Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 241

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Amatulic in topic Prodapt
Archive 235←Archive 239Archive 240Archive 241Archive 242Archive 243→Archive 245

Nathan Lee

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Has since won silver medal in Gina Bachauer https://www.bachauer.com/announcements/winners-of-junior-competition.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanWon (talk • contribs) 22:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Vicki Fraser

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I, Danielgagnon888, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danielgagnon888 (talk) 11:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

  • @Danielgagnon888: the reason it gets deleted is because there is no changes going on to the page. We expect you to either edit the page to improve it, or if you think it is ready, to click on the submit button to get it assessed and possibly moved to be an article. However with the page as it was before being deleted, the references were all connected to the subject, eg publisher, sellers or a personal website. What we need is reliable references with substantial content from independent writers. This may be from a book review, a biography, obituary, educational journal ( or other magazine or newspaper). If you know of such sources that you could use, let me know here, and I will restore it so that you can add them to the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @Graeme Bartlett: Ah, ok. Yes, I have several links to articles, including a couple interviews. I'll add those and resubmit. Thanks, Dan

Iranian American Women Foundation

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reason being there is no reason whatsoever to delete such an article. It is a rapidly growing prominent advocacy group with chapters in multiple cities across the United States. -2602:306:CC59:3560:79EC:618D:C6B0:9EBB (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


Quoted Reason for Deletion: "My own searches have found the same exact links that are listed here, trivial passing mentions that also include PR, none of it is substantial significant coverage needed for any applicably convincing notability." - User:Explicit

Reply: These are not "trivial passing mentions," on the contrary sources include articles and media coverage from across the United States on behalf of this group. Ranging from interviews with key personal regarding their objectives for their fellow communities to local news coverage of their events. It was up and unbothered for quite some time, and I have been trying to find the time to slowly chip away to add to it. Meanwhile, I have seen articles on Wikipedia with far less proper sourcing and media coverage, yet they are spared deletion. 2602:306:CC59:3560:79EC:618D:C6B0:9EBB (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Diaspark

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Edwinr78 (talk) 11:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sanomechanics

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -71.174.152.56 (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The page isn't deleted... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Robert Shapiro Chicago Businessman

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wiki2356 (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

There are two pages with this name, the extant Robert Shapiro (Chicago Businessman) and Robert Shapiro (Chicago businessman) which you blanked and was subsequently deleted as G7. Which is the page you want? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Australia Oriental Media Buddhist Charity Association

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

deleted under G12. This is my second article and I am not aware of G12. Please allow me to rework on it. Thank you -Celestina wang (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

@Celestina wang:   Not done. Copyright is a very important issue for Wikipedia: please read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources and for more detail Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations. We cannot hold copyright text, even temporarily, so I will not restore the deleted article. I will email you the text if you like, but most of it is available at the source site here. JohnCD (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:John Basedow

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chrissymackmack (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC) I wrote a page on John Basedow and submitted it for review. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Basedow. The draft was requested a speedy deletion by RHaworth because my draft appeared to be an advertisement. I contested the deletion saying that I would be more than willing to edit the page to standard. It was still deleted. I figured it would be saved in my sandbox or something, but I cant find it anywhere. Again, I have no problem editing it to standard, I just really dont want to have to find the sources over again. It took way too long to do the first time. Can I please just get the draft emailed to me or something? Chrissymackmack (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have stripped off some hype. The quotes from publications still need to be changed to not sound like a promotion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Lanko Theory ;The first lecturer Hip hop artiste in Africa.

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

..redacted...

