Wikipedia

User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 12

< User talk:SwisterTwister
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dajasj in topic Proposed deletion of Molly S. Bray
Archive 5←Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. North America1000 17:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Apologies

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You area solid editor I believe nothing should boomerang back to NA1000 if both can drop it. What you did was not vandalism, simply a misunderstanding, when it comes to notable coverage written in a promotional way, it inherently will happen to capitalist based consumerist products. We understand the difference of their personal definition of notability is unique. The subject which you reverted are absolutely not C7 and will survive AfD. But the issue is certain sources can simply be bias due to the form of notability of the subject. i hope we can agree at least in some form. Valoem talk contrib 17:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:42:16, 12 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Humorousrobot

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


Hello SwisterTwister, hope you are doing well. I received your rejection notice and took the appropriate steps to edit the content from the International TypeFounders, Inc. draft. The new draft, I believe, includes the required inherited notability from independent sources. Please review the submission, and if you have any comments let me know. Humorousrobot (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft question

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks ahead of time with my general question. I have a question about a page you have reviewed before - Rachael Hanfling. I have just started in the last several months with taking the Wiki challenge, learning to edit, create pages, etc. and want to contribute when I have the time. I am in a forum where someone (2 people removed) knows I am starting to do this has asked me about what the deal is with their page marked saying it is an autobiography or somebody close and what is wrong with that. I took a look at their page, and from what I can tell it has a lot of promotional language, and just brags about a list of accomplishments, not just states the facts. And I think it was created by an unregistered user if I remember correctly. When I told them this, (of course I told them I am no expert but that is what I could tell) they asked me if I can fix it. I do not mind trying to fix it-I don't think there is too too much, and I would like to work with biographies, and even though I know somebody who knows them I have no personal interest in the page so it should not be a conflict. My question is how? Just because I get in there and fix the promotional language, references, etc. there is still the label. Do I then ask you to re-review and see about changing labels or do I go back through a different forum? Another question is-is that all that is wrong with it or is there more that I am not seeing because I am so new? Thanks!Jrayewrites (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)jrayewrites

22:30:22, 13 December 2017 review of submission by Sam.wainer

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


I added some additional citations (web and print) and linked to a few outside websites. There is ample coverage within wikipedia of other key military specifications (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIL-STD-130 for example) and MIL-DTL-15024 probably should be there too. Let me know if you think adding more is required. The topic is "notable" although perhaps not exciting... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam.wainer (talk • contribs) 22:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

13:24:38, 5 June 2017 review of submission by Rhish

I've added a range of published articles about her could you review these? —Preceding undated comment added 13:24:38, 5 June 2017

22:26:40, 19 June 2017 review of submission by Helen1921


I'm not sure why you are saying that the newspaper articles are not reliable sources. Many are too old to be found online but they definitely exist and are published sources. This organization has a very long history. What kind of sources are you looking for?

06:12:28, 21 June 2017 review of submission by Queensonu


{{SAFESUBST:Void|}

I have submitted my Wikipedia page 28 days ago by the name "Farah Siddiqui Matin" but till now it has not been published or reviewed? can I know the reason please?


13:50:18, 28 June 2017 review of submission by Lukendo


Hi, I am confused, this has not been accepted as it does not have independent recognition. In the United Kingdom since 1901 The British Psychological Society (BPS) is the recognised body for Accrediting Psychometric Tools and Training for publishing. Identity is a Personality Profiling Tool Accredited by the British Psychological Society and as such users have to have a Level 2 Test User: Occupational Qualification to purchase and to interpret the tool. The BPS have extremely strict criteria and ongoing accreditation reviews and would not give their Accreditation if the Identity Tool did not reach their standards and verification requirements. Identity has been Assessed by and is registered with the British Psychological Society Psychological Testing Centre (PTC).

Hope this helps, many thanks.


notability criteria for page Jubilee (DJ)

Hi SwisterTwister, I wanted to ask about your comment about the page for Jubilee (DJ). I included 12 sources, 11 of which Jubilee is the primary subject (either an interview with her or a review of her music). The sources include extremely reputable publications with very large followings, most of which also have a print publication- Brooklyn Magazine, The Fader, Spin, The Guardian, and Complex.

These are some of the most reputable sources that would cover a contemporary electronic musician, and I fail to see how they don't meet the notability criteria.

Luvtoucans (talk)luvtoucans

23:35:23, 6 July 2017 review of submission by Doramensah1971



What do you mean by the subject does not meet the notability standards. All the articles I added focus on the subject. I can add 100s more. This is one of the biggest stars in the Nigerian film industry!

