User talk:Reaper Eternal/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Reaper Eternal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Thank you
Thank you, very much, for your third opinion response at Talk:List_of_people_who_accepted_Golden_Raspberry_Awards. Most appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Question: You and I appear to concur about the appropriateness of the information that was removed three times by Yaksar (talk · contribs). Can the info removed by Yaksar (talk · contribs) now be restored back to the page? -- Cirt (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome ;) . Yes, I would restore the deleted content. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
He did it, again [2]. What should be done at this point in time with regards to this user? -- Cirt (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Update: Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Yaksar_reported_by_Cirt_.28Result:_.29, let me know if you think this is an accurate representation of the behavior by Yaksar (talk · contribs). Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please, just let me explain. The intro as of now is concise, and the information I removed from it is already stated below. I am not trying to be disruptive, but as of now the article is somewhat of a mess and I am trying to help clean it. As for the background information section that started this controversy, if you read it you will see it says the exact same thing as the intro, and then includes info that, while perfectly fitting for the main article, is not needed here. Thank you. Yaksar (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- I addressed these concerns on the talk page of the article in my third opinion response. As mentioned there, related articles commonly have content common to both articles.
- We have a policy here, called "Bold Revert Discuss". It encourages bold changes of the sort you made (albeit with an edit summary). However, it also notes that if the changes are reverted, the result should be to discuss them on the talk page, not to continue re-instating the content. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm well aware that they should have content in common, believe me. But the information I removed from the background section seems very trivial, and the important parts were already written above. Please specifically look at the information I deleted that was not included in the intro and then assess if it is important enough to include in this satellite article. Thank you so much. Yaksar (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please, just let me explain. The intro as of now is concise, and the information I removed from it is already stated below. I am not trying to be disruptive, but as of now the article is somewhat of a mess and I am trying to help clean it. As for the background information section that started this controversy, if you read it you will see it says the exact same thing as the intro, and then includes info that, while perfectly fitting for the main article, is not needed here. Thank you. Yaksar (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Update: Yaksar (talk · contribs) received a warning from WP:AN3 to cease the disruptive behavior at this page. Hopefully, at this point, the user will stop the disruptive editing in the future. -- Cirt (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Update at AN3
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Yaksar_reported_by_Cirt_.28Result:_warned.29. -- Cirt (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
User continues to remove wikilink on my article
Hi,
The diffs:
I thought I gave a sufficient explanation the first time Hmains did it in my comment when I undid the edit.
Someone else has already complained on Hmains's talk page (although s/he has removed it, you can only see it in their revision history below) https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hmains&diff=next&oldid=401724669
I've also written about this on the talk page for the article: Talk:Tricia_Rose
What would you do? - Verapar (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, it appears to be one of the semi-automated AWB users. I removed the {{new unreviewed article}} (I reviewed it) and replaced it with a more appropriate tag. Hopefully, the issue will now go away since he was likely just churning through all the "new unreviewed articles".
- As an aside, maybe you should try out WP:refTools, which is accessible under your preferences, since it adds the ability to easily insert citations with author's name, URL, title, accessdate, and other information that is helpful in citations. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll redo the footnotes and ask you to have another look. But what do you think if something like that (the removal of the wikilink) happens again? - Verapar (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I've fixed the citations to use the web template, which I usually use. I had thought that with official websites, that wouldn't be necessary. Anyhow, so what should be done if they attempt to remove it again? Is it a pre-configured setting on AWB? Because I think it is incorrect, there are many cases like mine where a link to an article on a particular time period/century would be very appropriate to for contextualization. -Verapar (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Let me know if it happens again. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!
HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Happy 10th!
--Addihockey10 e-mail has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi
The page creator removed the deletion template which I have replaced - you may want to keep an eye on that one.