Draft:Frank L Harrison (academic)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 158.223.51.88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 158.223.51.88 (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Achraf Baznani

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

This artist began to make known in magazines in 2014 and its popularity has risen sharply since July 2015. He has exhibited some of his work in several galleries. [1] -Alfabytes (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

That article has been repeatedly deleted because it was written in overly promotional tone. I'd suggest to start a draft at Draft:Achraf Baznani first.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Or not, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maromania that draft is protected now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, I think we have enough sources to create a page about the artiste [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] 41.140.156.231 (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achraf Baznani (photographer). --bonadea contributions talk 10:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
My inclination would be to unprotect only the draft space version at this time. Given the outcome of the previous AfD and related socking in relation to the article, a draft article would be prudent.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear Ponyo, Can you please unprotect the page, then any one can create a draft? Regards 41.249.33.196 (talk) 09:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Achraf Baznani unprotected. Read WP:YFA, WP:CREATIVE and WP:42, and take care to write in a neutral tone. A draft that reads as promotional will not be accepted. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hellenic Electronic Center

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Thanos7v, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanos7v (talk) 19:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

this is a legitimate page which I am trying to create. Sorry I missed the warning timeframe for the deletion. -Thanos7v (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Michael I. Connolly

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Michael I. Connolly is a notable businessman and startup investor in Alabama. I will continue to improve on the article and keep adding reference to make it for Wikipedia. -Jacklynnel (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

SAGA: the South African Guild of Actors

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to continue editing the draft until it meets the criteria for publication -SAGActors (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also, you may want to change your username so that people don't complain about WP:GROUPNAME.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Achraf_Baznani

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The artist is well know, please undelete the page to work on it soon. Thank you -105.158.164.66 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 105.158.164.66 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Maureen Selwood at ANIMAC International Animation Festival 2008.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There is a valid OTRS-ticket (ticket:2016052010010984) that confirms that photographer agrees with releasing this file under a free license. Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC))

Natuur12 Undeleted. You'll have to add the OTRS tag to it and possibly then kick it over to Commons.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus   Done Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Chosen (Cast novel)

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

To preserve attribution, the deleted revisions prior to this article becoming a redirect should be restored. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: Which page's attribution are they needed for? Asking so that I can tell if a plain restore is necessary.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
The page Chosen (Cast novel) was deleted to allow a move from Chosen (A House of Night novel) that was requested by Robsinden and done by Carlossuarez46. The former page was previously an article that became a redirect and the article was latter recreated under the latter title. The deleted revisions of Chosen (Cast novel) prior to the redirection should be restored to preserve attribution of only that article, not any other article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
The page has two revisions that postdate the earliest edit to the page now moved there. The last time I tried selectively undeleting revisions I made a whole mess, so I'll punt this to someone with better understanding of complex page history stuff like @Graham87 and Anthony Appleyard:.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Asymmetrical multiplayer

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Player017, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 017Bluefield (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Tony Rose

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article should not have been speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Tony Rose is an NAACP Image Award Winner for Outstanding Literature. He has numerous European Gold Albums for his work with Prince Charles Alexander as the Manager and Co-Producer of Prince Charles Alexander and Prince Charles and the City Beat Band. He had three Production Deals with Virgin Records, Atlantic Records and Pavilion/CBS Records in the 80's, as well as one Gold and one Platinum Album for his work with the album "Merry Merry Christmas" by New Kids on the Block, for his work with Maurice Starr and New Kids on the Block, along with two Ampex Golden Reel Awards, also for his work with New Kids on the Block.

Thank you. If there is anything else you need to approve submission please let me know. Yvonne Rose

Most of the links submitted with the Tony Rose page do not work. Someone helped me put them in but they are no longer available. I tried to insert and repair the links myself but could not do it. I need to find someone to help me but in the meantime I am enclosing replacement links to be inserted which will attest for Tony Rose's notability as a Book Publisher, Author, Record Producer, Songwriter and Literary Awards Recipient. BELOW ARE SEVERAL LINKS SPECIFIC TO TONY ROSE: References[edit] 1. Jump up ^ "AALBC – Tony Rose Pens America the Black Point of View".