18:20:13, 7 July 2017 review of submission by KBVI




I am genuinely confused as to why the article I wrote about attorney Catherine M. Stanton was rejected. I have seen many similar articles about many other attorneys on Wikipedia.

I provided legitimate news sources about attorney Stanton. The article is not an advertisement. It's about an accomplished, female lawyer in the highly competitive market of New York City.

Any additional feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

KBVI

18:58:36, 7 July 2017 review of submission by Poutnikl


I admit I am very confused now, if and how can I ever improve the references to meet the criteria, or if I should ever try.. :-(. Perhaps this my first attempt will be my last one. Why is the single source PC Magazine in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_router considered better than wiki database of OpenStreetMap, combined with multiple admitedly less notable sources ?

19:05:13, 8 July 2017 review of submission by Heystack



Would you please review William M Gayton once again? We are not sure why there are other "Scouts" that have Wikipedia pages that haven't held Director of Scouting positions nor have they been involved w/ as many decisions. Thank You!

10:35:22, 9 July 2017 review of submission by Jamesrawson79


thanks for taking the time to review the draft. I have added reviews of the person practice and career written on significant, independant and mainstream news sources such as the Guardian Newspaper, Wired Magazine, Filmmaker Magazine and Creative Applications. These sources are both in their field and in mainstream media all significant third party and verifiable major sources that meet wikipedias guidelines for independance and significance. I have included references to works written about the authors work on the BBC, another significant independant news source and one such article was part of BBC's Best of 2015 list. In the exhibitions section i have included references to one of the works produced by the art group found by the person of note which was acquired by the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. I have also summarised the position of these mainstream news references and included them in the article to make it clear why the works are significant. Together with the existing extensive links and references all to verifiable thrid party sites like the Independant, Creative Review, a BAFTA nomination, and extensive profiles of the individual on major news and industry sites. I trust that all these changes demonstrate sufficent notability. thanks.

15:13:26, 9 July 2017 review of submission by MSmuzynski



Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for reviewing my article! Unfortunately, it was declined for lack of notability on the subject. I cited 10 articles from independent, reputable national news and international publications that wrote about the attraction/company. It has been featured in many, many more so I am happy to provide additional sources. How many would you recommend including in the article to meet notability guidelines? Thanks so much for your help! This has been a great learning experience.

I have added five more sources and additional information to the article draft to improve notability. Would you mind reviewing it again and letting me know if more improvements need to be made? Thanks again for all of your help!

Request assistance for Draft:Unigma

User:CorbuleacM (talk) - 12:20, 10 July 2017 (GMT)

Hi SwisterTwister,

I've added several more independent sources to Draft:Unigma. All of them are unique now. I've read and followed Wikipedia guidelines and I am trying for more than a year to get the page published. Please let me know.

Best regards,

Mihai.

14:24:31, 10 July 2017 review of submission by Bronagh1


I am not requesting a re review, i AM JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT THE COMMENT! IF I COULD JUST GET A BIT MORE CLARIFICATION THAT WOULD BE GREAT!

17:41:11, 10 July 2017 review of submission by Seporche


I am confused as to how the Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame, Texas Monthly, National Review, National Law Journal, D Magazine, and Dallas News are not considered significant sources for notability. The subject is a leading lawyer in her field and, although she is associated with notable persons, is an independently notable figure. Would you recommend expanding upon any certain sections of the article to better demonstrate this notability?

00:39:59, 12 July 2017 review of submission by Jamesrawson79

'

Hello, I dont know if you have had a chance to re review my draft submission but in lieu of your comments i have no added a series of articles that are directly about the subjects work/projects from independant and significant sources such as The Guardian, BBC, Wired Magazine, Filmmaker Magazine, The Independant, The Belfast Telegrapgh, Popular Science, Tank Magazine and IMDB in adition to the other web based references I had included previously. I trust this meets your notability criteria now. Thanks so much for your help through this process.

