User talk:Police,Mad,Jack/Archive 1

▼

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Police,Mad,Jack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  You might also be interested in stopping by Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement if you're interested in improving or adding police-related articles. bobanny 06:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Participants

Hiya, I made this edit to make your username signature work they way you wanted it to. You can tinker with your signature settings in your 'preferences' tab if you want your signature to always read that way but still work as a link to you userpage. Ask me if you don't get what I mean, and happy editing! SGGH ^speak! 11:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 16:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: thanks

No worries. Also, try to leave a new message at the very bottom so people know where to look for it. If you click '+' at the top it will do that automatically :) happy editing! SGGH ^speak! 20:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Firearms

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF 22:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: A question

I don't mind you asking at all. I am indeed a British police officer. I'm a special with Avon and Somerset Constabulary and have been so for about two months now. Firearms are hardcore! We had a group teaching me the self defence training and it was moderately hard core (I have some Combined Cadet Force experience so I am used to it, but some of the others found it markedly different.)

If you have any questions you can feel free to ask me, but I would rather if you email them, for obvious reasons! :)

Good luck! SGGH ^speak! 20:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Re. Border

In reply to your message: Hey, I'm very well thanks =) I think you'd really enjoy Australia, I hope you can make it out here one day!

I nicked the border off someone else's page and modified it and you're more than welcome to do the same here. I've simplified my coding a bit for you by inserting little tags so you can find it. Just begin editing my userpage/talk page and copy and paste the coding for the page border - it's at the very top. Insert it at the top of your coding and change the hex values to change colours to your liking. If you're unfamiliar with hex values, there's a simple colour chart at http://html-color-codes.com

Sorry, I tried to put the code into this message but it wouldn't work properly so you can just copy and paste from mine. If you have any questions just ask =) happy editing! SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 12:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

In reply to your message: Yeh I've been watching The Bill for years and I've been collecting the box sets of the originals so that I can catch up on what I missed before I was even born! I agree about the Wikiproject, it is a shame. I should really get back into it now that I've finished exams. I'll see you around =) SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 13:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Citations

Evening

Your addition to the SAS page was interesting but needs some evidence to back it up. One of the biggest issues with most of the SF related pages is lack of sources to substantiate what's said, so if you've got something which meets the needs of Wikipedias verifiability policy then it would be useful to add it. If not then it's liable to end up removed.

All the best

ALR (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem, you just need to add the reference to the article where you added it. I notice you've got a welcome template up above, that'll take you to where you can find the guidance on how to add references.

It's worth reviewing verifiability, Point of View and No original research. Personally I think that the guidance on sources in wikipedia is abysmal, but as long as you stick with those three the majority of your edits will be safe.

ALR (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I am, I have quite a lot of experience with all three. ALR (talk) 10:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Given my background I'm not generally open about where my background lies. I'm just approaching the end of my 18th year though; mainly in combat arm or combat support functions.ALR (talk) 14:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:SAS

Hi, Jack.

If you're interested in finding out more about the SAS, you can email me all the questions you want answering at lifetheory@gmail.com.

Matt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GowsiPowsi (talk • contribs) 18:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Firearms Unit

I didn't actually delete more than a few words, I moved most of the openng section into a section called 'Training and operations' ;) Ninetyone (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

right, what you have written is not a wikipedia article. for one, headings should not finish in colons and the headings themselves are *too* specific (yes, i know it sounds silly ;)).

i re-wrote some of what you wrote to both improve the english, and to make it more encyclopediatic-whatever. your content is very good, it was just your style that i improved a little.

the first para is only supposed to briefly explain the article, and should not be more than a few sentances long.

if you have issues with anything, please tell me, then i'll change it back by section, ok?

oh, and btw, i am only two years your elder ;)

Ninetyone (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

see dep. garcia's talk page. Ninetyone (talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

____________

(Discussion on this matter is closed, me and Ninetyone have both come to an agreement as of 28th December 2007.)

RE: Hey! topic

Hello there, thanks for the enquiry about the police. Yes, if you really want to join the police I suggest you do, but not at 18. Wait, until you are about 22 (when you have more experience of the world etc...) And yes, I did used to be in firearms, but I moved back to patrol because its rather risky and I would like to start a family soon.

Thanks for the comment, Have a great Christmas!

Any more questions please comment me :)

Regards

Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 15:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Further to that, I know everyone thinking of joining gets told this but it really is true; don't expect it to be like TV. While it's a fulfilling, rewarding, exciting job sometimes, for every hour of foot chases, dawn raids and high-profile arrests, there are ten hours of standing on crime scenes alone, directing traffic in the rain, "providing a visible presence" (aka: wandering around shopping malls being abused by complete strangers) and possibly the most soul-destroying job on the planet, ANPR operations. From your edit history I assume it's the Met Police you're planning to join, in which case add endless form-filling, a public who by-and-large treat you like an occupying army, and the ever-present possibility of compulsory transfer to Metcall. That's not meant to put you off - it is a unique job and can be uniquely satisfying - but it can also be uniquely boring and a lot of probationers are shocked to discover that. I agree entirely with Dep. Garcia about waiting until your early 20s before joining; quite apart from the fact that you're far more likely to be accepted at an older age, it never hurts to have some hands-on experience on how the real world operates. Assuming it's the UK police you're joining, you might want to consider joining as a PCSO first, to get a "taste" of police work without committing yourself to the full six months training & two years as a probationer - also, PCSOs are far more likely to be accepted as "real" officers should they apply. — iridescent 18:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, being a PCSO first helps you get your foot in the door so to speak! I am currently still a Police Constable, I don't really want the role of a sergeant at the moment. Its okay, I like people taking an interest in what I do, its better then people saying "oh your a cop, hide the drugs". Leave work at work and home at home :) Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 19:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

