Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Ppt1973, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Ched :  ?  14:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael McDonald (fighter)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michael McDonald (fighter), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TreyGeek (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Refer to this AfD discussion where the consensus was to delete the article the first time. The speedy was for recreating an article that was previously AfD'ed and doesn't have anything substantially different. --TreyGeek (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note on writing new articles

edit

Dear Ppt1973, thanks for the note on my talk page. I would recommend that before you try and create/write a new article on Michael McDonald or any other person, kindly read three of Wikipedia's articles consolidating our policies and guidelines with respect to articles on individuals>> WP:BLP, WP:BIO and WP:N. Every article on Wikipedia stands on a few non-negotiable pillars. Kindly ensure that any article that you create is based on reliable source, verifiability and is written with a dispassionately neutral point of view. Like I mentioned, if your article is considered non-notable as per our guidelines, it will be deleted. Now, how do we proceed from here. On this page >>User talk:Ppt1973/sandbox<< make your proposed article and drop me a line on my talk page and I'll take a look to give you suggestions on how to improve the article. How does that sound? Feel free to write to me for anything else too. Best regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 13:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Oh. I thought you would have had the contents. Contact the administrator Nyttend who deleted your article, leave a note on his talk page requesting him for the contents to be placed on the page I mentioned. A better idea would be that if you have the backup of the contents, use those to re-create the article. But do not post the contents anywhere other than the page I have pointed out. Warm regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 13:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, the page is now at User talk:Ppt1973/sandbox. Please be careful to modify the page quickly; this is close enough to the article that was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael McDonald (fighter) that it will qualify for deletion quickly if you don't modify it a bit. Nyttend (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'll also point out that WP:MMANOT provides more specific guidelines for the notability of MMA fighters and organizations than WP:ATHLETE does. --TreyGeek (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

MMAWeekly

edit

Hi Ppt, as you're one of the more frequent contributors to MMA articles, I thought I should give you a heads up. Currently, H3llbot is marking many, many MMAWeekly links as dead, as shown here. I'd suggest that in future we avoid linking to MMAweekly. Other substitutes are just as good, but it appears they don't delete old articles like weekly does. Hope you can keep this in mind. Thanks. Paralympiakos (talk) 15:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


List of current UFC fighters

edit

As stated in the nickname section of the talk page for this site, Fighters are listed by the same names as they are listed on UFC.com with, to create parity between the rosters. It annoys me too, that they list crocop and minotauro the way they do, but That's the way it is. Thank, in general for taking an interest in this site and helping maintain it, I hope you continue to do so in the future.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

WEC 53

edit

Nice attempt to get this protected. Unfortunately, admins hold to the idea that anyone can contribute to the encyclopedia. While I also believe that everyone should have the opportunity, anyone who has seen MMA pages on the night of the event knows what's going to happen tonight. I'll keep an eye on it. Additionally, I'm keeping an eye on all pages (e.g. fighters) that are linked on that page. I'll revert as much as I can. Thanks for the effort!--GnoworTC 22:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for removing the unsourced material on the UFC 133 page. I was trying to be nicer about it than I should have been I suppose. Wether people hear things or not, it shouldn't be put on a wiki article until it's been sourced/reported on. Anyway, thanks again. Dachknanddarice (TC) 18:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, UFC Fight Night 26

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, UFC Fight Night 26. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - UFC 138. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at UFC 138 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MattParker 119 (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at UFC Fight Night 26

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from UFC Fight Night 26, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Braehead Arena is in Glasgow, Renfrewshire is the county. The arena is technically called the Glasgow Braehead Arena! Nobody every refers to an event there as taking place in "Renfrewshire, Scotland" so Glasgow is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.186.155 (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cool, I did not know that. Take care.Ppt1973 (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Hey! Just wanted to drop you a quick line to thank you for all the effort you put into the UFC and MMA articles. I really appreciate it. Udar55 (talk) 21:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the kind word. This place gets out of control very quickly.Ppt1973 (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

MMA Project

edit

Hey, I see you are a member of the Mixed Martial Arts Project. I was just wondering what you need to do to become a member of the MMA Project ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiMntjMMA (talkcontribs) 22:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


A kitten for you!

edit
 

For your hard work in MMA articles.