03:11:10, 12 July 2017 review of submission by 36.102.227.121


Hello, I Would like you to please advice me on a possible way to make my article look less like an advertisement. can you please point out some specific areas you would like me to change? Thanks

06:29:11, 12 July 2017 review of submission by Andreei


Hi! I am a user of this software that I personally find really fine. But also I found out that there is no Wiki page about it that was a little bit strange for me because the product is absolutely notable to be included into Wikipedia. That's why I decided to write an article about it. I spent more than 5-6 hours reading your guides and rules how to create a proper article. I stronly believe that the way I wrote it is neutral with no commercial or advertising nature. It's just the description that you can't write in a different way. What concerns sources. I found them in the Internet in a few minutes. It means that the product is widely presented on the Web with reviews from different people and sites. Yes, I agree that some reviews are similar. But those reviews describe the functionality of a product. If the product does have this or that feature, it won't be described differently. The description will be the same, words can differ a little bit. But still, as this tool was my reliable handler during several months and now I have some spare time, I do want to go on with creating Wikipedia page for it. Please, help me to improve it. I will appreciate it!

03:58:02, 13 July 2017 review of submission by Jamesrawson79


Thats fantastic!! Thanks so much for your patience and guidance with this. Do you mean i need to do something regarding the page move myself? Or is this now out of my hands now and I just need to wait? thanks again,

16:17:15, 14 July 2017 review of submission by 70.171.176.153

I am the person who gave the Omaha Black Music and Community Hall of Fame Awards in 2011, and was inducted for my work with many bands including Rhythm Machine. You can google Rhythm Machine Donald Harris for an interview I did years ago with Larry Grogan (music historian) on funky16corners.com - My information on wiki was incomplete and vague. I wanted to give concise information. I have never submitted a complete list to wiki of the recipients of the awards in 2011, but would be more than happy to. I am uncertain of who provided the information you have, but it is incomplete and leaves several people unmentioned who should be reflected as honorees on wiki. Thank you

16:44:55, 14 July 2017 review of submission by Trepanationsolution


Can you provide more info on why the newspaper articles and the edited book on his work don't count as evidence of his notability? The previous editor stated that the book IT'S ALL ALLOWED wasn't appropriate as a reference, even though it is published by Intellect and the Live Art Development Agency (and by University of Chicago Press in the US) and is a peer reviewed academic publication. This evidences notability, as does the number of obituaries in broadsheet newspapers (including one that calls him the subject a "legend"). Other references are all single-focus articles in peer-reviewed scholarly publications. Are there specific aspects that require additional evidencing?

17:27:13, 14 July 2017 review of submission by Vlaurentius


Thank you very much for your clear explanation. Would it be better if I write an article about his ancient nobility background? and leave out any business related activities. Maybe I could just mention his advisory role to key politicians?

20:08:22, 17 July 2017 review of submission by Gospitt


Hi there regarding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:James_Evans_(Historian)

I have used 3 references that detail reviews of James's work 

Milton, Giles (Nov 2013). "Route to Riches". Literary Review. Retrieved 17 July 2017.

Jump up ^ Finlayson, Ian (28 Sept 2013). "Merchant Adventurers". The Times. Retrieved 17 July 2017. Check date values in: |date= (help) Jump up ^ Gulliver, Katerina (8 July 2017). "How the Puritans, not the Pilgrims, colonised America". The Spectator. Retrieved 17 July 2017.

These are 3 reviews from 3 of the most eminent publications in the United Kingdom.

Do I need to include further reviews?

As I could include.

http://geographical.co.uk/reviews/books/item/321-merchant-adventurers-the-voyage-of-discovery-that-transformed-tudor-england-by-james-evans

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/james-evans-as-arctic-ice-melts-an-old-dream-resurfaces-1.1990796

and he is featured at multiple literary festivals.

http://yorkfestivalofideas.com/2017/talks/why-english-sailed-new-world/

Your input is appreciated.

Best

Oli

08:04:01, 18 July 2017 review of submission by Captterra


Hi SwisterTwister, I saw that you declined my page on Basement Pong because I do not have any references. In fact, this is a game invented by me and some friends, we play it a lot. Therefore, there are (for the moment) no official references that exist. How can we solve this problem?

Regards,

14:08:58, 18 July 2017 review of submission by Coverdale1234


Please could you let me know which references are troubling you? I have sourced neutral and credible websites to back up my article. Please clarify what you mean by 'notability can not be inherited'.

Thanks

19:15:39, 19 July 2017 review of submission by Rebeccaswanson

I wanted a rereview because I want the notoriety of Michael Toombs examined as more of a community figure versus an artist, as he participates in more community upbringing projects and art projects that benefit Kansas City as a whole versus primarily contributing to his own personal practice, hence why his work is not in a museum's collection, but instead it is found as public art and murals around Kansas City.

