User talk:Sbb1413/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

A note re TRAINWRECK

While TRAINWRECK outcomes at RfD are most common when someone bundles dozens of redirects together, they can also occur in smaller discussions if the nominated redirects are not sufficiently similar for the same solution to apply to all of them. In the case of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_17#2020_virus, even though the set of redirects is small enough that we can expect editors to be able to properly assess each redirect, the ensuing !votes that recommend different actions for the different redirects can be a major headache to close properly. In this case I think I was able to come to a workable solution, but if there had been a few more votes the discussion could easily have become a no consensus mess. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:US space program has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:US space program. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:US space program has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:US space program. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Space program of the United States has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Space program of the United States. Thanks! buidhe 06:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from NASA into Draft:Space program of the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Space program of the United States has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Space program of the United States. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User ABF

Template:User ABF, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User ABF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User ABF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Dictionnaire des canadianismes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dictionnaire des canadianismes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 14:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

"How to pronounce English" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect How to pronounce English. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 14#How to pronounce English until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Saturn V

Hi, I've noticed that you have made a number of responses to the GAN review of this article (please see WP:GAN/I#N4, which says you are welcome to work on an article when it is being reviewed). However, I would ask remind you that I am reviewing the article for the nominator User:The4lines and not you, so your responses to each of my comments or queries are unwanted. Please just go ahead and edit the article if you wish, but only comment on the review if you feel strongly about something.

By the way, it can be argued that your comment about placing SI units first is actually incorrect for this article, as it is US-based, so your edits may be reverted. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you, I am performing a self-revert. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to work the the article but please stop answering on the Ga nom. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 18:18, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding removal/change of data

Hello Soumya-8974. I'm --Deepak7217 (talk) 02:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Deepak7217. I was trying to add an external review link to Chetan Bhagat book which which wasn't available there after doing an extensive research of that website(You can check). But things wasn't going according to plan.I noticed that I changed the appearance of original data. So I undo it. I didn't remove any data from wikipedia. Well I will try to give best to Wikipedia. Thanks for guiding me.

Thanks

• Thank you --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

"Undersea boat" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Undersea boat. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 18#Undersea boat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Soumya-8974

Thank you for creating SpaceX In-Flight Abort Test.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Was already at RFD when I reviewed it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gemini SC-2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Test article.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Could you please be more careful...

You nominated Oliver Henry for deletion, but your nomination did not cite a justificaiton from policy or guideline. As I noted I think the page, when you nominated it, was compliant with Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Primary_topic_when_a_disambiguation_page_lists_only_one_existing_article_by_that_name. Geo Swan (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (4th request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Apollo 11 into Lunar Module Eagle. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you. I have already realised this when I created this article. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Issue created by dividing current consensus list into sections

Hi Soumya! Dividing Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19/Current consensus into sections created a table of contents. However, that table of contents is now being displayed at pages like Talk:Coronavirus disease 2019, causing a formatting error. Could you look into trying to fix the error? (And roll back the sectioning if it can't be fixed?) Also, the numbering for current consensus lists is supposed to be permanent, since they are referred to in edit summaries, etc. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 00:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 04:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

It has been fixed using a semicolon. The edit summary was incomplete though. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 04:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Harassment warning

This is pure harassment. The reason you give for deletion is spurious, as the page is no more like an article than many other userpages. Did you see where Kautilya3, after introducing the principles of dharma and the Kautilyas, says "I hope to stand up for these values on Wikipedia" on the page? There are other personal comments too. You are not a complete newbie — you have been here long enough to know better. If you harass Kautilya3 again (or anybody else), you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 08:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC).

I am not harassing him, I just do not like the user pages that do not have any WP-related stuff. See my user page, where it has sufficient amount of WP-related stuff. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

That's a very disappointing reply. Userpages are not required to be "liked" by you, or to be just like your userpage. Also, Kautilya3's page does have Wikipedia-related stuff; I even quoted some of it in my question that you have completely ignored ("Did you see where Kautilya3, after introducing the principles of dharma and the Kautilyas, says "I hope to stand up for these values on Wikipedia" on the page?"). Bishonen | tålk 16:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC).

