User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15

DYK for Eleanor Nathan

On 2 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eleanor Nathan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eleanor Nathan was a member of the London County Council representing two different parties and two different districts for a total of 16 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eleanor Nathan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Eleanor Nathan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kate Brown (actress)

The article Kate Brown (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Essentially an unref blp too - no references, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Warning (yet again)

Pat, you created Eleanor Nathan, another unreferenced articles. You are an experienced editor and have been asked to stop this numerous times. If it is that you intend to add a reference but are just taking your time, please work on the articles in draftspace first, and transfer it when it's ready. This wasted other editors' time, and all articles need references. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm not aware that this procedure is compulsory. Somebody else did a lot to improve the article shortly after I created it. PatGallacher (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I missed your response here. The relevant guidelines are at WP:Verfiability: All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed...All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. I have also previously pointed out WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:INLINECITE: all blps need inline citations, including Romina Del Plá. Please start referencing properly - it makes it so much easier for readers and other editors. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

"Drive-by tagging"

What do you mean by "drive-by tagging" please?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

The term is a well-established one on Wikipedia, used for people who add tags willy-nilly to articles. In this case, it is not of great importance which plantations in Georgia her ancestors may have served on as slaves, and no big deal if we can't clarify this from this time away. PatGallacher (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

That's your opinion. We have details about her paternal line, and should have more about her maternal line, too.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't entirely disagree, but the exact plantation may not be the important thing. PatGallacher (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

The Social Register published an article about Michelle Obama's ancestors a few years ago. Many people are interested in this. I don't think we should censor US history.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (John Rutherford (Conservative politician)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating John Rutherford (Conservative politician), PatGallacher!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have inline cited the source and tagged it as needing more than the one primary source.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PatGallacher. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, Pat, could you please inline cite your sources for Romina Del Plá. This is a requirement for all biographies of living people (see WP:INLINECITE). If you ping me when it's done, I'm happy to review it so it will be accessible on all search engines. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

I will probably get round to this, but I have not been very well recently, and I have a few things on my plate at the moment. PatGallacher (talk) 19:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

sexual crime?

diff - hi, A sexual allegation has been made, do you think that warrants adding the recently deceased person to the Category:Sex crimes in the United Kingdom when no charges or any legal case have even started? I also think that WP:BDP is to apply to recently deceased people? Govindaharihari (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

• Ok, the category may not be vital, but mention of the allegation should remain in the article. PatGallacher (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  • It is not only not vital it is against the simplist of wikipedia policies and it is an embarrasment on your 12 years and thousands of edits here that you added it. Govindaharihari (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

My 12 years on Wikipedia includes ensuring that violence against women is dealt with properly. PatGallacher (talk) 01:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

You are now edit warring against WP:BLP - I get it that you have some personal issue with this but that should not stop you following wikiedia policy. Govindaharihari (talk) 01:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Cassidy. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 01:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph P. Mawra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph P. Mawra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph P. Mawra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BURLEY-XXII 08:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burley22 (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Paul Curran (actor)

The article Paul Curran (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources

Pat, you've been repeatedly asked to only create articles with references, especially important for biographies of living people. It might help you to work in draftspace first and only move when it's ready/ Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 22:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I'm not going to contest deletion on this. To complicate matters, looking into this I think there could have been 2 actors called Paul Curran, and I'm not sure if either of them pass notability (combined they might have). PatGallacher (talk) 22:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hi. I'll be glad if you take a look at this discussion and tell us your opinion. Many thanks. Keivan.f^Talk 22:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Jack Sargeant

Oh dear...we seem to have had the same idea at roughly the same time. I wasn't bold enough to move the page, so now we have Jack Sargeant and Jack Sargeant (politician). I'll change Jack Sargeant to a disambiguation page as it has no sources yet, but if you disagree then you're welcome to revert me and redirect my page. This is Paul (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RWP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary Workers Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Normally you would be right, but I believe that in this case the decision to point to a disambiguation page was correct. PatGallacher (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Category talk:Women rulers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Category talk:Women rulers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mainumby

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mainumby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 04:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Anna Campbell

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Anna Campbell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The Daily Mail is a specifically banned source, so I have removed this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Anna Campbell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Campbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Campbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 11:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Article on Anna Campbell

Hi Pat, thanks for creating this article. I see it's been nominated for deletion, and I have argued it should be kept. I've made other articles on Western fighters, and I also help run the Kurdish Wikipedia Project to engage the Kurdish community in the UK in improving Wikipedia articles on Kurdish subjects. Perhaps you would like to join our project? Please let me know if you're interested and would like to help out! --Jwslubbock (talk) 12:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

On the same article... don't forget that bolded alternative names in the lead should have incoming redirects, so that someone looking for Hêlîn Qereçox can find the article. It also reduces the chance that someone will create a duplicate article at the other name. I've made this redirect, also one from Helin Qerecox to cover all angles. PamD 09:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Leeds City Council election, 2018

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Leeds City Council election, 2018!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please only create articles with sources. This has been raised with you several times before over quite a period of time, and takes up a lot of other editors' time.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kasia Haddad

The article Kasia Haddad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted. No significant role in multiple films, no major awards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Taking of Prince Harry

The article The Taking of Prince Harry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This doesn't seem noteable to warrant a Wikipedia page. It's not even a real documentary about Prince Harry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arg Matey (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Cleopatra FAC

Hello! Judging by the talk page archives, I see that you have shown a strong interest for the article Cleopatra in the past. Would you be interested in reviewing it as a Featured Article Candidate? If so, please share your thoughts and critiques at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cleopatra/archive1. It would be most appreciated. Regards, Pericles of Athens^Talk 16:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Lindsay, 17th Earl of Crawford, 1st Earl of Lindsay

The article John Lindsay, 17th Earl of Crawford, 1st Earl of Lindsay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 13:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Lindsay, 17th Earl of Crawford, 1st Earl of Lindsay

The article John Lindsay, 17th Earl of Crawford, 1st Earl of Lindsay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Warning

KnowledgeChuck (talk) 13:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

KnowledgeChuck BLP does not apply to long dead individuals. BLP is biographies of living people. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Scottish Socialist Party

The source: https://scottishsocialistparty.org/executive-committee-election/ still lists National co-chairs: Calum Martin and Natalie Reid Jim1138 (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Zara Kitson

Hi there,

There is a discussion regarding the deletion of an article for Zara Kitson which is very similar to the one that was deleted for Toni Giugliano https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toni_Giugliano I noticed that you took part in the discussion and would invite your comments for Zara Kitson, as the discussion has been relisted to gain a consensus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zara_Kitson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.116.24 (talk) 13:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Richard Shuttleworth (politician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Shuttleworth (politician), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Shuttleworth (politician) has been accepted

Richard Shuttleworth (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jean Duprat (Avignon)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Jean Duprat (Avignon)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is more helpful to readers to have the references WP:INLINECITED, otherwise it is difficult to verify information, especially as the article (hopefully) expands.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Friendly notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Since you've briefly dipped your toes in the Donald Trump article, I'm giving you this friendly notice. It's sad that this sort of thing is necessary, but here we are! -- Scjessey (talk) 21:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Donald Trump

Just a heads up, the article is under consensus required. You need consensus to restore material challenged via revision. PackMecEng (talk) 20:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Do you? Or do you need consensus to delete properly sourced material? PatGallacher (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Per the talk page "Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). This includes making edits similar to the ones that have been challenged. If in doubt, don't make the edit.". PackMecEng (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

PackMecEng is correct and I came here to advise you of the same. A good move at this point would be to self-revert, thereby putting the article back into the correct state. ―Mandruss ☎ 14:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I second this. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I have reverted.[1] ―Mandruss ☎ 04:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Jean-Michel Duroy) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jean-Michel Duroy, PatGallacher!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE sources when you create articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nancy Lane

The article Nancy Lane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable chess player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Last of the Mohicans (1971 series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Vaughan (judge), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Vaughan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi

I created the article about Hubert Brasier per request from Davidgoodheart. I just wanted to point that out. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 23:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Maybe so, but the relevance of this to the deletion discussion escapes me. PatGallacher (talk) 23:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Ask Davidgoodheart, not me. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Şevin Söğüt, creating pages for women who died fighting with YPJ

Hi Pat, Thanks for creating the page for Ana Campbell! I would like to keep creating pages for other women who, like Ana fought with the YPJ and died. Şevin Söğüt is one of them who died recently. I would be very thanksfull if you could review the page I created for her Matilda.cramia (talk) 13:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Bobby Seagull moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bobby Seagull, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

I think this article already meets the general notability guideline. PatGallacher (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobby Seagull (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobby Seagull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bobby Seagull, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PatGallacher. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve River Tyne, Tasmania

Thanks for creating River Tyne, Tasmania.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please stop creating unreferneced articles - you have been asked on many occasions over the years.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

References

Please add your references to Alfred Thomas Davies. Can you please explain why you persistently create unreferenced articles even though this has been raised with you many times over a period of years? Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

River Tyne, Tasmania moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, River Tyne, Tasmania, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Flooded with them hundreds 11:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Note on adding unsourced content

Hey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded with them hundreds 11:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: River Tyne, Tasmania (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:River Tyne, Tasmania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:River Tyne, Tasmania, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, PatGallacher! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Robert Cawdron moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert Cawdron, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Rover (story paper)

The article The Rover (story paper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stub has remained completely unsourced since it was tagged in 2010. Clearly not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah Craze

The article Sarah Craze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Marie Pierre Adrien Francastel

Hello, PatGallacher,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Marie Pierre Adrien Francastel! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please WP:INLINECITE sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 13:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Sarah Craze

Hello, PatGallacher,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sarah Craze should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Craze .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Thanks,

Citrivescence (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Afusat Saliu listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afusat Saliu. Since you had some involvement with the Afusat Saliu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)