Sparkleyone
Welcome to the Wikipedia!
editWelcome to the Wikipedia, Sparkleyone! And thanks for fixing the bad Wikilink over on the Controversies in autism article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
- When you have time, you can peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette, and you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.
Best of luck, Sparkleyone, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 04:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hiya Sparkleyone
editYou might be interested in this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_by_alma_mater:University_of_Western_Australia
Invitation
editPlease weigh in on this proposal and see User:Leifern/Wikiproject health controversies. Thanks in advance, and feel free to spread the word. --Leifern 17:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
pov Bio-psychiatry article
editHi Sparkleyone:
Thanks for your recent contribution to one of the articles in my watchlist. Recently, pro-psychiatry advocates nuked the Biological psychiatry article and placed instead a highly biased pro bio-psych article. I have fought them in Talk:Biological_psychiatry but they outnumber me 5 to 1.
Last year Francesca Allan from MindFreedom International also fought alone against the shrinks of another article, the “Psychiatry” article. Like me today, Francesca was outnumbered and she withdrew from Wikipedia.
Is there anyone around that can give me a hand? That pro bio-psychiatry article can do great harm to the Wikipedia readership if it remains unchallenged. I am only asking for little help.
Thank you!
effects of war on organsiation of medical services
editI'd say (based on some experience and the reading of the references) that the major effect on smallpox vaccination in the Philipines was not so much missing vacciantions, indeed one of the tropes repeated is that many people were multiply vaccinated and caught Smallpox later, but rather that with the loss of the orgnaised chain of supply of reliable vaccine until the incoming Americans built infrastructure to do it, much of th evaccine passed along the supply route was cooked to uselessness. If you know that your supplies are of dubious effectiveness, then you repeat vacciante when you get the chance, and given that the population and the doctors were as smart then as we are now, it is unlikely that the people revaccianted would be ones who had observed in themselves and been observed to have a proper "take" of the vaccine, it was probably accurately targetted at those who remained vulnerable. There is a similar problem with live Polio virus in the tropics nowadays, and maintenance of the cold chain - which we can do rather better now - is a big preooccupation even in England. I hope that background is useful - you may care to revisit the paragraph in the article? Midgley 21:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Just thought I would tell you...
editI have added pictures to Headband. You had requested this to be done in Wikipedia:Requested pictures#Clothing. Any questions can be directed to my talk page. --WillMak050389 05:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for de-spamming Hypochondria.
Professional IQ Testing
editThanks for your message. First, it's not my website that I continue to post on the Intelligence Quotient page. It is the wittiest and most creative method, however, of instructing potential "IQ test" users about the perils of online intelligence testing, an oxymoron if there ever was one. You should review it before dismissing it out of hand, taking time to look up unfamilliar terms and concepts. Second, I created a new section on the discussion section to guide our link removals/additions. Third, kindly review my credentials. Class dismissed. :)
Mental illness
editHi Sparkley. Are you happy with "psychological disorder" being listed as an alternate title at the head of "Mental illness"? It was not one of your original choices. (I'm not thrilled with it.)--WikiCats 13:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Psychology Wiki
editHi Sparkleyone,
In case you havent seen it yet, please check out the Psychology Wiki.
Please let me know what your thoughts are about it :)
Tom Michael - Mostly Zen (talk) 01:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Music and the brain
editAn article that you have been involved in editing, Music and the brain, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Morton Shumway—talk 21:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)