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:R from how-to name

Template:R from how-to name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nardog (talk) 00:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Again, please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 13:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 13:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Clear consensus ≠ relist

This discussion had a clear consensus to delete, and relisting that was absolutely not an action that should have been performed by anyone, let alone a non-admin – controversial closures and relists are highly advised against for non-admins. Please don't do this again. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 00:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Space programs of the United States has been accepted

Space programs of the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Welch language

Welch language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: You have enough edits to create redirects yourself, but you are always welcome to use the AFC process if you want to. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Actually, I was restricted to create redirects for some reason. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 16:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Understood. There are areas of Wikipedia I generally avoid because I know if I wasn't extra careful, I would wind up in some dispute that may lead to a formal topic ban or similar sanction. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Update the redirect is now the subject of this deletion discussion. I was not thorough enough in my search before accepting the page, had I been thorough, I would not have accepted it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Dada

Dada, do you know Bangla? আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Hyã! I am a native speaker of the Bengali language. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

দাদা, বাংলা লিখতে পারেন এই রকম? আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Of course, I can. --সৌম্য-৮৯৭৪ ^{আলোচনাকক্ষ} _{কর্মকান্ডসমূহ} ^{সাবপেজসমূহ} 13:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

আপনার সাথে পরিচিত হয়ে ভালো লাগল। আপনাকে এই লেখার উদ্দেশ্য ছিল একটা অনুরোধ করা। আপনি হয়তো জানতে পারেন যে বাংলা ভাষায় বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া রয়েছে। বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া খুব ছোট, মাত্র ৯৪ হাজার নিবন্ধ রয়েছে ও বেশীরভাগ নিবন্ধ ছোট। বাঙালি হিসেবে যদি এতে নিয়মিত অবদান রাখেন তবে কৃতজ্ঞ থাকব আপনার প্রতি। কোন অবাঙালি এতে কাজ করবেন না ফলে সকল বাঙালির সাহায্য কাম্য। আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 13:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 05:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

AFC redirect request created - Hierosoluma

Hierosoluma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Note - it would have made my job easier if you had stated a reason. Google's demonstration that this term is used in religious literature as a transliteration for the city, along with the different transliterations with similar spellings that are incoming redirects to Jerusalem convinced me this was a useful redirect. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Space programs of the United States (September 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Nkon21 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Draft is merely copy and pasted from several other pages and external sites.

ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Soumya-8974! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User page blue rounded

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:User page blue rounded requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_12#Template:User_page_rounded. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym (talk) 14:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Redirect Nomination

Thanks for putting my redirect request in the right format, but turns out I was doing the same parallelly. May I go ahead and clean up the earlier incorrectly done section - Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_28#Nomination_of_Enola_Homosexual_for_Deletion? Amit Dash (talk) 18:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Ignore the above, there are already responses to your properly done section, which is good! Amit Dash (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Being merged

Template:Being merged has been nominated for merging with Template:Merging. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 01:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

rotational period isn't a physical characteristic

Thank you for forward-linking my Talk entry to the template's talk page.
Be well!
— Black Walnut ^talk 04:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Space articles

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Space articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

Saw the message you put then removed from my talk page (not sure why). But anyways thanks for publishing the infobox. It looks good, better then I would probably have done. Happy editing. OkayKenji ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I removed the message because I thought forking is better than improving, which made better improvements. I have planned to add some parameters and probably deprecate {{Infobox space shuttle}}. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Dipward

I have made a new proposal at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_5#Dipwad. See what you think. SilkTork (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Would you also take a look at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_5#Manor_of_Tottenham,_Wiltshire. SilkTork (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm Ahunt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

It is constructive. I had added a blue link to outline of aerospace. Also, why my edit to "WikiProject:Aviation" to "WikiProject Aviation" is reverted? "WikiProject:" is not a valid namespace, "Wikipedia:" is. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 13:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

If you wish to discuss your edits, please do so on the talk page concerned where others can see and engage in the discussion. Please also stop edit warring and take time to familiarise yourself with the Bold-Revert-Discuss (WP:BRD) recommendation for conflict resolution. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank You