Query
At List of people who accepted Golden Raspberry Awards, Yaksar (talk · contribs) continues to engage in disruption, despite the dispute resolution results of the Third Opinion process. Thoughts? Should I start a WP:RFC on the talk page? -- Cirt (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Per your suggestion, moved the page to Acceptance of Golden Raspberry Awards. -- Cirt (talk) 19:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I went ahead and started the RFC, at Talk:Acceptance_of_Golden_Raspberry_Awards_by_recipients#RfC:_Removal_of_sourced_info. -- Cirt (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK, it is on my watchlist. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive news
Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 backlog elimination drive
 Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! The drive is halfway over, so here are some mid-drive stats. 
 So far, 43 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 25 have participated. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now.
We have eliminated two months from the backlog – January and February 2009. One of our goals is to eliminate as many months as possible from the 2009 backlog. Please help us reduce the size of this part of the backlog if you haven't already. Another goal is to reduce the entire backlog by 10%, or by 515 articles. Currently, we have eliminated 375 articles from the queue, so if each participant copy edits four more articles, we will reach that goal. Thank you for participating in the January 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success! Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk), The UtahraptorTalk to me, and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC).
Gay icon
Your undo message is pretty clear about who added the content you removed, and looking at the subsequent IP's edit, it was vandalism. It's usually pretty clear when something is suppressed or oversighted which editor did it, even if both versions of the diff are hidden. (Only "hide revision" which we rarely have to use, actually creates that problem). 16:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Recent deletion
Darrendenzel (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)You deleted an entry because it had no content. Yes, but the previous entry did have content, and was deleted by another user. I don't know if it's possible to get the cached copy back but I think you've been too hasty.
- I tagged your page for deletion as having no content—I cannot delete since I am not an administrator. If you want a previous copy emailed to you or put as a user subpage for you to work on before moving it out into the main space, you can ask one of these administrators to provide it for you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Darrendenzel (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC) Hang on, now I can't post anything on there because the page doesn't exist. Yet you are not an administrator. It's a mess.
- Your page, Daisy Head, appears to exist and be in no risk of speedy deletion, since it is adequately sourced and has claims of notability. The speedy deletion notices on your page are old, and can be safely ignored. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for helping to clear out the third opinion requests. Cheers! --Vassyana (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
Wessex Hillforts Project
Hi, You may have already come accross it but I thought you might be interested that you can get a free PDF copy of this major English Heritage project here. There are some large files & I haven't got them all yet, but may be useful for List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset & all those redlinks.— Rod talk 17:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks for linking me to that. I'll go download it and read up on the content! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)
♠TomasBat 02:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm looking to get some help here. At Talk:Major_religious_groups#Graph_relevance.3F I am involved in an edit war with this dude. I already used WP:3O but the dude didn't like the opinion offered, refused to explain his own stance, and eventually just said I was a vandal and started reverting me as vandalism using a tool. Maybe you can step in as an uninvolved editor and reintroduce sanity to this discussion. Shii (tock) 08:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Doom Bar
Thanks for copy editing Doom Bar for me, I was expecting it to be more of a re-write, so I'm glad you've felt it was acceptable in the majority. I see you've put a few comments in for me to add/change, I'll get them sorted as soon as I can. Any other thoughts if I'm attempting to get it to FA status? Cheers Worm 13:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for taking so long! I just went through the article, and I would recommend fixing the citation issues before taking it to FAC. I'll have another look after everything is cited. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello
Wonderful job on the Bot! You are amazing (Sure to be great admin someday ;)) Novice7 | Talk 15:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! But have you seen how many times it crashes? Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't see that. Anyways, I plan to learn some languages soon.. And, by saying you are a future admin, I mean an Admin!! Looking forward to see that ;) Novice7 | Talk 16:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- By "languages", do you mean programming languages or spoken languages? Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Lol, I mean programming. I wish to learn Spoken too, someday :D Novice7 | Talk 03:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- By "languages", do you mean programming languages or spoken languages? Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't see that. Anyways, I plan to learn some languages soon.. And, by saying you are a future admin, I mean an Admin!! Looking forward to see that ;) Novice7 | Talk 16:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing me!
