User talk:OZOO/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Emperor of China Shaanxi Provincial TV Tower Roy Skelton Four Great Inventions of ancient China Flag of Nebraska RJR Nabisco John Scott Martin Xia Dynasty Dreamland Margate Alton, Staffordshire Helen Raynor Phil Collinson Port Aventura United States District Court for the District of Nebraska Bentley (Hampshire) railway station Doctor Who and the Daleks in the Seven Keys to Doomsday Calcium propionate Joseph W. Alton Nebraska Educational Telecommunication Tower Carroll

Cleanup Crown Prince Party American McGee's Alice Economy of Iraq Merge Demographics of Taiwan List of major freeway systems Expressways of China Add Sources History of Guinea-Bissau Of Mice and Men Big Bird in China Wikify Chained oak Program Specific Information Buddhism in Bhutan Expand Wang Liqin Sport in China Military history of China

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Ozoo

Your name...why!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oogieboogie (talk • contribs)

Blancmange (Monty Python TV)

The first sentence clause of User:81.187.190.185's add was not a crystal ball. Would you mind going back and restore that part, ending with a period, thus fixing your own error? Milo 01:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you ...

.. for reverting that talk page vandal yesterday!! Appreciate it :) - Alison^☺ 21:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

mr saxon

please as he ain't any where near a minor character, if you continue i may report to an administrator, although i am in the process of becoming one so watch out! --click here 15:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

He is no more a major character than Magpie or Van Statten. He is confirmed to appear in one episode. I am not sure what basis you can report me for. --OZOO (vote saxon) 10:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Doctor Who and the Daleks in the Seven Keys to Doomsday Posh Nosh Further Adventures of Doctor Syn Camille Coduri Philip Martin (screenwriter) Alan Ruscoe Rob Shearman Ian McCulloch (actor) No. 133 Squadron RAF Ben Aaronovitch Tom MacRae Ian Briggs Euros Lyn Shaun Dingwall Ian Stuart Black Bruno Langley John Scott Martin Adrienne Hill The Robots of Death

Cleanup Carole Ann Ford All's Fair in Oven War Acme Corporation Merge Captain Clegg Fatalism Weebl's cartoons Add Sources Daleks (video game) Rentaghost Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death Wikify Jailbird Pankaj Kapur Small Soldiers Expand List of Doctor Who robots Four Great Inventions of ancient China Jack Prelutsky

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Utopia references

Thanks for that, I can't think what went wrong!--Rambutan (talk) 11:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Chronology

Thanks for the changes, you saved me a bit of a job! I'm trying to polish it up to featured status - but does it count as a list or an article? Will ^(talk) 17:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

VotD

[1] Sorry, what was that edit supposed to be? It removed good italics, and had a bizarre edit summary. A mistake? I've not reverted it, so if it was, please do!--Rambutan (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it was a mistake. I was reverting this edit not knowing that another editor had already removed it as well as making other changes. Undid it. --OZOO (What?) 16:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry to bother you. I'd have done it myself but for that unmentionable thing!--Rambutan (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, OZOO! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ^∆ 22:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Rob Styles

Hi. Thanks for the reverts to the article. He may get a pasting for some time to come. Vandalistic negativity is one thing, but I am concerned at the moment about a constructive editor introducing inappropriate supposition and original interpretation into the section of the article most under fire at the moment.

Don't get me wrong - the user has contributed much that is relevant and has spotted this "controversy" long before I did. What worries me are his attempts to lead the reader with emotive inserts bordering on scorn, and that is not neutral editing. So far, I have attempted to regulate the balance of the piece by reverting him, but he is headstrong (it says 21 years old on his userpage) and will not let the status quo exist for very long.