LlamaAl (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

15 000

edit

Congratulations for your 15 000th edit. I suggest you to ask for rollback rights here and to archive your talk page. Regards. --LlamaAl (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
I am honestly impressed with the amount of work you've put into MMA articles. Your work is greatly appreciated! Keep up the good work. ComputerJA () 21:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion

edit

Hey there, I wanted to get your opinion on whether or not this and this are enough to create the article UFC Fight Night: Manuwa vs. Błachowicz. Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just rumors at this point. Polish event has been floated around for a couple of years now. We need some reliable info and the sources I've seen don't event have a date attached to the proposed event. I've seen the Manuwa/Blachowicz and Filipovic/Gonzaga rumors with bouts linked to this event. Could very well be the Fight Pass event with a tentative date of April 11, but we need more to go on before creating a page. Cheers. Ppt1973 (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Taking advantage on this discussion Gsfelipe94 (talk) 14:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Gsfelipe94's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Talk:UFC on Fox: Lawler vs. Brown.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Future fights

edit

Hey brother. Concerning your recent edits to the fighters taking part in the UFC 183 event, we can't put future fights in the table as it would violate WP:MMA. You can input the data so long as it is hidden. It can only be shown once the result comes in. Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

UFC 123
added links pointing to Matt Hughes and Gerald Harris
UFC 120
added a link pointing to James Wilkes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Anthony Johnson

edit
 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Talk:Anthony Johnson (fighter).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Francisco Rivera (fighter)
added a link pointing to NASC
Urijah Faber
added a link pointing to NASC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ivan Jorge

edit

If you're not busy, could you clean up the Ivan Jorge article? Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ha. The dude who created it is a real pest. Thanks anyway. Enjoy the fights tonight. WWE Batman131 (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Montaño

edit

Hey brother. If you have the time, could you look over Augusto Montaño? Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 15:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!!

edit

Thank you for your help in improving my articles any help with Irene Aldana and Nina Ansaroff would be most appreciated. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benson Henderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

UFC Fight Night 69

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of UFC Fight Night 69, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: UFC Fight Night: Gustafsson vs. Teixeira. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Concise fight results

edit

I see you're undoing some of what I've done to tie results to fights (Means and Dariush). Not a huge problem, but curious as to why. In my eye, it's strange to put the who, what, where, why and when in one sentence, and have a separate one for the how. It makes some sense if we were forced to edit in real time, because the fight is announced first, but after the fact, isn't it tidier to say Joe Blow knocked out/submitted/decisioned Joe Schmo at the show? If someone wins a fight, that they first faced their opponent goes without saying.

Clear and concise, or no? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • No problem and I can see you point to an extent. The changes made were to keep the initial sources for the fight announcement, and then add sources for the results of the fights. Cheers! Ppt1973 (talk) 12:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oh right, that makes sense. Though perhaps the source for the announcement is also made unnecessary by the source for the result. Hard to win or lose a UFC fight that wasn't scheduled. For now, I'll reshrink those, but keep both sources at the end. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1968 Democratic National Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thug. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


Source correction for several fighters

edit

Thanks! I was updating reaches for fighter in the 2 previous events and never realized I was using the wrong link for the ones in Goiânia... Dumb, dumb, dumb... Thanks again! Psycho-Krillin (talk) 01:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 15 June

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of UFC events table

edit

I was about to revert, but you got there first. Please see the talk post. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I would also welcome your comments at the above talk page section. I feel there are a couple significant problems with the existing layout, and I would like to hear why you disagree with changing the order. Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fight records

edit

I've removed the 'hidden' codes from the Jessica Eye and Miesha Tate fight records, so that their forthcoming fights against each other are shown again. I know that you meant no harm, but hiding them is unnecessary (the dates are clearly visible, and other articles do this as well), and it could also lead to someone making a mess of things when they try adding them back in. -- James26 (talk) 14:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dominique Steele
added a link pointing to Strikeforce
Norifumi Yamamoto
added a link pointing to Ramon Salazar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

UFC 189 music

edit

Hey, why do you keep removing the bit about the entrance music? It's an important thing to note and it fits that section of the article accordingly. WWE Batman131 (talk) 19:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Redmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portarlington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Dempsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newtown, Pennsylvania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joby Sanchez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EMT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the The Poseidon Adventure (1972 film) plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WEC 26 Condit vs Alessio Poster.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WEC 26 Condit vs Alessio Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Straight man (stock character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Deacon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

UFC 193

edit

Can you let me restore a more productive edit? Somehow, keeping individual UFC events pages without substantial details on fights would violate WP:IINFO. Let's talk more at talk:UFC 193. --George Ho (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

edit
 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! George Ho (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ppt1973, I would just like to ask if you are going to be participating in the DRN mediation case for the UFC 193 article. Participation is voluntary, but it would be helpful to have an indication that you are either: a) not going to participate, b) reserve the right to participate, but do not currently wish to, or c) you currently wish to participate. Remember to keep the discussion focused on content, not editors, if you decide to participate. Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removal of sourced content

edit

Regarding this edit, please do not delete sourced content from articles. -- James26 (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

What's new

edit

This is my first time using Wikipedia, do you actually get money for editing articles JE1109 (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yair Rodríguez

edit

Hi dude. I found on Internet that Yair Rodríguez has a longer MMA record that the one hosted in Sherdog. I found he was 8-0 before lost against Luis Herrera on FMP 13. I also found that he beat a guy named Willie Martínez [1] in a FMP event to reach a 3-0 record. At the time he win the FMP Featherweight Championship against Jonatan Guzmán he had more fights (he didn't debut on that event). Events hosted by Mexican Fighters Promotions on YouTube has official decisions and times, so I think we can put them on Yair's official record. - MichaelBreacker (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion on UFC 200

edit
 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Talk:UFC 200.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UFC on Fox: Holm vs. Shevchenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentina Shevchenko. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why double up on fight results?

edit

Regarding this diff, if Krylov defeats Barroso (or anyone defeats anyone), doesn't the fact that they were booked to fight go without saying? I think so, and think you should think so, too. But if you don't, an explanation in an edit summary would be nice. Otherwise, it seems like pointless wordiness. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Ngannou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levallois. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Your addition to Kirby Puckett has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Graves (fighter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toledo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Almeida

edit

Thank you for editing the bit i put in as i didnt know if it would make sence. I wrote the having been undefeated he lost the fight in rnd 1 by ko.. thanks mate -WWEMEOWMEOW Wwemeowmeow (talk) 09:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ryan Jimmo

edit

Notes section is for awards and notable accomplishments directly related to the fight. I think having one of the fastest knockouts in UFC history is most definitely a notable accomplishment. Also, I know you have been doing this for awhile so you should know, while addition of content my not necessarily need an edit summary, removal of content definitely does.--Rockchalk717 18:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mehdi Baghdad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartago. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

UFC events creation

edit

Hey man, how are you? I wanted to approach you regarding something... You create a page for UFC Fight Night 94 based on Brasília. But they just announced on broadcast a Fight Night event one week earlier than this one. I think I've said that before for someone else, but we shouldn't create fight night articles with a number on the title when there's a good amount of time before it happens. My suggestion is creating a different name like "UFC Fight Night Brasilia 2016" just to keep as a redirect directly on that page. As soon as a main event is confirmed, then a title can be changed. That avoids situations like this (which happened a lot in the past), specially because sometimes you try to reach an article based on number and it gets redirected to a different one. Obviously it seems that event will become FN 95, but anyway... That was my point. Might be something better for the future. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion on UFC 200

edit
 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Talk:UFC 200.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rashad Evans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Kennedy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fighter's notes

edit

Hey man, sometimes I saw that you edited some of the notes in mma records of articles. Those edits are always corrected when a result is updated during an event, including other details on that same notes section. Specially those cases in which a fighter had a result overturned. I developed a pattern for them, so it looks similar in all pages (Originally a XXX win (finish) for Fighter; overturned after he tested positive for YYYY). As I said, sometimes I see that those things are changed unnecessarily (recent example is Kevin Casey's article) also including catchweights (Catchweight (xxx lbs) bout; Fighter missed weight). If possible, please do not change them again. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 04:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reminding. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion on UFC 205

edit
 
Hello, Ppt1973. You have new messages at Talk:UFC 205.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Ppt1973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unhiding future fights from records

edit

Why do you keep doing this? Per WP:MMA, those should be kept hidden until the fight has happened, yet you keep intentionally showing them.

"Never add future bouts. The purpose of the record table is to provide a quick account of a fighter's past career, not to speculate about his/her future. Upcoming bouts that have been officially announced can only be mentioned within the body text at the end of the Mixed martial arts career section, provided that they are notable (covered by reliable third-party sources.)"

I've told you about this in the past, and you ignored it. Cut it out.TBMNY (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
Thank you for improving the Cub Swanson article. He is my favourite athlete of all time. 张雨涵 (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Ppt1973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and happy new year

edit
  The Teamwork Barnstar
Hi Ppt1973, A teamwork barnstar for you for the teamwork contribution on MMA related articles. Have a wonderful and happy new year.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mario Elie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Mullin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

UFC Fight Night: Volkan vs. Shogun

edit

Hi Ppt1973, Greetings to you. I moved the page above to UFC Fight Night 134, because the headliner for this event has yet to be official and Volkan is still in travel ban at this moment - see [2] which his legal team is working to get it lifted. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 23:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Interview request

edit

Hi, I'm a journalist who's been working on a series about interesting stories on Wikipedia and Wikipedians. For example, I wrote about these two teenagers who edit articles for the NY subway and why St. Patrick's Wikipedia page is excellent. I'm working on a story about notable individuals who have passed away and wondered if I could ask you about Tom Petty's page. Could we by chance connect over email via stephenbharrison at gmail dot com .... Thank you! Stephenbharrison (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fight Night 137

edit

Proposed deletion of UFC Fight Night: Manuwa vs. Santos

edit
 

The article UFC Fight Night: Manuwa vs. Santos has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Colton Meltzer (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

UFC 233

edit

Hi Ppt1973, good day. The 2 bouts you added below as per you source provided are not official (see * comment scroll all the way down) - [3]. Could not find any sources that indicated they are official. Just dropping a note to check with you on this. thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

UFC Bantamweight Championship bout: T.J. Dillashaw (c) vs. Henry Cejudo

Bantamweight bout: Dominick Cruz vs. John Lineker

Welterweight bout: Ben Askren vs. Robbie Lawler

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

AdvoCare Invitational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maryland Terrapins basketball
Myrtle Beach Invitational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ohio Bobcats basketball

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Ppt1973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year

edit
  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hi Ppt1973, Sending you a warm greetings for New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.Reply

UFC on Fight Night on ESPN and ESPN+

edit

H Ppt1973, Greetings to you. I need you input of the below. ESPN has just announced the UFC events for the second quarter 2019 - see [4]. They defined UFC Fight Night on Fight Night and UFC Fight Night on ESPN+. I created the UFC first quarter 2019 article based on MMAJunkie naming (UFC on ESPN and UFC on ESPN+) . Since the "Fight Night" is in the naming on the second quater schedule based on ESPN Media Zone I created the articles as per the source and changed all the naming and links for the first quarter as well for consistency since it would be ESPN broadcast events (anywhere the naming in Wikipedia eventually will be change to the actual event names in later date). Since ESPN name both events on ESPN and ESPN+ as Fight Night event - should be name all of them in alternative name as UFC Fight Night xxxx (which means no more UFC Fight Night on ESPN and UFC Fight Night xxx( replacing UFC Fight Night ESPN+ xx). May be it is a little better to see the below for clarity.

I have changed the initial article names and links
a. UFC on ESPN to UFC Fight Night on ESPN
b. UFC on ESPN+ to UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ (with alternative name UFC Fight Night xxx)


New articles I have created (second quarter 2019)
c. UFC Fight Night on ESPN (alternative name UFC Fight Night xxx)
d. UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ (alternative name UFC Fight Night xxx)


I put alternative name starting from UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ 7 to UFC Fight Night 151 and the rest of the above (c) and (d) events following the Fight Night numbering. I was going to change the first quarter numbering and thinking it might not be the conventional way to do that since we had UFC on Fox but not UFC Fight Night on Fox but on the other hand ESPN named their event with "Fight Night" on both ESPN and ESPN+ channel. So at the present the numbering is not correctly in place and I am writing to you to seek you input. You could go to the List of UFC events for the links of the events. By the way I have yet to link the to "UFC Fight Night xxx]] and yet to create UFC Fight Night xxx redirect for the second quater events. Let me know what you think and if you think and if you think and change them as may if you see fit. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ 7 - Volkan vs Overeem

edit

Hey Ppt1973, good day. the source you provide of the above bout here [5] stating it is a rumous and not an official announce. Volkan has been booked for UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ 5 against Dominick Reyes on March 16, 2019 in London - [6]. UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ 7 is on April 20, 2019. It is unusual for a fighter to be booked 2 bouts at the same time, in advance, especially only one month as fighters might sustain long medical suspension and could not fight the next scheduled bout.

By the way, I have created all the redirects, if you want to link to UFC Fight Night xxx, it would work now. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

WW

edit

see - [7] - it states welterweight bout. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mixed martial arts in Kazakhstan

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mixed martial arts in Kazakhstan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

UFC 252 and Nate/Jorge pages

edit

Hi Ppt 1973, I have reverted the above edits. For Nat and Jorge the is a proposal and closing deemed to keep the BMF belt - see Talk:List of UFC champions - titled "BMF title" and for UFC 252 - we need more than one source (need multiple) to create an article in Wikipedia. We can sub the same sources when more info/bouts and ources are provided. Stay safe and thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Fight Island

edit

It's not mine, but I think it's definitely notable and I added some sources. But I just watch LWT, I know next to nothing about martial arts. Perhaps you could help make it into something that can be allowed in article space? - Alexis Jazz 17:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. Till, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of UFC on ESPN+ 43

edit

Hello, Ppt1973,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Fbdave, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged UFC on ESPN+ 43 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Fbdave}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fbdave (talk) 23:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edgar card

edit

Why isn't Marcin Prachnio vs. Mike Rodriguez listed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.155.6 (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Background section

edit

Hello! How are you? I've noticed that sometimes you provide changes to articles without adding the proper information to the background section of the event. Please remember to add such info everytime something change regarding replacements or bouts being moved from one event to another. We can keep the articles better that way and might encourage more people to keep improving them. Thanks! Gsfelipe94 (talk) 19:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

UFC on ESPN 19

edit

Hello, how are you? I'd like to know where did you find a source saying that the December 5 event will be broadcast by ESPN? The only thing I've found in the ESPN website says it will be broadcast by ESPN2 (see here). We had UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Teixeira and will have UFC Fight Night: Blaydes vs. Lewis being broadcast simuoutaneously by ESPN2 and ESPN+. To avoid new names and confusions (just like when he had Fox Sports 1 and 2), we should keep naming them as Fight Nights. If you have something saying it will be broadcast on main ESPN, then we keep it, otherwise we should revert the title. Thanks! Gsfelipe94 (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Aren't you going to reply to this? Gsfelipe94 (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Cassiopeia: See this. We gotta bring it to the event talk page as Ppt1973 has not been helpful at all. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi Ppt1973, Good day. I understand there are a lot vandalism or no civil conversations or editing in MMA articles; however, Gsfelipe94 and I are good faith, regular MMA editors as you have aware and we are here on good will to discuss MMA related matter which at time would need your reply and corporation. Felipe has brought the issue on Talk:UFC on ESPN: Hermansson vs. Holland since you didnt reply his message on your talk page, kindly take a minute to join in the discussion where we might need your assistance. I thank you in advance. Stay safe Ppt1973 and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 05:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ppt1973, Good day. You didnt reply on the Talk:UFC on ESPN: Hermansson vs. Holland, for such I pasted the communication and decision made below just to update you. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ESPN2 events