2. Jump up ^ "Publishersweekly".

3. Jump up ^ [PDF]- 1 - HIP-HOP IN THE HUB: HOW BOSTON RAP ... http://www.libraryofvinyl.org/research/Hip_Hop_In_The_Hub_Foster_2009.pdf - by PC Foster - The story of Boston's hip-hop community from 1979-2000. VERSION 2.0 (May 5, 2011). Pacey C. Foster. Professor of Management. University of ... www.libraryofvinyl.org/research/Hip Hop In The Hub Foster 2009.pdf

4. Jump up ^ “THE BOSTON BLACK MUSIC SCENE TONY ROSE, MAURICE STARR AND PRINCE CHARLES ALEXANDER REUNITE” PAGE TWO. PDF] http://charlesyancey.org/newsletters/36%20Yancey%202012,%20September.pdfTony Rose, Maurice Starr, and Prince Charles Alexander, held a .... Founders of Boston's Black Music Scene (left), Maurice Starr and Tony Rose, ..... long record of upholding civil..

5. Jump up ^ “TONY ROSE, MAURICE STARR AND PRINCE CHARLES ALEXANDER RECEIVE PROCLAMATION”- BlackNews.com - Tony Rose, Publisher/CEO, Amber ... www.blacknews.com/news/amber_communications_group101.shtml - Tony Rose, Publisher/CEO, Amber Communications Group, Inc. Receives an ... Yoon; Charles "Prince Charles" Alexander, Tony Rose and Boston City Councillor ... Platinum Records and Productions, received an "Official Resolution" January ...

6. Jump up ^ "PRINCE CHARLES EMERGES FROM THE BOSTON GHETTO, Billboard of Mar 30, 1985, Page 57 - Google Books". https://books.google.com/books?id=5yMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT134&lpg=PT134&dq=tony+rose+and+solid+platinum+records+and+productions&source=bl&ots=kKp5lT4y7j&sig=ma5Ay9rwhBCN-QbdU4ibqWkUiU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiAw9OjgP_LAhVE4CYKHXaeC5E4ChDoAQg4MAY#v=onepage&q=tony%20rose%20and%20solid%20platinum%20records%20and%20productions&f=false Vol. 97, No. 13 - ‎Magazine Tony Rose, president and architect of Boston-based Solid Platinum ... and a production and publishing deal with Virgin Records Publishing

7. Jump up ^ “Tony Rose: From Beat to Books - A Good Black Man” - www.agoodblackman.com/books_trose.shtml - Tony Rose, Publisher and CEO of Amber Books the road was long with many ... The Ruggles Street Housing Projects is where Tony says he got his early ...

8. Jump up ^ PUBLISHERS WEEKLY -AMBER SHINES” 

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/print/20060828/14469-amber-shines.html

Aug 25, 2006 ... Eight years after founding Amber Communications, Tony Rose and his wife, Yvonne, have used an opportunistic publishing philosophy to build . . 9. Jump up ^ "Tony Rose, Publisher/CEO of Amber Communications Group, Inc. Signs Ebook Licensing Deal With K-Tel International". http://www.blacknews.com/news/tony_rose_ebook_licensing_deal_ktel_international101.shtml#.V42IPk-PvK_/

10. Jump up ^ “TONY ROSE RECEIVES HARLEM BOOK FAIR AWARD”. 

http://baystatebanner.com/news/2013/aug/21/news-tony-rose/.

11. Jump up ^ “TONY ROSE WINS AN NAACP IMAGE AWARD - THE BAY STATE BANNER” Amber Books, the award-winning imprint of Amber Communications Group, Inc. headed by Boston native Tony Rose, was among the NAACP Image Award recipients for Best Literary Work - Youth/Teens, for its title Obama Talks Back: Global Lessons - A Dialogue with America’s Young Leaders. http://baystatebanner.com/news/2013/feb/06/tony-rose/

External Links[edit] • [1] www.tonyroseenterprises.com

Occupation Music Producer, Author, BookPublisher, Record Producer,Songwriter

Website Tony Rose -YMARI (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Um, OK. The page was deleted under PROD but for some reason there was an A7 tag on it as well - that for some reason didn't show on the preview of the deleted page when I looked at it. David Gerard, did you see the A7? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I killed it as an expired PROD, the A7 was probably not the case (it asserts considerable notability). Either way, PRODs are without prejudice so a restoration is not a problem. But IMO as an editor, the article does need more third-party sourcing. @YMARI: I've restored it as Draft:Tony Rose, remember the stringent requirements of WP:BLP (basically, you should have a source for every claim) and that it clearly passes WP:NOTABILITY, and move it back to main article space when you're sure it's ready and people looking at it afresh will be clearly convinced - David Gerard (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

List Of Dictators Who Had Pet Cats

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

List Of Dictators Who Had Pet Cats · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] This article was going to be expanded, and have sources put in, but it was deleted before that stage could come about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Resuenam (talk • contribs) 09:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have to say though, this looks like prime AfD fodder.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Captain Pawan Kumar

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

He was a martyr of Indian Army who was known to be bravest of braves. So give me some time to edit his page -Jd20malik (talk) 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Pawan Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Another version of the article was deleted as G4 by Randykitty, if the previous AfD isn't overturned the later G4 probably should not either.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

lucas llach

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

the article was deleted for political reasons, the person's biogrpahy was relevant to wikipedia -Lllach (talk) 21:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title is correct? If you are Mr. Llach himself, I strongly suggest you read WP:Autobiography. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Well it did exist and had traffic http://es.wikitally.com/wiki/Lucas_Llach.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lllach (talk • contribs) 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC). So please if you can help me republish it again it'd be great. And no, it wasn't an autobiography, actually it was pretty "intervened"

Wikitally is not associated with Wikipedia, and even if it were we cannot undelete pages that are not on the English Wikipedia. That page was deleted off of the Spanish Wikipedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Jeremy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lllach (talk • contribs) 13:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

KoKo (computer virus)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Needed information was in the article. A relative of mine seemed to have an issue, of which helpful information was provided, when I last was able to view the article. I decided to look back, to find that information, to assist in the removal of KoKo virus from my relative's computer, and found the article no longer existed. The person who deleted the article spoke of opinions that information about computer viruses is not acceptable as Wikipedia content, as if it was encouragement for mischief. I only see it as informational content, that mainly serves to help someone who thinks they're infected, to identify that KoKo is truly what they have, and could potentially help them rid the virus. I do not recall there being code, so to help someone develope the virus and infect others, which, I agree, would be unacceptable for Wikipedia content. Still, if there were hacker-helping code there, it could certainly be edited out. Thank you for reading. -Dahson5 (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Might want to note that Wikipedia is not technical assistance, though.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Northwood Mortgage

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Morified, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Morified (talk) 13:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:LARI AZAD

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Nakramlari, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nakramlari (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I also recommend you to closely follow DGG's advice there.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Buygoodeals recovery

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you please restore it to draft for me to use it for future reference and improvement? -Weibinzha (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Weibinzha (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. That draft was so over-the-top promotional that there is nothing worthy of salvaging. Please start over from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Red Eclipse

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can you please restore this deleted article in the draft namespace or in my user namespace? -Trustable (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

  Declined. Given the fact that the article was deleted via AFD (which disqualifies it for restoration on this page) and then confirmed in a rather contentious Deletion Review, I think your best approach is to ask the original deleting administrator at User talk:Sarahj2107 if she's willing to draftify or userfy the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Geoffrey_(Gordon)_Nathan

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Intend on editing the draft and making it live -Geoffreynathan (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Vi Wickam

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Mawilson16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mawilson16 (talk) 00:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my request. The page for Vi Wickam met several criteria for submission, and I was working with the subject of the page on sources to verify several facts that may have made it suitable for publishing on the site. Our communication was put on hold for several months - thus the deletion - but I would like to begin anew on it. I understand it is not an indefinite holding ground for unpublished material, and I thank you again for your review of this request to undelete the page. -Mawilson16 (talk) 00:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft talk:Christopher Mykkles

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

erroneous G4 deletion, main page has been restored -Prisencolin (talk) 23:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Varadapura