I don't edit-war, nor do I 3RR, so my reverts are occurring just once a day. If you are happy with the tone of the incident as it stands, then please disregard this message. However, if you are as concerned as me, consider lending a hand. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 15:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Italics & Quotes in Who chronology

Many thanks for that. I wasn't looking forward to going through all the titles. Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 09:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Sarah Jane Adventure Title

http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/09_september/06/sarah.shtml --~~The_Iceman2288~~ note for bot - post was added at 11:19, 6 September 2007

Civilization Zero

So what is Civilization zero. You said it's mentioned in Blink... where about... is it a movie poster at the video shop? What do we know about this? Please let me know soon as Blink will be aired in the U.S. tomorrow night and I can look for it.--Dr who1975 14:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure where it actually appears- my guess is in the DVD store- but it's included as part of a gallery on the BBC website. Hope this helps. --OZOO (What?) 16:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Three phone calls

Yes, you're quite correct. I should've checked before making my revert. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 16:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The Simpsons WikiProject membership update

The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 17:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem

and that's what it's there for :)  — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 17:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Martha Jones

Mistake, definitely. I only wanted to remove the "daddy issues" comment -- I have no bloody idea how I reverted to a different version.--SarekOfVulcan 17:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No worries: by all definitions but intent, that was vandalism. Glad you caught it before there were intervening edits.--SarekOfVulcan 17:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Peru Surfing

Hi, I've added a number of sources since you last commented on "Who Invented Surfing" I'd appreciate your looking at the new documents especially #4. Also, Henning has written a lot about surfing including one book about Polynesia...his reseach indicates Peru as the origin and is generally accepted in the most of "Knowledgable" surfing community. The authors and their credentials of Document 4 are a sign of this acceptance. Surfmac2004 21:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

VitasV

I had a chat with another user, and we're trying to give VitasV a warning that his behaviour is not acceptable. This is what we have so far
Dear VitasV

Thanks for your input here - although regrettably, both I (Wiggstar69) and Stuart DD feel you do not take into acount any other opinion then your own and seem quite agressive in your approach when talking to other users; see
1
2
3
4
5

a trend which you are continuing both here and here".

You have even started attacking other users 1,2

I hope we can come to an agreement, before you find yourself being reported.

Would you like to add your name to the list of users above, or add anything to this note?
StuartDD _{contributions} 08:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, OZOO! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. β^_command 05:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Simland

Two Things:

1. I sort of agree with your tag because the article should be re-written when the company expands,
2. Why?!?

--SimpsonsFan08 (talk) 12:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The page (as it was) failed the Notability critieria for companies or websites- nothing about Simland had been written in reliable, secondary sources. If every single web company was allowed an article, Wikipedia would become unmanagable. --OZOO 15:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:WikiProject Torchwood members

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Torchwood members, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:WikiProject Torchwood members has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:WikiProject Torchwood members, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Rob Styles

Hi. Thanks for watching the above article while my broadband was down. The user in question has an obsession with his "every commentator" claim if you look at the history. I did try to tell him this was an unlikely scenario but he wouldn't have it. As for Facebook, well... Ref ^(chew)(do) 18:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Sarah Jane Smith

... Had you looked further down, you;d have seen my comment on the talk Page!

The opinion of one editor is insufficient and I see no reason not to challenge it.

BTW, in case you were unaware sarcasm is unacceptable in Edit Summaries. 86.165.34.125 (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I apologize for the sarcasm, but various things (mainly football) has resulted in me being a bit annoyed lately. To be fair, you hadn't posted your comment when I undid your edit. I've given my opinion on the talk page. --OZOO (Whaddya think, sirs?) 18:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC) (edited by OZOO (Whaddya think, sirs?) at 21:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC))

David Beckham article.

Hey sorry about the changes. I'm new here and still learning the norms of the community. I'll be sure to cite my sources adequately from now on. Velvet Llama (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

DW Celt sockpuppet ring

Hi, you might be interested in the results of this checkuser which I filed in relation to the sockpuppet ring of accounts operated by DW Celt. All of them turned up positive and have now been indef blocked. Coldmachine^Talk 17:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Editor Review?

Hey OZOO, I was going through the editor review pages and reviewing a few of my fellow editors and noticed that your request for review was rather old. Would you still like someone to give you a review on that page? If so let me know by contacting me on my talk page. Have a nice day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sykko (talk • contribs) 06:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey I know I said that I was going to do a review for you in a couple of days and it's been like a week now, I am sorry for that. I just want you to know that I havent forgotten and that I will add a review on there soon %%-SYKKO-%% (talk to me) 02:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Torchwood Institute GAR

I have nominated Torchwood Institute for a community review of its GA status, which can be found here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in weighing in on the discussion. Please comment there for ways of improving the article and helping it to maintain its GA status. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashley Timms

The article Ashley Timms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE and not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OZOO. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rob Cross (darts player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kriss Kross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Vettel and Hamilton

Although Vettel and Hamilton each have 43 points, the FIA uses a count-back system to resolve tie-breakers. If two drivers have equal points, the driver with the most outright wins is considered the champion (or in this case, championship leader). Since that's not an option here, the FIA decide based on who achieved their best result first; as Vettel won a race before Hamilton did, Vettel is considered the championship leader for now. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion opened on article talk page. OZOO 21:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Top 25

I did the top 25 list that was missing. If you're willing to rewrite anything, and maybe add the intro text that I was unsure on what to put, feel free to do so! igordebraga ≠ 18:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 PDC Pro Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Thornton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Manchester City season article

Hello, I reverted it because apart from Man City's season articles I have never seen it anywhere else before so it is obviously rare. I have kept the section name to "Transfer and loans" like you requested in your edit. Also as you can see it all looks a bit squashed and no need to seperate first and reserves transfers/loans. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 15:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

World Series of Darts Finals not a major

Please check Darts database who covers all darts events. Major wins are clearly listed and this is not one of them. The World Series of Darts Finals has never been a major check MVG'S wins on Darts Database this event is listed under "other wins" like regular world series events. Please check before you edit again. Regards 31.200.130.127 (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Darts Database is not an official source. The PDC, on their Order of Merit Rules page under section 2.1, clearly list the World Series of Darts Finals as a "Premier Invitational Event"; alongside The Masters, the Champions League, the Premier League and the World Cup. I would additionally note that DartsDatabase does not agree with the PDC on all other tournaments – Phil Taylor's win in the 2016 Champions League of Darts is included under "Other Wins" on his page; even though it is a major. The WSODF also carries with it a Grand Slam of Darts place, further indicating it is a major. OZOO 12:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't know what you are talking about Taylor's win in the Champions League of Darts is included in his major wins. I just checked it there. So I don't know what you are talking about there ? 92.251.140.203 (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

That's been changed in the past 24 hours, then. See this archived version from late June. OZOO (t) (c) 11:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Well I don't know but it's there now 92.251.140.203 (talk) 13:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Just because it carries Grand Slam places does not make it a major. Why don't TV commentators count the two wins in MVG'S career total so. Everyone goes by darts database it is always sourced on wiki. Is the WSODF listed as a major on the PDC roll of honour ?. 31.200.130.127 (talk) 17:09, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I am going to contact the PDC to see their response31.200.130.127 (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Us darts masters

Looks like I was right about the position of the top four seeds in the draw. 178.167.193.100 (talk) 22:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it turns out you were correct. But WP:V and WP:RS applied to this article, same as any other. Edit summaries such as this, this and these are not to be encouraged, either.

It doesn't matter ffs it's the same formats in these events lighten up does it make any difference if the top 4 seeds are added.178.167.193.100 (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Verifiability of information is one of the core principles of Wikipedia. I looked on the PDC website and found no reliable source backing up that version of the draw. The same seeds were listed on the draw for Shanghai, without a source, and turned out to be incorrect. OZOO (t) (c) 09:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

2017 Perth Darts Masters

Just want to say it's quite ironic from you that you're pushing that verifiability agenda and then you deleted that seeds early on from another user which did had in fact a source cited I believe (not sure tho I'm sorry). But the point is that you then wrote "No source provided. Those seedings are probably incorrect anyway, since Taylor is above Barney on the OOM" in the discussion page without having a source cited in that message, too. Btw it is you who is wrong. You can cleary just calcute gained points from the tournaments (there is a system behind that you know (https://www.pdpa.co.uk/pdc-tours/development-tour/)) to say that RvB is indeed (after Shanghai) above Taylor or just have a look at the current WSOOM. -- ThommyI (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

then you deleted that seeds early on from another user which did had in fact a source cited I believe (not sure tho I'm sorry).