My understanding of Wikipedia was formed both in the stated position of Wikipedia that: “Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, an indiscriminate collection of information, or a web directory. It is not a dictionary, a newspaper, or a collection of source documents,” as stated in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. That “Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view” as stated in Wikipedia:Five pillars. I appreciate the goal stated in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view “that all encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.” See: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. That as stated in Wikipedia:Reliable sources “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view).” That this stated goal is to be achieved through “verifiability”; “In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source.” Wikipedia:Verifiability. That what the Wikipedia is not is clearly stated in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. These are all goals I believe I have complied with in the article edits I have made. I also cannot ignore the fact that some other well connected editors in their superior status do not comply with these standards in that “verifiability” may be disregarded in deference to their opinions of what reality should be rather than is. Their ability to use Wikipedia as a “soapbox” for ill-verified or unverifiable opinions of what reality should be dominates. As the view of a few that they may overrule what any editor posts in compliance with a neutral point of view and reliable published sources, based only upon their personal whim of what reality should be, is found by Wikipedia to be superior to verifiable truth. Then I must accept that reality. Thank you Soumya-8974 for your invitation to contribute to Wikiproject Rocketry. As I do not believe that the Wikipedia shall treat my contributions based upon the principles stated in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, nor Wikipedia: Reliable sources, and that some are not required to meet the standards stated in Wikipedia:Verifiability, and may impose their personal wishes in contravention to those principles, I must accept that. While I enjoy writing history I am not an egomaniac nor a masochist. I feel given the reality as opposed to the stated desires of Wikipedia I should decline further participation. Thank you. Mark Lincoln (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 16:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salyut 1

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salyut 1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 19:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salyut 1

The article Salyut 1 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Salyut 1 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 01:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Islamic language for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Uanfala (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ladakhi Wikipedians

A tag has been placed on Category:Ladakhi Wikipedians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in Ladakh

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in Ladakh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		WikiProject Notification

This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
The Downlink project page
I am notifying you, that thep The Downlink newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.
If you have any suggestions on what to add to the newsletter please leave a note at the newsletter discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink. If you wish to have the newsletter added to your talk page on release then please add your name to here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink/Recipients. Thanks, Terasail [Talk]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Request for undeletion

Recently Abhas Mitra page was deleted, a prominent astrophysicist, former head of theoretical astrophysics, Bhabha Atomic Research Center, a prestigious research center (Government of India). His theories contradict some theorists, that's why his page is always deleted. There isn't a matter of notability, in terms of notability, he comes under world's top astrophysicists, also Received 1st Prize in Young Physicist Colloquium organized by Indian Physical Society in 1989. Got qualified as a SENIOR National Research Council Fellow at Goddard Space Flight Centre, NASA in 2004. Was a visiting professor in Max Planck Institute for Kernphysik, Heidelberg in 2006. In 2011, I shared BARC Group Achievement Award in connection with MACE Gamma Ray Telescope. Have acted a referee for the Astrophys. J.; JCAP, Astrophys. Sp.Sc., European Physical J. & several other journals. Happen to be a member of International Astronomical Union. Former FULL Member of American Astronomical Society (1992-94). In early 2001, gave 10 min BBC (India) Radio interview on my research which claimed non formation of exact black holes. Was interviewed live on NDTV & Headlines Today, featured on Aaj Tak in 2004 in connection with science news. For past 7 years, my name appears as one of the most mentioned living Indian Physicist” on google (usually with Ashoke Sen & Jayant Narlikar). My name appears in the list of Distinguished Alumni of Mumbai University which complies names since its inception in 1857. I happen to be a PhD guide (Physics) of the same university. Times of India (Kolkata) , in its year end survey, described me as one of the TRAILBLAZERS for 2015. YEAR OF THE TRAILBLAZERS On Dec 28, 2015, International Lifestyle portal Louis Philippe, announced “The 7 Most Talked About Indian Men in 2015” : 1. Narendra Modi, 2. Sunder Pichai (Google CEO), 3. Milind Soman, 4. Virat Kohli, 5. Salman Khan, 6. Abhas Mitra, 7. Azim Premji (Wipro). MESNXP (July 9, 2015). Warning: This compilation is grossly incomplete and misses out many names of many great Indian Scientists: 15 Brilliant Indian Scientists Who Deserve Our Respect For The Work They Do., a FB Video on this article with 255k views as on August 17, 2018. Maitreya Arya (talk) 03:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello

I am working on the Wikiproject: Musical Instruments, hoping to make it more active. It used to have something of a newsletter, long since defunct. I noticed your upcoming newsletter and am interested, to see what you find to put in it for content. I am mulling ideas for a newsletter and perhaps yours can be a model. Best Wishes, Jacqke (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your invitation message

Your Solar System invitation message has a bunch of unsubstituted if statements in it. Please fix the messages that you have delivered, and fix your invitation so that it doesn't leave if statements on people's talk pages. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done – I make WPJ invitations using {{subst:WikiProject invite}}. Can you fix this template so that #if statements are substituted? Thank you. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Look at the code in some of the templates in Category:WikiProject invitation templates for guidance on how to fix your template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Scottish Gaelic, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your edit was in contradiction of the hidden comment regarding there being no official status and of what is said in the very article, compounded by blanking the hidden comment. You provided no support for your changes. This is actively disruptive. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

I have reverted your edit and evoked WP:BRD to discuss about this. It should be held on the talk page of the article, not here. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

No, it was you that were bold, I reverted, the onus is on you to discuss your contested edit, as I am sure you are aware. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scottish Gaelic. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. WP:BRD. Do not war. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

"Googol Books" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Googol Books. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 28#Googol Books until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

The Downlink Volume 2 Issue 1

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		1 October 2020 — 31 October 2020

Volume 2 — Issue 1
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News! The Soyuz MS-17 launched on 14 October 2020, 05:45:04 and docked after a "two-orbit rendezvous flight plan" to the ISS only three hours later at 08:48:47 UTC. The OSIRIS-REx probe successfully makes brief touchdown and collects a sample from the asteroid Bennu at 22:13 UTC on 20 October 2020. Expedition 63 ended on 21 October 2020, 23:32 UTC after 187 days, 21 hours and 38 minutes duration. Expedition 64 began on 21 October 2020, 23:32:00 UTC. With ISS commander: Sergey Ryzhikov, and astronauts: Kathleen Rubins & Sergey Kud-Sverchkov. Soyuz MS-16 landed on 22 October 2020, 02:54:12 UTC after 195 days, 18 hours and 49 minutes in space.
Article of the month. John Glenn John Herschel Glenn Jr. (July 18, 1921 – December 8, 2016) was a United States Marine Corps aviator, engineer, astronaut, businessman and politician. He was the third person and the first American to orbit the Earth, circling it three times in 1962. Following his retirement from NASA, he served from 1974 to 1999 as a Democratic United States Senator from Ohio; in 1998, he flew into space again at age 77.	Image of the month. Captured on Oct. 20, 2020 during the OSIRIS-REx mission’s Touch-And-Go (TAG) sample collection event, this series of images shows the SamCam imager’s field of view as the NASA spacecraft approaches and touches down on asteroid Bennu’s surface, over 200 million miles (321 million km) away from Earth.
Members New Members: F.Alexsandr (Joined on the 8th October) Dndlp (Joined on the 18th October) Path slopu (Joined on the 23rd October) Wehwalt (Joined on the 24th October) Whoop whoop pull up (Joined on the 24th October) Josecurioso (Joined on the 29th October) Number of active members: 91. Total number of members: 295.	Article Statistics — This data reflects values from the 31 October 2020 Spaceflight articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 16 2 7 32 FL 4 4 8 FM 92 92 GA 11 22 36 47 116 B 1 46 37 46 130 C 55 157 513 446 5 1,176 Start 37 159 1,121 2,186 367 3,870 Stub 8 249 2,105 223 2,585 List 14 128 76 203 421 Category 1,020 1,020 Disambig 46 46 File 194 194 Portal 54 54 Project 67 67 Redirect 1,132 1,132 Template 485 485 Other 25 25 Assessed 125 536 2,038 5,044 3,121 595 11,459 Unassessed 54 54 Total 125 536 2,038 5,044 3,121 649 11,513 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 43,569 Ω = 4.92
October Launches — All times stated here are in UTC. Antares - NG-14 (October 2nd at 01:16:14) Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L12 (October 6th at 11:29:34) Long March 3B - Gaofen 13 (October 11th at 16:57) Soyuz - ISS 63S (October 14th at 05:45:04) Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L13 (October 18th at 12:25:57) Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L14 (October 22nd at 15:31:34) Soyuz - GLONASS-K (October 25th at 19:08:42) Long March 2C - Yaogan 30-07 (October 26th at 15:19) Electron - In Focus (October 28th at 21:21:27)
November Launches — Launch dates can change. See a current list: here. Atlas V - NROL-101 Falcon 9 - GPS 3 SV04 PSLV - RISAT 2BR2 Long March 6 - ÑuSat 9-18 Delta IV Heavy - NROL-44 Long March 3B - Tiantong 1-02 Falcon 9 - NROL-108 Falcon 9 - SXM 7 Falcon 9 - Sentinel 6-Michael Freilich Vega - SEOSat-Ingenio & TARANIS Falcon 9 - Crew-1 Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L15 Electron - STP-27RM LauncherOne - ELaNa-20 Angara A5 - Test Flight Falcon 9 - Türksat 5A Soyuz - Falcon Eye 2
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list. Newsletter contributors:OkayKenji, Soumya-8974 and Terasail