Draft:Visar Mulliqi decline

Dear David,

The issue about the decline is, you will not be able to find any Balkans (South-Eastern Europe) artist with world-renowned Museums containing their art collections. Moreover, there is no major art review that can be cited as for any of them, since all the WikiPedia articles of the artists in the Balkans are based on local sources.

The source that you have declined is an Academic Personnel at the main University of the Republic of Kosovo, in the Faculty of Arts section. Moreover, he has recently held 2 exhibitions in Paris, which are well-sourced and documented, with a lot of pictures in the sources, text and even the Galleries confirming the events.

Please be aware of the circumstances before coming up with such decisions.

I have added another source from the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports of the Republic of Kosovo (Governmental official source), and resubmitted the article.

Thank you.


P.S. The person in the article (Visar Mulliqi, painter) has also held an exhibition in the Museum of Kosovo in 2011, if that helps. It is cited in the CV of the official website of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Prishtina, where he currently lectures 'Painting'.

06:04:04, 20 July 2017 review of submission by Asmita93


Hello sir, Please help me in improving this article.

12:39:16, 20 July 2017 review of submission by Jogideep



Hi,

I have updated my article as per wiki guidelines. It would be great if you can review my draft again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Assetz_Property_Group

14:54:31, 20 July 2017 review of submission by Minerva567


Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for reviewing my submission so quickly. I am submitting this draft for re-review after taking into account your edits. I looked at your comments and saw some flaws in the draft with the references, as there were some interviews and two paragraph profiles. I have since taken those sources out and replaced them with reliable sources or deleted them entirely if they weren't able to be backed-up by clear evidence. In your comments you said, "Overly suggestive of an advertised business profile both in information and sources", I hope my edits show that I improved the draft in this area. I searched many other CEO profiles such as "Jeff Immelt" and believe this article is of the same notability as far as sources and has the same tone as many CEO and President pages. I understand that the business executive articles are tough pages to write as they often come off as advertised business profiles because of the type of information. Hopefully the updated version is strong enough, let me know. Otherwise, I am willing to do more edits as I believe Isaac Rodriguez is extremely notable and others would like to know about more about him, as I see his name everywhere. Any advice on how to improve this article is greatly appreciated. Thank You.

Submission by Furious.lion declined on 17 July 2017 by SwisterTwister

Hi SwisterTwister. I am learning the process and sorry for multiple resubmission. Regarding your comments, I've edited the reference section and added several 3rd party sources such TV channels, newspapers, magazines that cite Oktay Arslan's work. Since this is my first wikipedia page creation, I've mainly inspired from similar Kurdish scholars' wikipedia pages such as Azad_Bonni, Nadir_Nadirov etc.


12:51:16, 25 July 2017 review of submission by Tkhandelwal


Thank you for reviewing Electrical Transient Analyzer Program Page. I tried to make this page based on the content that seems to be approved for Ansys. Can you please let me know which parts need to be deleted and improved in order for this article to remain on Wikipedia? My goal is to link all references and resources for ETAP software to this page.

13:40:57, 27 July 2017 review of submission by Trainkid4449


Hi, I would just like clarification on what sources are reliable and can prove notability. I tried to used other motorsports venues as a guide, but they seem to be using sources similar to those I used, or in some cases no references as all. Here are a few that I used:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-Ohio_Sports_Car_Course https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Ledges_Road_Course (No Refrences) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summit_Point_Motorsports_Park https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lime_Rock_Park

Could you give me an example, perhaps from another track, of a reference that proves notability?

Thanks, Michael

23:27:19, 27 July 2017 review of submission by El Capitano81


I am a Newbie and the instructions have a lot of jargon that i am not familiar with could you please explain exactly what is wrong?

15:54:26, 29 July 2017 review of submission by Narayanan, Ananth


Could you please define what is meant by "not suitable for Wikipedia?" Does it mean that Wikipedia does not list such people? We have gone through a number of revisions from notability to technical fixes. However, this comment that "This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia" does not indicate the requirement for any specific fix as the criteria.

The section on what Wikipedia is not is very broad: 2.1 Wikipedia is not a dictionary 2.2 Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought 2.3 Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion 2.4 Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files 2.5 Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site 2.6 Wikipedia is not a directory 2.7 Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal 2.8 Wikipedia is not a crystal ball 2.9 Wikipedia is not a newspaper 2.10 Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information 2.11 Wikipedia is not censored

Please identify which section in your opinion this content does not meet?

Thank you for your time and effort.

14:38:41, 1 August 2017 review of submission by Jakemadoff210


I need clarification on the word "significant'.

