User talk:WhiteFactLoom

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello WhiteFactLoom! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 00:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’m a new contributor, so I’m still learning how everything works. I noticed that my uploaded pictures were removed. I even tried using a different one, but that was also deleted. Could you please explain why they were removed and what I need to do to correctly add images to the article?

I read the pages you shared, but I still don’t fully understand what steps I need to follow. Also, do I need to get permission from the person in the picture or fill out any form before uploading? Or does the picture need to be one that hasn’t been used anywhere before?

Thank you for your time and guidance! WhiteFactLoom (talk) 01:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

They were removed because of copyright issues. In order to upload images for use in articles, the image must be under a public license. For example, the website where you got it from would say something like CC-BY-SA or CC-BY, or "some rights reserved". If not, the copyright owner would have to allow it to be used under a public license. This is done by the process outlined here: WP:Donating copyrighted materials. It has to be the copyright owner who gives the permission. The people in the picture do not have to give permission. ... discospinster _talk 16:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Whindersson Nunes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 03:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Adakiko,

Thanks for your message. I was actually trying to fix an error in reference 43, when I corrected it, another error appeared (I can’t recall exactly what it was), so I temporarily removed part of the infobox to resolve it.

Now that you’ve reverted my edit, the reference 43 error (“citation journal error”) has appeared again. I’d appreciate it if you could help fix that too. I’ll make sure to include an edit summary next time. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 04:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hello WhiteFactLoom. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WhiteFactLoom. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WhiteFactLoom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ravensfire (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

I am not a paid editor and do not receive any compensation for my edits. I edit voluntarily because I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and helping improve the quality of content. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

I noticed some of my recent edits were removed. I believe the content is well-supported by reliable sources and relevant. Could you please clarify why it was removed? I'm happy to collaborate to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s guidelines. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashneer Grover (October 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eulersidentity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources.

WP:UPE suspected. The entity's page has been attempted multiple times in the past, and the entire draft was created in a single revision by a new account created one day prior.

Eulersidentity (talk) 00:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, WhiteFactLoom! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eulersidentity (talk) 00:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi WhiteFactLoom! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! GoldRomean (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi GoldRomean,

Thank you for your kind words! I really appreciate your encouragement.

I’m still learning how to create and publish a Wikipedia article successfully. I’ve tried once, but my draft were declined. Since you’re an experienced editor, could you please guide me on how I can create a page properly and make sure it meets Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards?

Thanks again and happy editing to you too! WhiteFactLoom (talk) 22:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Article for George Jacob

Hello @WhiteFactLoom

I noticed that you had removed content from George Jacob's article - Kindly abide with the Wikipedia guidelines and maintain a NPOV - There are citations supporting the fact that he was involved in Lavish Spending. Make sure edits are done according to the guidelines - if you are paid by the following - kindly say so! ChronoTexts (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I made that edit to maintain a neutral point of view (NPOV) as required by Wikipedia’s guidelines. The content you’re referring to appeared to be written in a non-neutral tone, so I reverted it to keep the article balanced. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herbert Allen III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks WhiteFactLoom (talk) 22:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Rollback

I've rolled back your source tag for the plot section of Doctor Death: Seeker of Souls. Plot sections on Wikipedia are generally accepted to not need sources. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 02:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Got it✓ WhiteFactLoom (talk) 02:03, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beverly Shade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's wrestling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Solved! WhiteFactLoom (talk) 01:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarika Barrett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tarika Barrett to request its speedy deletion, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 04:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

I put a lot of effort into creating the article and making sure the information was accurate and useful.

I’m a new editor, and I feel a bit that the article was deleted too quickly without giving me a chance to improve it. If I had received a message or a little time, I could have fixed any issues and made it fully compliant.

I’d like to ask: would it be okay if I try creating the article again? I want to improve it further, follow the guidelines closely, and make it as complete and reliable as possible.

Appreciate your guidance and support. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome to start a new draft and submit it through the Articles for Creation process; this time, kindly take care to make sure all references are real and that you write the article yourself. Articles with fake references and articles generated by AI, especially articles about living people, can damage their subject's reputations. I hope you understand that is is important we avoid them. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 07:40, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know. I just wanted to ask did the article that got deleted have any fake references, or did it look like it was written by AI? I’d really like to understand what went wrong so I can fix it and do better next time.

Tanks for taking the time to explain! WhiteFactLoom (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

It was deleted because it had fake references - I assume that these were generated by AI, because editors do not, typically, knowingly falsify references. They do copy-paste in chatbot messages, naively assuming that the references will be good. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 08:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Understand, but I didn’t use any Ai to create the references. Might I added something by mistake without realizing it, but I’ll make sure to double check everything more carefully next time. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Julia Rebekka Adler, you may be blocked from editing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I apologize. Please give me a day and I will rewrite the article myself without any machine or AI assistance. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Openly, Inc. moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Openly, Inc.. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:04, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I apologize. Please give me a day and I will rewrite the article myself without any machine or AI assistance. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Openly, Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft talk:Openly, Inc., was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi pythoncoder,

Can you check lead paragraph of the Openly, Inc. draft. please take a look and tell me if it follows Wikipedia’s guidelines, or if it needs any improvements? I write the whole lead para my self. WhiteFactLoom (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Openly-logo-plum.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Openly-logo-plum.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Openly, Inc. (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Openly, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello WhiteFactLoom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Talk:Draft:Openly, Inc., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Parris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Parris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Parris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ashneer Grover

Hello, WhiteFactLoom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashneer Grover, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ashneer Grover

Hello, WhiteFactLoom. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ashneer Grover".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Openly, Inc.

Hello, WhiteFactLoom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Openly, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello WhiteFactLoom! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Please Review My Draft:), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strive Health (August 7)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Mmemaigret, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Draft does not appear to have any significant coverage. Refer WP:42, WP:NCORP, and WP:CORPTRIV.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Strive Health to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Mme Maigret (talk) 10:11, 7 August 2026 (UTC)