Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Archive 4

< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions | Pending changes reviewer | Historical
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mifter
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

User:Ludwigs2

I've been around a while, am a rollbacker, and would like to test the new feature. Plus, it would give me something productive to do in my spare time.   Ludwigs2 20:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cat-five

Even though I'm not as active as I used to be I still have active spurts where it would be useful since I still do vandalism patrols and I know all the relevant policies needed to use the tool well. Cat-five - talk 20:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 21:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Footyfanatic3000

I already have rollback rights, and would like to try this. Footyfanatic3000 (talk  · contribs) 21:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done -FASTILY (TALK) 21:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Tvoz

I've long spoken out in support of flagged revisions, especially for BLPs, and am glad to see this finally get off the ground.

Otherwise:

  1. Have had an account since 2006, and routinely edit.
  2. Have in the vicinity of 18,500 edits.
  3. Quite familiar with policy on vandalism.
  4. Quite familiar with basic content policies.
  5. Have read the guideline on reviewing.
  6. Have rollback rights already.

Tvoz/talk 22:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Twp

I've been an active editor (with some wikibreaks) since 2005; I'm a periodic RC patroller and newpages patroller; I help out newbies in #wikipedia-en-help from time to time. I'm not formally a rollbacker but I do use Twinkle's rollback to revert vandalism. I've been agnostic on flaggedrevs and would like to become a reviewer to learn more about how the system works in practice. Thanks. Tim Pierce (talk) 23:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 23:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bubba73

Rules of chess may be added to the trial and I monitor it (and edit it) Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 00:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Eliezg

Active, content-driven editor (and vandalism reverter) focused especially on mammals (especially marine mammals), some birds and quantitative ecology articles. Sampling of primary author articles include Walrus (a test page for "Pending changes"), Crabeater seals, Tufted puffin, Kutkh. Thanks! Eliezg (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BMRR

Wikipedia editor for almost four years; spend the majority of my time here cleaning up vandalism. BMRR (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:First Light

This looks like a very good test, and I would like to see firsthand how well it works. I regularly revert vandalism, mainly plant and bird articles, along with a few biographies that are on my watchlist. I'm an autoreviewer and rollbacker. First Light (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Random89

I have rollback rights, and I actually drafted a (very) early version of an implementation of reviewing rights. I'm an active contributor at ITN, and am interested in seeing the implication of reviews on the mainpage, as well as in general. Random89 01:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Johnuniq

Rollbacker. I often revert misguided edits and it seems undesirable to require someone to review the result. Johnuniq (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done - but please note this won't prevent others from reviewing your edits, but rather will allow you to review others edits to pages in the trial.  7  01:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ithizar

Experienced editor who already has rollbacker rights for use in patrolling vandalism. Ithizar (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  01:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jojalozzo

I want to help. Jojalozzo 01:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done 7  01:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ylee

I am a longtime and frequent editor, have had revert rights for some time, and in general do my part to make Wikipedia a better place for all.YLee (talk) 02:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 02:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Abrazame

An article or articles I have been monitoring in my watchlist for vandalism et al have been added to the trial and I would like to continue to participate in that regard. Incidentally, I've never requested Rollbacker rights though it's been casually offered once or twice, but if someone here has authority to grant that as well, it would probably facilitate that aspect of my participation here. Thanks for your consideration, Abrazame (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done added reviewer. For Rollback, please apply above - but in looking over your edits I see plenty of "undo" actions (which is good practice) - but I don't see a lot of warning editors about problems which you are undoing. If I have missed them please highlight that in your rollbacker request. You may also want to use TWINKLE.  7  02:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:AirplanePro

Becoming a reviewer would give me something to do when I am without a article I am able to work on. I am currently an autoconfirmed user with more than 600 edits and have been around since November 2009. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 03:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Aka042

I'm a fairly experienced editor (~5000 edits), have been active for about 1.5 years, and have rollback rights. I do NPP and RCP once in a while and would like to get involved with this new feature. THanks. Aka042 (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done. — ξxplicit 05:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Duncan

I'm awesome. I'm a rollbacker and have been around a while; I'm a "recent changes" patroller and revert vandalism on the double. I think I'd make an ideal reviewer. I'm also gonna do some testing over at the Labs. I'm an admin at the test site. —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 06:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Please explain your block log. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I think that was explained in previous revisions of my talk page, but, okay; I did the whole WP:GHBH thing and I know it wasn't the best of decisions. However, I invite you to look at the age of that block log and my contributions around it. —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say 06:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Woodstone