I have linked to notable sources that cover this company. Another company of the same pedigree, "Birchbox" has a Wikipedia page with similar content and quality links.

Thank you.

15:34:05, 2 August 2017 review of submission by UpsideLMS


Dear SwisterTwister,

Thank you for such a quick review. Very much appreciated. However, sad to know that our page got declined.

Also, after review noticed that the Awards Section went missing. UpsideLMS has won a lot of awards and has a lot of valuable resources indicating the same. Request you to review once again and if still any changes are required, please guide us exactly what needs to be changed so that we can incorporate the suggested changes and get the draft approved from your side.

Awaiting response. And many thanks once again.

17:25:30, 2 August 2017 review of submission by Kaityrobertspr


I'm not sure why the references aren't considered adequate. Did I enter them incorrectly? There are links to Elle, HuffingtonPost, etc. Please help me understand so that I can resubmit.

09:09:27, 4 August 2017 review of submission by UpsideLMS


Hello SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your suggestions although I am not quite convinced with the "credible source" comment you have made for the awards as the references mentioned are those of the Awarding bodies itself, which is the most credible source.

Also regd. the "promotional content" comment, while it has not been our intent to do so (and we have referred to and written in line with many competition pages with approved Wiki pages to see how the content is to be written) I am happy to know how we can change/tweak it to make it fit for approval.

Thanks in advance.

20:48:04, 7 August 2017 review of submission by SpokenReasonsFF


Hello, I am requesting a re-review because information on John Brenkus is factual, and to my knowledge, complete. If there is anymore that needs to be added, I would love to know what that would be. Thank you in advance.

17:06:51, 10 August 2017 review of submission by Acmetoys



Thanks for your notes. Friedman's work was produced in the pre-internet period where artists were alternative video artists were largley ignored by main stream media sources. Thereafter stalwart museums such as MOMA have exhibited his work in major shows such as Pacific Standard time

Per your recomendation I have added several references re art galleries, shows, and exhibition reviews of Friedman work (see below) Each one of these articles mentions Friedman's work by name. I have also included several link to U Tube videos that Friedman created for Berlin, Stacy Q, and several other bands. Each band that Friedman directed had a number #1 hit after Friedman directed videos for them.

In addition the LA times also reviews Friedmans's work as follows "Bradley Friedman directed an 111/2-minute video of the Screamers in 1981 performing "Eva Braun," a synth-punk song named for Hitler's mistress, in front of TV monitors. He also shot the stern and synthesized Anti-Sex League in 1980 playing a song with an unpublishable title enhanced with blurred-out images from a porn film. It directly related to the name of the band and the lyrics of the song and the performance, and the video was a response to a perceptions of sexual restrictions at the time," says Hyman. "Filmmakers were [manipulating video] to add to the music or add political commentary with the alternative imagery they were bringing. The period between Nixon's resignation and Reagan's inauguration is unique for more than artistic experimentation, but for an overlap between visual arts and music not seen since the Dada movement of the '20s," says MOCA chief curator Paul Schimmel. "I think the punk generation and the artists came through the Vietnam War and Watergate having a very different relationship with the government. There was this antiart art and that was also true with the punk bands … it wasn't intended to be stylish, but to capture raw energy."

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/12/entertainment/la-et-guidefeature12-20120112

[1]

https://sites.google.com/view/bradley-friedman-external-link

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/169463935/

https://books.google.com/books?id=YCQEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT45&lpg=PT45&dq=ucla+international+visual+music+f...

https://books.google.com/books?id=ieUoCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA304&lpg=PA304&dq=eva+braun+friedman+screamers&source=bl&ots=IgHP8XUC_a&sig=09eBva4DnDVgXAfJHILFF1XWf_I&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjptLOv_8rVAhUT52MKHRaZB-QQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=eva%20braun%20friedman%20screamers&f=false

https://www.alternativeprojections.com/screening-series/strange-notes-and-nervous-breakdowns-punk-and-media-art-1974-1981/

https://www.alternativeprojections.com/screening-series/

http://autre.love/journal/2012/01/12/experimental-film-in-los-angeles

References

  1. ^ {{cite news|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GCQEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT83&lpg=PT83&dq=bradley+friedman+music+video+director&source=bl&ots=kXaBNCmHip&sig=IBcppoQaeGnqzr16qH4QqBUDwMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij3vSH6crVAhWowFQKHQcpC4UQ6AEIOjAD#v=onepage&q=bradley%20friedman%20music%20video%20director&f=false

16:53:33, 11 August 2017 review of submission by 1398Hygeia


Hi, just looking for more direction on this feedback "we actually need significant independent news, but the kind we need is rarer in company executives. Also, notability cannot be inherited. "

Having a hard time understanding notability as inherited here.

