Wikipedia

User talk:Luwanglinux/Archive 1

< User talk:Luwanglinux
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Luwanglinux in topic Nomination for merger of Template:Contains Meitei text
Archive 1Archive 2

Unblock request

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luwanglinux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not get any previous warning of this name space block with the tag copyright violation ever since an admin informed and corrected my mistake of my past edit I have not made any copyright violation edits nor have I violated any wikipedia rule while renaming page(redirect made by me)ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 21:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were warned about copyright in October of this year. Looking at Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Luwanglinux#Luwanglinux_2, at least some of the contributions under review are from after that date, into November and December. I want to be very clear here, I'm not meaning to imply that you have definitely violated copyright in November and December, only that the investigation is ongoing. If your edits from November and December come back clean, I strongly believe it would be appropriate to lift the block. However, the investigation is ongoing at this time so it would be inappropriate for me to lift the block at this time. Yamla (talk) 21:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Arambai

Latest comment: 3 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arambai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thenamesdictionary.com/name-meanings/163201/name-meaning-of-alapai. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 17:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luwanglinux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think its a great misunderstanding that I am blocked indefinitely ,In my first request I stated I did not get previous warning(4 warning) because I thought the warning(copyright violation) from October 31 (this year) would not affect me(I would not invite myself another copyright warning) as I am not repeating(copyright violation I never intended to repeat) ever since that.Those four warning1, 2, 3, 4 I get it on the same day 31 October.even this most recent copyright tag of Arambai is a misunderstanding by the reporter(editor who reported it)[7],I have read the wikipedia WP:CV,WP:COPYVIO,I will keep my promise not to bring copyrighted material to wikipedia,also I am open to discuss with fellow editors in time of doubt.this is the investigation[8] as mentioned by the blocking admin,I have stong faith in myself that copyright violation will not be found after 31 October.So kindly unblock me.it feel so unfair to me as the blocking admin did not even point out my most recent copyright violation.(he just counted my mistake(4 warning) from past prior to 31 oct)ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 08:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We must take copyright seriously, as copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. We must be assured that you understand what copyright is and how copyrighted content can and can not be used on Wikipedia. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

They claim here "I have stong faith in myself that copyright violation will not be found after 31 October", even though they were made aware in the ANI discussion that they violated copyright on 5 December: this was copyrighted text (the same text can e.g. be found here though the actual source is probably elsewhere). Please keep blocked. Fram (talk) 09:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
@Fram: The article is about a mythology my writing was based on the work of a research person(Wangkhemcha Chingtamlen) but I did not copy it from the source you mentioned here.the current version of the article is more copyright violated [1].ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 05:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luwanglinux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit I have violated the copyright rules after reading this line from wikipedia Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure...I made my mistake not because I take copyright violation lightly but I was unaware of the minute details regarding copyright text.In future I will never repeat such a mistake(I will not even copy idea from copyrighted sources found),During my punishment time(ongoing indefinite block),I have read many rules and information about copyright from WP:Copyright,WP:Copyright violations,WP:Copyright assistance etc,Kindly give me a second chance and unblock me I will continue to contribute to wikipedia in a productive way and in days to come I will also help editors like me who were unaware of copyright rules if I find while editing wikipedia article.Sincerely-ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 09:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just noting that your block is not a punishment, but intended to prevent harm to Wikipedia. Blocks are not punitive. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC) @331dot: Thanks for the warm comment I never had the intention to harm wikipedia,Can my block be lifted please I have read and understood many rules regarding copyright as well as other rules to be followed while editing or contributing to wikipedia and I can assure fellow editors that I will not repeat this shameful incidents of using copyrighted texts not only in wikipedia but in other platforms or works by me it really is a big lesson for me...ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 11:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Luwanglinux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked for violation of using copyrighted text in edits I contribute,I also understand that I have been blocked to prevent disruption and jeopardy to Wikipedia..in the meantime I have read wikipedia rules and term about copyright as much as I can ,I also learn that even a speech given by a person in a function or event is copyrighted speech.And I will be in trouble if I use his or her speech without proper approval from the owner of the speech ..stating this I would like to assure wikipedia communities that I will be very careful regarding copyright and other rules if I luckily get a chance to have edit privilege again and I will contribute constructively as I am now more precisely aware of copyright rules, Thanks-ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 07:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