You yourself say that you are not sure about sourcing (and there was none). But I will admit, I was unaware that the WSODOOM was used rather than the main PDC OOM. I would, however, note that the WSODOOM has changed post Auckland; and that the order of Anderson - Wright - RvB - Wade; is only correct if the seeding is from before the Auckland Masters. After Auckland, the top 4 is Anderson - Wade - RvB - Taylor; and how can we say that one or the other of those is correct?

BTW, my push for verifiability is not an "agenda" but one of the core content policies of Wikipedia. OZOO (t) (c) 06:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I would also note that the PDC has a different World Series Order of Merit; which says the top 4 for Melbourne should be Anderson - RvB / Wade (tied) - Wright; so which one should we use? OZOO (t) (c) 08:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

It seems I was right to be removing the unverified seedings from the 2017 Melbourne Darts Masters page, at least, as they were wrong. OZOO (t) (c) 09:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

The part abput not being sure was refered to the potential source, not the seedings. They are existent nethertheless and all of them. Its a term of logical eyplanantion and definition whcih concludes to an existance of them as the top PDC players are kept away from each other in the First round. With the other part you're right. The seeds changed after Auckland, so did the ranking of course. We're both not responsable if the other user used the outdates ranking for seeding. Id don't get your link to the current WSOoM as its the normal one which is used for ranking and citing here on wikipedia, I wasn't refering to another. Cheers ThommyI (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Tommy he is wrong about a lot of stuff on here and will not listen to others when he has been proved wrong time and again 178.167.136.108 (talk) 23:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ironic to say this when I have just been proven totally right; we shouldn't have had the outdated seedings on the Melbourne page. OZOO (t) (c) 06:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

You were totally wrong you said it was based on the PDC oder of Merit which it was not. So you were actually wrong 31.200.163.211 (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

But I was totally right to remove it, and you were totally wrong to restore it. Correct? OZOO (t) (c) 21:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

You were totally wrong about the seedings list 178.167.146.69 (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

In what way? The seeds I removed are not the seeds that are there now, nor will they be the seeds used in the tournament. OZOO (t) (c) 17:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	Pretty darn brilliant work at Wikipedia:Top 25 Report this week. Especially loved the references to Deaths in 2017.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Top 25

Didn't notice you were already starting to write the list (A lad insane adding a big mistake - confusing MMA with boxing! - to his usual dryness must have struck a note with me), so I jumped on you - but to compensate, I've added what you had done and you're free to change what I did, specially in the intro. igordebraga ≠ 00:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Put up last week's list in your sandbox - xHamster is still ruled out, but there's plenty of Playboy! - in case you want to do the Top 25 this time. igordebraga ≠ 13:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Cheers, I'll try to get something written tonight or tomorrow. OZOO (t) (c) 13:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Why delete my edit???

Why delete my edit (Personal attack removed) ? How about I look up all your edits and delete them, well if you delete my edit again I'll happily then delete all yours!!! PJNWUK (talk) 11:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@PJNWUK: Your edits to the England national football team article were, as I mentioned in my edit summary, and as you have been previously informed, excessive level of statistics, in contradiction of WP:NOTSTATS. If you feel they should be kept, please attempt to get a consensus for the change, either on the talk page, or for a more general view, on WT:FOOTBALL. If you feel any of my edits are inappropriate, please do revert them, but do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. You are also advised to remember the rules against personal attacks. OZOO (t) (c) 12:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Whatever, you're defeating the object of this website Very existence by not allowing legit factual updates PJNWUK (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Simply I will go down every avenue to have this website removed indefinite PJNWUK (talk) 12:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Well, good luck with that. OZOO (t) (c) 12:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

World Series of Darts Finals

Can you not see this is not a Major event and has never been classed as one ?. Are you new on here or new to Darts. The WSODF is a regular tv event and is not counted as a major.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.164.191 (talk • contribs)

I did not say that it was a Major event. If you read the Template, it says "Premier event". The PDC rules are clear.