06:55:22, 14 August 2017 review of submission by Valuation1997


I am requesting a re-review because this is not an advertisement. This is a page to make peple aware of the organisation which is a government body and provides help to public at large.Accordingly the idea is to disseminate the information on this office of the government to peaple at large. Kidnly note that this wikipage is for awarness not for any commercial prupose as it is related to a governmetn agency. Its a nascent governmetn body so it can not be termed as advertisement. This will certainly enrich wikipedia by adding information on government bodies. hope you will re-review this. Incase of any query i will be glad to provide the same.

14:34:00, 14 August 2017 review of submission by Jakemadoff210


Hey SwisterTwister, just following up this. I made the necessary changes. Let me know. Thank you!

23:28:04, 15 August 2017 review of submission by LaLoo


I edited the product description to include reliable news sources that support it. Hope this helps.

08:43:33, 16 August 2017 review of submission by Jogideep



Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my submission. As you said '3 of the sources are repeated announcements', it would be great if you can tell me which one you are referring to. As my resources are unique and from reputated sites giving different pieces of information

ET realty M&N Acritique India Infoline Other are two sources are citing company info having good authority. I have seen in other wiki articles citing info from Bloomberg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Assetz_Property_Group

21:01:16, 17 August 2017 review of submission by AlfredGoodach


Hi, I am requesting a re-review as the artist related to this page (Papamitrou) has performed some notable acts. The album that his music is part off called: "Wins and Losses" by Meek Mill, was No. 3 on Billboard 200 the first week it was released (7/21/17). Also, the 1st song of the album is the tile of the album and it is one of the songs that Nik Papamitrou produced. According to the Wikipedia rules of a notable song writer/producer, this should satisfy that requirement as this song made the top 100 hot song list on the Billboard also. Please review and notify us of your decision.

Thank you, Alfred.

05:01:22, 19 August 2017 review of submission by Siddhesht


Anil Lamba is published author by one of the well-established publishers [HarperCollins] Can you point out specific content which should be removed? [Anil Lamba] falls under notable person [1] under section Creative Professional. Refer point 2. He has created concept of 'Finance for non-finance people' I will appreciate your help, suggestions to improve this article to suit wiki guidelines.

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)

12:08:45, 21 August 2017 review of submission by Dugbrink


I do not understand why the article was rejected. There are multiple examples of listings that have no external sources or significantly fewer (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLC_Ann_Arbor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiara_Yachts, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basin_Radio_Network, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike-sell%27s) yet they were published.

It seems ironic Wikipedia only wants to publish articles about topics that are already widely notable. I would expect readership would like to learn about more diverse topics.

Please reconsider.

16:38:44, 25 August 2017 review of submission by Mrwonton06


Wondering what sources would be less trivial than a pair of separate Rolling Stone articles. There are several other sources on the band I can dig up if need be. They charted multiple times on the Americana Radio charts, so I feel like they're fairly notable -- enough to warrant a Wiki article anyway.

15:47:00, 31 August 2017 review of submission by Jakemadoff210


Gotcha. So I can see tangible examples of what you mean, can you please tell me what sources in this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birchbox) make it worthy of publishing. This is a company in the same vertical and my post has similar sources.

Thank you.

I've been working on this for awhile and would really like to get this published.

20:08:24, 21 September 2017 review of submission by Drpcgalle


14:32, 28 August 2017 (UTC) review of submission by djgilbert

Incorrect message: Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 14:32, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Response: 

Totally wrong and off base to make your assertion. Rocky Mountain Performance Excellence is a part of the network leading to the U.S. Presidential Quality Award, termed the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award established 30 years ago. The article provided information on the Rocky Mountain Mountain Performance Excellence nonprofit that allows organizations a pathway to the Baldrige Award. Please read the Wikipedia article to understand the context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Baldrige_National_Quality_Award

Your logic would cause the deletion of all websites of state and local governmental affiliated organizations. Totally wrong and misguided. Please un-delete.

15:12:23, 11 October 2017 review of submission by NatalieRoss


Please assist with anything I need to improve to get my submission approved. Thank you.