Feezo has given you a Wolf! Wolves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Wolves must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion and protecter forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a wolf, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of wolves by adding {{subst:Wolf}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Thanks for your helpful review! I've requested reviewer rights as you suggested and I'll be sure to take your other advice into consideration — I'm definitely going to keep working on Perl when I have time. Cheers, Feezo (Talk) 02:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
(moved from above)
Dear Reaper Eternal,
Thanks a lot brother for helping me in Tajik Passport Edit, I highly appreciate that help.
Best Regards,
FAIZAN ALI VARYA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizanalivarya (talk • contribs) 07:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome, but I had very little to do with it! Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
Able 52
Hey, I addressed some more comments for your GA review of Able. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- I re-reviewed the article and passed it. Thank you for your hard work on Hurricane Able (1952)! I had just noticed that the template looked weird and that the other template still said "C", so thanks for fixing it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yea, thanks a lot for reviewing it. That's a much different review than I've ever gotten before (usually ends up being random prose stuff), so I really appreciate it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I was peeking at the review of my first (and so far only) GA, Worlebury Camp (review here), for how to review a GA nom. My reviewer was Sasata, somebody with 100+ GAs and 20+ FAs. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yea, thanks a lot for reviewing it. That's a much different review than I've ever gotten before (usually ends up being random prose stuff), so I really appreciate it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
IRC cloak
Myself
Requesting a cloak for myself. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
My bot
Requesting a cloak for my bot, EternalBot (talk · contribs). Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
jhu spelling
Johns Hopkins is spelled with an s at the end of Johns. Look it up. Please don't revert the correction. 96.231.206.23 (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought it was "John Hopkins University". A whole lot of people spell it that way. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for troll assistance
The subject line above says it all - and I hope this individual learns that correct back-and-forth is the best way to communicate!75.21.150.44 (talk) 14:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Bet you had a lot of fun making that... 
-- AnonMoos (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hehehe. Actually, I built the thing in PNG format in reverse. I then placed them all into a GIMP .xcf file, reversed the order, and exported as animated GIF. It was kind of fun. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Jarrod Glover
Hello, I notice you have tagged my new article Jarrod Glover for a speedy deletion because you believe it to be a 'Negative attack page'. I have a number of sources, which I am progressivley adding. I am a new user. Could you please give me a moment to add the sources? The page is not meant to attack Mr Glover and contains text from his blog where he makes these statements. I have a number of News articles I can add also.Enidblyton11 (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK, but please do not create any more pages like that unless they have references when you create them. Otherwise, it is a negative unsourced page and Wikipedia's policy is that such pages must be immediately deleted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Online Ambassadors
I saw you have been really active lately and I clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that this is a copy-paste message ;) , I am interested in mentoring one student. What do I need to do? It appears that I may have to identify myself to the Wikimedia foundation or release my name (I am not going to compromise my privacy). I have 7 DYKs, 1 ITN, 1 GA, and a lot of experience copyediting and cleaning up articles. I regularly work at NPP and RCP. I am also relatively unavailable via IRC. Finally, I do regularly give third opinions to help resolve content disputes, and I have occasionally given an editor review. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- I was screening people for certain things on user pages, so it wasn't simply copy paste (and we need a lot of ambassadors and this seems to have been fairly effective). Send an e-mail to the selection team with the questionaire at Wikipedia:Online_Ambassadors#Becoming_an_Online_Ambassador answered. I don't think we need real names for Online Ambassadors, though I think we do ask that you join the google group. If you have any questions make sure you turn my attention to them. I look forward to you participating. Cheers! Sadads (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion
Hi Reaper Eternal, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot, to let you know that I recently removed a Speedy Deletion template you added to User:Example/bidel. I removed it because the page has the namespace code 2 (see namespace), but the CSD you used (G2), does not apply to user pages. If the template shouldn't have been removed, please replace it (SDPatrolBot won't remove it again), and report the error. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- False positive, users shouldn't create pages in the Example (talk · contribs) userspace. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, G2 still doesn't really apply, would have been better off with a different CSD. However, I'll have a look at making sure the creator "owns" the userspace. - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, maybe I should have used "G6 - housekeeping". Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, G2 still doesn't really apply, would have been better off with a different CSD. However, I'll have a look at making sure the creator "owns" the userspace. - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RfA
Hi. It's only the tip of the iceberg, see a full repertoire of this user's questions. --Kudpung (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- All I gotta say is "WTH?" Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
(moved from above)
Dear Reaper. I am sorry for adding the page. I copied it from Wiki Answers, and the ad was on the page. I deleted the add part, but please, don't hurt the article, please
Doomei - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doomei (talk • contribs)
- I moved the page to here for you to continue working on. Right now, it is not notable, and please rewrite it in your own words if you copied it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
You know, I hate you, what ever your stupid name is ReaperEternal. I'm not on wikipedia evrey friggin' moment of my life, and you randomly deleted my NGOG page. I was abou to go and write with my own words when i found out a douchebag named ReaperEternal deleted it. I am infuriated, as you can tell, from my language, and request that you restore THIS INSTANT or I will notify higher powers on Wikipedia. -Doomei
- Hello, you were given several hours to rewrite it. However, you did not, and as you well know, the page was an unambiguous copyright infringement. As such, it was deleted since such content is not permitted on Wikipedia for legal reasons. You are allowed to write it in your own words, but I am afraid that somebody will nominate it for deletion again due to a lack of notability unless you can find some reliable sources for it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Burn In Hell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.194.182.142 (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
HI THERE IT'S 89.164.7.154 & 89.164.182.248 AND DECENT WORLD
YOU JUST CAN'T DESTROY AS, THE WORLD
YOUR EFFORTS ARE FUTILE
I WILL NEVER SURRENDER DICTATORS!!! There are many others to edit disputed articles! So you better be sure to block them all!!
BLOCK ME as long you wish, ... your attempts are futile
I'll ADAPT! I'll PREVAIL !
DOWN THE CENSORSHIP !!!
WIKIPEDIA IS TOTALITARIAN REALM!!
There are many others to edit disputed articles!
So you better be sure to bloc all the world, since I'm everywhere anytime!!!
Be aware of me, anytime, anywhere!!
I'LL BE BACK!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.129.88 (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- ...(These guys sound nuts!)--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's trolling. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- ...(These guys sound nuts!)--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
From This Fire
Currently working on this page. Amonty1816 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!
|
Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs). |
 |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
RfPP
Please don't remove admin notation templates from RfPP like this. Post after them in the same section if you need to make further comment. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I edit-conflicted and didn't realize I had deleted your comment. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Editor Review
|
A beer on me! | |
| Here's a beer for your fine efforts on improving Wikipedia! Cheers! Thanks for taking time out to review another editor and offer constructive criticism. The Interior (Talk) 20:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Cirrus cloud
 | On 3 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cirrus cloud, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that cirrus clouds (pictured with a fire rainbow) cover an average of 20% to 25% of the Earth's surface at any time and can produce glories, fire rainbows, and sundogs? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Editor assistance list
A problem has been identified at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list. You may like to read Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
ErikHaugen's RfA
I think you may have misunderstood my question. I've clarified on the RfA's talkpage. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool 15:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- And I have replied on the talk page. Thanks for letting me know! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Why did you removed the good content from Chaugaon page?
Dear Reaper Eternal,
I am a contributor of the Chaugaon page, but suddenly on 30th January 2011, I found that you have removed majority of content from this page. It is realy demoralizing for me. Can you please justify why you did this?
Mangesh Khairnar (talk) 11:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- First, I did not remove the majority of the content. I only removed a large portion of the content on what individual families do in Chaugaon, as that is unimportant material in addition to being original research. That section would best describe what cottage industries are in Chaugaon, not who does them. By describing who does what jobs without a source, you are making unreferenced claims about living people, something which is not very good. I also removed information on the water tank, as that does not appear to have much importance. I collapsed a large portion of information on Chaugaon's seasons since the material there did not need to include that many words. In other words, I actually didn't really remove information, I only rewrote it so that it would be easier to read. (It might look like I deleted a lot of content there since English isn't your first language, but I really didn't.) Finally, almost the entire page is unreferenced and needs to have its sources in reliable sources so that the information can be verifiable. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Please have a look at my talk page. Mangesh Khairnar (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
January barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Reaper Eternal for copy editing articles totalling over 60,000 words in the January GOCE Backlog elimination drive. Your contributions are greatly appreciated! -- Diannaa (Talk) 17:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC) |
GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
| Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We have reached the end of the month and the end of another successful drive; thanks to all who participated.
If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the November 2010 Backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering the barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Thank you for participating in this year's first Backlog elimination drive! We hope to see you in March. Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (talk), The Utahraptor (talk), and Tea with toast (talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC).
Thanks A lot for helping me in Tajik Passport Artical.
Dear Brother,
I hope you will keep helping me for my future articles as well.
Best Regards, --Faizanalivarya (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Reaper, I just reviewed the article this article: Hurricane Danielle (2010), for GA. Its a pretty good article, however, it falls just short of the GA criteria. Since it was only minor issues, sometimes even nit-picky I will admit, I did not instantly fail Danielle for GA. Good luck on improving the article, and on the WikiCup. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 04:25, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Talk:Microsoft Office free download
Hello Reaper Eternal. I am just letting you know that I deleted Talk:Microsoft Office free download, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK 15:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
If there is one thing I am bad at, it is decorating my user page. It probably would have stayed like that without your help. Thank you! --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 22:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Thanks!
Thanks for your help on Interstate 70 in West Virginia. --AdmrBoltz 03:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: Talk:Logan Konop
Hello Reaper Eternal. I am just letting you know that I deleted Talk:Logan Konop, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Umm...I think that was a hoax, even though it was created in the talk space. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- When I find pages created in the
Talkspace without corresponding articles, should I ever tag them for speedy deletion as vandalism, hoaxes, or patent nonsense or should I just tag them with {{db-g8}}? Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)- Either will work, but if I find a talk page with no article page, I delete it under G8 anyway! PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK! Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Either will work, but if I find a talk page with no article page, I delete it under G8 anyway! PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- When I find pages created in the
A kitten for you
Panyd has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}
Thank you for your well-wishes. They were very much appreciated and made me feel a lot better during my time off. For your kindness I present you with a kitten! May it love you and keep you. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 23:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Logs
Hello Reaper Eternal! I was looking through your contributions, and saw some amazing edits. Keep it up! Also, I saw that you log the CSDs. Can you tell me how you do that? Thanks. Novice7 (Talk) 16:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hello!! Is it difficult to do? Sorry, if I'm disturbing you. Novice7 (Talk) 05:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Look at my vector.js file. You have to disable Twinkle as a gadget in your preferences, then copy the Twinkle "importscript"s that are in my vector.js into your vector.js. After that, restart FireFox. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Oh, how're you? Hope you're in good health :) Novice7 (Talk) 16:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Look at my vector.js file. You have to disable Twinkle as a gadget in your preferences, then copy the Twinkle "importscript"s that are in my vector.js into your vector.js. After that, restart FireFox. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Can you help me? What should Is select as criteria (CSD) for Luctor_et_Emergo_Breda? Or, is it PROD? – Novice7 (Talk) 13:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- That would be G11 ;) . It may be in Dutch, but it is still spam. (I commonly use Google translate and just paste in foreign-language articles so I can read them. A foreign language article that does not meet the criteria needs to be tagged with {{notenglish}} and listed on pages needing translation into English.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Wow. I do that sometimes, but, by the time I get to Google Translate and paste the article, someone else might have tagged it for CSD :D Thanks for your help. I can't believe it's been almost a month since I talked to you. – Novice7 (Talk) 13:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Re: Author blanking pages