SAS

Hi there. The reason I deleted the information you added to the SAS page is that is appears to be unsourced something that was made up one day. You have listed it as "Foundations thought up in 1941" which seems to imply it has no standing and someone just made it up. As a result it didn't appear to have any real relevance or connection to anything, just some random thoughts. Unfortunately due to the nature of the edit it is likely it will be removed by someone else unless you can provide some basis of reference for it. Ben W Bell talk 18:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You have to understand this from the point of view of other readers and editors, to them it just looks like a random set of lines. Provide a reference for it and some context and it may be a different matter, but as it stand it appears like something someone thought up one day and just added to the article. Remember the tenant of Wikipedia, verifiability. Reference it and most importantly provide some more context for the lines in the article instead of just having four thoughts sitting there in the article. Ben W Bell talk 18:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

That's alright, I don't like rude people either. No need for it. Good luck and good editing. Ben W Bell talk 21:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

SAS Philosophy warring

Hi,

I have noticed the content dispute about the 'philosophy of the SAS' part of the Special Air Service article over the last day or so. Another user has reverted it to the last revision before either version was there, and I have started a discussion about it on the talk page (Talk:Special Air Service#SAS Philosophy warring. It would be good if the matter could be sorted out there before it is added back to the main article.

Thanks, and happy editing. Blair - Speak to me 10:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

re: welcome!

Thans for the welcome. check out my additions and tell me if they're up to par. Cheers! Sallicio (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Sallicio

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Life on Mars wikiproject

I have added my name to the list and think its a great idea thanks for telling me - J. Naven 21:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Invitation

Thank you for your offer, but I'm afraid I'll have to decline at the moment, as I'm quite busy :(.

However, I think the project is a fantastic idea, and wish you good luck with it. --Dave the Rave (DTR)talk 22:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid the situation is the same for me. May I make a suggestion though? Ask the League of Copyeditors to help with your project page. The page has so many mistakes on it that I think it may inhibit participation. Good luck. --Melty girl (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Infobox?

You put on the page about an infobox well heres an attempt by me in case we don't get a better one and happy new year to you to - J. Naven 22:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

This user is a member of the WikiProject Television Life on Mars task force.

Thanks for the opinion mate I just put it into a proper template page - J. Naven 22:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

LOM Wikiproject

I know what you mean by the things at the top of the page I'll try to make one now - J. Naven 22:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay I think I did it right its my first time doing one of these so I don't know if it will work properly with the assessment scales but I am confident iit will anyway here it is but I think we could use a picture for the Project as the LOM looks a bit dull - J. Naven 23:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject

Hopefully there will be loads of people joining - J. Naven 23:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Invitation

Greetings from Canada, Happy New Years and thanks for the invite to your wikiproject "Life on Mars." I have to admit that I have never seen an episode of the show and have only read about it. It sounds like a show that I can really get into. I have a strong interest in films and TV sitcoms that revolve around the idea of time travel. I wish I could help but since I've never seen an episode I don't think I can be of much help for now. Maybe in the future after watching a few of the episodes. Nhl4hamilton (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite. The LoM pages really need work so I'll help out if I can Tphi (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nelson, (Life On Mars)

I have nominated Nelson, (Life On Mars), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson, (Life On Mars). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Harland1 (^t/_c) 19:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism information

Why'd you change {{Vandalism information}} to 1? Is there a reason? _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}• 13:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, my error, you've changed it back, ok. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}• 13:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries, mate, just wondered. I've got no idea how it works either. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 18:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

oxfordshire

i live in oxfordshire --Madcow 93 (talk) 13:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For setting up the Life On Mars project J. Naven 17:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much J. Naven! :) This is my first Wiki Award!