I'm a regular editor and frequently clean up vandalism from my watch list Woodstone (talk) 07:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Espresso Addict (talk) 12:21, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Randomtime

Semi-active editor, would like full use of the reviewing tools to help fight vandalism. RandomTime 08:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Glane23

I'd like to participate in the trial, especially for articles I watch routinely Geoff Who, me? 10:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Taric25

I have been a member registered user since 2005, and up to approximately 2008, I mostly edited articles about works, such as works of fiction and non-fiction, paintings, etc. I seldom edit such articles anymore and have moved to editing articles about demographics and biographies of living people, although I do still edit articles relating to the Japanese language and Japanese art from time to time. Because of our even more strict adherence of policy including verifiable sources, and since I also have access to AWB, I would be very pleased to help as a reviewer. Taric25 (talk) 12:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Modernist

deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I have been an active editor - mostly in the Visual arts since June 20, 2006. I currently have nearly 49,000 edits none automated - all one by one. I have rollbacker rights and I have a lot of experience protecting articles from vandalism. I have collaborated on 7 Featured articles with other editors and several good articles. I think I can be an effective reviewer...Modernist (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Already   Done by another admin - would have loved to help you out for that great number of FA.  7  12:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BlueMoonlet

Regular editor and rollbacker BlueMoonlet (t/c) 13:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hobit

I'd like to be able to review changes for the handful of articles I watch. Hobit (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Mootros

I am an established editor and frequently clean up vandalism from my watch list Mootros (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:JayJasper

I am an established editor with an extensive track record of reverting vandalism JayJasper (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Quartermaster

I regularly clean up vandalism. I understand all the wikipedia mumbo jumbo from BLP to TLC. I Have a clean record (the single block was an error caused by a hijacked template). Already have rollback rights. I don't suffer from HUTA. Quartermaster (talk) 15:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Intelligentsock

Sorry to bother again, but adding all the queue pages to my main account's watchlist for the trial is clogging it up. I've created this alternate account for pending changes use during the trial, as I'd forgotten the password to my other alt account. I'd also like rollback rights on this account, for the same purpose. (Relevant log entry). Intelligentsium 16:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Escape Orbit

Regular editor and recent changes patroller. Rollbacker. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cyclopia

I routinely deal with vandalism with articles on my (huge) watchlist and elsewhere; autoconfirmed user with discrete number of edits since years. Cyclopiatalk 17:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Exor674

I try to do vandal-fighting whenever I don't have anything else going on -- should be more regular over the summer Exor674 (talk) 18:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Michael A. White

Editor since 2005, semi-active, used to revert vandalism a lot. Would love to participate in this new system. --Michael WhiteT·C 19:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hqb

Active editor and RecentChanges patroller since 2007; already have Rollback. Hqb (talk) 19:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Thirteen squared

I'm a rollbacker and have been for months. I patrol new pages and new changes and routinely revert vandalism. I am well versed in BLP, NPOV, OR, etc. Thanks for consideration. 132 19:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Already done by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Til Eulenspiegel

I am requesting Reviewer rights as I have been a daily active user for years and would like to help; I always revert clear-cut vandalism on sight from my watchlist, and have also created several new articles and DYKs over the years. My only block record is from early 2008, for edit-warring with a (now-banned) user on Sumerian-related topics. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:The C of E

I'm a rollbacker and I routenly revert vandalism on sight along with reporting often to WP:RFPP and would be happy to play the role of a Guenea Pig for the new policy The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Giftiger wunsch

I always make sure my edits are constructive and I have been heavily involved in anti-vandalism efforts for most of my edit history. I recently took a break from wikipedia but I'm going to be editing again in smaller doses over the coming days and weeks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:T3h 1337 b0y

I patrol recent changes, and have made some edits using Twinkle. RussianReversal (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ring Cinema

I monitor for vandalism and other problems on some pages and I'd like to continue with that. Ring Cinema (talk) 20:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:DVdm

Have been using rollback for a while now. Time for some positive action. I think I have been reviewing edits on other language wiki's already. DVdm (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ezra Wax

I've been here for a while and would like to be able to commit changes to articles I come across. Ezra Wax (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Killing Vector