edit

Hello everyone. I brought this issue up at User:Ppt1973 talk page as he was the one who moved the event from UFC Fight Night 185 to UFC on ESPN 19, but he completely ignored me. Therefore, I'm bringing the subject to everyone here. I'll quote my message there with some adjustments: I did not find a reliable source saying that this event will be broadcast by ESPN. I asked him that, but got nothing back as mentioned. The only thing I've found in the ESPN website was that it will be broadcast by ESPN2 (see here). We had UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Teixeira and will have UFC Fight Night: Blaydes vs. Lewis being broadcast simultaneously by ESPN2 and ESPN+. To avoid new names and confusions (just like when he had Fox Sports 1 and 2), we kept them as Fight Nights. Apparently this one (as of now) will be broadcast solo on ESPN2. We either change those two events to "UFC on ESPN" (which I disagree per what I've just said) or we keep them as Fight Nights, regardless of being simultaneously broadcast in their streaming service (which seems like a better option). I even changed the Template:UFC Events back then: Fight Nights (on ESPN+ or ESPN2). I'd like to hear your thoughts on that as this discussion will mean at least that this event will be renamed or the other two. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Discographer, Udar55, Cassiopeia, IMAHua, Ticelon, A.lanzetta, InedibleHulk, PRehse, Ppt1973, Psycho-Krillin, HeinzMaster, Fbdave, Sdpdude9, 29cwcst, Dwanyewest, and WWE Batman131: Please ping others. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Gsfelipe94: for pinging. I am for your first choice above, being UFC on ESPN, for the continuity of consistent numbering, that is to not break the sequential count. Please see the table below.
List of UFC events
Date Sherdog mmajunkie
November 7, 2020 UFC on ESPN 17: Santos vs. Teixeira UFC on ESPN 17: Santos vs. Teixeira
November 28, 2020 UFC on ESPN 18: Blaydes vs. Lewis UFC on ESPN 18: Blaydes vs. Lewis
Thanks, --Discographer (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I second what User:Discographer's table above and including UFC Fight Night 185 to UFC on ESPN 19 by Ppt1973. ESPN+ XX (UFC on ESPN+ XX) = UFC Fight Night XXX; and ESPN XX = UFC on ESPN XX which is the norm and also for the for the continuity of consistent numbering. We have to edit Santos vs. Teixeira and Blaydes vs. Lewis UFC Fight Night events to UFC on ESPN: XXX vs. XXX. I would like to recommend the usual editors who have normally done the same type of edits where by User:Ppt1973 moves and changes all the Event names from UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Teixeira onwards and also rework on all the fighters' pages on the associated event name which they have fought or are scheduled to fight. User:Gsfelipe94 could help to relink the right event names on the background of the event pages if there is any info to update. I will update all the events name which the fighters have fought or are scheduled to fight on List of current UFC fighters. If we have the agreement here then let Ppt1973 to start the work first then Felipe and I will then edits accordingly as per proposal above. Stay safe everyone and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 05:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm up for it. It's just that noboby brought that up before and it would most likely be ignored until who knows when. Unfortunately the commitment here has been very poor. As soon as it's good to go, let's change it. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hulk hears you, Hulk don't care. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the great contribution. Good to know you should not be pinged again. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Depends on the subject. If I pinged someone to a proposal, I'd like to at least know they read it and weren't interested. If it happens again, I'll leave you hanging. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
There won't be a second time. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Gsfelipe94. If the event is on ESPN, it should be a UFC on ESPN event. ESPN2 is a different channel entirely, so it should follow the same format of any shows that have appeared on that channel (or ESPN+) in the past. Udar55 (talk) 15:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm honestly up for either of the proposals. Since main media have been calling the previous two events involved in this situation as "UFC on ESPN", it would be better apparently to follow that direction. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Have a safe day, and enjoy the fights! IMAHua (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm with the option to keep the ones on ESPN2 as normal Fight Nights. HeinzMaster (talk) 03:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
HeinzMaster The proposal ESPN2 is no on normal Fight Night but ESPN+. ESPN(1/2) is on UFC on ESPN. thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 04:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
CASSIOPEIA I see, sorry got confused, ESPN this ESPN that. I think we change them to UFC on ESPN even if they are broadcast on both channels. Just for the sake of numbering HeinzMaster (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


