User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 5

Closing moves

Hi, I reverted your closing of the discussion at Talk:Sudanese civil war (2023–present)#Requested move 26 May 2024, as it was closed improbably. You closed the discussion as "no consensus" which does not represent the discussion. Please refer to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure which states that Anyone, administrator or not, who wishes to close a requested move must be very familiar with the policies and guidelines associated with it (especially Wikipedia:Article titles, Wikipedia:Disambiguation, and Wikipedia:Consensus), and ideally will have participated in several move requests previously.

Your closure of the discussion as "no consensus" does not reflect the discussion that has taken place, I am not sure if that was by accident or not. But your closure looks like a supervote which a discretion reserved for admins but even then, they will explain in details why they reached a certain opinion that is not obvious from the discussion.

How that make sense and I did not close the move discussion as I was involved the discussion, but feel free to go back and close the move properly. FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

That's okay by me. I know no matter which way, a review will still be initiated. Many thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

No, not necessarily. This one was a dry cut.

In general, maybe it is better to participate more in AfD discussion (although I see you have plenty of experience) and other move discussion before jumping to closing. Tbh I am still not sure why you closed the discussion as no consensus. Maybe you want to elaborate more? FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @FuzzyMagma In fact, your revert is not appropriate. When one disagrees with an RM closure, we initiate the Wikipedia:Move review process. You should have indeed asked @SafariScribe to revert themselves stating your reason. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@DaxServer that is one way to do that, and if @SafariScribe explained here that they believe the closure was not a mistake, I will revert my revert and escalate to Wikipedia:Move review.

Given SafariScribe experience, I am operating under the assumption that the closure was a mistake because it does not make any sense. I mean that is why I am here, to discuss FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

In the future, please do not revert the closures, despite what you assume. Ask the closure to revert and if they disagree we move for a review. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 09:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

ok, noted. @SafariScribe please let me know if you want me to reinstate your edit FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@DaxServer, thank you for the reminder. I thought so when I saw the revert but I have no say because I know @FuzzyMagma will leave a message hence, I could have questioned either. I have had much experience in page moving and closing but this one is just though and with a strong spirit, concluding that it will still be closed near as I do. @FuzzyMagma, DaxServer is correct. Before reverting ones edit which is not obvious vandalism, first know why before reverting and even, before going to WP:MOVEREVIEW. I have no problem reverting my edits like I said earlier, it's just that today is Sunday in mt time zone and who am I not to cheer up. I was sleep deprived but ate a lot this morning. @DaxServer, thank you also. Will both of you want a cookie? Of course I will! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) SafariScribe, Happy Sunday and I hope you’re enjoying your day :). Mistakes have been made (by both of you) but it’s not too late to go for move review. So, do you want FuzzyMagma to revert his reversion and go to move review, or let it be closed by someone else? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Happy Sunday too. Let it be closed by someone else. We've settled that issue. No one is going for a review as the discussion is still open and everybody is cool. The weather is cold to talk much. FuzzyMagma behaved matured enough by fixing it himself. However, there were few mistakes DaxServer has corrected. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay, great :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Question

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohd_Amri_Yahyah

https://cms.fam.org.my/v1/teamdetail/czo4OiJjbXMucGFmYyI7/T2024TM3

(team player 17, can the page be updated since sources prove he is not retired?!) 93.138.236.53 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

The source you provided isn't reliable. Convince me by providing news sources that are reliable per WP:RS. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Dave Conlon (football coach)

Hi - I had a new draft article and it seems to has disappeared and been redirected.

Please can you help?

Re below is what it shows - where/how can I assess the Draft:Dave Conlon (football coach) - I was trying to have this as a page. Thank you in advance

My Apologies

I’m sorry guys, @Safari Scribe, @Reading Beans, @Vanderwaalforces. But it’s unfair to nominate all my articles for deletions it’s not fair, accept my apologies and withdraw your nomination please. Madeforall1 (talk) 07:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

No one nominated all your articles for nominations. Retaliatory nomination is considered bad faith. The polo club doesn’t look so notable to me so I don’t think it can be withdrawn unless consensus states so. Best, Reading Beans 07:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I have apologized Sir, it’s all good now but the one for “Dumo Lulu Briggs” i think you should search the news tab, i believe you know him. Madeforall1 (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Safari Scribe I saw you close the AFD, Can you do justice? As per mine meeting Wikipedia GNG Madeforall1 (talk) 08:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Confused

From AFD - what does "Maybe this is one of the deprecated places needing attention I. Wikipedia. That doesn't mean a clergy if such office won't be entered" mean? Geschichte (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I can see typographical error in the text. Can you link the AFD, lemme take a look at it. I can't efficiently remember. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Asking for help for Draft:Peter Seah Lim Huat

Can you help me improve this draft: Draft:Peter Seah Lim Huat? GuapMachine (talk) 03:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

I have cleaned up the article here Peter Seah Lim Huat. Please do not add spams and unverifiable materials. Those you did that got a notable draft declined. Now I wish to ask, why do you have to resubmit when you didn't do what other reviewers asked to get the article as clean as? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. I thought I had done what they asked me to do, sorry. GuapMachine (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

May 2024 GOCE drive award

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to SafariScribe for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 09:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001 video game) ‎