Oops! Sorry, I'll surely remember it. You see, I'm dumb and don't get these things quick :D – Novice7 (Talk) 03:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User Boxes:DarkfireII2
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User Boxes:DarkfireII2, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Before you warn me for "Creating vandalism pages", please read the history of the article, where it shows that I and another user accidentally move-conflicted when userifying the page. In any event, the page was not vandalism—it was an obvious good-faith attempt to create a userbox. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see so many of these that are vandalism. The chirpy summary and silly content made it look like someone fooling around rather than something created in the wrong space which needed userfying. andy (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: AccountsPortal
You're correct! It's also a company, hence the speedy tag, but the primary topic of the article is probably more the software, so you have a point there. - Vianello (Talk) 18:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, on second glance, the infobox at right on the article seems to indicate the article is about the company of the same name. Bit unclear though, isn't it? - Vianello (Talk) 18:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's OK, we all make mistakes! (I didn't realize the "Spam user talk pages" option was turned on either!) Additionally, this appears to be non-notable, and suitable for AFD. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've PROD'ed it. It'll likely have the same ultimate outcome. Thanks! - Vianello (Talk) 20:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's OK, we all make mistakes! (I didn't realize the "Spam user talk pages" option was turned on either!) Additionally, this appears to be non-notable, and suitable for AFD. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The article had been vandalised. See my comment at the AfD and check out the unvandalised version which I have restored. JohnCD (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've spent four hours or so trawling through Scholar, News archives, web generally & can now accept that Interstate_Van_Lines fits with WP notability policy. I posted a note on the article talk page for more concrete facts (ranking in the industry etc) but have managed to double the length of the thing anyway, and made it less like an advert. Still don't think that the awards mean that much but, hey, doubtless the company is proud of them. - Sitush (talk) 22:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's nice! Good work! :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
February 2011
Dear user of STiki, please be more careful when using this tool! If you disagree with this edit, you should go to page LGBTQ symbols and move it back. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! --Emaus (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, your bot's edit looked like common redirect-breaking vandalism that I commonly see. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. --Emaus (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Kyuss article
Reaper Eternal, I was in the middle of making some necessary fixes to the Kyuss article and you stopped me in my tracks! I didn't make "unconstructive changes." Basically, some former members of the band started a new band called Kyuss Lives! Legally and artistically this is a completely different band. The main songwriter, guitarist, and singer isn't involved. So, I was making some changes that aren't controvercial at all. Of all the articles on Wikipedia, band articles are usually filled with the most glaring factual errors, and any changes I make are just to fix obvious errors. If you're faster and better at cleaning up that page than I am, go for it, but those changes ARE necessary and accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.33.221 (talk) 02:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I reverted you when you started deleting pieces of citation templates [3] . I know that band articles on Wikipedia are commonly junk, and I appreciate your attempts to fix errors. Just please do not delete the references out of articles so that they screw it up. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of DaDaBIK
I'm removing the proposed deletion template; I wrote the article clearly and with a neutral point of view, DaDaBIK is a very popular Open Source software (as you can see googling the name and from here http://www.dadabik.org/index.php?function=show_dadabik_on_the_web) and has a long story of 10 years of development so I think it worths a wikipedia article. If you can give me some hints to improve the article, I would be glad to follow them--Ugeeeen (talk) 13:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, I agree that it is written neutrally and clearly. However, in order to keep the article from being nominated for deletion, you will need to provide reliable, independent sources that show why the subject is notable. (Notability is a bit like a measure of whether the topic is worthy of a Wikipedia article.) For example, a reliable source which says that "DaDaBIK" is the most-used database builder would help show notability. However, merely being in development for 10 years does nothing to establish notability. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your reply, in the next few days I'll add more sources about notability.Ugeeeen (talk) 14:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Barnstar!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I award you this Anti-Vandalsim barnstar for your outstanding work on reducing the massive amount of vandalism sustained tonight! You've beat me to it multiple times! Cheers Bped1985 (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- I second this barnstar. Thanks for your work. 7 04:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- I second this barnstar. Thanks for your work. 7 04:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
A little help?