RE: Hey

Hey, I'm from Scotland. I take that you're from the UK also as you have heard of (and appear to like) Life on Mars. Good show apparently (I missed it on BBC, shame) so I'd be glad to join your WikiProject. It would seem that teenagers are all over this wikipedia... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 19:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

PS. I'm making an English football WikiProject. Not running yet, but if you're interested, pop along. It should be here, so if the link is blue, you can join. Thanks in advance, _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 19:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Oops. It looks like there already is one, bugger. I'll make a Scotland one instead. Please think about joining. Thanks again, _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 19:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you muchly. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 19:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh you're too kind... I'll get on it. I think the first one should be in February, since there are only five members, but whatever. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it's now here. Cheers! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 18:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeh, how stupid of me :D _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 21:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Tell me about it... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 21:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for your invitation, but the LOM userbox on my userpage was only meant to indicate that I enjoy watching the show. I haven't considered helping editing the wikipedia articles for the show. There is only 2-3 shows that I want to dedicate my time to, The Simpsons, to a lesser extent, South Park, and possibly Black Books. Thank you anyway! --Simpsons fan 66 05:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Canvassing warning

Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "The occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice."¹, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that has resulted in blocks being issued. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. --McGeddon (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want to drum up members for a project, you should do so on the talk page of the related article, rather than through privately messaging the hundred or so editors who have ever edited a Life on Mars article (I'm guessing that's where you picked the hundred users from; I have certainly copyedited the article in the past, but am not a particular fan of the show). Anyone who really cares about the series is likely to have the main article and its talk page on their watchlist. --McGeddon (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, my original warning was a pre-written Wikipedia warning template which may not have been entirely appropriate, but spamming the same message to a hundred users (many of whom are presumably at my level or less of Life On Mars interest) certainly goes beyond "occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages". Please think before posting identical messages in this volume in the future; it's usually more appropriate to post to a talk page of a related article, such as Talk:Life on Mars (TV series). --McGeddon (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Only a casual interest in the series mainly because a friend [1] provided most of the radio equipment used in the first series and all used in the second series. --jmb (talk) 22:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Life_On_Mars,_promotional_books_and_DVD's.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Life_On_Mars,_promotional_books_and_DVD's.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow

Last time I checked there were about 5 people good job with the invites mate - J.Naven 13:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Well now there are a few members its time for the hard work - J.Naven 14:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

?

Just asking what was up with what was put on my talk page - J.Naven 16:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Assume good faith

Please read this before suggesting other editors might be vandals.

Thank you. :-) Theelf29 (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

M-1 Carbine Revert War

The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look? Sf46 (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

LOM invite

Thanks for the invite: good to see people keen to get involved in wikiprojects. I enjoyed watching the series, and have edited casually, but I've already got more on my "to-do" list than I have time, so I'm not committing to anything else at the moment. All the best, anyway. Gwinva (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

LOM invite

Thanks. I like the series but I have only a small interest in it. My edits there were disambiguation and format ones. I can't say anything more than I'm involved in another encylopaedia project where I'm paid for my contribution, so as you can imagine, my involvement in wikipedia from now on will not be a priority one, and as such I can't really devote my time here. MegX (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeh we should get to work on that actually I'll start whenever your ready - J.Naven 18:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Tone tag

Please don't just delete cleanup tags from articles, without commenting, as you did on Phyllis Dobbs - they're usually put there because editors are pointing out areas that others should be focusing their attention on, to help produce better articles. Phrases like "If you're rude to her sexually [...] you'll get a clip around the ear" are of an inappropriate tone for an encyclopaedia. Take a look at WP:TONE for an explanation of the tone of voice that Wikipedia articles should take. That whole "Writing better articles" policy is worth reading if you've got the time. --McGeddon (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Please try to be WP:CIVIL to other editors - Wikipedia's built on that, and personal attacks just sour the environment and deter contributions. I'm trying to help improve the articles you're working on - if we're at cross purposes on the tone of an article or the relevance of a tag, I apologise, but it's more useful to tell me that or discuss it on a talk page somewhere, than to just tell me to get lost. I hope we can work together. --McGeddon (talk) 18:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Nelson

Thought you should know in case you don't already the Nelson article has been deleted - J.Naven 15:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome Template

I have made a temporary welcome template as a suggestion for the Wikiproject seeing if you like it - J.Naven 16:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry being stupid I forgot to make a link its here for now but I think it shold be somewhere like Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars/Welcome - J.Naven 17:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Life on Mars - January 2008 Newsletter

The Life On Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 1 - January 2008

"I had an accident and I woke up in 1973. Am I mad, In a coma, or back in time? Whatever's happened, its like I've landed on a different planet." - Sam Tyler Project news The project was started this month! Well done to Police,Mad,Jack and J. Naven for getting the project off the ground. To do Character profiles, such as Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler, Annie Cartwright and Phyllis Dobbs need expanding. Lesser known characters but still of importance, like Nelson, DC Chris Skelton and DS Ray Carling still need expanding.

New members Police,Mad,Jack, J. Naven, Bevo74, Tphi, GusF, WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden, Rotring, Badwolftv, Theelf29 and Wolfmankurd are the first members.

This newsletter was automatically delivered by _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.}☆ on 19:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC). To stop recieving this newsletter, tell me through a note on the participants page. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.}☆ 19:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Article Assessment

I think your right about assessing articles but I'm not sure how to review them do you know by any chance? - J.Naven 22:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Nah i'm afraid I dont mate.

Damb niether do I which is going to be a problem as we have to assess articles but I do think Sam Tyler should be upgraded froma stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J. Naven (talk • contribs) 15:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

User:WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden

No, he didn't retire. I simply had to delete User:WBOSITG because it violated CSD U2.   jj137 ^♠ 03:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Life On Mars

Why have you removed a legitimate question and its answer from the above discussion page? --Kife 16:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm just sick of people suggesting a taskforce when I have gave good evidence against it so many times. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 16:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I can understand your irritation. But you're not going to encourage editors to join the project if you delete any questions they might have.

Is it ok with you if I restore the comments? At the very least, it might prevent anyone asking the same question. --Kife 16:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: "Please do gather evidence and make sure your conclusion is "Solid" so no one can pick holes in it." What conclusion?? I just asked a darn question!

Jeepers! I asked a question ("very very silly sentance" as you put it - learn to spell, by the way) and you respond by belittling me?? If you check my user page history, you'll see that I had added a userbox to support the LOM project[2], but given your obnoxious reply, I have removed it.[3] Do not belittle people's questions, and do not vandalize the WikiProject LOM talk page by removing my question from it. Maybe you started that WikiProject, but once it begins, you do not own it. Wryspy (talk) 02:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

RE Specialist Firearms Officer

It was done to correct the grammar, those fis better than them. And just because you start a page doesnt mean you own it. And no incorrect information was added to the page, so i fail to see your point Pat (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Just doing my bit for Wikipedia. Note that if you want to see what changes other editors have made to an article, you can click the "history" tab and select any two versions to "Compare selected versions" of - the changes will be highlighted in red. --McGeddon (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Stopping it

Hello again. If an editor seems to be adding good information to Wikipedia but in a style that needs tidying up to meet WP:MOS, then I usually check their other edits to see if there's anything else that I can help clear up. If I've "messed up" any of your text by adding factual inaccuracies then please do correct that, but I thought I'd been careful to only correct grammar, spelling and formatting issues, in areas where I'm unfamiliar with the subject. Put me right if I've done any damage. --McGeddon (talk) 15:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Life on Mars

So are you saying this should not be a member of Category:WikiProject Life on Mars? Sorry, I'm afraid I don't understand your objection... I'm just doing a little cleaning up. -- Prove It ^(talk) 18:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

Thanks for trying to help reduce vandalism on Wikipedia, but please follow the 1-4 scale of vandalism warnings given on WP:TT, rather than jumping straight to the level 4 "assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning". You should try to assume good faith for something as simple as a corrected typo on your user page. --McGeddon (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, editing someone else's user page is inappropriate, even for a small typo, but this doesn't merit a harsh "assume bad faith, last warning" to an innocent new user who might not know any better. Please read WP:TT before issuing further vandalism warnings - in most cases you should start with a level one vandalism warning and work upwards. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

A good Wikipedian is supposed to take a deep breath and think "assume good faith". If it's possible that an edit was made by someone trying to be helpful, our first response should be one of polite reproach, rather than treating them as a full-on malicious vandal and possibly scaring them away. Even though this means being initially, teeth-grittingly polite to a lot of genuine vandals, it's worth it for the one in a hundred who apologises and sticks around to help out.

The "compare selected versions" button in the history page will let you compare edits to find exactly what an editor added or removed to a page, if you haven't explored that functionality yet. User:QYV only corrected a single-letter typo in your userpage. --McGeddon (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but a level four final bad-faith warning is not appropriate for a user who has only been around a week, and has received no previous warnings. You were absolutely right to point out QYV's misunderstanding, but should have used a much lower warning level. Don't bite the newbies; "nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility". --McGeddon (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

While the above is true, the user also reverted your edits, calling it vandalism, and he did continue to edit your userpage after you asked him not to. He was given a final warning by you, and continued to edit, so I have blocked him for 24 hours, and am about to leave him a message explainin things to him (or her). However, Police,Mad,Jack, I would suggest you be slightly more civil to McGeddon up there, even if you have had a brush with him in the past, we should all try to remain friends, that's fair enough isn't it? :) SGGH ^speak! 20:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

That was a different user, from an anonymous IP address; User:QYV did nothing more than correct a single one-letter typo on Jack's user page, which Jack issued a level-four bad-faith warning for. --McGeddon (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Wryspy, you will be blocked from editing. I would have only used a level 1 warning except that this discussion makes it abundantly clear that you know better. It is truly ironic that after you gave someone a vandalism warning for tampering with a user page, you reverted my own edit to my own user page. Wryspy (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Please Note: I am not a vandal. My account was compromised, this is not my doing. Sorry. Jack.

Sorry to hear it. I trust you've now changed your password to stop it happening again. --McGeddon (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Membership bars

Do you mean the one the project offers, the large brown one, or the ones in my drop down box on my user page? Either way, just go on it, copy the code to your one and tinker :) SGGH ^speak! 17:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

If you edit the page with the template on, you will see its name inside of {{ }}, copy that name into the search bar with Template: in front of it, and you should get there SGGH ^speak! 17:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

LoM/Ashes template

Hey man, I'd been intending to update it in the next few weeks, but I just had a look at it. I've written a review of what I've done on its talk page here :) Cheers, Tphi (talk) 17:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I'm rewatching the entire show to prepare for Ashes to Ashes so I'll add characters to the list whilst I'm watching them we should have triple the characters soon - J.Naven 20:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandals

Don't let them get you down. It's much easier to revert vandalism than to create it - I just end up feeling sorry for the time that they're wasting. --McGeddon (talk) 22:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Can I ask why you're adding extra full stops to articles (and usually removing them a few minutes later), by the way? --McGeddon (talk) 16:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, but making unnecessary edits to articles isn't ever a helpful thing to do, and you left one test edit there for at least a quarter of an hour. Don't be cryptic - if there's a good reason that you're doing it (are you trying to clear your cache?), maybe I can help you find a better way to achieve it.

And I'm sure you're right about the firearms unit merge. Would be better to put your argument on Talk:Firearms unit than in my talk page, though, so that others can read it. --McGeddon (talk) 17:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Forward

Were they call made after the forward started? If you send me a link to the one which is now a redirect, I'll take a look. If you wrote a substantial bit then it can count, that fair? SGGH ^speak! 21:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

To be honest you habe written a law enforcement article at whislte, even if it was subsequently merged, go for it! SGGH ^speak! 22:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries, I have edited your CAIT article a little bit, as every force as far as I know has a CAIT, Avon and Somerset Constabulary certainly does. Also sorry for above typos, I'm not using my regular keyboard and this one is rubbish. SGGH ^speak! 22:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Your edits

Hello again. I just had the firearms unit article on my watchlist - Wikipedia lets editors keep track of articles they're interested in by clicking the "watch" tab, and gives them a "watchlist" of recent edits to all those articles. I tend to watch any that need further work, and just noticed you adding a full stop, which you'd done before. The watchlists are explained here - they're definitely worth using, if you haven't tried them.

The police whistle article was a one-paragraph stub, and closely matched the existing "police whistle" section of the whistle article - it seemed a pretty uncontroversial merge, given that the article was a stub that hadn't been touched for a couple of months. You're perfectly free to undo it if you disagree with my reasoning, of course. --McGeddon (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Street Crime UK

I love it (and live it, to a certain extent) I wish they would come to Somerset SGGH ^speak! 09:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Life On Mars

Thanx for the invite :-D from Onshore

Life on Mars characters

I think we should change the names of Chris, Ray and Phylis' pages. Its strange for them to have their ranks infront of their names and since niether Gene, Sam or Alex have them we should just remove their rank from the page name - J.Naven 21:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow haven't looked at the mebers list for a while its really is picking up - J.Naven 18:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Giant smiley

Haha! That's clever, thanks very much SGGH ^speak! 19:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

February 28 SGGH ^speak! 17:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

"Stalking"

Oh, hello again. I'm just an editor who has a passing interest in improving some of the same articles as you, and sometimes I might change a sentence you've written, in the course of my edits. This is how Wikipedia is supposed to work, and isn't "stalking"; editors don't "own" their edits, and shouldn't feel possessive when someone else alters or replaces them. As it says at the bottom of every edit window, "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it." Take a look at WP:OWN if you haven't already, and try to assume good faith from fellow editors. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I've got some police-related articles on my watchlist, and I occasionally tidy up grammar and style if I notice the need for it. If you're responsible for making edits which require a bit of tidying up, then that will show up on my watchlist, and I might notice and correct them. This isn't "stalking", this is how watchlists work. --McGeddon (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

But I am "monitoring what you do". I've got a watchlist that includes several articles you edit, so I can see when an edit's been made; it's nothing personal, though. If we're both in the UK, then we're probably online at similar times of day. (If you're not familiar with the idea of Wikipedia watchlists, they're explained here.) --McGeddon (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No offence intended, you just seemed suspicious that I could see your edits and correct errors within a few hours. You sounded like someone who didn't know about watchlists. --McGeddon (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Status Bar

Yeah sure. See this page for information on how to do it. And newsletter is being made. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 19:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Right, this is how to do it.

1. Add this code to your monobook file, if you use the Monobook skin (check in your preferences at the top):

importScript('User:Voice_of_All/Addtabs/monobook.js');
importScript('User:Misza13/statusChanger.js');

1. Create User:Police,Mad,Jack/Status with this code:

{{User:Police,Mad,Jack/StatusTemplate|}}

1. Create User:Police,Mad,Jack/StatusTemplate with this code (edit as you wish)

'''<div style="border: 1px solid black; background: white; float: right; position: relative; top: -30px; padding: 5px">
Example's status: {{ #switch: {{{1}}}
 | in=<span style="color: green;">IN</span>
 | busy=<span style="color: #FFAA00;">BUSY</span>
 | out=<span style="color: red;">OUT</span>
}}
</div>'''

1. Add this code anywhere on your userpage, talkpage, etc.

{{User:Police,Mad,Jack/Status}}

Hope it works. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 20:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot to add that you have to change your status with the new buttons at the top (Next to My talk, My preferences, My watchlist etc.) _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 20:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Not at all! It is a bit complicated. There are three new links at the top right of the screen (hopefully): In, Busy and Out. Click one to change your status. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 20:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I see what's happened: you used the wrong code. Heh, no-one's perfect :P _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 20:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Life on Mars Newsletter

