User talk:Judynicole65

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 in philosophy (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We can't just "approve" a blank list. There has to actually be content before it can be accepted or moved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2026 in philosophy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Judynicole65! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2026 in philosophy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2026 in philosophy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - ExcitedA. It may be a good idea to look at this. 22:42, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Australian films of 2026 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Australian films of 2026 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian films of 2026 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Tropical cyclones by decade/1980–1989

Template:Tropical cyclones by decade/1980–1989 has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

List of United States tornadoes in 1928 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of United States tornadoes in 1928. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it appears to be a work in progress/unfinished list. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. • Quinn (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2015 awards in Nigeria

A tag has been placed on Category:2015 awards in Nigeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:38, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 short documentary films

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 short documentary films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 animated short films

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 animated short films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 short films

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 short films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Comics characters introduced in 2025

A tag has been placed on Category:Comics characters introduced in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

List of French films of 2026 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of French films of 2026. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

1949 in Mexico moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1949 in Mexico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 01:05, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

1946 in Mexico moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1946 in Mexico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

1942 in Mexico moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1942 in Mexico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:24, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cowboy Xbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Cowboy Xbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BugGhost 🦗👻 23:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cowboy Xbox

A tag has been placed on Category:Cowboy Xbox indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

About Draft:1942 in Mexico

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:1942 in Mexico by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- Reconrabbit 16:19, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

So you are aware: you are allowed to move Draft:1942 in Mexico to 1942 in Mexico once the latter is deleted, under WP:DRAFTOBJECT. The way you have done it is not correct because it removes attribution. -- Reconrabbit 16:27, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Cowboy Xbox.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cowboy Xbox.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Reconrabbit 20:37, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 15:44, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cowboy Xbox

A tag has been placed on Cowboy Xbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK (talk • edits) 15:45, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

About Draft:1942 in Mexico

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:1942 in Mexico by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 15:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Please protect Cowboy Xbox

Can you please protect the page Cowboy Xbox? I created this page twice. Judynicole65 (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

You shouldn't be creating this page at all. Wikipedia is not a place for hoaxes. GSK (talk • edits) 17:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Judy - I was the person who originally nominated your Cowboy Xbox article for deletion. You know that it's not real information. It's a fictional character you invented, and does not require a wikipedia article. Please don't make any more edits about this topic again - if you do, it's very likely you will be blocked from editing entirely. There are plenty of other wikis that allow this kind of stuff - but wikipedia is not one of them. BugGhost 🦗👻 20:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

asilvering (talk) 06:38, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Judynicole65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Judynicole65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Please list all accounts you have used besides this one.

Vboezjh

Have you taken the standard offer? (six months with no edits)

Yes.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

No

Judynicole65 (talk) 22:54, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No you haven't. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judynicole65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Asilvering blocked me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock me. Asilvering blocked me. I won't vandalize or create hoaxes again. Judynicole65 (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

A good reason to get unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judynicole65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I won't continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will only make useful contributions instead. Please accept this unblock request.

Decline reason:

No chance. If you are exceptionally lucky and go six months with zero further edits, including to this talk page, you may apply under WP:SO. You'll have to work much, much harder at that point to demonstrate you should be unblocked, having spent your time with this account clearly demonstrating you shouldn't. ZERO further edits. Yamla (talk) 14:30, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do I get unblocked?

What is the best reason to accept my unblock request? Judynicole65 (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Asked and answered already. I see you are already ignoring the advice to go six months with zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

You'll have to use UTRS now ...

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings/unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined, leading to the posting of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of United States tornadoes in 1928

Hello, Judynicole65. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of United States tornadoes in 1928, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of United States tornadoes in 1928

Hello, Judynicole65. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of United States tornadoes in 1928".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)