12:48:13, 1 November 2017 review of submission by Traci Morgan



References and citations are added and edited. They follow the instructions and are much the same as I have seen in many other biographies. Can you look at the specific citations/references and advise which are acceptable and which are not acceptable.

Joshua Margolis

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Are you sure that Joshua Margolis is an economist?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Zigzig20s I shall enhance the article soon but, as his university is the Harvard Business School and his field is business, I concluded he was an economist. His university profile is also extremely similar to all of the other economist profiles there at the school. SwisterTwister talk 18:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Well, Organizational Behavior is not Economics.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Happy Holidays
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

2018 coming soon...

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's that time of the year, ST. No fancy template, but just wishing you all the best for the holidays and the new year. It's probably a lot warmer where I am than where you are 😎 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

15:08:56, 21 December 2017 review of submission by Spatel2209


Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2018!
Thank you for all the hard work and effort you put into Wikipedia. God bless! Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

ho, ho, ho

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hi SwisterTwister, Neddy wishes everybody a very merry Xmas (suggestions of direct ancestory with one of the eyewitnesses to the happy event have, so far, proved unfounded)  Coolabahapple (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!

Hello, SwisterTwister! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

hi Swister

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Merry christmas Swister,

Badr bin Abdullah bin Mohammed Al Farhan is a notable prince. He is the buyer of the Salvatori Mundi painting. could we return the page and remove the redirect ! thanks.

--George the writer (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Georgethewriter The sources you are using are not establishing Notability no matter the publication name; the information is advertising-esque and there's nothing showing how it can support itself as an independent article with the relevant material needee. In its current state, I redirected as an article with these concerns is especially at risk of being deleted. At best, Notability also cannot be inherited from others. SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

TheSandDoctor (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

 
 
 

My very best wishes, SwTw for this holiday season. May your heart be filled with happiness during this special time. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Heddwch ac ewyllys da

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
    Compliments of the season
Wishing you all the best for 2018 — good health, sufficient wealth, peace and contentment 
 Cheers! ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 20:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Ejembi John Onah

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User:SwisterTwister; Unless I hear otherwise from you; your review comment on the above subject will be removed since there is a current review comment with resubmit button, thanks.

Ejembi12 (talk) 02:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Dualism (Indian philosophy) page

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello SwisterTwister,

I have been doing a content split of the article Dualism according to proposal I placed on the talk page, and I recently created an article for Dualism (Indian philosophy) which you reviewed. You removed one of the two major sections without leaving an explanation -- could you explain why? Everything that was removed was already on the other page. Can I at least re-add the part with a citation? Thanks

Gazelle55 (talk) 16:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
 
 
 



New: "Prisoners"

New: "Fashion designers"

New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Angus W. Thomson

Proposed deletion of Angus W. Thomson

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Angus W. Thomson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Well, you got me to read WP:PROF and that's really handy, thanks. Gabriel syme (talk) 02:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Latest comment: 6 years ago24 comments16 people in discussion
SwisterTwister has not commented here since his block. As this is a CU block, it cannot be removed without discussion with a CheckUser. The block may also be appealed to the arbitration committee. Continuing discussion by other users on his talk page about this block is not helpful to the purposes of Wikipedia. If there are things that need to be discussed, they can be done in other places. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Well, I disagree with this entire spi, but I also realize theres not a damn thing anyone can do. I cant believe this. I really hope this is just a botched april fools joke... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 01:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
...and quite an early one at that. :) J947 (c · m) 04:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
@Bbb23, Zppix, and Winged Blades of Godric: Is it usual to blank ST's user page in such a matter? It seems rather brutal especially given that the evidence is only in the past month or so- as if we're ignoring all his helpful contributions from 2008 (and there's a lot of them) and just defining who he was as a user by his recent acts. jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
That's above my paygrade and subject to discretion of BBB23.Winged BladesGodric 14:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Personally i think blanking is overkill... but ill leave it up to someone with less of a COI Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 15:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
+1, even though it is against current policy. We shouldn't disrespect a user because of 2 months out of 9/10 years. That's like me being blocked because of a week of disruption! J947 (c · m) 04:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
This makes no sense. Enough disruption and you'll be blocked way sooner than that. So will I if it ever came to that. Just move on and let it be. --NeilN talk to me 04:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
@Jcc: It's standard practice per WP:SOCKTAG. "If confirmed by CheckUser, on the sockmaster's user page, replace all content with..." Editors need to easily see why the block occurred. --NeilN talk to me 15:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
While the guidelines state so, sometimes the clerks are sympathetic to the broader contribs. of the user.For an example see Ricky81682's u/p.Regards:)Winged BladesGodric 15:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
In practice, it's up to the discretion of the CU/blocking admin/clerk, but with the level of deception uncovered in this case, blanking and tagging is appropriate. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
I'll leave it as this doesn't seem worth fighting but I think we'll have to disagree on whether the level of deception (over just the last two months of 10 years+ spent on-wiki) outweighs the work ST has done over those 10 years. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Agree with you on dat, Jcc. >SerialNumber54129...speculates 15:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm not so sympathetic.It not only comprised of deception in AfDs et al, but also included blatant personal harrasment of a sysop, in furtherance of an editorial feud.The egregious nature of edits by HYYY (see his edits to NA's t/p) was one of the part. reasons which led to the ANI thread and subseq. the SPI.Winged BladesGodric 16:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Totally agree. ST take a wikibreak for a year and try the standard offer. There will be sympathy. J947 (c · m) 22:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
I think the blanking was reasonable enough. There was nothing at present of general interest unconnected with individual article problems, which lose their interest as they get resolved. Anyway, it's all in the page history and archive--the blanking is basically symbolic. DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Guess I haven't been paying much attention these last four months. Needless to say, I'm very disappointed. I don't know what was going on, but I'm willing to bet it was totally unnecessary. Drmies (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sad...

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

He was a good person. I guess it was so sudden for him to leave. Xyaena 19:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, that's sad... L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gideon King

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gideon King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Perfit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Michael Perfit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub that hasn’t been edited in almost two years; notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Failla

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Failla, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ericwg (talk) 02:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Jaillet

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Jaillet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paisarepa (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Allen Adler (executive) for deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Adler (executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Adler (executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Proposed deletion of Alan Cline

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Alan Cline has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -Crossroads- (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Athena Papas

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Athena Papas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'talk 09:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Cline

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alan Cline, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'talk 10:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Burne

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Burne, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'talk 10:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heitor Almeida

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Heitor Almeida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurie Dinnebeil

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Laurie Dinnebeil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

"Marabella North Secondary School ( Marabella Senior Comprehensive)" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Marabella North Secondary School ( Marabella Senior Comprehensive). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Marabella North Secondary School ( Marabella Senior Comprehensive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laurie Dinnebeil

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Laurie Dinnebeil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability other than the chair that she holds at U of Toledo and no explanation as to why a person who holds that chair needs their own article which does nothing other than state they hold that chair.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurie Dinnebeil for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Dinnebeil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Dinnebeil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 10:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Warren Zapol

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Warren Zapol has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Neil A. Doherty for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil A. Doherty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil A. Doherty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of James Pipas for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Pipas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Pipas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Therapyisgood (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Blumenthal

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Blumenthal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. racecar d (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mitchel Lasser for deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchel Lasser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchel Lasser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BD2412 T 06:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Koski

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article William Koski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of sourcing to meet GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dexxtrall (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 17:37:14, 2 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by TheGremlin

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion



iwanturCAT (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

If I post something here do you receive a message to read it? I'd like to learn to build a company page, and am using the Asetek page as an example. I selected their competitor, a somewhat larger company with equivalent media coverage and created the page. While it is a work in progress, I have provided abundant external references from independent reputable sources. Please clarify what it is that is missing so I can provide. Thank you

Proposed deletion of Myles A. Brown

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Myles A. Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 19:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 44885

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

UTRS appeal #44885 is now open. --Deepfriedokra (talk)

UTRS appeal #44885 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yun Yen

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yun Yen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. pburka (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Klement Tinaj for deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klement Tinaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klement Tinaj (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonah Smith for deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonah Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonah Smith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Karla Gower for deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karla Gower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karla Gower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Asketbouncer (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luis Viceira

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Luis Viceira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing mentioned that distinguishes him from any other professor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BostonMensa (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of high schools in Boquerón, Paraguay for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of high schools in Boquerón, Paraguay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of high schools in Boquerón, Paraguay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jax 0677 (talk) 23:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Roush for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Roush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Roush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coretheapple (talk) 14:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Clement Pryke for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clement Pryke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clement Pryke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Clark Stanford for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clark Stanford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clark Stanford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

"Status Quo (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Status Quo (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Status Quo (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Allen Adler (executive) for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Adler (executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Adler (executive) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Driodr (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Burton

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Burton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Molly S. Bray

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Molly S. Bray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dajasj (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister/Archive_12&oldid=1212158531"