The Life on Mars Wikiproject Newsletter Issue 2 - February 2008

"They reckon you've got concussion - I couldn't give a tart's furry cup if half your brains are falling out. Don't ever waltz into my kingdom acting king of the jungle." - Gene Hunt Project news Ashes to Ashes begins airing on BBC One and BBC Four this month: the project's volunteers could help out with all of these articles as well. Unfortunately there is no change in the volume of good articles in the project. A list of Life on Mars and Ashes to Ashes has been created and Alex Drake's article has been made. To do Character profiles, such as Gene Hunt, Sam Tyler, Annie Cartwright and Phyllis Dobbs are close to good article status, with a bit of work, we can do it. Lesser known characters but still of importance, like DC Chris Skelton and DS Ray Carling still need expanding or creating. Everything Ashes to Ashes should be worked on.

New members Llamafish, Gingerclan, Gogorox93, Kaid100, Onshore, Yukichigai and Jamesgibbon joined in January. Theelf29 has left the project.

Newsletter delivered by _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} on 20:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC) using AWB. Complaints or issues should be brought to him.

Inappropriate level 4 warnings

I see that your account has issued another level four bad faith warning, after a new user deleted a section of an article without giving an edit summary. This is exactly the sort of situation that Template:Uw-delete1 is designed for - a level four warning is an extremely inappropriate reaction, and I have removed it. If you don't understand how these templates should be used, please take the time to read WP:TT, and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Improper use of vandalism warnings is vandalism, and seriously deters new users, damaging Wikipedia. If you continue to issue inappropriate level four warnings, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. --McGeddon (talk) 19:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I just moved this serious warning to the bottom along with my previous response, as it looked like you hadn't noticed it, and it is a serious issue. Barring further vandalism warnings (which I hope I won't have to make), I shan't post to your talk page again. --McGeddon (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Police

It appears to have been fixed already, but must have been vandalism. Good to see so many pics of our guys, I was going to contribute my own but doesn't appear to be necessary! It is cold out yes, but I am nice and warm in my house, Pachelbel's Canon is playing! I'll take a look at that article when I have a minute, don't forget to add it to the WPLE forward. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SGGH (talk • contribs) 09:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

LOM Wikiproject

I'm sorry I should have checked with you before doing this but I've moved a few of the pages related to the Wiikiproject from the Life On Mars... to Life on Mars. I thought it should be changes to lower case to be constitant with the shows page and the actual project but if you disagree feel free to change it back. It didn't cross me to contact you I've been stressed doing quite a bit of work - J.Naven 22:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Vandalism

Although the IP has prior final warnings, his or her edits to your page do not appear to be disruptional, rather just bad-wikiquette in terms of editing anothers page. The warning you left seems sufficient. Remember it may be being used by more than one person. SGGH ^speak! 09:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Already been blocked for 24 hours SGGH ^speak! 17:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Go for it, you can add it in yourself to WT:LE if you like. I would suggest awarding the one stripe award, for say.... 10+ or 15+ tags? SGGH ^speak! 17:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar mate - J.Naven 17:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Life on Mars

I think that soon we should ask for this to be re-assessed it might need a bit of work to it but I think it deserves it wondering what you thought - J.Naven 21:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: A2A

Thanks for the heads up! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 20:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Ashes to Ashes

Thanx for the message. I can't wait, it should be good :-D I also know that tonights episode is repeated on BBC FOUR next Thursday at 10.00pm. Onshore

Chris Skelton

You have again reverted it and warned the IP appropriately, there doesn't seem much more to be done. You seem to be getting a lot of IP vandalism directed at you recently? Try a level 2 vandalism warn next time if its a series of bad edits. SGGH ^speak! 17:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for the tip, its ashame that whilst we try to improve the articles others try to wreck them - J.Naven 18:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd kill someone if I missed it, I hope that scene with them on the Thames in the speedboat is tonights episode - J.Naven 18:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

See the BBC think of everything by doing that no-one will be killed, by the way I'm not sure if this was a mistake by BBC news or if its true but they were interviewing the cast and Ray was listed as DC and Chris as DS, looks like someone got a propmotion, or the BBC messed up - J.Naven 18:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

About the drive being on the wrong side - J.Naven 18:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Well since they messed up the Cortina maybe they're going for a tradition of having the wrong cars - J.Naven 18:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sort of, the model is right but there are lots of parts that shouldn't be on it Jeremy Clackson made a long list a things which ended up with him realising the car is a chop and shop car because then they don't have to pay road tax, cheapskates - J.Naven 19:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Glenister Interview the videos here if you want to watch it - J.Naven 19:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Chris Skelton

I finished reverting the page to its previous unvandalized state. I have also added the page to my watchlist and will fix any vandalism that I see! -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

A2A

It was brill, best part was when she said 'where does that put me' and it spelt dead, of course speedboats and mini-uzis are fun too - J.Naven 17:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hope we do get more, the Ashes to ashes character list will expand loads during the next few months - J.Naven 17:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

wrong information on The Sharon Granger page

Sory, I'm rather new to Wikipedia and I assumed quite a lot of this after I wacted the first episode od Ashes To Ashes last night, also sorry for reposting it I thought it was just a glitch or somthing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanAshley (talk • contribs) 18:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Sharon Granger Vandism

Sorry my spelling is awful I'm currently shearching for an online dictionary and I'll run ever thing through before I post it I ment Chris Skelton, I got a bit confused it's been a while since I've LOM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanAshley (talk • contribs) 18:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: School hols

Grrr. Lucky you, we're still at school...we have a long weekend next weekend though... I'm busy picking subjects for next year... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

We break up on March 21... fantastic. In Scotland we don't get halfterm. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Nah, it's not your fault - we do get longer for October hols and Easter, so...... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Fourth, the equivalent to Year...11 I think... _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Right, you taking your GCSEs this year, or next, or never? (I don't get how this system works, btw ;) ) _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

So very similar to here then. Primary school til P7, then Secondary school till 16. You can stay on until 17 or 18, go to college or university. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Well I was going to go for a degree in Graphic Design, leading on to a phD in the future. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 21:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well I'm a hoity-toity kinda guy. I've always wanted a phD because then you can be Dr. something: Dr. Jones, Dr. Harold, Dr. Morrison...so professional..._{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Nah.. I'd die in the army. If the enemy didn't get me, my teammates would ;) I can be very annoying. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Peh. I'm very lazy too. As you can tell my my contribs..._{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes? Football, rugby and other unfamiliar pasttimes?  ;) _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Badminton. Now that is fun. There was a club at school but it was cancelled when the teacher got pregnant... :/ _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, you could say that. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

LOL. But seriously, I'm only 15. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 22:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I know. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 09:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

LOM Invite

Hello,

Many thanks for the invite to the LOM project and I'll be delighted to help out A bright cold day in april (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

LOM template

The links aren't wrong - they go where they're supposed to, and there's nothing wrong with putting the cast in the box. Also, the point of Wikipedia's edit button is so things can improve, and reverting users isn't doing that, and reeks of WP:OWN. Will ^(talk) 17:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, is there any actual reason why the links to the cast shouldn't be there? Or the links to the Bowie songs? They are related to the shows, after all. Will ^(talk) 18:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thin ice

Hello, I don't believe we've met before. Could you explain what you meant in the edit summary of this edit? --Tony Sidaway 19:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Ashes to Ashes (TV series)

Please don't make personal attacks and stay calm in discussions. The best rule of thumb is to comment on content, not contributors. Thanks. --Veritas (talk) 20:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kyriakos (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree

We proberbly should, the Life on Mars and Ashes to Ashes Wikiproject, we should come up with a shortened Version like Wikiproject LOM/ATA unless everyone wants to write out to entire name in full - J.Naven 22:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Users

Oh yeh new users, really pickin up now, I see you got caught in a edit war- J.Naven 22:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Episodes

I see pages for A2A episodes have been created and I was wondering the same should be done for LOM. The problem would be the titles for them, what do you think - J.Naven 22:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for my late reply, I ment if we could do articles on each episode of Life on Mars like is being done to A2A - J.Naven 21:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

WP template & banners

When adding the WikiProject banner to an article (like you did here), would you mind adding it inside a bannershell (like this) if there is one? Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 14:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Kewl - no problem :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Copyediting

Thanks, it's on my watchlist. --McGeddon (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: WP LOM Newsletter

Ok. I'll make a separate bit for users in that cat, thanks. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 20:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Not yet

Na got it recorded watchin it in 15 mins - J.Naven 22:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Project invite

Thanks for the invite, but I probably won't be watching much of the rest of the series. --McGeddon (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Zip Zip Zippy Zipgun

I think I got the title right.  ;) He was continually adding unreferenced facts, so I reverted them. The facts he added were reverted by others before me though. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 17:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I have asked him through the talk page to reference his facts. I will search for some if you like. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 17:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The reference in the show was not to the A-Team programme - the term was coined long before that. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

He seems to think it was a reference to the TV show you gave me a link to, which started in 1983, but the series couldn't have used that as it is set in the 1970s. It is also irrelevant trivia we don't need anyway. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed ;) _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

If you like. I have filed an AIV report on him. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I'll link it: WP:AIV is where you put reports of vandals for admins to deal with. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Cheers mate. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Quite. Now we wait. Even if it wasn't vandalism it is still a personal attack in the edit summary. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{it seems the winds have stopped...} 18:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Me too

Me as well and I've got a test first lesson, nice way to welcome u back - J.Naven 20:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind welcome!

Appreciate the tips. Thank you! --Mazestephan (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Back to school

Haha! We're off today and tomorrow...not doing anything like _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 16:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Huh? What's that? _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 17:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Lucky! Oh well, good luck with that. You might want to archive your talkpage - almost 100 sections now! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 17:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the lateness. Read this for instructions. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 20:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

your sig

you should not have images in your sig. β^_command 17:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Betacommand, read WP:SIG please and consider removing the images from it. Thank you. — Save_Us † 17:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yup, have to remove the images - no images, no templates, etc. Avruch ^T 17:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Again, to see why, read WP:SIG, and to reply to you, no, everyone doesn't use them, you may be refering to unicode characters like the smiley in your sig, read this from WP:SIG:

Images of any kind may not be used in signatures for the following reasons:

• they are an unnecessary drain on server resources, and could cause server slowdown
• a new image can be uploaded in place of the one you chose, making your signature a target for possible vandalism and Denial-of-service attacks
• they make pages more difficult to read and scan
• they make it more difficult to copy text from a page
• they are potentially distracting from the actual message
• in most browsers images do not scale with the text, making lines with images higher than those without
• they clutter up the "file links" list on the image page every time you sign on a different talk page
• images in signatures give undue prominence to a given user's contribution

As an alternative to using images, consider using unicode characters that are symbols, such as these: ☺☻♥♪♫♣♠♂♀§. For a full listing of Unicode characters see Wikibooks:Unicode/Character reference.

Regards, — Save_Us † 17:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I saw your replies to these requests. You need to remove the image because it is disruptive (it is visually distracting and it breaks posts you sign in up with odd spacing. John Reaves 17:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

If you're not willing to remove it, you need to at least reduce its size to coincide with the rest of your sig. John Reaves 17:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd guess removing the font size tags would do it. John Reaves 17:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Your old sig had <font size="6">☺</font> , just use "☺". John Reaves 17:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Alternatively you can alter the number inside like this:

<font size="1">☺</font>

<font size="2">☺</font>

<font size="3">☺</font>

And etc. — Save_Us † 17:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Signbot only recognized ~~~~. Were you just copying and pasting the code? John Reaves 17:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

No, the helmet is an image, not a unicode character like the face. You can't have that in your sig. John Reaves 17:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. John Reaves 17:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

And no, that can't be done with the helmet. — Save_Us † 17:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• [4] Only kids with idiotic images in their signatures. John Reaves 18:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Any image in a sig is, we're here for an encyclopedia, not a "who can have the cutest signature" contest. John Reaves 18:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Go away Sinebot you bloody idiot I was signing my posts but you still put I wasnt.

Are you signing with ~~~~?

you should remove :en: from the links so [[User talk:Police,Mad,Jack instead of [[:en:User talk:Police,Mad,Jack β^_command 19:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betacommand2 (talk • contribs)

Ah the irony. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 21:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Help

I take it you already got your help, but I'm not a sysop unfortunately. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 21:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Citations

Thanks for helping remove "citation needed" tags for stuff that's been cited. It's always good to have actual footnotes so that other users can see exactly what's been cited and where, though - take a look at my edit to see how it's done. It also gives the article a clearly titled list of references, rather than a list of numbers. --McGeddon (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You still seem to be deleting "citation needed" tags. Please take a moment to replace them with <ref>-style footnotes instead, so that other editors can see (or check) which reference the claims are being drawn from. Let me know if you need any further guidance on how to do that. --McGeddon (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, it's okay, I know you're not just deleting them - I'm just asking you to replace them with <ref> citations, so that we get a footnote number appearing in the body of the article, which links to the exact source that's being referenced. If you check this edit you can see how it's done. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll take a look when I've got the time, if nobody beats me to it; Smidsy999 has been doing some good work on the references in Specialist Firearms Officer. There's not much to it, though; you can just copy and paste the existing "cite web"s and replace the URLs and things. --McGeddon (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

A2a

Definatley watchin it but I'm down cause my stupid xbox broke and i hav to BUY a new one - J.Naven 19:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Anyway at least this episode cleared the pain, "did that make you feel better" NO! - J.Naven 15:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Wierd how she can fight better than Sam - J.Naven 16:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Good point and Gene's proberbly to decent to hit a women - J.Naven 16:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd kill her if she killed Gene with that uppercut, even if it was by accident, what exactly would kill them broken neck or what - J.Naven 16:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Not the nicest way to die, it be a lot easier if you were shot, quick and palinless, unless you wake up in 1981 and are stalked by a clown - J.Naven 16:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

As long as it not the 1910's or the 40's otherwise there is a good chance you'll die with the world war thing then i'll just be plain scared - J.Naven 17:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Some help 4 U

[[:en:User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[:en:User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] '''·''' [[:en:Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])<font size="6">☺</font>[[Image:Crystal Clear app agent.png|32px]]

That's your sig code. Take out those :en:'s and you should get:

[[User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])<font size="6">☺</font>[[Image:Crystal Clear app agent.png|32px]]

Also, MiszaBot can't do that I don't think. I think it can just put old topics into an archive.

BTW if the above doesn't work, put [[Category:Wikipedians who have opted out of automatic signing]] on your userpage. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{that one guy who buried stuff} 22:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Forward

Great stuff, I have updated everyone's progress. SGGH ^speak! 17:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Incidentally you may want to archive your talk page sometime, manually or with a bot SGGH ^speak! 17:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

You can do it manually, look at my talk page you'll see how I've done it. SGGH ^speak! 17:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

A2A userbox

Thought it was about time to get one of these so here's my attempt

A2AThis user was shot and woke up in 1981.

- J.Naven 17:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)