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Indian maps members

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Indian maps members requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Wrapper

Template:Wrapper has been nominated for merging with Template:Wrapper template. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 22:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians considered themselves a participant in all WikiProjects

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians considered themselves a participant in all WikiProjects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Biography-topic rocketry articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Biography-topic rocketry articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rocket engine-topic rocketry articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Rocket engine-topic rocketry articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rocket-topic rocketry articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Rocket-topic rocketry articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spaceport-topic rocketry articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Spaceport-topic rocketry articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

List of languages by religion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of languages by religion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. I am not convinced that this is a valid list in Wikipedia terms and it appears to be your own original research. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians with 4G connection has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians with 4G connection has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Belated

I don't think you ever got one of these, but as one of our current busy bees, you've earned it. :)

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		For your contributions to Project Spaceflight. Neopeius (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 04:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Indic Scripts

Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Ladakh here, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians in India-administered Kashmir

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians in India-administered Kashmir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Kashmir maps

I am not sure why you are changing Kashmir maps in myriads of pages. There are no edit summaries and no explanation whatsoever of what it is that you are trying to do. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

A golden rule is to discuss contentious issues in advance. The changes you are making must be clear to every one and receive their agreement. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

The Downlink Volume 2 Issue 2

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		1 November 2020 — 30 November 2020

Volume 2 — Issue 2
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News! The ISS has been continuously occupied for the last 20 years! Expedition 1 arrived on 2 November 2000 with the first long-term residents. That’s longer then Wikipedia has existed. Crew-1 successfully launched from LC-39A on 16th November 2020, at 00:11:15 (UTC). Later, on 17th November 2020, 04:00 (UTC) Michael S. Hopkins, Victor J. Glover, Soichi Noguchi and Shannon Walker joined Expedition 64 and the crew of MS-17 on the ISS. Arianespace had a launch failure after liftoff of its Vega rocket on the 17th November. Two satellites were lost due to an integration error of the fourth stage.
Article of the month. Apollo 12 Apollo 12 was the sixth crewed flight in the United States Apollo program and the second to land on the Moon. It was launched on November 14, 1969, from the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, four months after Apollo 11. Commander Charles "Pete" Conrad and Apollo Lunar Module Pilot Alan L. Bean performed just over one day and seven hours of lunar surface activity while Command Module Pilot Richard F. Gordon remained in lunar orbit. The landing site for the mission was located in the southeastern portion of the Ocean of Storms.	Image of the month. This is an image of the ISS from December 9, 2000. Almost 20 years ago, this image is one of a series of 70mm frames taken onboard Space Shuttle Endeavour. With the ISS being continuously occupied for the last 20 years, this shows how the space station has developed over the years.
Members New Members: Springfield2020 (Joined on the 2nd November) Helwr (Joined on the 12th November) Hportfacts5 (Joined on the 28th November) Number of active members: 94. Total number of members: 298. November Launches All times stated here are in UTC. Falcon 9 - GPS 3 SV04 (5th at 23:24:23) Success Long March 6 - ÑuSat 9-18 (6th at 3:19) Success Ceres-1 - Tianqi-11 (7th at 7:12) Success PSLV-DL - EOS 1 (7th at 9:41 Success Long March 3B - Tiantong 1-02 (12th at 15:59:04) Success Atlas 5 - NROL-101 (13th at 22:32) Success Falcon 9 - Crew-1 (16th at 00:27:17) Success Vega - SEOSat-Ingenio & Taranis (17th at 01:52:20) Failure Electron - "Return to Sender" (20th at 01:44) Success Falcon 9 - Sentinel 6-Michael Freilich (21st at 17:71:08) Success Long March 5 - Chang’e 5 (23rd at 20:30:12) Success Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L15 (25th at 02:13:12) Success H-IIA - Optical Data Relay Satellite (29th at 7:25) Success December Launches Launch dates can change. See a current list: here. Soyuz - Falcon Eye 2 Soyuz - Gonets M Falcon 9 - SpaceX CRS 21 Long March 11 - GECAM Falcon 9 - Turksat 5A Soyuz - Progress 77P Angara A5 - Test Flight Electron - The Owl's Night Begins PSLV-XL - CMS 1 Soyuz - OneWeb 4 LauncherOne - ELaNa 20 Long March 8 - XJY 7 Soyuz - CSO 2 Delta 4 Heavy - NROL-44 Delta IV Heavy - NROL-82 Falcon 9 - NROL-108 Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L16 Falcon 9 - SXM 7 SSLV - Demonstration Launch	Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 30 November 2020 Spaceflight articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 16 2 7 32 FL 4 4 8 FM 94 94 GA 11 23 36 47 117 B 1 46 38 46 131 C 55 160 517 464 5 1,201 Start 37 158 1,125 2,204 370 3,894 Stub 8 247 2,110 225 2,590 List 14 128 77 207 426 Category 1,023 1,023 Disambig 46 46 File 197 197 Portal 55 55 Project 63 63 Redirect 1,116 1,116 Template 491 491 Other 27 27 Assessed 125 539 2,046 5,089 3,118 600 11,517 Unassessed 39 39 Total 125 539 2,046 5,089 3,118 639 11,556 Monthly Changes Since October, 43 new pages have been added to Spaceflight. There has been 2 more images which have reached FM class, both GA and B classes have 1 more article. 5 more lists have been added to the project. While 25 articles have been improved to C class as well as 24 articles reaching start class and 5 new articles added to stub class.
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list. Newsletter contributors: OkayKenji and Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Downlink members

A tag has been placed on Category:The Downlink members requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I love your sentiments man. I gave you because you are not only a Bengali. But your efforts contributed great for India. 🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 14:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		For your energy in boosting Project Spaceflight. Neopeius (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Soumya! Just wanted to say that I'm glad you're bringing energy to the WikiProject and the Timeline project. I have been posting in Discussion and also on the TLS Talk page if you'd like to talk shop. I just finished making a good lede for Spaceflight_before_1951 and I just finished logging all the flights for 1966_in_spaceflight. :) --Neopeius (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles that will be featured on The Downlink

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles that will be featured on The Downlink requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Babel / Userbox-level template

Dear Soumya-8974, You may care to revisit whatever you did to the Babel / Userbox-level template, because now it is enormously stretched (vertically). There is an example on my user page. Thanks and best wishes, --Frans Fowler (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Awards yet to be added to the user page

Thanks for helping me with the Spacecraft Prefixes thing! Here is a spaceflight achievement star for you:

             /\                  /\     #################
            /  \        ################
    _______/    \___####       |    |
    \___            ___/#################################
        \          /#####      |    |
        /  __/\__  \     ###############
       /__/      \__\            \/     #################

Thanks!

Thanks for helping me with the Spacecraft Prefixes thing! Here is a spaceflight achievement star for you:

             /\                  /\     #################
            /  \        ################
    _______/    \___####       |    |
    \___            ___/#################################
        \          /#####      |    |
        /  __/\__  \     ###############
       /__/      \__\            \/     #################

PythosIsAwesome (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Something cool

I was just wondering if this is you talking in this thread: https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/135094-how-to-update-ksp-from-the-launcher/ Its the exact same username and both users are Indian so, I thought I would ask. I found it by complete random and thought it might be the same person, what are the chances of running into the same person in the vastness of the web?! You can delete this after you read it whenever you do, just thought you might find it interesting, the sheer improbability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PythosIsAwesome (talk • contribs) 21:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

RSN remarks

You are an experienced user, and should know better than to comment on regional or ethnic origins. It isn't any better than stating user X is from Uttar Pradesh and naturally suppotive of the Modi ministry. That is why the user wants to... CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 20:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

I didn't want to attack the user. I wanted to refute their claims. It was clear to me that the user is of Chinese origin, and I thought that Chinese people (excluding the Hong Kongers) would naturally follow their government publications. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Kashmir

It is my humble request to please stop creating templates for some time, in which you are referring to the whole J&K region as Kashmir. Let [1] this discussion close first, then you may proceed with it. You are welcome to comment there. LearnIndology (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Have a Happy Holidays!

Hello Soumya-8974: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CaptainGalaxy 16:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Burzil Pass

As Kautilya3 has pointed out previously, you have a habit of changing the Kashmir maps on pages. Please stop. Your edit at Burzil Pass changing the map from Kashmir to Gilgit-Baltistan caused an error to occur, as there is no Gilgit-Baltistan map. The change was simply not necessary and caused further problems at the page. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

The map is called "Gilgit Baltistan" (no hyphen). I have fixed it now. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Kautilya3, thanks for cleaning that up. Soumya, please correct any similar mistakes you have made and kindly provide an explanation for why you have been changing those maps. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Template:User from Scotland, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are changing the wording of the template I chose many years ago. I chose to say that I am "from Scotland" and you are changing it me being "a native". However you feel I should be categorised it is not your business; do not put words in my mouth, or the mouth of others who have carefully chosen a template. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sino-Indian border dispute into Draft:South Tibet (disputed territory). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divided regions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greater Mongolia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Soumya-8974,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CaptainGalaxy 00:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Do not edit your comments in discussions after others have replied

Do not edit your comments in discussions after others have responded to them, as you did with your nomination statement at the National capital territory RfD. See WP:TALK#REPLIED for the full guideline, but in short the reason for this is that it can (and in this case did) deprive subsequent comments of necessary context and alter the meaning and/or implication of other's words. This is just as serious an issue as editing other users' comments directly. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

What should I do instead? I have slightly changed my mind regarding my nomination. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

If you change your mind, WP:STRIKE it out. I have done this in the aforementioned RfD so you can see what that looks like. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

The Downlink Volume 2 Issue 3

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		1 December 2020 — 31 December 2020

Volume 2 — Issue 3
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News! The Chang’e 5 lander landed on the moon on December 1st, and started to gather lunar samples. The Chang’e 5 ascent module launched from the moons surface on December 3rd and later docked with the service module in lunar orbit. Hayabusa-2 has successfuly returned samples it collected from the asteroid 162173 Ryugu. It landed in South Australia on 5th December after a 6 year mission. SpaceX Starship SN8 completed a 12.5km flight and successfully made it back to the launch pad however was unable to slow down and hit the ground creating an impressive fireball. China becomes the third country to terurn samples from the moon. After the Chang'e-5 return capsule lands in Inner Mongolia at 01:59 local time on December 13th.
Article of the month. Mary Jackson Mary Jackson (née Winston, April 9, 1921 – February 11, 2005) was an American mathematician and aerospace engineer at NACA, which was succeeded by NASA. She worked at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, for most of her career. She started as a computer at the segregated West Area Computing division in 1951. She took advanced engineering classes and, in 1958, became NASA's first black female engineer.	Image of the month. With China becoming the third country to return moon samples back to earth, this is an image of the Apollo 11 Lunar Lander being worked on by Buzz Aldrin. This mission was the first time moon samples were brought back to earth. This image was taken over 51 years ago on July 21, 1969.
Members New Members: ExoEditor (Joined on the 14th December) XFalcon2004x (Joined on the 16th December) PythosIsAwesome (Joined on the 17th December) Number of active members: 97. Total number of members: 301. December Launches All times stated here are in UTC. Soyuz - Falcon Eye 2 (2nd at 01:33:28) Success Soyuz - Gonets-M (3rd at 01:14:36) Success Chang'e 5 (3rd at 15:10) Success Long March 3B - Gaofen 14 (6th at 03:58) Success Falcon 9 - SpaceX CRS 21 (6th at 15:17:08) Success Long March 11 - GECAM (9th at 20:14) Success Delta 4 Heavy - NROL 44 (11th at 1:09) Success Falcon 9 - SXM 7 (13th at 17:20) Success Angara A5 - Test Flight (14th at 5:50:00) Success Electron - The Owl's Night Begins (15th at 10:09:27) Success Rocket 3 - Test Flight (15th at 20:55) Failure PSLV-XL - CMS1 (17th at 10:11) Success Soyuz - OneWeb 4 (18th at 12:26:26) Success Falcon 9 - NROL-108 (19th at 14:00) Success Long March 8 - XJY 7 (22nd at 04:37:37) Success Long March 4C - Yaogan 33 (27th at 15:$4) Success Soyuz - CSO 2 (29th at 16:42:07) Success January Launches Launch dates can change. See a current list: here. Falcon 9 - Türksat 5A Falcon 9 - Transporter 1 LauncherOne - ELaNa 20 Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L16 Falcon 9 - Starlink V1.0-L17 Firefly Alpha - Dream 1 Hyperbola-1 - (Second Flight) Jielong 1 - Hainan-1	Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 31 December 2020 Spaceflight articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 17 4 7 35 FA 7 17 4 7 35 FL 4 4 8 FM 96 96 GA 11 22 37 49 119 B 1 47 37 44 129 C 55 159 518 475 7 1,214 Start 38 158 1,124 2,207 369 3,896 Stub 8 248 2,175 225 2,656 List 14 130 78 208 430 Category 1,027 1,027 Disambig 47 47 File 196 196 Portal 55 55 Project 57 57 Redirect 1,121 1,121 Template 492 492 Other 27 1 28 Assessed 126 541 2,050 5,169 3,124 602 11,612 Unassessed 43 43 Total 126 541 2,050 5,169 3,124 645 11,655 Monthly Changes Since November, 99 new pages have been added to Spaceflight. 1 new file, with 2 more files reaching FM class. There 3 more articles have reached FA class, with an increase of 2 GA class articles. 4 more lists have been added to the project. While 13 articles have been improved to C class as well as 2 articles reaching start class and 66 new articles added to stub class.
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list. Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Azad Kashmir map

Greetings,

You updated the map of Azad Kashmir at Commons saying it was "to be consistent with other location maps", but do you mind elaborating on which other maps used on Wikipedia depict Indian-occupied Kashmir as part of Pakistan? This one doesn't, for example (yes, it hatches the area, but that's not the same as colouring it identically to Pakistan-administered areas as you did). Additionally, I would note that the map description clearly states that it represents the "de facto situation", which your new version patently does not.

I would appreciate some clarification on this matter. Sincerely, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 23:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Please learn how to bundle nominations

Adding multiple nominations that have the exact same rationale and target page is disruptive and inconvenient for other editors. You've been warned several times about this before. Please learn how to group nominations together as to avoid cluttering the log page where they're made, and it also prevents other editors from submitting redundant !votes on each separate nomination. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Soumya-8974, again. Thank you. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Soumya-8974, please come respond to this ANI discussion before doing any more redirect tagging. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:UBX/CCP virus

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:UBX/CCP virus. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dictionnaire des canadianismes

Hello, Soumya-8974. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dictionnaire des canadianismes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

For reference this block was implemented following a discussion at WP:AN/I Thryduulf (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Indian Institute of Management Jammu edit request 11 January 2021

Add "the" in the first sentence and change the ampersand to "and" in the following prose:

Indian Institute of Management Jammu (IIM Jammu) is a public, autonomous business school located in Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Established in 2016, it is, as of 2021, the latest Indian Institute of Management to be established. Prof. B. S. Sahay is the Founder Director of IIM Jammu. IIM Jammu is currently offering Master of Business Administration (MBA) and Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) in Management as per Indian Institutes of Management Act 2017. The student intake is 140 for Masters of Business Administration (MBA) programme for the year 2019.

--Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

While it is not prohibited to make such a request while blocked, there are some restrictions on responding to it. Editors willing to respond to this, are strongly advised to read and understand WP:PROXYING before acting. Mathglot (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have learned the lesson from this indef block, and I promise I will never express my racist view and never disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. I will comment on articles, not on contributors. I will respect others. Excluding minor changes, I will not contribute on controversial articles without prior discussions. I will boldly retarget redirects instead of putting them in RfD. I am here to improve an encyclopedia, not to destroy it. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Far too soon to unblock. Considering how serious the problems were, the appeal fails to convince; see the ANI discussion here. I suggest you appeal again per WP:Standard offer in six months' time. Bishonen | tålk 13:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC).

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I will boldly retarget redirects instead of putting them in RfD is severely missing the point of your RfD deficiencies. Boldness in retargeting should only be taken when a redirect is obviously not controversial, and I'm not confident you are familiar with when an action may be controversial. I will never express my racist view: I don't think I have ever seen someone admit they are racist on Wikipedia, so I'm actually impressed with that admission. That being said, I think it would be more convincing to show how you are working on resolving the underlying cause of the racism rather then a promise to simply not express these views. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
• The issues with redirects are not solely nominating things at RfD that should be done boldly, making bold changes that should be nominated at RfD, proposing/boldy making changes that are not needed to be made and repeated misunderstandings of policies and guidelines despite them being explained multiple times. I would not be comfortable with you being unblocked without a topic ban from everything to do with redirects. Whichever admin chooses to review this unblock request should also consider the comments at AN/I regarding your contributions to the Kashmir topic area. Thryduulf (talk) 12:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
• Thank you. Will re-appeal after 10 June. However, I am now contributing to other wikis, and watch whether my edits are disruptive after this block. --Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Launch mount landing pad

Hello, Soumya-8974. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Launch mount landing pad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)