Longtime WP editor, experienced with review from Wikinews, already got rollback, likes long walks on the beach & classical music Killing Vector (talk) 22:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 22:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Notyourbroom

Most of my day-to-day edits are reverting vandalism or fixing others' edits. This account is about five years old, though I've only been editing in earnest for about 1.5 years. —Notyourbroom (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Mlpearc Public

If needed, using my alternate account. Mlpearc Public (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ThinkEnemies

Because all the cool kids are doing it. OK, that's probably not a good reason. I would like to help make this two-month trial a success. I have a good grasp of WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR and understand what constitutes vandalism. Trusted editor that can respect the responsibility. †TE†Talk 23:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Could you address your very recent block? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Content dispute with what I perceived to be a POV pusher. I reported the editor after his/her 4th revert. After it wasn't addressed on that page, and receiving indication the editor did it to make a point, I reverted it back to their 3rd reversion, after they tagged the content in question. We were both later blocked after another editor reported me for the particular revert. †TE†Talk 23:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:AirplanePro

Becoming a reviewer would give me something to do if I have nothing else to do on Wikipedia. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 23:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

User:SeanNovack

I've been here for several years now, mainly adding detail, correcting spelling and grammatical errors, and fixing vandalism at first. My first attempt at an article was a BLP on my father that turned into a deletion discussion that I (rightly) lost. This gave me excellent insight on how the process here is supposed to work and the fact that Wiki has rules you may not agree with, but you have to obey. I may not always agree with WikiPolicy, but I do follow it when it comes to editing. While I'm frequently at odds with people on issues of NPOV, I've never shied away from discussing the issue and accepting third party opinions. Rapier (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:GateKeeper

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2008 (3 years) and I'm familiar with the editing policies. I follow many pages through my watch-list and a lot of my time is spent reviewing recent changes for vandalism. Additionally its summer and I have lots of free time to contribute :] -- GateKeeper (talk) @ 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Skinwalker

At times I encounter vandalism and/or BLP violations on my watchlisted articles. I've been around for a while and I know the relevant policies. Skinwalker (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cynical

I've been a Wikipedia for some time, and have a full understanding of what is acceptable and what is not under Wikipedia policy. Cynical (talk) 02:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 02:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ginbot86

Have been a rollbacker for quite a while now, I also frequently check the Recent Changes area and keep a keen eye on my watchlist.Ginbot86 02:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:The Tetrast

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights

For article Scientific method which I've edited often enough and for other articles which may come to use the Pending Changes system (some of the number articles). Main reason, to prevent vandalism while allowing casual edits. The Tetrast (talk) 02:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

  Done--Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ThinkEnemies

Because all the cool kids are doing it. OK, that's probably not a good reason. I would like to help make this two-month trial a success. I have a good grasp ofWP:NPOV, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR and understand what constitutes vandalism. Trusted editor that can respect the responsibility.†TE†Talk 23:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Could you address your very recent block? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Content dispute with what I perceived to be a POV pusher. I reported the editor after his/her 4th revert. After it wasn't addressed on that page, and receiving indication the editor did it to make a point, I reverted it back to their 3rd reversion, after they tagged the content in question. We were both later blocked after another editor reported me for the particular revert. †TE†Talk 23:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done. On balance, I see nothing to make me think you'd abuse it, so I'm happy to AGF. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hayden120

I watch articles that receive vandalism on a daily basis, and a few of those have been selected for the trial. Therefore, I'd appreciate being able to give this a go. Many thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Pinethicket

Active on RCP with rollback permission (20+K edits), have created several dozen articles, am familiar with WP editing and policy. Pinethicket (talk) 08:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  09:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Church of emacs

I'm a Wikimedian with 26,000 global contributions (1,200 on enwiki); sysop on multiple wikis and oversight on dewiki. Thanks, Church of emacs(Talk) 11:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  12:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Grondemar

I currently have access to the Rollback tool and am interested in helping out during this new feature trial. –Grondemar 13:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Fayenatic london

I'm a daily editor with over 26,000 total edits, and a member of WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy whose pages (articles on human names) should probably alleventually be included in this protection programme, as they are a regular prime target for vandalism. Fayenatic (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:KelleyCook

Already have rollback access and two of my routine patrol pages were added to the trial queue. KelleyCook (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bobrayner

I think I have a good record as an editor. Sometimes I watch recent changes and clean up the usual vandalism; that accounts for about half of my 2000 edits. The rest of my edits have been relatively gnomish; hopefully they demonstrate a broad understanding of wikipedia policy. bobrayner (talk) 14:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done already done.  7  22:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Naraht

I have been a rollbacker for a while and have more than 7,000 edits. I'm interested in seeing how this affects vandalism on WP.

Naraht (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jeremy Visser

I’m approaching my 5th Wikibirthday, have 2031 2032 edits, have a clear picture of what is vandalism and what is not, and have reverted my fair share. I don’t tend to write lots of copy for articles, so this is an opportunity for me to help out Wikipedia in a way that I’m good at. :) — Jeremy 14:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 15:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Scray

Have had rollback privilege for a while, and a fair number of edits. I will endeavor to use the reviewer privilege properly. Scray (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Smallman12q

Have 9k edits and rollback rights. I have a sufficient understanding of WP policies/guidelines and am interested in helping with the review process.Smallman12q (talk) 16:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Muchness

Editing articles, maintenance tagging and contributing to deletion discussions since 2005. 17K edits, familiarity with WP policies and guidelines, clean block log and no history of vandalism. Muchness (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Nthep

I have rollback rights and spend a fair amount of time fighiting vandalism especially by new users NtheP (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Claritas

I'm a frequent recent change patroller, and I'm intrigued by this new process - decent number of edits and experience fighting vandalism/in deletion discussionsClaritas § 18:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done (added rollback as well) --RegentsPark (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ScottyBerg

I'm a rollbacker and new page patroller, and I just learned about this interesting flagged revisions trial. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BsBsBs

I regularly edit, review and vandalcheck, especially articles on car companies and matters concerning China BsBsBs (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Goochelaar

Editor for a long time, rollbacker for some time, I like to give my small contribution to WP. Goochelaar (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jimmy Pitt

Autoreviewer with rollback privileges, occasionally active in vandal checking and disambiguation, have been a wikipedian for well over four years and would like to contribute further Jimmy Pitt (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Khfan93

Long-time member who has been in and out of wikipedia. Primarily I work to revert vandalism, so this would be an appropriate power. I will not be offended if I do not receive it, however. :) -khfan93 21:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 22:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Arnoutf

Long time editor, familiar with policies, patrolling many pages for POV and other problematic edits trying to resolve without conflict. Arnoutf (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  On hold, Can you please explain your block log? Since the block was for edit warring, I'm a bit hesitant to assign the reviewer bit. Nakon 22:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough. Note this was a year ago. The situation was a case of clear and obvious and vandalising (POV pushing) thourh sockpuppeteering, by a sockpuppeteer (User:philscirel) with a long history on this specific article Fethullah Gulen. However the sockpuppetry case took 3 weeks (!!!) to be even looked at after which the sockpuppet was banned. While the sockpuppet procedure did not respond at all I kept reverting the sockpuppet (claiming his edits to be vandalism), but so did the sockpuppet with my reverts (i.e. claiming those as vandalism) and reported me for 3RR violation. Since the sockpuppet had basically prepared a completely different version of the article in some distant past , the vandalism of the sockpuppet was not very obviously vandalism for the admins who were not familiar with the history of the specific article. The patrolling admin blocked both me and the sockpuppet for a short while to restore rest. A little while later the sockpuppet was blocked (and reappeared a while later again and again, but that has nothing to with the case here).
Indeed I may have overreacted to trolling of a repeating sockpuppeteer, this has learned me some restraint and just wait for the proper procedures (even if they take an absurd amount of time as in this case..... 3 full weeks to respond to a sockpuppet notification). Arnoutf (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:AussieLegend

Most of my work these days consists of vandalism reversions, MOS compliance, etc. AussieLegend (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:SatuSuro

  • Watching the alphabet soup on my watch lest - S is near the middle/end of the trial period?... Interested in status if it is available, despite recent slowing down edits due to real life issues. SatuSuro 23:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Zach425

Long-time editor (though I often take a break for several months) who focuses in part on vandalism. —Zach425 talk/contribs 00:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done  7  01:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Schmloof

I routinely revert vandalism using Twinkle and am kind of a stickler for sources. I also truly believe in assuming good faith. This sounds like an excellent idea and would love to give it a shot. –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 10:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Laveol

I've been around for quite a while now - more than 3 years, I think. I regularly check on quite a few articles and would like to contribute as a Reviewer as well. Laveol T 13:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Artem Karimov

An established English Wikipedia editor for over 4 years that abides by rules and guidelines. Artem Karimov (talk | edits) 16:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:BalthCat

I believe that in order to be successful, this process will require sufficient reviewers in place. I have edited for some time, including the occasional recent changes patrol, I have read WP:Reviewing and the various policies, and believe that I could contribute this way.

User:Hoo man

It would be fine to have the availability to test those changes here. Of course, I know, that I'm not much active over here, but I got much experience with those rights from dewiki (I've reviewed over 750 version there, so I know if somethings wrong). Hoo man (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Active cross-wiki, not concerned. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bellagio99

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights

I am a longtime reviewer with over 3600 edits. I check my 90+ article watchlist several times daily. In addition, I often do "drive-by" edits (my term) when I am reading an article for my information and I catch (too often) syntax issues. I have had rollback rights since they began. I do a fair amount of vandalism rollbacks as well as asking for citations. I think the reviewer trial is a good idea in principle and hope that the experiment works out in practice.Bellagio99 (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

  Done Nakon 19:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Bob Castle

I regularly keep a watch on BLP articles and use the recommended Wikipedia guidelines regarding NPOV, referencing, etc. I currently have rollback status. Bob talk 19:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Nakon 19:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Kenosis

20,000+ edits since the beginning of 2006. Obvious vandalism has long been one of the things I look for on my watchlist. Kenosis (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:SusanLesch

Rollback and autoreviewer, I have been a editor for four years. With luck I can help you with this two-month project. Thank you. SusanLesch (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Already done by User:Courcelles. Nakon 19:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Purplebackpack89

Rollbacker on two Wikipedias, 4000+ edits, no blocks on this Wiki Purplebackpack89 19:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:RayAYang

One of the pages I watch has been added to the trial. RayTalk 20:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:December21st2012Freak

I've been on Wikipedia for almost 1 year now, familiar with the policies and guidelines, I know what is and what is not vandalism, and I have a reasonable edit history. Décembër21st2012Freâk Talk at 21:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Alistair Stevenson

Two pages on my watchlist are now subject to Pending Changes, I would like to be a part of the trial. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 21:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Mifter (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Ltwin

Been here several years. While my work is primarily on Christianity related topics, I read alot of articles and revert vandalism when I see it. Ltwin (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Mr Bungle

Editing for a few years; although I have not done a huge amount of editing recently, I regularly check on a number of articles Mr Bungle | talk 00:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Mifter (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Colipon

Have been editing WP since 2003, consistent record in NPOV and very good understanding of WP policies. Colipon+(Talk) 04:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done. — ξxplicit 06:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jæs

I have had a (demonstrated) interest in genuinely trying to help protect WP:BLP articles, and this seems like an obvious way to continue helping from time to time. jæs (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Rockvee

Rollbacker; Know most rules/policies after being around for over 3 years. Rockvee (talk) 05:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:PatGallacher

I think I can make a responsible contribution to this process. PatGallacher (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Lunchscale

Edited on WP with Rollback for many years. Have over 2k edits, most of which are vandal reverting. Lunchscale Talk! Contrib! 11:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Checker Fred

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Checker Fred (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I have been an editor for awhile. I have been reviewing vandlsim. Also have been useing roll back for awhile.

  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Moxfyre

Long-time editor, frequently involved in copy-editing and removal of vandalism, never been involved in a content dispute that wasn't resolved amicably through discussion with other users. Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 13:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Deor

A couple of pages on my watchlist are in the trial, so I suppose I'll see what this is all about. Deor (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Cameron Scott

Long-time editor, familiar with our policies on BLP, verification and reliable sources. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jwy

Want to help speed promoting good edits to the readers --John (User:Jwy/talk) 15:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Eljohnson15

Have been an official Wikipedian since 2006, I regularly check for vandalism and one of the article I contribute to was tagged El Johnson (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Chaosdruid

Member of several groups under which I anticipate coming across articles under pending review (GOCE & ARS) as well as several projects: Greater Manchester, Ukraine, Motorsport, F1 and Robotics Chaosdruid (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Mifter (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Archive_4&oldid=1190233652"