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this article hold the information of place where people visit of Karnataka and all over India visit this sacred place. and then click the "Save page" button below -Vishwakumarmc (talk) 07:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Vishwakumarmc: - don't worry, the speedy-deletion request mentioned on your talk page was nearly two years ago, and it was declined. The page was then very promotional, but it has been improved and no-one is now proposing to delete it. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Bar Harbor Flight 1808 Flight Track.gif

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This image Obviously came from the FAA accident report and is therefore public domain gov and should not have been deleted. It would be relatively simple to add the source. -Dspark76 (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Seems like an URL was overlooked which supports this claim, so done and @Explicit and Fastily:.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Game Jolt

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I came up with a draft for an article to be submitted on Wikipedia, which failed after review. Left it and had always planned to do an overhaul with the Wikipedians who gave me advice in mind when I had the time so it's more appropiate, but alas it got auto deleted due to inactivity (and I was ignorant of that fact, went on holiday just as I got the warning + subsequent deletion). Thanks for your consideration. -Honno (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:Jennifer Nettles

Latest comment: 8 years ago13 comments4 people in discussion

Please move to User:Jax_0677/Template:Jennifer Nettles. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @BDD: It looks like this was deleted by you at MfD. No one gave an opposing argument so this could probably be a soft delete, but I figured that I'd ask just in case since I'm not as familiar with MfD as I am with AfD and I know that there are some differences here and there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Tokyogirl79:, my goal at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 24 was to reinstate the template which was redirected at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 24 due to only 3 potential links. Now that it has FIVE potential links, it will be easier to do this if it is placed in my user space than to start it from scratch. I tried to reinstate it myself, however, User:TenPoundHammer reverted me, so I have tried to initiate a discussion about the issue with little success. Instead of relisting the discussion to gain more feedback, it was deleted immediately. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
  • You can consider this a soft delete, yes. But Jax, you're the one who requested deletion. Now you're requesting undeletion? Is this some kind of game to you? I would prefer someone else handle this from here on out. --BDD (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Reply - @BDD:, this is no game. If you review User_talk:Jax_0677#Template:Jennifer_Nettles and the history of the template, I tried to implement this template with 5 links, but it got reverted by User:TenPoundHammer, who threatened to take the issue to ANI, which I also did here. I have placed a split tag on Template:Sugarland. If you look carefully, I said "Delete or instate navigation box with links to the 2 albums and 3 songs recorded by Jennifer Nettles". How am I supposed to start a discussion about getting this template initiated if I am being reverted without a TFD? It has been more than one year since the redirect was put in place. Per WP:G4, "It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, [or] pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies". --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
TenPoundHammer, care to comment? Why wasn't this just taken to TfD? --BDD (talk) 13:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, to be perfectly clear, why wasn't "Template:Jennifer Nettles" taken to WP:TFD in calendar year 2016? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I didn't take it to TFD because I wasn't aware it'd been undeleted. Jax 0677 is clearly WP:TENDing here because this template is so precious to him, even though it can easily be merged to {{Sugarland}}. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, if you look carefully, you will see that the template was not undeleted. I reinstated the template, and you reverted it to redirect to Template:Sugarland instead of taking it to WP:TFD. WP:G4, "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, [or] pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies". There is no evidence that I am tending, and no consensus in a TFD discussion defaults to keeping the template, not redirecting it like was done. There are now 5 links, and it would be easier if this template were undeleted, than for us to go through this entire dialogue. Template:Sugarland is getting kind of long, hence the reason for the split. So I ask again, WHY was "Template:Jennifer Nettles" redirected AFTER I PUT FIVE LINKS INSIDE OF IT instead of taken to TFD? --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The user who responded at ANI was correct—this should've been taken to TfD. If TPH made such a threat, it's obviously inappropriate. --BDD (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Reply - I mistakenly said "TFD", when I meant to say WP:RFD. TenPoundHammer should have taken the issue to WP:TFD after I made the 5 link template in 2016. When I filed at RFD, I said delete OR reinstate, in hopes that a discussion would take place, and that a relist would take place after one week if no discussion had occurred. I was told that WP:DR is for issues that cannot be resolved anywhere else. Again, no consensus defaults to "Keep". --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Asian Swedes

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It follows the convention for diaspora, per Asian Nigerian, Asian South Africans, Asian French, Asian Australians, Asian Canadians, Asian Latin Americans, Asian Argentines, Asian Brazilians, Asian Mexicans, Asian Peruvians, Asian Caribbean, Asian Surinamese, Asian Americans, and Asian Hispanic and Latino Americans. Also it never met the G7 criterion. -Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Goddard

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Neville Goddard is a notable person. He has many books selling on one of the most popular websites https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=node%3D13431540011&field-keywords=Neville+Goddard&rh=n%3A13431540011%2Ck%3ANeville+Goddard -98.240.73.254 (talk) 03:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

  • It's expected that an author will put out work and have it published somewhere, especially nowadays when it's so easy (and in some cases smarter) to self-publish. You need to show where Goddard has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspapers and academic sources. I'll warn you, it's really difficult for religion themed works to gain coverage, especially self-published ones (as he has self-published at least part of his work), as either one in itself is something that doesn't typically gain a lot of coverage in places Wikipedia would consider a WP:RS. It doesn't mean that the work itself isn't good or is undeserving of coverage, it's just that there are so many self-published and/or religious works out there and most RS that would cover them have to be extremely selective. If you can find coverage to show that he's notable then JzG might be willing to overturn the AfD, but you'd have to show that coverage first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (WALA)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, 108.51.121.169, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 108.51.121.169 (talk) 17:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (WALA)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have more complete information now. Would like to continue with page creation. Thank you. -108.51.121.169 (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Answered above and done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Bolanle Olukanni

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bolanle Olukanni · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

41.190.2.232 (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done. I have reset the clock, which gives you seven days to add at least one reliable source to the article. When you have done that, you may remove the PROD-blp template at the top; but if the article is to be kept, it will need references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Ningpan/sandbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Ningpan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ningpan (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

  Administrator note Did so, then got suspicious about the formatting and content and when I performed a check it gave an identical content to http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.655.5959&rep=rep1&type=pdf. I have thus sent the text to Copyright problems. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Kingsley's Chicken

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article was deleted after uncontested PROD. This business is significant in local culture and media and it is possible to expand to address the PROD user's concerns -Dfadden (talk) 00:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Coke (soft drink)

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Invalid R3 -2602:306:30AC:C1E0:BC08:FC8E:63A1:2885 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

It was just a redirect to Coca-Cola; Edgar181? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
I deleted it 5 years ago as a recently created unused redirect from an implausible search term, a valid R3. What purpose does asking for it to be undeleted now serve? -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Coca-Cola is actually a soft drink, the R3 is inactually valid. 2602:306:30AC:C1E0:BC08:FC8E:63A1:2885 (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
I have recreated it. A restore is not really needed! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Film infoboxes

Latest comment: 8 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Both templates were merged into {{Infobox film}} per discussion at TfD, so they really shoud have been kept and redirected as the page histories are non-trivial and required for attribution. -PC78 (talk) 19:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@PC78: Attribution for which pages? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
{{Infobox film}}, where they were merged to, surely? PC78 (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
That page has no recent edits that appear to be copied from the templates. Mayhaps at some earlier point something was copied there? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
This was all back in 2013, the merge discussion resulted in changes being made to the primary template back then. PC78 (talk) 20:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Well, yes, but it doesn't seem like anything was copied to the Infobox film template, according to the history all edits in 2013 seem to be ordinary edits with no attribution-requiring ported-over changes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
PC78 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Actually it looks like most of the code ended up becoming {{Infobox name module}} which is used as a sub-template, hopefully that clears things up a bit? Details of how the merge was carried out are at Template talk:Infobox film/Archive 23. But this all seems rather besides the point: bottom line is that the templates were merged, they have non-trivial history and discussion which is directly linked to the remaining templates and on that basis they should never have been deleted. I'm not sure what else I can say. PC78 (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Generally speaking, attribution is needed for merged text - readable or markup. The merge under discussion there apparently involved additional functionality being added, not text or markup transferred over. It seems like some content from Template:Infobox Korean film and Template:Infobox Chinese film ended up in Template:Infobox name module, though. Thus I'll perform the restore as a protected attribution redirect for that page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, although that seems like a needlessly complicated way of doing things. PC78 (talk) 10:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Game Masters Leagues

