Mangool Kanakath Surendran

Hi, Can you please guide me how to edit a semi protected article, Ezhava in Wikipedia.

In Wikipedia, the term Ezhava gives some wrong information to the public, which has to be corrected.

If one Type Thiyya in Wikipedia, Ezhava is appearing in Wikipedia and gives wrong information about Thiyya.

Thiyya is not cumming under Ezhava.

Mannanar dynasty is not an Ezhava dynesty.

Mannanar dynasty is a Thiyya dynasty and Mannanar was a Thiyya King.

Chekavar is also Thiyya.

Theyyam is related to Thiyya. Ezhava have no relation with Theyyam.

Ezhava is originally from Travancore and Cochin region of Kerala in India.

Thiyyas are originated in north Kerala state and Mahe of Pondichery state regions in India.

Social status, costumes, culture, marriage system,gods and goddess of Thiyya are different than Ezhava.

These two communities ( Thiyya & Ezhava) are 2 separate caste or communities of 2 regions.

Ezhava has manipulated the thing to get more OBC reservation quota for Ezhava from the Kerala Government by telling that Thiyya is also Ezhava.

As per OBC list of Kerala in Government of India, OBC ( Other Backward classes) list, Thiyya was listed at sl. no 185 and Ezhava was listed at sl. no. 44 in Mandal commission report of Government of India for 27% job reservation in Government jobs for OBC listed Communities on 10th September 1993.

Ezhava is trying to eliminate Thiyya from the world.

Wikipedia should not give an incorrect information to the public. Regards

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mangool Kanakath Surendran/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mangool Kanakath Surendran/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Mangool Kanakath Surendran! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mangool Kanakath Surendran/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mangool Kanakath Surendran/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ezhava have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Any edits you wish to make to Ezhava need to be requested at Talk:Ezhava. If you wish to submit a new article for consideration, please go through the information at WP:FIRST in order to determine proper prose, formatting, referencing, etc.

CNMall41 (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sitush (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RegentsPark (comment) 16:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Request for removal of block

My dear Wikipedia administrator RegentsPark,

I have created an article named, Thiyya community of India in my Sandbox in Wikipedia, devoting my many days hard work.

At present, I was made it in the form of a reply to a clarification about Thiyya community to make Wikipedia administrators to understand about it, due the reasons given below.

It has to be edited further to make the article Thiyya in my Sandbox in Wikipedia in the form of an Encyclopedia and the article Ezhava, published in Wikipedia also have to be edited to remove all Thiyya related items from that.

Reasons:

1) If any one type Thiyya in Wikipedia to know about Thiyya community, Wikipedia explains about Ezhava community. And gives a statement that Ezhavas are known as Thiyya in north Malabar, which is a wrong statement.

2) If any one type Thiyya in Google to know about Thiyya community, Google is referring to Wikipedia and explains about Ezhava community.

3) Thiyya community is no way related to Ezhava community in any manner.

4) Ezhava community is a separate community, whose social status, culture, marriage system, food habits, spoken language slang, region where they are found, way of worshipping, the Gods and Goddess etc are different from Thiyya community.

5) Both Thiyya community as well as Ezhava communitiy is 2 different independent communities belong to Hindu religion.

6) This kind of wrong statements published in Wikipedia, under Ezhava has resulted lot of harm to the entire Thiyya community. Also it has resulted to forceful community conversion of Thiyya community into Ezhava community.

7) Thiyya community feels ashamed when calling them Ezhava.

8) I have tried many times to edit the wrong statement published in Ezhava in Wikipedia, but Wikipedia did not correct it. Also many other people tried it to correct it, but Wikipedia did not correct it.

9) If any one type Thiyya in Wikipedia, Wikipedia should explain about Thiyya and not about Ezhava, because, both the communities are different and they are not related in any manner. Government of India has listed both these communities separately as independent communities, then why Wikipedia is propagating wrong statements, which is resulting to forceful conversion of Thiyya community into Ezhava community and harming the entire Thiyya community?

Regards

Mangool Kanakath Surendran

df06b5345ea57013ef9e99e0c9d3b82a

Hi

I have not done anything wrong to Wikipedia.

I had just tried to intimate Wikipedia management about the public grievance to Wikipedia by the entire Thiyya community of India against the few wrong statements published by Wikipedia in Ezhava.

For that sincere effort of mine, Wikipedia have blocked me from editing Wikipedia.

My Appeal key is given below:

df06b5345ea57013ef9e99e0c9d3b82a

Therefore, please remove the blocking, if the Wikipedia thinks I have done the right thing to intimate about the public grievance to Wikipedia.

Regards

Mangool Kanakath Surendran