Premier Invitational Events:

• Premier League
• Champions League
• World Series Finals
• Masters
• World Cup

The World Series Finals are a Premier Event. OZOO (t) (c) 08:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

It is not regarded as a major as has not been in any season it has been staged do you actually watch darts ?. I have compiled data on it for years ?. 92.251.145.71 (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

If you have a reliable source, that is not original research, that can be used to verify that the PDC is wrong and the WSODF is not a premier event, please provide it, and I will not complain about the Template saying what it does. As it is, the only source - The PDC website - includes the event amongst "Premier Invitational Events". OZOO (t) (c) 11:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Where does it source WSODF as a premier event ?. It just lists WSOD I have also contacted Dave Allen at the PDC they count it as a regular tv event 92.251.145.71 (talk) 11:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

As I quoted above; from rule #2.1 :

Premier Invitational Events:

• Premier League
• Champions League
• World Series Finals
• Masters
• World Cup

OZOO (t) (c) 11:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

I know the PDC does not regard this as a major nor do statisticians 92.251.145.71 (talk) 11:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Why does ITV and their statisticians who are showing the event for the PDC not regard this event as a major when they are covering it ? 178.167.196.126 (talk) 00:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Source for this, please? NB: The phrase used in the PDC rulebook and in the template is "Premier event", not "Major". OZOO (t) (c) 08:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

You're wasting your time and mine!!!!

Delete my edit one more time and I will delete the whole page!!!! PJNWUK (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I acknowledge your threat to commit vandalism and shall treat it with the seriousness it deserves. OZOO (t) (c) 12:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Sylvia Hermon party

In future, when something has been changed by a discussion and a new consensus being reached, please put that in the reasoning of your edit. By putting 'there isn't an Independent Unionist Party' as your reasoning, you made me think you were misinformed and unaware that a consensus was already in place.

Thanks for linking the discussion though. I personally agree that Sylvia Hermon should be referred to as an Independent. JackWilfred (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, OZOO. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays

I'm having a merry Christmas and I hope you have a good day today and a happy new year. Thanks for working with me over the past year on the Top 25 Report. Keep up the good work.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2018 PDC World Darts Championship

On 2 January 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 PDC World Darts Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 06:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

The Masters 2018

Hi can you create a page for the above please ?. I know the seedings for the event. Regardx 92.251.207.11 (talk) 01:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I think it would be best until the official rankings/schedule were released on pdc.tv, personally; which should hopefully be quite soon. Note that the article exists as a redirect, so you should be able to edit it as an IP. OZOO (t) (c) 09:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

There is no need to wait for OFFICIAL lists we know the seedings thats your problem you always want to wait snd see instead of go and do 92.251.163.210 (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Someone has already created the page. See no point sitting on your hands waiting i really dont understand your way. We know the seedings lets get it done. 92.251.163.210 (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

There is no need to be aggressive. Remember that you initiated this conversation and I am not obliged to create every dart based article. OZOO (t) (c) 17:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Top 25

Recent events forced me to revise the last list of October. And given it broke the Stranger Things streak at #1, are you willing to do the same for the one you did the following week? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igordebraga (talk • contribs)

@Igordebraga: Just needs some changes as ST is no longer three times on their consecutively, correct? Changed the intro and the ST #1 entry. OZOO (t) (c) 21:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

And if you wanted, something about Kevin Spacey topping the previous week, but it's OK to just change the Stranger Things facts. Anyway, hoping to see soon your final write-up in the yearly list (Fate of the Furious, unless you decide to trade one with @JFG:, who hasn't written any of his yet... and I assigned Queen Victoria to you, just to get a Brit to talk about the royal family, but you can drop it) igordebraga ≠ 03:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Related to one of the current stalwarts of the list... wonder if you've noticed this. igordebraga ≠ 03:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

I saw it, and will be extremely annoyed if there isn't a movie in the works explaining which of the previous films was the catalyst for Welxit. At the very least we should get a Netflix series I won't watch. OZOO (t) (c) 21:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)