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Smiloslavov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smiloslavov (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Bolanle Olukanni

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Adelphine (talk) 19:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Abel Tilahun

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below can someone restore everything at [Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Abel Tilahun]]? I want to add lede sentences to them so they can't be deleted again. -Sulky mulky (talk) 21:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The entire content of this page was Page title - is ... and empty section headers - feel free to recreate if it will be useful for you. — xaosflux Talk 21:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Aaron Banda. There really is no content to "restore" here, there is no objection to anyone creating an article or draft on any of these subjects. Wikipedia:Article Incubator was retired, so I don't expect that resurrecting these page skeletons under that project will have much support. — xaosflux Talk 21:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
I suggest closing this as 'not done', however if any other admin wants to proceed feel free. — xaosflux Talk 00:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I just the original editors to be able to return and not find their stuff deleted. It's clear that just adding a sentence is enough so if like to add those. Sulky mulky (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

  • The user in question that created most of the pages (Michaelphoya) was alerted to at least some of the deletions via his talk page, so he would already be able to find out the reason why the pages were deleted. The same would be said for any of the other people whose pages were deleted. There's really no true value in putting an explanation for the deletion on every single deleted page, especially as these were apparently deleted because they had no content and for all practical purposes had gone stale and been ignored after their creation. All that's going to do is create something new to be deleted at MfD in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm marking this as a   Not done. It looks like this was something done by a WikiProject that appears to be only semi-active, considering that the notification of the MfD discussion was the first activity the talk page has seen since November 2015 - and even then the activity was pretty minor. There was no content worth restoring on the pages and the pages were effectively abandoned, making it relatively unlikely that the article creators would actually return to the pages. Even if they did, the page has a notification on the top saying that the page was deleted via MfD and gives them a link to said discussion, so there's already a notification of sorts at the top of the page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Homeless (record label)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Richieramone, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Richieramone (talk) 01:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Herry Tangiri

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It's a genuine Indian Film Celebrity Page. He is a famous actor, his co-actors have wiki page, he too deserves Wikipedia page. He has done more than 7 films, all famous films. He is a known personality. Please put back his page. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] -Dell7273 (talk) 07:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Herry-Tangri-to-play-Yuvi-in-Sushant-Singhs-MS-Dhoni-biopic/articleshow/50040492.cms
  2. ^ http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/life-style/awarapan-banjarapan-/271556.html
  3. ^ http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/bollywood/herry-tangri-to-play-lead-in-vivek-agnihotri-s-next_150875.html
  4. ^ http://www.cricketcountry.com/news/ms-dhoni-biopic-yuvraj-singhs-role-to-be-played-by-bhaag-milkha-bhaag-actor-362911/
  5. ^ http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/bhaag-milkha-bhaag-actor-to-play-army-captain-in-junooniyat-2825951/
  6. ^ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3822788/
@Dell7273:   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herry Tangiri, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Prodapt

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was deleted as per request from my boss and now he wants it back for verification. Please help me in getting the page back -Debanerjee (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

  Not done. It was deleted several times. The most recent version of the article, deleted in January, contained just one word "Prodapt", so there is no point in restoring it. The previous version, deleted in 2011, was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 (notability) and WP:CSD#G11 (promotion), so it's ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You are free to start over in draft space; see Wikipedia:Articles for creation for details. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_241&oldid=1138664186"