Kip the Dip

License tagging for Image:White & Nerdy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:White & Nerdy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:White & Nerdy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:White & Nerdy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Go eat shit fuckers, you will be blocked from editing. Mendors 01:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. --MZMcBride 01:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism

The log indicates that the page was created:

20:56, 4 August 2007 (deletion log) (Restore) . . The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and fourty three times (←Created page with 'parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet pa...')

The time is in UTC. --MZMcBride 05:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Just so you know, Wikipedia is one of the worst places to try to contact me because I am inactive there, and it would be easier to contact me with a sock IP address (Don't Do That Actually) I wasn't logged in, it's just that when I checked your contributions, I saw you replied to my comment at Uncyclopedia. It's a good thing that you contacted MZMcBride, or I would be even less believable than before. About the attention whore, you know how popular that joke is, at my 2 months at Uncyclopedia, it's the most popular thing I've seen.

Still, I am more convinced, but why did you nominate it for deletion?. I'd think that if you created something that was about to become an in-joke, why would you nominate it for deletion? That make me question if you actually created it. And why did you confess to all those pages creations, knowing that Famine would ban you? Also, while I'm here, do you mind me signing your autograph page? --Manforman 14:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:White & Nerdy2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:White & Nerdy2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ct, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mendors 20:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Penispenispenis

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Penispenispenis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Penispenispenis was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Penispenispenis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

I'm sorry to say, I think even if I'm unblocked, I'm indefinitley leaving Uncyclopedia, not because of you, but because Famine treats Uncyc like his own website. Famine is such a bastard, defintley. There has been so much shit going on, starting off with the UGOTM scandal, than the Norwellian's whoring their shit and getting away with it. At the time, articles are getting featured not because of there content, but there author. As you know, there has been all those Manforman hating sockpuppets, and SmackBot vandalised my article. The two of us and another are getting infi-banned for a misunderstanding, what is this, China? I didn't BP you because I disliked you, but as I said, it was a misunderstanding, on a positive note though, I really thought you were a funny guy, with the block me page and the parakeet page along with the confession.

And if there's any other annoyance on Uncyc, it's Thekillerfroggy. Not only he vandalised my userpage there, he was against everything I did, he was incredibly rude, contemptous, arrogant, prejudice (towards users who weren't as good, like me) and he won UOTM, Uncyclopedia is crazy?

If you're unblocked, will you continue to contribute to Famine's personal website, or will you quit and get on with the rest of your live? That's what I'm doing. Apparently, winning UGOTM didn't teach him his lesson, and he continued to bitch. He also takes the cake, he tells people to do work, but continues to fuck around, and I actually wrote more articles than him in the past 2 months Your a nice guy, and someone I'll miss, but now is the time to leave the Wiki I've been tortured at recently, goodbye.--Manforman 18:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to mention, I don't think it's funny that Famine infi-banned you for creating User:4.252.99.182/sig, I think it's hilarious--Manforman 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and grats on the unban!! Since I'm still banned, can you revert the changes on one of my articles and revert it to this revision, [1], thanks--Manforman 19:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I somehow stumbled upon this, figured I'd mention that I don't whore to the people in my town. I brag about my FAs there, and sometimes spitball with my mates to come up with ideas. Of late I haven't whored on IRC at all, and I haven't seen anyone else doing it, either. It's not fair to blame the site's problems on one town and 4 users(one of which is now permabanned). I spend a lot of time writing a page, once I get an idea, and trying to pin up all of mine and UnIdiot's featured articles to whoring just isn't fair to him, or me. - TLB ^{(Tick Tock) (Contribs)} 18:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

ManforMan, I'm sorry if our whoring frustrates you, but the honest truth is, either way, good articles get featured. I mean, plenty of people I whore to vote abstain or against, ljlego for example. If it makes to feel better, I'm stopping whoring. Like really. I am. This is UnIdiot btw, I just don't have an account. Acccount Created The UnIdiot 02:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I think you should also know that TKF is well on his way to becoming an admin over at uncyc. Obviously, others don't have the same problems with him as you do. I think we should all just sit down with an acoustic guitar and sing koom-bah-ya. Whaddaya say? - TLB ^{(Tick Tock) (Contribs)} 02:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Deleted pages

I am afraid I have deleted the Uncyclopedia pages in your user space, on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a hosting service. If you don't have the pages saved, please e-mail me (follow instructions at my user page) and I'll recover them and send them to you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Nobody cares. Ha! -- Kip the Dip (talk) 03:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of user page

Hi there, I have deleted your page as requested. As far as most users are concerned, the page and all its history are gone. However the 1500 or so administrators/sysops here can review deleted pages and all their history. If you want to hide your page and its history completely you will need to request oversight. You can do this by going here where you can see under what circumstances oversight is granted, and how to apply for it. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 18:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

Why did you create this blatantly POV redirect? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan321 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

So assholes wouldn't keep creating it. Kip the Dip (talk)

Proposed deletion of Frickin' A

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frickin' A, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable band, no hits. Fails WP:BAND.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 01:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Filthy capitalist pig-dog

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Filthy capitalist pig-dog, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MichealH ^{Have I done something wrong?} 12:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 8==D

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that 8==D, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deunanknute (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kip the Dip. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kip the Dip. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to David Gilmour— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Now 3 US.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Now 3 US.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Funkle Bunkle

Hello Kip the Dip,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Funkle Bunkle for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Funkle Bunkle to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cremastra (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Killjoys. Kip the Dip (talk)

Minor edits

Hi, Kip the Dip! I noticed that you regularly mark your edits as "minor" when creating your edit summaries, such as here, here, and here. On Wikipedia, minor edits refer to a specific type of edit where "only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." You aren't in any trouble for doing this, but it would be helpful if you stopped marking your edits as minor if they don't meet these criteria. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)