If you're free, can you do a quick copy-edit of Kylie Minogue singles discography's lead? It's currently at the FLC, and I feel the lead is choppy. Thanks! – Novice7 (Talk) 12:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Certainly! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
|
All Around Amazing Barnstar | |
| For your valuable contributions to every possible Wiki-areas. (You deserve more than just a barnstar, but this is the biggest token of appreciation I could find :D) – Novice7 (Talk) 14:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!
|
Please help! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog is still very large. Still exceeding 20,000 articles! The goal is 18,000 or less. Lets see if we can do it! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thank you for all your help thus far! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs), and WikiCopter (talk · contribs). |
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
Party for the Integral Advancement of the Haitian People
I suspect somebody's purposely vandalizing it for political reasons, because something very similar happened last week too. So I'm going to protect the page. Bearcat (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm. I don't think indefinite semiprotection is the best solution because two vandalism are not really a whole lot. Maybe two weeks would be best since the vandalisms/spam/political advertising were about 1 week apart? Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Well, even indefinite protection isn't actually permanent; after a month or so even an "indefinitely" protected page will have the protection taken off if there isn't a compelling reason to leave it protected in the longer term (such as a vandal who's so persistent that he keeps coming back for more every time the protection comes off.) That said, I'm not wedded to indef if you feel strongly about it — but it really isn't meant to be permanent protection, so much as "until someone decides it's ready to come off" protection. Bearcat (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Sir Richard Herbert
| | On 25 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sir Richard Herbert, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Sir Richard Herbert was the illegitimate son of William Herbert, 1st Earl of Pembroke, and Maud, daughter of Adam ap Howell Graunt? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
(moved from above)
STOP YELLING AT ME ITS A FREE COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.204.206 (talk) 03:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Please don't shout. Be civil. – Novice7 (Talk) 04:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's just a troll. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- He/she has been blocked – Novice7 (Talk) 13:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's just a troll. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
ur a fag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Griffico (talk • contribs) 19:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: Editor review
Hi there. First of all, thanks for taking the time to review my edits. I really appreciate it. As such, I'm also happy you found those mistakes I made on the DYKs - nobody is perfect and I rather get whacked than have such errors exist. As such, could you do me a favor and see whether I was able to address those concerns on those articles? TIA SoWhy 07:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Much better! Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- No, thank you. I really appreciate it. If you need anything, please just ask. Regards SoWhy 10:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
A question
Can you tell me if this is neutral? – Novice7 (Talk) 12:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- It seems neutral to me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's my first FA nomination. There seems to be no comments :( – Novice7 (Talk) 13:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! What is the deletion category for this? TfD or CSD? — Novice7 (Talk) 13:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's a copyright violation of this, all the user did was copy the text right out of the table. I tagged it G12. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I didn't think of that. I knew it was a bad chart. — Novice7 (Talk) 03:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Editor Assistance - Help needed for Willie Nelson article
Hi, I've been working in the article of Willie Nelson for a while now, and I had nominated it to GA. The article is comprehensive in its information, but my main problem are copy-edits, that caused that the nomination fails. Since I've seen you in the editor assistance list and I really can't see the mistakes in the article, I need someone to correct those mistakes for me. It shouldn't take much time, a little help would be appreciated, hope to hear from you soon. Thanks for the time.--Gduwen (talk) 17:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I'll start copyediting! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, and I really appreciate that you answered and started to work so quick! BTW in the lead where says "Since the first concert", where you asked for a clarification I meant the first Farm Aid concert.--Gduwen (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| for understanding and flexibility, and allowing the Wolfcub to run with the pack ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks so much! I know it's daft, but there you go! Daft is one of the things I'm good at. It's that large, nebulous grey area between lunacy and genius, lol ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)