User talk:PrairieKid/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Happy Easter!
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marco Rubio presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Level of detail in the HRC main article
Hi. About this edit of yours, restoring "On April 9, 2015, it was widely reported that Clinton would announce her candidacy on April 12, followed by a campaign trip to Iowa and New Hampshire.[371][372]" to the HRC main article. With respect to including this three-day 'pre-announcement', consider the WP:10 year test that is part of WP:RECENTISM. Will anyone reading the general biography of Clinton ten years from now care that she pre-announced her campaign three days ahead of time? Doesn't seem likely. Do you know or care whether, say, John McCain pre-announced his campaign in 2007 in this fashion? Probably not. Now with the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 article, that's a different story: those articles are intended for the reader interested in the day-to-day, ups-and-downs story of a presidential campaign, and there the details of a pre-announcement are useful. But not usually in the main article. Wasted Time R (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton
|
You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. |
Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, PrairieKid. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mike Huckabee presidential campaign, 2016, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Query
how do you have an associates and a bachelors already? Just curious, thanks for your articles! - Ttoya (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2015 UTC
- I don't have the bachelor's degree yet. I will start attending Gonzaga in the fall. As to the others, I skipped a grade early on in my education which allowed me to get ahead in high school. During my last two years of high school, I participated in a a dual enrollment program at Clark College where I am just about to finish my associates. I am going to have my AA and HS diplomas at the same time, just before turning 17. I've gotten pretty lucky with the way it has worked out for me. PrairieKid (talk) 16:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Other articles you can edit.
Hello I am dfrr. I am way much older then you but not even 40 years old. now I think I need to give you some articles about some TV shows from the 50s 60s 70s 80s & mostly 90s so here it is. Note:some of these show have spun-off or crossovered wth each other
- Happy Days (1974-1984)
- Perfect Strangers (TV series) (1986-1993)
- Family Matters (1989-1998)
- The Danny Thomas Show (1953-1964)
- All in the Family (1971-1979)
anyways I do not have any time to post every show I will post more later. have a good nightDfrr (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-))
DYK for Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016
 | On 21 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign began with a road trip from New York to Iowa in a customized Chevrolet Express van? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Please discuss
Taking an approach of my way or the highway is not the way to collaborate. Please engage in talk page and reply to my concerns before making massive edits, to which I am objecting. - Cwobeel (talk) 01:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Governorship of Scott Walker
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Governorship of Scott Walker, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 02:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi.
Hey, I've seen you doing some work on the Rand Paul page, and just now found you on the adopters page. I'd love to work with you! -- Mysterious Gopher (talk), 00:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The Herald (submissions) during the second round.The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was 
Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
Coemgenus (submissions) was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
LeftAire (submissions) worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Recent Edits to U.S. Presidential Elections
- I had posted this in the WikiProject Talk previously, but given there was no response I'm personally messaging you and a couple other members for their own thoughts. More edits had been done as of yesterday without complaint, so I'm again seeking clairification. --Ariostos (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm just curious if the latest edits to the US Presidential Elections, principally by Ericl, are actual adopted policy by the Project membership; in simple terms it amounts to the removal of the candidate and balloting sections, to be replaced instead with the Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates nominated (though Ericl's latest edit in 1856 neglect this), with the balloting for those offices being relegated to the Convention articles. The recent edits to the 1860 most exemplify this apparent "new direction". --Ariostos (talk) 15:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George W. Bush presidential campaign, 2000 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- On June 14, 1999, [[Governor of Texas]] [[George W. Bush]] announced was running for [[President of the United States in [[United States presidential election, 2000|the 2000 election]].
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)