User talk:ROLEXMEENA

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sogaria railway station (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sogaria railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:48, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, ROLEXMEENA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:48, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sogaria railway station has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sogaria railway station. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an IP block exemption for a period of 3 months. If you still need an IP block exemption after it expires, please file a new request. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC) --Yamla (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dholpur–Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line, from its old location at User:ROLEXMEENA/sandboxUser:ROLEXMEENA/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dholpur–Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dholpur–Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dholpur–Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Dholpur–Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibited one or more of the following signs which indicated that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khatipura railway station (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khatipura railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Real Cricket moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Real Cricket. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gommeh 📖   🎮 17:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sogaria railway station (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All but one source leads to a 404 error.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sogaria railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Kota–Nagda–Ratlam section. Another editor, Bneu2013, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Add citations for unsourced statements.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bneu2013}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bneu2013 (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello! Your image was inserted successfully on the page New Delhi–Mumbai main line, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia generally doesn't use AI-generated images, per WP:AIIMAGE. Belbury (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please read Wikipedia:How to delete a page. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Moving articles

You recently moved Vadodara Junction railway station and a couple of other station articles to remove "railway station" in the article titles. It seems, however, that "railway station" is included by convention in titles of articles about Indian stations, so I have moved the articles back to their former titles. Deor (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 13:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked, please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mathura–Vadodara section, you may be blocked from editing. Baltalı İlah (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Delhi–Ahmedabad line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Delhi–Ahmedabad line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 07:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Jaipur–Sawai Madhopur line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jaipur–Sawai Madhopur line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 07:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Sawai Madhopur Junction. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Sogaria railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sogaria railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sogaria railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Fermiboson (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson Sogaria railway station is a functioning railway station under Indian Railways and falls under the Kota Division of the West Central Railway (WCR) zone. It serves as a satellite station of Kota Junction and contributes to handling rail traffic in the Kota region.

Being part of a major railway division and zone, the station is an operational component of the railway network rather than a trivial halt. Its role in freight and passenger movement adds to its significance.

Reliable information about the station can be verified through Indian Railways and West Central Railway sources. The article can be further improved by adding more references and expanding sections such as connectivity and operations. Therefore, improvement is preferable over deletion. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

You are not allowed to make talk page comments using an AI model. Fermiboson (talk) 13:07, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson

Hello, thanks for your message.

Yes, I used AI earlier while editing. I understand that this is not appropriate here, and I will avoid using it going forward.

The information I added about Sogaria railway station is based on verifiable details (like it being under Kota Division of West Central Railway). I will rewrite the content in my own words and add proper reliable sources to improve the article.

If there are specific issues, please let me know and I will fix them. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello, I'm Fermiboson. An edit that you recently made to Kota Junction seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Fermiboson (talk) 12:27, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson

Hello, thank you for your message.

I understand the concern regarding AI-generated content. I will make sure to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines by using reliable sources and writing content in my own words. I will avoid adding any unsourced or potentially inaccurate information.

If any of my edits did not meet the required standards, I appreciate the feedback and will improve accordingly. I will also use my sandbox for drafting before making further edits.

Thank you. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Using an LLM to reply to concerns of AI use is not a good look. Please answer straightforwardly whether your edits were made using AI and if so, commit to not using it in your editing process in the future. Fermiboson (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson

Hello, thanks for your message.

Yes, I did use AI assistance in my earlier edits. I understand this is not appropriate for Wikipedia editing. I will not use AI-generated text going forward and will rely on reliable sources and write in my own words.

I will also review and improve my edits accordingly. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Could you please go through your previous article creations and rewrite them completely in your own words. Fermiboson (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarmathura–Gangapur City railway line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Fermiboson (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson Hello, thanks for the notification.

If the article does not currently meet notability guidelines, I request that it be moved to draft space instead of being deleted, so that it can be improved with proper sources and content.

I am willing to work on improving the article by adding reliable references and expanding it. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. The thread is ROLEXMEENA. Fermiboson (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson Hello, I understand the concern. I did use AI assistance earlier, but I will not use it going forward. I will make sure to follow Wikipedia guidelines, use reliable sources, and write content in my own words. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:21, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Draft:Gwalior–Sheopur–Kota railway line. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Digod Junction moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Digod Junction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fermiboson (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson Hello, thank you for the update.

I understand the concerns about sources and the use of machine-generated text. I will work on improving the draft by adding reliable references and rewriting the content in my own words.

I appreciate the opportunity to improve it and will resubmit once it is ready. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Sheopur–Kota railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sheopur–Kota railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fermiboson (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

@Fermiboson

Hello, thank you for the update.

I understand the concern about machine-generated text. I will work on improving the draft by rewriting it in my own words and adding reliable sources to establish notability.

I will resubmit the article once it is properly improved. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 13:33, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Gwalior–Sheopur railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gwalior–Sheopur railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fermiboson (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Gwalior–Sheopur–Kota railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gwalior–Sheopur–Kota railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fermiboson (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of New Gangapur City railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Gangapur City railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Gangapur City railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

-- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 15:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mathura–Agra section

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mathura–Agra section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 01:59, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Delhi–Mathura–Agra section

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Delhi–Mathura–Agra section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 02:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ratlam–Vadodara section

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ratlam–Vadodara section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 02:05, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kota–Nagda–Ratlam section

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kota–Nagda–Ratlam section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. -- LWG ^{talk (VOPOV)} 02:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Warning for LLM usage without human review

This is your only warning. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) without human review, as you did with New Delhi–Mathura–Agra section, Ratlam–Vadodara section, Mathura–Agra section, and Kota–Nagda–Ratlam section, you will be blocked from editing for disruptive editing. In particular, you used an LLM to create articles that contained questionable citations and information. This undermines Wikipedia's attempt to be a reliable informational source.

