I had created your userpage, you can edit it and write about yourself, so that other editors may know more about you
I had also created sandbox in your userpage, sandbox is a place where you can test and experiment Wikimarkup languages and you can write an entire article there ,as there are least chances of deletion there, if you are confident enough that you article is notable ad have reliable sources , you can copy-paste your content into Article wizard for creating an article directly in the Wikipedia mainspace Anoptimistix (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
This is short list of effective wiki markup language highly useful in day 2 day editing work in the Wikipedia please have a look at this Help:Cheatsheet
Wikimarkup Code Sheets
editFull list of markup languages
This are very powerful yet simple to understand wikimarkup languages useful and very effective in having technical advantage for editing wikipedia .Please have a look Help:Wiki markup
I have created archivebox for you
editHello ! I have created archivebox for you at the top of your talk page, at archivebox you can move your talk page messages for preservance and after moving it there, you can delete messages in your real talk pages, to keep it clean or less messy.Im happy to help thanks Anoptimistix (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
List of people from Punjab, India
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of people from Punjab, India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to List of Indian warriors does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! - Arjayay (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Bhagat Singh
editIt is misleading to say that Bhagat Singh was a Sikh. The issue has been discussed in the past on the article talk page and if you actually read the entire article then you will see that it is in fact addressed. Please do not reinstate your edit to that article without first obtaining consensus to do so. - Sitush (talk) 12:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
edit
Your recent editing history at Bhagat Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jagat_jit_singh reported by User:Sitush (Result: ). Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 15:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)- Note concerning block: Sitush and others have explained to you the reasons your edits are reverted, both in edit summaries, on the article talkpage (which Sitush has asked you many times to go to), and on your own page above. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Please listen to what experienced editors tell you. Bishonen | talk 15:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC).
DS Alert
edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Given the way you are progressing, you ought to read this by heart.Regards:)Winged BladesGodric 15:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
please unblock me
edit
Jagat jit singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
there had been editing in Bhagat singh and the edit which i made was truely based on the source mentioned along with it but still there had been edit war Jagat jit singh (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Yes, there has been edit war. That is why you are blocked -- and the edit war stopped. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 18:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
December 2017
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 05:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Please Unblock me
edit Jagat jit singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
sorry, I does'nt know much about the Neutral point of view. I have engaged in a talk about the issue of religion in Talk:Bhagat Singh and with other users. I does'nt know that this disrupt the fundamental principles of wikipedia but now i have read the policies and i will not do any activity that disrupt the five pillars of wikipedia Jagat jit singh (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, it appears that over the last 2 weeks, no admin has been willing to unblock you based on this request. You can try to make a new, more convincing request - but please note that repeating this request may be considered disruptive, and result in your access to this page being revoked. SQLQuery me! 01:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
please unblock me
edit Jagat jit singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Its my another request to please unblock me . i have understood that for what i have been blocked for, now i will not do any activity again that are against wikipedia policies, and will make productive contributions instead Jagat jit singh (talk) 07:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.