This move appears to be incomplete though the link updates have been done. -- ferret (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Strike that, I must have needed a refresh. -- ferret (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

No! You are right. There was problem with WP technology that it closed the move without moving directly as directed in the script. However, I've manually moved it. Thanks for reminding me. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome ...

story · music · places

... to WP:QAI, - A project member's article is TFA today, and I have an interesting biography in the DYK section, happy reading and writing! List your articles for review on top of the project talk, - and review ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Ah! Great and thanks for welcoming me. The bio is quite interesting particularly the age (101)! I shall list this one first. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Looking forward to that, watchlisted! - The project is interested in accessibility: blank lines between talk page entries confuse screnreaders, DYK? - Looking at the articles of people who recently died is my top project. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Today is "the day" for James Joyce, also for Bach's fourth chorale cantata (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics have a mammal I had to look up. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2024)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: State of emergency Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Sun Management Center • News program Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Casey Jones (song)

Hi,thank you for your contributions. I note that you've again chosen to close an RM before the required 7-day timespan. Two support votes and two days does not mean a WP:SNOW close is proper. I urge you to follow policy and refrain from closing discussions before they have run their course. See WP:RM. 162 etc. (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Believe me, this will be my last early closure. I have learnt it now and like being dorsile, I have heard you advise and that of SilverLocust. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
110		Dark Star (song) (talk)	Add sources
281		Live/Dead (talk)	Add sources
77		Transgender rights in Germany (talk)	Add sources
25		Mexicali Blues (song) (talk)	Add sources
5		The Grateful Dead Family Album (talk)	Add sources
133		Personalization (talk)	Add sources
757		Qom (talk)	Cleanup
88		Rock Island Line (talk)	Cleanup
321		Osun State (talk)	Cleanup
7		1984 in South Korea (talk)	Expand
65		The Ace of Cups (talk)	Expand
623		Raphael (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) (talk)	Expand
285		Anthem of the Sun (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,298		John Perry Barlow (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4,927		Jerry Garcia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
339		Sex and drugs (talk)	Merge
223		Roll Over Beethoven (talk)	Merge
2		2023 NAIA women's wrestling championship (talk)	Merge
4		Sammy Masters (talk)	Wikify
343		Jam band (talk)	Wikify
49		Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series) season 7 (talk)	Wikify
4		Classic Rock Gold (talk)	Orphan
15		Nazo Ekezie (talk)	Orphan
4		Oluwapelumi Arameedey Kayode (talk)	Orphan
7		Lee Seung-yun (talk)	Stub
7		André Vandernoot (talk)	Stub
70		Laurence Shurtliff (talk)	Stub
4		Beatrice Funke Ogunmola (talk)	Stub
10		Bob Bralove (talk)	Stub
8		Lee Chul-seung (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Your reason

Gooday SafariScribe, What was your reason why you accepted the article Opay, I need to know on the Afd discussion coz I don't feel strong to start picking up points. If the article wasn't suitable it shouldn't have been accepted. Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

@Gabriel601, Opay meets notability per SIGCOV and GNG. I am analysing sources to see the deletion discussion. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Cubana Chief Priest

New article alert. You maybe interested to work on it. Cheers. Chat Term talk 16:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

@War Term, thanks for your wonderful impact to the article. However, I have nominated it for deletion as it doesn't meet Wikipedia:GNG. I also want to tell you that "celebrities may not meet our criteria for a minimum entry. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks for the Afd nomination. Let's see what the community says in 7 days time.

Best, (Chat With Term)talk 21:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2024)

Calder's Flamingo in Chicago Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: List of public art in Chicago Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Cape (geography) • Ambush Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

July 2024

Hello SafariScribe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SafariScribe. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SafariScribe|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blanes tree (talk) 22:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Note: this warning I believe is spurious. It is impacted by Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Blanes tree. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

There might be some truth in this assumption.

We received spam mails from wikisubmissions.com and idigitalakki.com after our Draft was submitted for reviewing. Both companies wanted to assist us in getting successfully approved.

Coincidence? 212.29.33.164 (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

@212.29.33.164 I don't know what you may be pointing at, but I have a friend that can break it down, @Timtrent. Fwiw, no reviewer takes prejudice of declining a draft if it merits one according to WP notability guidelines. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

All interested parties should read WP:SCAM, making any reports it suggests

@SafariScribe Despite assumptions that this notice is spurious, we can all expect to be asked the question at some point, and should give a clear and unequivocal answer to it. It matters little who asks it, it needs to be answered. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

P.S. I have never edited for any payment whatsoever. My edits and works on Wikipedia is completely voluntary. If there is an report of scam from any resemblance of me, my edits, even possible fabricated lookalike username, please note it isn't me. I will advise you promptly file a report to the Wikipedia community. @104.232.119.107, @212.29.33.164, @Timtrent. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I believe in it.

We should not forget that it is ultimately possible for anyone to evaluate these Pending_AfC_submissions lists and then send spam emails based on the gaterhed information.

There is no reason to say that this was SafariScribe. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

o hai!