Based on comments on your talk page, it appears you now understand not to use an LLM in this manner on Wikipedia. I hope you will follow-up on your pledge to not do this again in the future. However, if it does happens again, you will be blocked. --SouthernNights (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Udai Kalan railway station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Udai Kalan railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 03:50, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Lalpur Umri railway station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lalpur Umri railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 03:52, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Chhoti Udai railway station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chhoti Udai railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 03:53, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Sawai Madhopur–Sheopur–Shivpuri–Jhansi railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sawai Madhopur–Sheopur–Shivpuri–Jhansi railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 02:59, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sawai Madhopur Junction

The article Sawai Madhopur Junction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

PhantomVorteX (Talk) 09:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

This article already contains reliable sources and important information. Kindly do not delete it, as it is a many-years-old Wikipedia article of an important railway junction. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 09:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I do not understand why so many articles are being proposed for deletion, including both old and new articles. Users create and improve these articles with a lot of effort, but articles are proposed for removal within seconds. Kindly reconsider this deletion proposal. ROLEXMEENA (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

You should fill criteria mentioned in WP:GNG, which includes citations to multiple reliable sources which demonstrates that this article should be on Wikipedia. Please think twice before posting article to mainspace, I know it takes effort to write every single article, but if there's no need of that article in wiki, both hardwork and time are wasted. If you fulfill criteria of WP:GNG, feel free to remove the tag from your article, but if it still fails it will be again nominated for deletion. PhantomVorteX (Talk) 09:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Kota Junction railway station

Please don't unilaterally move the content of pages to redirects to those pages, as you have done at Kota Junction, Sawai Madhopur Junction and elsewhere. I am currently in the process of reverting these edits, which are not in line with existing naming guidelines, which dictate that the article on a railway station should be at a title ending with "railway station"; for instance, the article on Kota Junction should be at Kota Junction railway station, not Kota Junction. Also, please revert your unilateral and out-of-policy moves at Dausa Junction, Bayana Junction, Bharatpur Junction, Jaipur Junction, Bandikui Junction and Ramganj Mandi Junction; you may use WP:RMTR for that. JavaHurricane 13:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Real Cricket

Hello, ROLEXMEENA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Real Cricket, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei (talk) 09:59, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Real Cricket

Hello, ROLEXMEENA. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Real Cricket".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:ROLEXMEENA. Fermiboson (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Jaipur–Rewari new railway line. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:12, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Kota–Rewari railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kota–Rewari railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has primary sources only. Please add secondary coverage to establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Please also add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:15, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Devpura railway station. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Kushtala railway station. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary coverage and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Please also add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:32, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Sawai Madhopur Bypass Line Project. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:33, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Kota–Jaipur main line. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:36, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Jaipur–Sawai Madhopur railway line. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please show more coverage in secondary sources and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Please also add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:42, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ROLEXMEENA. Thank you for your work on Jaipur–Gangapur City railway line. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary coverage and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Please also add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 05:52, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kota railway division, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kota was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Delhi–Palwal–Mathura section (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 12:48, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello Mariamnei, thank you for starting this discussion. I created this article using reliable sources from Indian Railways, Railway Board, Western Railway, PIB and other independent sources. Could you please let me know the specific concerns with the article? I'd be happy to improve it in line with Wikipedia's policies. Thank you. ~2026-40029-34 (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Vadodara–Mumbai section moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vadodara–Mumbai section. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Jaipur–Gangapur City railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jaipur–Gangapur City railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Junbeesh (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Jaipur–Rewari new railway line moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jaipur–Rewari new railway line. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Junbeesh (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for apparent continued use of LLM tools.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Please engage with the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:ROLEXMEENA in order to be unblocked. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:54, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Request for review of partial block

Hello Rosguill,I would like to request a review of my partial block.I understand that there were concerns about my use of LLM tools. My intention was never to mislead anyone or ignore Wikipedia's policies. I was trying to improve my articles and understand the rules, but I now realize that I made mistakes.I apologize for any problems my actions caused. I have taken the concerns seriously and I will follow Wikipedia's policies in the future. I will make sure that any future contributions comply with the community's expectations.I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia, especially on railway-related topics, and I hope to continue doing so in a constructive and policy-compliant way.I kindly ask you to reconsider my partial block. Thank you for your time and consideration.ROLEXMEENA (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ROLEXMEENA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

From what I understand, I was blocked because of concerns about my use of AI tools while editing Wikipedia and because I kept asking about it. I did not fully understand the expectations at the time. Looking back, I can see why my edits and questions caused concern.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

If I am allowed to edit again, I will write articles myself and check everything carefully using reliable sources before saving any changes. If I am unsure about a policy, I will ask once, listen to the advice I receive, and follow it instead of repeating the same issue.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I am sorry for the problems my actions caused. I respect Wikipedia and the work of its volunteers. I would be grateful for another chance to contribute properly. Thank you for taking the time to read my request.

ROLEXMEENA (talk) 11:43, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. You are free to make WP:EDITREQ on article talk pages. That's your path to demonstrate you have learned how to edit Wikipedia appropriately, without abusing AI tools any more. It's far too soon to consider lifting your partial block at this time. Yamla (talk) 12:19, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of New Delhi–Kota section

The article New Delhi–Kota section has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Delhi–Ahmedabad main line

The article New Delhi–Ahmedabad main line has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sabarmati BG railway station

The article Sabarmati BG railway station has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ROLEXMEENA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Izno (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)