ꯃꯇꯦꯡ ꯄꯥꯡꯒꯦ

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  @Luwanglinux: ꯅꯪꯒꯤ ꯑꯔꯥꯝꯕꯥꯢ ꯍꯥꯢꯕ ꯂꯃꯥꯢꯁꯤꯗ ꯃꯈꯥꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯦꯡ ꯂꯧꯔꯛꯐꯝꯁꯤꯡꯁꯤ ꯍꯥꯞꯆꯤꯜꯂꯨ꯫ ꯑꯩꯅ ꯍꯥꯞꯄ ꯌꯥꯕꯕꯨꯗꯤ ꯌꯥꯢ꯫ ꯑꯗꯨꯗ ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛ ꯀꯨꯔꯨꯒꯤ ꯃꯔꯩꯗ ꯏꯕꯥꯅꯤꯃꯛ ꯌꯥꯎꯕꯅꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯅ ꯌꯦꯡꯁꯤꯜꯂꯒ ꯂꯩꯔꯝꯒꯅꯤ꯫ ꯅꯪꯅ ꯏꯗꯤꯠ ꯇꯧꯕ ꯃꯐꯝꯗ ꯑꯩꯁꯨ ꯁꯨꯝ ꯌꯥꯎꯁꯤꯜꯂꯗꯤ ꯏꯕꯥꯅꯤꯁꯦ ꯁꯣꯛ ꯄꯄꯦꯠ ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒ ꯃꯤꯠ ꯄꯄꯦꯠ ꯅꯤ ꯍꯥꯢꯔꯒ ꯕ꯭ꯂꯣꯛ ꯇꯧꯈꯤꯅꯤ꯫

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Kangleipak

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

 Template:WikiProject Kangleipak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 22:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Transclude list item excerpts as random slideshow/doc, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Certes (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Accusation?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Gotitbro: I have come to know about this information [2] from my talk page on [3] I am shocked actually what made you think I might be a sockpuppet of Goutamkumar!?? Does having same interest in Manipur article made everyone sockpuppet.???.. If so won't it make every user with same interest in India related article sockpuppet users?..ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 13:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nongsamei Puya

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nongsamei Puya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=reviews.books.Nongsamei_Puya_second_edition_released_by_Syed_Ahmed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sennecaster (talk) 02:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Luwanglinux! I noticed your contributions to List of Manipuri kings and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nomadic (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loiyumba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Your edit to Manipur government in exile has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyvio Notice

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Manipur State Constitution Act 1947, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from [4], and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ChunnuBhai (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Loiyumba, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.ipindia.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/Images/pdf/Journal_55.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Loiyumba saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ChunnuBhai (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Khagemba, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=manipur.History_of_Manipur.The_Kingdom_of_Manipur, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Khagemba saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ChunnuBhai (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

How to address WP:COPYVIO

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello User:Luwanglinux Please read WP:PERMISSION to understand how you can address copyvio notices. I can see that you have uploaded many images on wikipedia commons, that are straight away lifted from E-Pao website, but have mentioned them as your own work. Thats not how copyright works. Those images are likely to be deleted anytime.ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manipur State Constitution Act 1947, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Maintenance templates should be removed only after the problem has been addressed. Please dont remove the copyvio template till the copy paste content is first rewritten. ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC) ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kabaw Valley. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kabaw Valley. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please make sure that you state exactly what the sources state, not your own interpretations. Also, you should not use web sites. They are not reliable sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Proof reading and citations

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Manipur, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Please proof read your content before publishing it, and make sure that all the punctuation symbols and spaces are correctly used. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

In this edit, for instance, there is dangling comma at the front, there is no space after first sentence, and there is no period after the second sentence. We can fix things for you once or twice, but not for ever! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Note also that "Special to the New York Times" is not the name of an author! Citations also need to be proof read. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
At the same time, the Telegraph article you cited is in Opinion column. It requires an author, because we need to know whose opinion is being cited. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

IOSR Journals

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Luwanglinux
IOSR journals (they publish multiple titles) is on the original Beall's list [5] which largely started the awareness of the predatory publishing problem.
It has long been considered a predatory publisher on WP - I first became aware of it when I had my knuckles rapped by an admin for adding it as a reference to an article.
This is a list of current uses of IOSR journals on en.wikipedia - 58 uses including:- 54 spam link reports, 2 AFD discussions, one Help desk and one copyright discussion - no articles at all.
Please do not add IOSR as a reference in our articles - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Clans of Hao has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Category:Clans of Hao has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. noq (talk) 11:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabaw Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thadou.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 for deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Waapham amata

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Tamo! Tamogi anouba kanglei mythology da happirakpa picture do thengnajei. Adumaina yaaragadi Leimarel Sidabi, Panthoibi, Emoinu, Nongthang Leima na Chingba page singsigisu asangba matamda hapiragadi nungaijagani. Eisu houjik Wp/mni Meitei longi Wikimedia da edit toujari. Haoreima (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Haoreima (talk) Hoi hpke ermdamgdmk eikhoina angmba twminncꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 04:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Thagatchari Haoreima (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atingaa Koilou Sitapa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Manipur State Constitution Act 1947; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Let past things be past; in collegial spirit, I look forward to your contributions to Wikipedia. Happy editing! –Austronesier (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Austronesier thanks same to you happy editingꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 21:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kangleipak

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, Luwanglinux. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kangleipak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anglo-Manipur War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anglo-Manipur War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

It's a templated text, but nevertheless contains essentials about WP procedures. WP is a community. If you reach an impasse or feel that the objection to your edits by another editor is unjustified, seek third-party advice. The last paragraph of the template text explains how. –Austronesier (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Please read WP:ROPE. I hope you can prove to be an exception to this behavioral pattern and change to a more mature editing and communication style ("possible vandalism"[6]?). –Austronesier (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puya Meithaba ( Burning of Puya )

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Puya Meithaba ( Burning of Puya ) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is a WP:POVFORK of History of Manipur. The page creator moved some of the contested content over here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

You are risking a block for long-term edit warring

Latest comment: 3 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Luwanglinux. As you know, you have been reported for edit warring at Anglo-Manipur War and other articles. I've responded to the complaint with a proposal that you be blocked for long term edit warring. If I am the administrator who closes the complaint, I'll take into account any promise from you to make no more reverts on articles you have previously edited without first getting a consensus on the talk page. If you agree, that means we can count on you not to do anything unilaterally, but will wait for others to support you. Please respond at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

EdJohnston I replied [7] no one is happy being blocked , but if some editor act like enemy its too hard to deal with , I will be quiet I will wait for decision I raised my appeal against the complaint. But I think you took me as an editor who never listened to others which is very unfortunate and not true 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Also see this most recent removing content style of user TrangaBella who reported me for edit warring, this is not a good faith edit at all [8] 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

The complaint will stay open until you answer yes or no to my offer. Due to your highly qualified response I don't perceive your acceptance. Perhaps you could use a complete sentence to say "I agree to make no more reverts on South Asian articles I have previously edited without first getting a consensus on the talk page". EdJohnston (talk) 19:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
This answer is not enough. There should not be a vandalism exception. You have a very generous definition of vandalism where your own edits are concerned. For example here where you said 'reverting possible vandalism' to another person who was (in good faith) undoing your recent change. EdJohnston (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Ok so I should not revert any article from now on right under any circumstance right? I was asking only ? Thank you 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
I prefer you use the form of words that I suggested above in green. If you get consensus for your change, you can obviously then go ahead and make the change. EdJohnston (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
EdJohnston I am not keen to edit only on south asian article in english wikipedia so, I do not like to use the green text you suggested but I have given my answer repeatedly. I will not revert again just as you suggested. 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 19:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
The green sentence only asks you to refrain from reverting (without agreement) on South Asian articles. You can agree to that, without changing your ability to work on all other articles. EdJohnston (talk) 20:18, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
EdJohnston Did I really revert any article or edit war after our discussion? 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

  Hi Luwanglinux! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

TrangaBellam Ok, will keep an eye on those thing thanks for reminding me 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

  Your edit to Puya Meithaba has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk Page Guidelines

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:TALK#REVISE advises to not change content of posts, after it has been replied to. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ming treasure voyages on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Warned for making an inappropriate report at WP:AN3

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Luwanglinux. Please see my closure of the report you filed. Details are given in the report. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

EdJohnston Thank you for being kind I will not do anything misappropriate to wikipedia norms and regulation 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 05:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Manipuri kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union of India.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of countries and dependencies by area on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taliban insurgency on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sanamahism

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

 Template:Sanamahism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sanamahi1

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

 Template:Sanamahi1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sogdia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abolitionism in the United States on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shusha on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Spartan army on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Contains Meitei text

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

 Template:Contains Meitei text has been nominated for merging with Template:Contains special characters. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

@Gonnym I have requested a discussion here 👉 talk to consider 'not merging the template' before making a final decision hope everyone will cooperate. 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luwanglinux/Archive_1&oldid=1099530219"