Thank you for the quality improvements and review, I need to get my dots in order - thanks for those too :D

MissAnonymous123 (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

complainment

HEY, WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE TO DECLINE ALL MY ARTICLES??? IT HAS RELIABLE SOURCES! Zanbarg (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

oH, AND YOU ALWAYS DECLINED MY ARTICLES! EVEN THE PLAYTIME FILM ARTICLE! HOW DARE YOU! Zanbarg (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Could you cool it with the SHOUTING? Being rude and aggressive isn't the way to get what you want. It looks like your draft submission is lacking independent sources, unconnected from the film - simply add some of those and you can resubmit. -- D'n'B-t -- 10:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Request on 21:08:03, 30 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Catycherry

• Catycherry (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Antoneta Kusijanović (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks so much for reviewing my page! I'd love your help understanding why Antoneta Kusijanovic isn't notable enough for a page – her film Murina is very powerful, and won the top award for a first feature film at Cannes a few years ago. She's also been awarded for multiple other films, and has hundreds of press articles about her and her movies. I've created or edited pages for much less recognized folks (including a number of local DJs and fictional characters) so I'd love some guidance on the types of sources you'd like to see to demonstrate that notability.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Catycherry (talk) 21:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Catycherry, there's an WP:UNDUEWEIGHT with your draft. We don't need to know about her directing of Murina. Just tell us any award she has won for directing, any review of her film direction such as styles, themes, etc. Has she directed multiple notable films? I can only see you cite five or thereabout, which isn't enough for WP:NDIRECTOR. Write about her and list the films she has directed as well as maybe few awards of the film that sources recognized her impact. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Gangadhar Nehru

Hi @SafariScribe, Hope you are doing well. I saw that you are reject my previous draft Draft:Gangadhar Nehru, Do you really think that the article does not pass WP:GNG? Whereas the subject is mentioned in hundreds of english, Hindi, and even Urdu language books. And there are many books which are not available on the internet, which you can put in the category of (WP:OFFLINE). I think you should check again. Thank You with warm regards! Youknow? (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Youknow?, the books you provided lack page numbers. Can you provide them for verification? Best, Reading Beans 11:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Promotional wording

Hi, you recently tagged Naver Dictionary as having wording that reads promotional. I posted on Talk:Naver Dictionary about the tag seefooddiet (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

@Seefooddiet, I have edited and removed some promotional contents from the article, hence my removal of the tag. Also remember that Wikipedia doesn't value unnecessary things to know about a company, book, etc. I mean things that aren't encyclopedic. However, I thank you most graciously for your benevolent editings towards contributing from another language to English Wikipedia. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

New draft page review may have missed the sources/references ...

In regard to this new draft page Draft:Ivo_D._Dinov, the actual reliable sources of notability citations are provided but well into the article. Could you please consider rereviewing the content of the draft and confirm if it meets the academic-specific criteria? Here are a pair of conditions that are satisfied (and citations are referenced in the draft article:

According to the 8 wikipedia notability criteria, this draft page for Ivo D. Dinov, an academic satisfies at least 2 of the criteria:

• #3 The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).

The scholar is an honorary member (fellow) of the Sigma Theta Tau International Society, and an elected member (fellow) of the International Statistical Institute (ISI). Both references are provided in the article.

• #5 The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

The scholar is a named professor and chair, the University of Michigan Henry Philip Tappan Collegiate professor (reference is provided in the article, it self).

Thanks much. VodnaTopka (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

SafariScribe, following this recommendation from David_notMD, this draft article, Draft:Ivo_D._Dinov, was revised. Please check again if this is a better reflection of notability. Thank you for your diligent Wikignome work. VodnaTopka (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

VodnaTopka AfC reviewers who hav declined a draft do not necessarily conduct another review. David notMD (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

@David notMD, it's not helpful with such a reply. A second opinion gives a reviewer (sometimes along other reviewers) another time to revise the draft again but it appears I have missed this one. @VodnaTopka, kudos with your accepted draft–article, and continue adding your knowledge to Wikipedia. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Marcelo Albornoz Serrano

Hello! I saw you declined this draft, but I think it fulfills WP:NPOL. Am I wrong? Broc (talk) 12:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Broc, I don't see that he meets WP:NPOL. There is no significant office election or appointment. Being an Undersecretary of Justice and a member of the Committee on Freedom of Association of the International Labor Organization doesn't confer that either. Maybe am missing something. Can you provide evidences of your thought, I mean what you think? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Please consider adding specific feedback to your decline reviews

I see that so far just today you have declined over 100 draft submissions and accepted nine. I understand you must be busy but I hope you can provide comment feedback to those you decline on what the issues are beyond what is in generic template. From the comments I am seeing on your talk page this does appear to be a problem. Consider offering more assistance even if it is sacrificing efficiency. 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC) Myotus (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

I will do that. I normally use that when I feel the draft, with a little editing will be accepted by another reviewer. Cheers though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Your FAC

Hi SafariScribe, I'm really sorry I missed your entry. It's a good article, perhaps a bit on the long side, but who am I to talk! and it was very rude of me to ignore your talk page message to me. I guess I just forgot. Goldfish memory me. Anyway, I was thinking of retiring, but I might put one more FAC up first. More importantly, if you put Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie up again ping me. Or email me. It won't be canvassing, because you've already tried the neutral way once. After that, all bets are off  :) I hope it hasn't discouraged you, and I hope I haven't been part of that discouragement. Apologies to you again! ——Serial Number 54129 16:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Oh no. Serial Number 54129, I understand and I will do that when I finally renominate. I will stay off like a week before starting some removal, restructuring, resizing, copyediting, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Stella (Trane) Jackson

