License tagging for File:Quadeca - From Me to You (Deluxe Edition) Cover.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Quadeca - From Me to You (Deluxe Edition) Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oak Fire

edit

There is already an article by that name, and in terms of acres burned, the new one is more notable. Would you give your opinion on Talk:Oak Fire?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Populated place

edit

 Template:Populated place has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2022 FIFA World Cup riots for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 FIFA World Cup riots, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 FIFA World Cup riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Roc0ast3r! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:54, Sunday, February 19, 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Quadeca - From Me to You (Deluxe Edition) Cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Quadeca - From Me to You (Deluxe Edition) Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Gunnar Wilhelmsen

edit

  Hello, Roc0ast3r. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gunnar Wilhelmsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vermin Supreme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duncan Hunter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1,000 Blind People See For The First Time (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Roc0ast3r! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1,000 Blind People See For The First Time (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bart van Kent moved to draftspace

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Thanks for your contributions to Bart van Kent. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 09:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Roc0ast3r. I've deleted this at your request, but I think CycloneYoris' move to draft was not necessary, as the subject appears to be an elected member of parliament, and thus meets WP:NPOL. If this is the case and you want the draft back to restore it to mainspace, then let me know. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
If that's the case, then I'd wish to restore it back to the mainspace. Thanks for letting me know! RONIN 10:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Done: Bart van Kent. If you can find another source or expand from the existing one that would be great. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Dexter King

edit

On 23 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dexter King, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of MrBeast videography for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MrBeast videography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MrBeast videography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

edit

Concern regarding Draft:1,000 Blind People See For The First Time

edit

  Hello, Roc0ast3r. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1,000 Blind People See For The First Time, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

edit

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Roc0ast3r. Thank you for your work on Kyle McNorton. Another editor, Kentuckian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work on this article! I commend you for your contributions. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kentuckian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Kentuckian |💬   03:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Roc0ast3r. Thank you for your work on Abbey Duke. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

edit

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Roc0ast3r. Thank you for your work on Emile Eicher. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for starting articles on legislators. Please consider expanding them so that they do not remain stubs.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

edit

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Roc0ast3r. Thank you for your work on Adam Turk. Another editor, Kentuckian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article! I deeply appreciate your efforts to expand the sum of human knowledge. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kentuckian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Kentuckian |💬   17:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral history of Howie Hawkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Spencer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shelley Devine

edit
 

The article Shelley Devine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unknown Person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. House1090 (talk) 22:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit

Your GA nomination of Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely

edit

The article Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely for comments about the article, and Talk:Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

edit

DYK for Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely

edit

On 31 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a member of the House of Lords was the principal of a Canadian junior school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Tottenham, 8th Marquess of Ely), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont

edit

On 4 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont, was nicknamed "the loneliest boy in the world" by journalists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

edit

DYK for Sam Carling

edit

On 22 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sam Carling, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sam Carling was the first UK member of Parliament to be born in the 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sam Carling. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sam Carling), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

edit

Nomination of Semi Bird for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Semi Bird, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semi Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

edit

Your GA nomination of Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont

edit

The article Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont and Talk:Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont

edit

The article Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont for comments about the article, and Talk:Frederick Perceval, 11th Earl of Egmont/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

edit