That's what we have so far:

  • Change the other two events to "on ESPN": Discographer, Cassiopeia, Gsfelipe94, HeinzMaster, Ppt1973.
  • Change this event to Fight Night: Udar55.
  • Neutral: InedibleHulk, IMAHua.

It has been three days since the other editors were pinged. Should we wait a little bit longer? Gsfelipe94 (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

It has been three days, so I am for immediately changing these. The first of these two had previously been created by me, mistakenly as a redirect, so it was nonetheless deleted. Thanks to the editor(s) who will move these two articles to their rightful designated places:
Thanks for all you've done too, Gsfelipe94. Best, --Discographer (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Let's wait until tomorrow, but do not wait for me on those moves. Feel free to do them. We can all fix those related articles. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm fixing them now. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Discographer, Udar55, Cassiopeia, IMAHua, Ticelon, A.lanzetta, Gsfelipe94, PRehse, Ppt1973, Psycho-Krillin, HeinzMaster, Fbdave, Sdpdude9, 29cwcst, Dwanyewest, and WWE Batman131:. Thank you Gsfellipe94 for renaming and moving all the Event page, starting from UFC on ESPN 17 (Nov 7, 2020) to UFC Fight Night 188 (March 6, 2020) and List of UFC events. I have changed all the body text and fight record on the fighters and List of current UFC fighters page as associated with the new event names. I also updated the new event names in 2020 in UFC, 2021 in UFC, Templates - Ultimate Fighting Championship events, 2020 in mixed martial arts, 2021 in mixed martial arts, Reidrects - UFNxxx and UFC on ESPN+ and UFC Fight NightXXX. Thank you everyone. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
The consensus looks and sounds fine. Feel free to change without my input.Ppt1973 (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


Happy holidays

edit
File:Christmas tree decorations 5.jpg Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!


Hello Ppt1973, Wishing you a joyous holiday season and a happy and peaceful New Year. Thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Happy editing. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

) Ppt1973 (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

MOS:UNITS on ValuJet Flight 592

edit

Can you please explain why you chose to blatantly violate MOS:UNITS here? "In non-scientific articles with strong ties to the United States, the primary units are US customary (pounds, miles, feet, inches, etc.)". Customary units must at least be mentioned, so your removal of them is inexcusable.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

UFC on ESPN: Barboza vs. Chikadze

edit

Hi Ppt1973, Good day. When the UFN change to UFC on ESPN or UFC on ABC, pls moved the pageinstead of create a new page so the history log/page of the page can be kept. If we keep the check on "leave a redirect behind" we could still have the original page. We could move the page name back to UFN 191 and then cut and page UFN 192 content to UFN 191 and and UFN 193 content to UFN 192 so on and so forth. This is my thought, if you think differently, then let me know. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kwan Ho Kwak for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwan Ho Kwak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwan Ho Kwak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


Discussion invitation

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts § The Sherdog requirement. Cassiopeia talk 01:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Season’s Greetings

edit
 
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Hi Ppt1973, Have an enjoyable holiday season! Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Antwain Britt for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antwain Britt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antwain Britt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 05:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zach Micklewright for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zach Micklewright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Micklewright until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 21:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cain Carrizosa for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cain Carrizosa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cain Carrizosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFC Fight Night 216, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Pearce.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Seth Dikun for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seth Dikun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Dikun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 02:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament

edit

I don't know what your intention was with this edit, but overwriting an existing article and attempting to turn it into a single year isn't the way forward. Please don't do that again. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Ppt1973 (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply