WL6 Shaily

Welcome

Hello, WL6 Shaily and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Crusio (talk) 07:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Toeti Herati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toeti Herati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 07:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agam Wispi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agam Wispi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Agam Wispi

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• Shaily, you're going to have to copy and paste from your user space draft as the article was not deleted. Vejvančický has already done some edits, so be sure not to overwrite any of what he/she added. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• Try and space out the information a little, don't forget to add more references. This article could be very helpful to you, but you may need to run it through a translator to work with it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Oka Rusmini

• Please remember Shaily, blogspot and goodreads are not reliable sources. Look for peer-reviewed stuff, or at the very least sources known for fact checking. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ajip Rosidi

1. Generally it is preferred to show the age of the subject using {{Birth date and age}}, or {{Death date and age}} if the subject is deceased.
2. You seem to have written over the entire article that existed at the time. You should be merging the new content in with the old, not overwriting everything. The earlier version had several sources and pieces of information which are still important.
3. The current article does not have enough references. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Afrizal Malna

1. As I told you before, Good Reads is not a reliable source. The reliability of several of the sources you have used is questionable, especially footnotes number 5 and 6
2. Don't forget to format your external links. Also, external links go after the references. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Mimi Herbert

1. You need a lede to introduce the subject.
2. The quality of references is pretty good. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Bernard Arps

1. More references needed. "Presently, he is working on ethnographic projects that concern the ways performance can get out of hand (including ideas about what constitutes ‘out of hand’), the use of audio media in everyday Indonesian life and especially religion and politics, the impact of media and performance on the forms and functions of language (illustrated by the case of Osing in Banyuwangi), popular music and dance as means of promotion (case study: two genres in Banyuwangi), the realism of shadow puppetry, and the translation, adaptation, and interpretation of narrative across religions (the case study being the story of Dewa Ruci)." is uncited. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Annabel Teh Gallop

1. Needs a lede and preferably more references. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Oka Rusmini

1. Awards section needs references.
2. Good reads again... Not sure about Indonesiatera either.
3. Don't forget to format your external links. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

S. Rukiah

1. Need more references. "In 1965 she suffered from trauma resulting into death which put an end to her literary journey." is uncited.
2. Not sure about the quality of any of the references besides the Lontar one.
3. Don't forget the template for birth/death dates. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Lily Yulianti Farid

1. Needs more references. "She is also credited with the role of the initiator and director of the mid-June "Makassar International Writers Festival" (MIWF) in Makassar in 2011. Her strong belief in literary writing and reading tradition encouraged her to attend festivals of writers in several countries like Singapore, Australia, France, Holland and Hongkong, besides Ubud, Bali, and Utan Kayu, Jakarta." is uncited. Also needs to be made more neutral.
2. What makes WordsWithoutBorders a reliable source? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Toeti Heraty

1. Needs more references. "Heraty's poetry reflects not just her feminist stance, but also her love for arts. Her house in Menteng, Jakarta, is a gallery of famous paintings by Affandi, S. Sudjojono, Srihadi Soedarsono among many others. She also headed the Yayasan Mitra Budaya Indonesia, (YMBI, Foundation for Lovers of Indonesian Culture) in 1998. She is the founder of "Jurnal Perempuan", which is a feminist magazine that raises issues concerning women. Heraty offers her services to a non-government organization, Suara Ibu Peduli, that works for the empowerment of women." is uncited.
2. What makes IndonesiaBuku.com a reliable source?

Overall

I highly suggest you take a look at Hemingway and see what is expected. The infoboxes in particular should use the templates. Also, work needs to be done on Ajip Rosidi to try and improve the referencing and reinsert the information that was lost. If a page already exists, you should try and insert content so that both new and old content flows together naturally. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

More suggestions

Kwee Tek Hoay

This is in desperate need of better references. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Akhudiat

Reference 1 is blogspot and definitely not reliable. Man Yogyakarta 1 Portal Community is probably not reliable. The external links are also generally unreliable. Have you read the guide to reliable sourcing? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Kwee Tek Hoay

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)