Good morning. I am just asking for some tips on how to get this page posted. I am a summer intern at Trane Technologies and it is my last day today so I am hoping to leave with some tips I can give the person who will be taking over this project. Thanks! 32.141.76.18 (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

@32.141.76.18, I thought I have listed that already. If not, link the draft here for me to take a second look. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Poupette Kenza

Hello @SafariScribe, you declined the submission of this article : Draft:Poupette Kenza, which is mostly a translation of the French wikipedia article. The reasons for your refusal are lack of reliable sources, lack of significant coverage. The contrary is true: there are a number of focused articles, by quality secondary sources. Le Monde, Le Point, Le Figaro, Libération…  are among the French most significant & reliable French newspapers. The articles they published don't just report some facts : they analyze the phenomenon this person embodies. Among others, you may want to check:

1. Le Monde : https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2023/02/18/poupette-kenza-exhibe-sa-vie-de-femme-au-foyer-a-ses-millions-d-abonnes-sur-snapchat_6162397_4408996.html

2. Franceinfo : https://www.francetvinfo.fr/internet/reseaux-sociaux/soupcons-de-maltraitance-publicite-cachee-qui-est-l-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-au-c-ur-de-plusieurs-polemiques_6012842.html

3. Ouest-France : https://mcetv.ouest-france.fr/mon-mag-buzz/people/poupette-kenza-debarque-sur-tiktok-et-pulverise-tous-les-records-24012023/

4. Radio France : https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/podcasts/capture-d-ecrans/capture-d-ecrans-du-mercredi-28-decembre-2022-1263560

5. Le Point : https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/qui-est-poupette-kenza-l-influenceuse-qui-enchaine-les-bourdes-17-05-2024-2560439_23.php

6. BFMTV : https://www.bfmtv.com/tech/actualites/reseaux-sociaux/maltraitance-detournement-de-fonds-placements-de-produit-poupette-kenza-l-influenceuse-en-constante-polemique_AV-202308170305.html

7. 20 Minutes : https://www.20minutes.fr/faits_divers/4100520-20240709-seine-maritime-pourquoi-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-incarceree

8. Le HuffPost : https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/life/article/poupette-kenza-quand-la-surexposition-des-enfants-d-influenceurs-pose-probleme_214358.html

9. Le Parisien : https://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/cagnotte-detournee-linfluenceuse-poupette-kenza-et-lorphelinat-trouvent-un-accord-des-soupcons-persistent-05-07-2023-HYAFBHMRKFANVFPLQYA4TGX75M.php

10. Libération : https://www.liberation.fr/societe/religions/je-ne-travaille-avec-aucun-juif-linfluenceuse-poupette-kenza-dans-le-viseur-de-la-justice-apres-des-propos-antisemites-20240516_RKQJX4KKZJGGXOKXNCPJQPFZJM/

11. Le Figaro : https://www.lefigaro.fr/secteur/high-tech/l-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-au-coeur-d-une-nouvelle-polemique-apres-des-propos-antisemites-20240516

We've got coverage that's focused, analytic, and reliable - and I therefore think you should reconsider your refusal. AYGFS (talk) AYGFS (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@AYGFS, sources in an article must meet WP:SIRS WP:NBIO. Yes, a French celebrity but not notable. Your draft is written like an expanded CV and overall spectacular promotional news. Try trimming down irrelevant words that doesn't show any encyclopedic information about Kenza. By the way, do you have any relationship with the draft you have written? If so, you should also declare it by reading WP:COI before your draft will be considered Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I would be happy to accept the draft after you have done the above. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

My draft has all that's required: a noticable subject, multiple reliable sources, a neutral wording, etc. Since you won't see it now, my guess is you wouldn't see it in the future either - whatever more I (or anybody else) could write. Anyhow, thanks for your tine and farewell. AYGFS (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@AYGFS you are welcome to resubmit it and another reviewer will take look but give WP:NOTGOSSIP a read first. It does come off more as a diary in some parts and for controversial claims make sure you are using high-quality sources. Safari, WP:SIRS is only applicable to organizations. This is about a person so WP:NBIO is the relevant guideline. S0091 (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@S0091, thanks for the refresh. I almost got to say WP:42. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Yep, 42 is a good one and one I also forget about. S0091 (talk) 17:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Carrozzeria Coriasco

You rejected this draft as not meeting the Reliable Sources guidelines - there is literally a book written about Coriasco, by an uninvolved author. I can add more sources, but if you think that a standalone book on the topic does not meet WP:RS then I am not sure what it will take. Sannia's Carrozzieri book is also excellent (with an introduction by Leonardo Fioravanti and the foreword written by Umberto Eco), while Autoweek.nl and La Escuderia seem perfectly reliable to me. Please clarify your interpretation of WP:RS so that I know what has to be done in this case.  Mr.choppers | ✎  20:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Mr.choppers Hi there, first off, please provide exact page numbers of the books you cited. Page numbers of the book that verify the statement the citation is put next to. They will ease review as you cannot just cite an entire book for a single (or two) sentence(s). That being said, the draft is also kind of written in an unencyclopaedic tone, you might want to restructure some of the sentences in the second section and put that list as pure prose instead. I'd also say that the citations are not sufficient because there are some sentences that lacks citations from the second section. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: I didn't write it - I do own one of the reference works and will add page numbers accordingly. Are you saying that to pass WP:DRAFT, an article has to be perfect and complete? Last I checked, articles should only be rejected if they would have been deleted if put up for AfD - which is clearly not the case here. As for the possibly uncited sentences, I will quote WP:AFCR: Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material. The content and sourcing policies require inline citations for only four specific types of material, most commonly direct quotations and contentious material about living persons. I see nothing potentially contentious (except possibly "Thanks to the success with the 600 Multipla and 850 T derivates, in Italy 'Coriasco' nowadays is a household name for light vans.") As for the style of writing, it was written by someone who's a non-native English speaker, but AFCR has minor issues like that covered, too: ...accept the article and tag it with maintenance templates to alert other editors to issue(s)..

To list or not is a matter of opinion, I would say putting that content in prose would be turgid and hard to read. But again, this is not cause for rejecting an article.  Mr.choppers | ✎  00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers I wasn’t telling you why the draft was declined — I was pointing out a few things I noticed. And by the way, I personally will not accept a draft if I can’t not verify the claims it makes from the cited sources, because whether you like it or not, the verifiability rules is key and it applies to all articles and drafts. I don’t want to address the fact that you own one of the cited materials on the draft… that sounds like you’re citing your own book, citing your own opinion. I’d recuse here and leave the review for someone else whenever you resubmit it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: are you suggesting I am Alessandro Sannia? I recommend you withdraw your statement and apologize, and then read WP:AFCR.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

No no, you misread or misunderstood my comments. You said you own one of the referenced work right? And then you’re citing your own work in an article you’re creating. That was what I was pointing out, not saying you’re the subject. My comment is not even anywhere close to giving such impression, I’m not new to AfC and can tell you when an when not to accept a draft more appropriately. Because you do not agree with a reviewer doesn’t mean otherwise of the reviewer’s competences. I don’t plan on replying further in this matter. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

You wrote that sounds like you’re citing your own book, citing your own opinion and then suggested that I "recuse" myself - you are clearly accusing me of citing a reference I wrote myself.  Mr.choppers | ✎  20:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers, I won't say your draft meets WP:GNG. The major issue is verifiability. I can't verify all those transformations he did as it was in the article, and being honest, they don't seem to have been covered in multiple reliable sources. Provide sources where relevant to help any reviewer access them and know whether to accept or decline the draft. Also, we accept drafts that we believe will pass AFD per WP policies and guidelines. If verifiability becomes a major issue of an article, then it deserves merging or deletion as the case may be. Maintenance tag is also good but should be an alte work, when the article is good enough and historically significant. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

First, it is not my draft, as I have already stated above and should be clear to anyone who actually reviewed the draft. There are currently seven cited sources, including one published book specifically about the company. It meets WP:N without issue. As per the guidelines, an article only needs inline citations for "four specific types of material, most commonly direct quotations and contentious material about living persons." Why can you not verify the conversions? They are cited. Again, from the guidelines: "Avoid declining an article because the reliable sources are not free, online or in English. Books, magazines, and other print-only sources are perfectly acceptable, and may as well be in another language." Your behavior seems to fall foul of WP:NOTHERE.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers, I have taken time to digest the draft again and here are helps I came out with.
The sources reliably cites "Fiat 1100 Boat Car By Carrozzeria Coriasco", which may be a notable product of the company, and possibly deserves a page. If source "Alessandro, Sannia (2017). Enciclopedia dei Carrozzieri Italiani [Encyclopedia of the Italian Coachbuilders]. Turin, Italy: Societa Editrice Il Cammello. p. 192. ISBN 9788896796412 is accessible by you, because I cannot, you may email the contents including the other cited from this book. I also unfortunately have no access to source Alessandro, Sannia, ed. (2019). Carrozzeria Coriasco. Turin, Italy: Societa Editrice Il Cammello. ISBN 9788896796627. Among them, including lack of WP:SIGCOV, I can't see the draft meeting WP:NCORP. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

A published work specifically about the company in question meets SIGCOV. You are in direct contravention of the guidelines at WP:AFCSTANDARDS; the crux and the base concern of this process is whether or not an article would survive the AfD process. If I thought you were discussing this honestly I would scan and email you pages from the Sannia (2017) but judging by your talk page you are not exhibiting good will.

Core purpose

The purpose of reviewing is to identify which submissions will be deleted and which won't. Articles that will probably survive a listing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion should be accepted. Articles that will probably not survive should be declined. Issues that do not affect the likelihood of success at AFD (e.g., halo effects like formatting) should not be considered.— Preceding unsigned comment added by user:Mr.choppers (talk • contribs)

Academic notability

Hi, my draft was recently rejected due to not meeting any of the academic notability specific criteria, even though the subject meets several of the academic specific criteria, most notably first, third, fifth and sixth criteria.

1st: Like I wrote in the draft, a peer-reviewed Festschrift was dedicated to the subject recently, which already satisfies the first criteria by itself, according to the academic notability page criteria note 1c.

3rd: Like I wrote in the draft, Lavento is a member/fellow of Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, which is the practically the Royal Society of Finland.

5th: Finland uses the German academic rank system, where the professor is the highest possible chair and only awarded to the most distinguished researchers, which makes it similar to a distinguished professor.

6th: Lavento was the chairman of the Finnish Antiquarian Society, which is the oldest and the most notable of all scholarly cultural heritage societies in Finland.

How should I edited the article that these points are more apparent? I've already cited the societies where the membership/professor status are mentioned. And do you think these sources are not clear enough for a non-finnish/swedish speaker? Thanks in advance. MrGakster (talk) 19:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing mind having a look at this one given your knowledge of Finnish. @MrGakster you may have a point but will see.

On another note, SafariScribe I notice many queries go unanswered. If you are going to review hundreds of drafts be prepared to answer questions/address concerns regarding your declines. S0091 (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@S0091, some of the questions are duplicated/asked or answered either at the AFC help desk or teahouse. I try my best to respond as I am going through a short time stress. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your editing suggests otherwise. If you are "going through a short time stress" then I suggest slowing down. S0091 (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

SS Hi there. You are reviewing drafts too quickly and I mean it. You are doing a good job actually, but it would be better if you decide to actually take care in reviewing the drafts. For example, I've accepted some drafts which your initially declined, maybe because you didn't really pay attention to the details. Just as S0091 has noted, since you're having stress (in real life?), it would be best to take a break from reviewing drafts and come back anytime you want. That is by the way. If you'd want to continue despite your stress, and to avoid these plenty of unanswered threads on your talk page, leaving a very detailed reason of your decline would still help. For example, don't just use the in-built AFCH decline reason, convey your own view using the comment box, this would probably address any possible questions the submitter would have, you comment could refer them to specific guides/policies that would help them better. Overall, I love the fact that you're learning so quickly from your mistakes. I hope you recover from your stress as soon as possible. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, @S0091. I fully agree with @MrGakster's contentions regarding NACADEMIC points #1, #3 and #6. I'm not sure I entirely agree with #5; yes, it's true that there isn't anything higher than Professor, but whether that automatically makes Professor = Distinguished Professor, is perhaps debatable. Nevertheless, this draft is a clear pass; I'll go ahead and accept it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for checking and accepting the draft @DoubleGrazing! And good luck to you too @SafariScribe! MrGakster (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@S0091, @Vanderwaalforces, @DoubleGrazing, thank you all for the resolve and encouragement. Congratulations @MrGakster. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, you have not done anything bad or even close. Everyone learns differently but they way I learn (I am always learning) is reading the AfC Helpdesk; everyone's responses are helpful as are Jéské Couriano's source assessments. I also follow up on past reviews to see if they were later accepted or declined again by others and rely on the second check by NPP for my accepts. Given you are an NPP reviewer, you might consider not marking your accepts as reviewed (up to you). Everyone makes mistakes and certainly opinions differ about what is acceptable or not and sometimes I look back on a review and wonder what the heck I was thinking. :) Based on the activity on your talk page, you have several experienced editors watching so likely if you had a question you could ask here and someone would answer. You are also welcome to ping me or visit my talk page, even if it is to disagree with something I have done. S0091 (talk) 18:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@S0091, it's usually a rare action for me to mark my accept as reviewed. I do that on a very needful case, where I edited simultaneously with many editors or that I am fully sure. In short, I take NPP guideline a double time before marking. Welp, I also rely on NPP for a second look of my accept. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought it marked it as reviewed automatically because AfC reviewers who are also NPP have stated they mark their accepts as unreviewed. My language did not make that clear. S0091 (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Blair Doroshwalther moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Blair Doroshwalther. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because please correct the formatting before submitting for review. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 23:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2024)

Smiling woman Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Happiness Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: List of public art in Chicago • Cape (geography) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

---

Israeli apartheid

Hi, are you going to carry out the move? Selfstudier (talk) 22:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

@Selfstudier, the article is protected that only admins can move it, hence my request at WP:RM/TR. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Ah, OK, understood. Selfstudier (talk) 08:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Help on how to Archive my talk page

Hello, @SafariScribe

I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my gratitude for your guidance and assistance with drafts and reviews. I am reaching out to inquire if it is appropriate to request help with archiving my talk page, as it has become quite lengthy and cluttered.

Best regards

Afrowriter (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Afrowriter, I hope this isn't late yet. Read Help:Archiving a talk page for an easy guideline. I will recommend User:Elli/OneClickArchiver, which may be easier because I use it. It will appear on the right sidebar or even add an "archive" button to all the sections of your talk page. Is there still any other question? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe Thanks for reaching out. I've been a bit busy and away from Wikipedia due to the crisis going on in this part of Cameroon. I was making preparations for a relocation. Glory be to Allah, I have been able to move with my family for the time being. I'm just now seeing this message, and I will give it a try once again. Thanks for all your assistance in making Wikipedia a safe place for some editors.

Best regards, Afrowriter (talk) 08:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Afrowriter, I'm very very sorry to hear that. It's similar in Nigeria, where we are having a peaceful protest. Would you like me to help you out by leaving some queries unanswered for you to attend to later? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you still trying to figure things out around here like customizing my signature and so on. we keep you posted. Afrowriter👳‍♂️ (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:DIALux

Hello, thanks a lot for reviewing the dialux draft page and your feedback on improving the page quality. I have now tried to be more precise. Better information is provided with clear references. Some of the details like for example the supported standards of the programm are hard to find. The only source for these is at least the manufacturer homepage. Who else should know these in detail?

There was a disusion on the importance of the topic on the german wikipedia site This could be of help to get an idea how significant the dialux programm is for the work with light. Thanks for your assistance. 2A02:908:1C24:5700:3816:3DE:CFAB:9321 (talk) 09:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing once again. The draft is now in rewritten in an encyclopedic format. The are more information now and the text has a better order. Several screens were added. Any further guidance on improving the draft would be much appreciated. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

@212.29.33.164, I hope to give feedback after looking at the draft, but will leave it for another reviewer. Thanks for your works Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I look forward to your comments. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Question from K.Dishaunda on User:K.Dishaunda (16:04, 5 August 2024)

User: K.Dishaunda How to add a photo? --K.Dishaunda (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @K.Dishaunda and welcome to Wikipedia. You may love to read Wikipedia:Uploading images for more ways and steps to check and take before uploading an image on Wikipedia. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 19:19:55, 22 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Jbsmitty

• Jbsmitty (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tim Sheehy (businessman) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Is there any specific assistance you need with the draft? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Review declined

Draft:Sovereign_Gold_Bond

I have listed multiple sources, I can easily show a 100 articles from top new sites about the scheme.

A google search would have shown that the there are thousand of articles and videos on this topic. Skratata69 (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @SafariScribe

I have added articles from the most reliable sources in my country and as agreed upon on Wikipedia. (The Hindu / WP:THEHINDU and The Times of India / WP:TOI). Please have a look at the draft again when you are free. Skratata69 (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

@Skratata69, You did great. I will leave another reviewer to review it. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Question about sources for declined translated page

@SafariScribe Hello there, and thanks for checking out my draft Draft:Sossio_Giametta so promptly. I have the same question as a few other people here - I don't quite understand what more sources would be needed. I used very prestigious and independent Italian newspapers and the Italian BBC. Could you please explain what the problem is? Bravenewworld1984 (talk) 08:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Dear @Bravenewworld1984,

Having an article about a translator is a not bad, but it's important to remember they are also considered like writers. Your draft appears to lack the sources a possible complete WP:BLP should have, which, as you know, is stricter on the English Wikipedia than on other Wikipedias. Welp, you should also add identifiers for the books, such as the ISBN, Google Books URL, or a citation where he was credited as the translator. These are essential for verification. Cheers. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @SafariScribefor getting back to me so promptly. I have added all ISBNs and inserted Giametta's works as a translator as separate from his authored ones. Also, just a minor note - it's not a bio of a living person but of a dead one as he passed in January this year. Best :-) Bravenewworld1984 (talk) 10:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh! A deceased? My bad. I see you have resubmitted it. Another reviewer will look at it. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 22:18:17, 23 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Thirdward544

• Thirdward544 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rick Barrett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SafariScribe, I saw the message about my article: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." Does it need more sources or different sources?

Thirdward544 (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

This has been handled by Tim Trent. To your question @Thirdward544, it means that the existing sources are not enough or reliable to support the contents of the page. Do you still need a hand? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 13:10:32, 24 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by עומר תשבי

• עומר תשבי (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Shalom Meckenzie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think there are more then enough sufficient references, addressing the subject of the article directly. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the subject has an article in Hebrew. Furthermore, it is worth noting that there are sources that are offline(magazines). I referred to one but I can refer to more. עומר תשבי (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

עומר תשבי (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

@עומר תשבי, I commented on your draft. However, if you think more sources including offline sources will serve better, then you're free to cite them or share herein. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Review changes to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abodo_Wood

Hey, thanks for taking a look at my article draft and for your feedback. I have now edited the article again to include more sources and edit the tone to be more formal and encyclopaedic. I'd be grateful for advice to see if this is now acceptable before resubmitting. Thanks ValerieCo (talk) 04:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@ValerieCo, my advice firstly is asking you, please, are you in any way related to the company? I mean it's not bad neither will it get the draft deleted. It's just for clarity reasons per WP:COI. To your draft, unfortunately, the tone of the draft reads promotional, like an advert. I know it isn not easy, trust me. When you're writing such draft, avoid words that seems to promote the company because Wikipedia doesn't need them. For example, you said, "Abodo Woods produces carbon-negative timbers...", whereas this phrase can be changed in a way that keepa it neutral (see my brief changes to tye draft). I have cut few of them and it is remaining many. To ease and aid your work on the draft or subsequent draft in the future, read WP:PEACOCK. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @SafariScribe No I'm not related in any way to the company. Thanks for the feedback, I've had another go, let me know how this looks now. ValerieCo (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Inquiry Regarding Review Status of Accepted Draft Ryan Trey

Hello, @SafariScribe

I hope this message finds you well. I recently submitted a draft for the article Ryan Trey, which was accepted a few weeks ago. However, I have not received any follow-up notification indicating that the draft has been reviewed.

From my understanding, once a draft is accepted, there is typically a notification that follows to confirm its review status. In this case, I have not received such a notification.

Could you kindly enlighten me on how the review process works and what steps I should take to ensure that the draft has been properly reviewed? Any guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Best regards

And Please stay safe been seeing the news lately about the crisis in your country Afro^📢t@lk 08:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@Afrowriter, when an article is accepted, it will appear in the article space, but this doesn't mean it has been reviewed under WP:NPP. An AFC reviewer with NPP rights can mark it as reviewed if they are confident it won't face deletion through AFD. As an AFC reviewer, I generally don't mark the pages I accept as reviewed because I prefer to get a second opinion during the NPP review process. I hope that makes sense to you now? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Oh! The protest has been peaceful. Grazie di curro. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok thank you now i understand better the said article has just been reviewed thanks Afro^📢t@lk 11:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you help me understand why you rejected my draft for Linda Rabbitt?

Hi @SafariScribe, I left a couple of questions for you on my Talk page, and I thought I'd follow-up here on your Talk page. :) I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, BlueRoses13 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry for the delay @BlueRoses13, I will follow up as soon as possible. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe That would be great — thank you. Sincerely, BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe So sorry to continue pestering you. I left a long reply to you in WikiProject Articles for Creation on July 26, but then I received a notification that this thread was no longer active. Here's the message:

Topic "10:44, 25 July 2024 review of submission by BlueRos..." was archived or removed from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.

You might no longer receive notifications about this topic.

So, I'm not sure how to proceed. I absolutely want to be patient. After all, you're volunteering your time, and I know your plate is full with AfC. At the same time, I want to make sure my follow-up doesn't get lost in the shuffle.

So:

1. Would you like me to just go ahead and resubmit the draft?

2. Would you like more time to reply to my reply?

3. Should I do something else?

Please let me know whatever is best; I'm eager for your guidance and wisdom.

Thanks so much!

Sincerely,

BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@BlueRoses13, I have dropped looking at the draft after the reply at AFC help desk. Don't ever be discouraged, you are improving in whatever way. Also if you feel you have done the feedback, request that I check on it again. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe Thanks! Yep, I incorporated your feedback on July 26 — but I didn't resubmit, since I've been waiting to hear from you. I just clicked "resubmit," and I sure would be grateful for another review. Thanks so much for all your hard work. Cheers! BlueRoses13 (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe Hi there, I just want to thank you for being so generous with your time and expertise in helping me get this page across the finish line. I appreciate greatly your detailed feedback! All the best, BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Andamiro draft

Hey, i noticed my draft regarding Andamiro was denied a bit ago.

I dont quite understand what exactly is wrong with my references, the description on the top of my page is not descriptive enough, as its a bit of a broad message.

Draft:Andamiro

Its just kinda confusing, i'm not natively english and a lot of this topic is in korean so i had to use a translator for some articles, so its difficult to understand what i'm trying to look for. Andamiro has a large presence in NA and korea, so i would like to have a good external source of information that is not monitored by the company itself. HyperNover (talk) 21:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

In a general view, your draft doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP. The sources and content are dubious and few, promotional.. Source 1 is the company's website without any "profile/bio/about" information. Source 3 is from an unreliable source, Intergame Online. Source 5 is an OT, talking about the meaning of "Andamiro", which is not necessary. Source 6 & 7 are both directories and thus, unreliable. Also, the information including the "current company's capital" is not necessary at all. The draft should show how the company is notable, it should show appearance in multiple news, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Milan Mach (actor)

Hello, You have declined to move this article to main space. Could you please explain a little bit more what I can do to make it ok, as I had already added as many citations as I could find. This would help in my future articles. Thank you Taraa Scott (talk) 19:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

@Taraa Scott,

If the actor acted all those films, it's likely to meet WP:NACTOR. However, we need sources that are independent and reliable. Examples can be: newspapers, books, magazines articles e.t.c. IMDb, Discogs, and others are all unreliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2024)

A fictional social network diagram Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Social experiment Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Happiness • List of public art in Chicago Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Your comments on Draft:Carrozzeria Coriasco

Hello SafariScribe. Thank you for your input on my draft article on Coriasco. Another user and I have made a bunch of edits and added many references. However, because you didn't really specify particular problems than the standard the draft needs multiple published sources with a listing of the requirements, we still don't know where exactly we go wrong. It would be very helpful if you'd indicate citation needed or this reference does not qualify, so we get a better picture of what exactly you think we must improve. Just a few examples will do. Thank you in advance.

Ok. I will include citation needed tags, where it is needed. Thanks for notifying me. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Very well, I'm looking forward to your added tags then. {17:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)} Erremm (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Question from Zddyl on H:TALK (16:37, 12 August 2024)

Hello i need help to create a article --Zddyl (talk) 16:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia @Zddyl. To create an article, you may want to read Help:Your first article. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 17:25:07, 29 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by DrBlackcow

• DrBlackcow (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sol Chin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. About the draft Draft:Sol Chin, I have supplemented the references and cited reliable sources based on the comments you provided when you declined the draft on July 6th. I understand that I cannot speed up the review process on my demand, but I am now curious to know if the draft has been appropriately revised so that it could be accepted quickly. I apologize for asking this question, as I am not very familiar with Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.

DrBlackcow (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

@DrBlackcow, I'll look at it the second time. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@DrBlackcow, you have resubmitted the draft, and I will leave in the hands of another AFC reviewer. Reading WP:NMUSIC can help you too. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)