Boxing

edit

- it would be great to see you get involved mate.--Vintagekits 15:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Tthaas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Paul Smith Jnr - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Bill Kinkel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nook Simple Touch

edit

Hello there! Thanks for submitting a new version of File:Nook Simple Touch.jpg. I would like to ask you for a frontal shot of the device, something like File:Nook1.jpg, perhaps with a white background (like a piece of paper). It'd really help to illustrate the articles better. I could do the post processing as well. --Yamavu (talk) 23:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Awesome, thanks a lot! --Yamavu (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Varieties vs. varietals

edit

Hello Tthaas, in some recent edits to infoboxes using {{Infobox Wine Region}}, you have moved information on grape varieties from the parameter "grapes" to "varietals"; here is one example. This is not a correct use of the term varietal, please check up the definition! Côte-Rôtie AOC can for example not produce a varietal Viognier. I've adjusted the usage for the French AOCs you edited, but I have not touched the usage for US AVAs, where it may perhaps be more relevant. By the way, could I also plase ask you to use an edit summary for all your edits, to make it simpler for other editors? Regards, Tomas e (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thomas; the issue is that putting grape varietals in the "grapes=" field is even more incorrect, as it is for total volume of grape production, not grape types produced (see Template:Infobox wine region -- "grapes – annual production of grapes. Indicate units." Contrast with "varietals – principal varietals produced in the region. Don't list them all if there are more than a few."). I placed the grape types grown or allowed under AOC/DOC/DOCG/DO/etc rules into the "varietals=" field due to that. The failure is in the infobox's design; there's no convenient place to accurately describe what grapes are grown in a region if the wines produced are blended, if you stick to the strict definition of "Varietal" meaning "wine made predominantly or entirely of a single type of grape," rather than using the commonly accepted (at least in the US wine industry, where I work), though technically incorrect, meaning of "type of grape."(for example, there is nowhere to put a the blend of Merlot and Cabernet Franc in an infobox for Saint-Émilion AOC. How sad for the folks at Chateau Cheval Blanc!). Perhaps we should instead edit the infobox to read something like "Grape varieties grown," for that field, or even combine the two fields into one so it would read something like, "Merlot, 1500 1,500 short tons (1,400,000 kg), Cabernet Sauvignon, 1,200 short tons (1,100,000 kg)" when placed and fully filled-out?
For US AVA's, the infobox design problem is in fact less relevant, as most US-produced wines are labeled varietally (and most of the non-varietal wines are classified by either what grapes they contain -- eg, "Cabernet, Merlot, Syrah," -- or by what world region they emulate, as in "Anderson's Conn Valley Vineyards Right Bank," a Cab-dominated Bordeaux-style blend). In US wine law, the AVA refers only to the physical area, and there is no requirement delineating what grapes grow well there.
As for edit summaries, I'll try harder. Regards, Tthaas (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Would You Rather (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Trent Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Grand Theft Auto, AHL, Beauval and Taxi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Naches Heights AVA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Washington State and Biodynamic
Benn Olson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alaska Aces

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Rutherford (ice hockey) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Charlotte Checkers
Scott Pitt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Charlotte Checkers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
North Fork of Long Island AVA
Johnstown Generals
Holmes Chapel
Coombsville AVA
Michael Kandel
New Hampshire wine
Krzysztof Majchrzak
Nevada wine
Utah wine
Vaca Mountains
Martin Larsson (guitarist)
Lake Erie AVA
South Dakota wine
Maine wine
Holtby
Hudson River Region AVA
Rhode Island wine
Emanuel Viveiros
Vermont wine
Cleanup
Crawley Town F.C.
Halal
Globalization of wine
Merge
Winemaker
Orlando Wines
Lexcycle Stanza
Add Sources
J. Sargeant Reynolds
Finger Lakes AVA
Wyoming wine
Wikify
Ben E. Keith
Don Carmody
Tampa Bay Derby Darlins
Expand
Vignerons indépendants de France
Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon
Athletics at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
I award you this Writer's Barnstar in recognition of your work expanding articles and creating new ones. Keep it up! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I wanted to thank you with a barnstar, because your name came up on a list of editors who recently passed 1,000 contributions to articles. Nice job. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of 2011-12 Ligue Magnus season

edit

  Hello! Your submission of 2011-12 Ligue Magnus season at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 08:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2011–12 Ligue Magnus season

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Mark Jankowski

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Mark Jankowski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mark Jankowski

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rudy Kurniawan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudy Kurniawan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Kurniawan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Domaine Ponsot

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Domaine Ponsot at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Domaine Ponsot

edit

Hi, just wanted to say thanks for a great job on the Ponsot article, it is excellent. Camw (talk) 08:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Grace Family Vineyards

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Grace Family Vineyards at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

There's another issue, due to the fact that somebody tagged an entire section of the article for Relevance. Please see comments at the DYK template. Maile66 (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps you failed to see Maile66's note above. Please revisit Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Family Vineyards. --Orlady (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rudy Kurniawan

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Domaine Ponsot

edit

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Denis Dubourdieu for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denis Dubourdieu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Dubourdieu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BenTels (talk) 20:23, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Domaine de la Vougeraie

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Domaine de la Vougeraie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! deMURGH talk 21:26, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryan O'Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHLPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reggie Berg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anoka and International Hockey League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naples Half Marathon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reuben Mwei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross-country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Naples Half Marathon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Spirit of the Marathon II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Britain, Olympic and Bill Rodgers
Epiphanie Nyirabarame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to America
Vasyl Matviychuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to America

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Jinhao

edit

Hello, Tthaas,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Jinhao should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinhao .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Florida Firecats Logo.GIF

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Florida Firecats Logo.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Tthaas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Tthaas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Elgin Reid for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elgin Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elgin Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Tthaas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Martin Concepcion for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Concepcion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Concepcion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paul Buchanan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Buchanan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Buchanan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 18:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Florida Everblades 5th anniversary logo.gif

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Florida Everblades 5th anniversary logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Driscoll.Jem.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Driscoll.Jem.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply