Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 242
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
| Archive 235 | ← | Archive 240 | Archive 241 | Archive 242 | Archive 243 | Archive 244 | Archive 245 |
hrishi wayangankar
that is the article about sport player, which has news paper link also, like other sport player article on wiki and then click the "Save page" button below -Hrishi wayangankar (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)- Also @Hrishi wayangankar: please don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Autobiography for why this is strongly discouraged. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Datagame
Please move to Jayscott74 user space so I may retrieve text and edit it / prepare for more properly cited resubmission -Jayscott74 (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jayscott74/Datagame. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Thomas Darnell
The article about this artist was deleted at AfD about 10 years ago, from what I can see in the logs. The subject is undeniably notable (I have mainstream newspaper and other coverage of him), so I'd like this userfied so that I can work on it. The deleting admin has been inactive on wikipedia for many years. -The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC) The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- The deleted revisions are a copyvio. You can see most of their text here. —Cryptic 03:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, in that case nevermind, I'll just make a new one. Thank you! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 00:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:List of Xbox Demos (North America)
I, AGPunchak, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AGPunchak (talk) 01:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done I've restored it, but I think that this information is far too WP:INDISCRIMINATE for Wikipedia, so I've restored it with the idea that you could take this information and add it to a wiki that focuses on Xbox minutiae. I'll also let the video game WikiProject know in case they know of a good, specific wiki you could add this to. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Zanata_(Software)
I, Dychen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dychen (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Even though this is the second G13 on that draft, it was improved a bit after the last restoration, so....
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~The Dirac Point Electron[edit source]
An example of a point mass graphed on a grid. The grey mass can be simplified to a point mass (the black circle). It becomes practical to represent point mass as small circle, or dot, as an actual point is invisible. The Electron Internal Structure has arguably been the holy grail of Quantum electrodynamics (QED) for a century. It started with Dirac and his postulation of the existence of positron. The electron and positron are created when two .511 Mev photons collide. This process is called Pair Production. This is the mainstream scientific consensus but it has many issues. The Infinite energy to compress a charge to a infinity small point being an obvious issue. Feynman came up with Renormalizationto work around this and other issues that the point model produced but he and Dirac were not happy with the shenanigans. At his Nobel lecture Feynman said "Therefore, I think that the renormalization theory is simply a way to sweep the difficulties of the divergences of electrodynamics under the rug. I am, of course, not sure of that."[1][2]
The Torodial Electron[edit source] Electron Toroidal Model
Torodial Model of an Electron in Momentum Space Composition Photon Photon Torodial/Spinor Strip
Circularly Polarized Photon Ribbon wrapped 720° into a Torodial Partical Composition Photon John Williamson[3][4][5] has done some very interesting work, a form of Relativistic electromagnetism, deriving a model of the electron that seems to be consistent with quantum electrodynamics. There are many Spinor theories for the Electron Internal Structure [6] [7] thought Williamson et. al. have been making rigorous contributions lately; and these will be presented as a likely leading edge on these theories.
Einstein's Last Question was "I would just like to know what an electron is.".[8] This problem also obsessed Feynman and Dirac, as both were unsatisfied with the QED Renormalization technique that Feynman developed to deal with the infinite energy needed to compress an electron charge to a point. Williamson's theory seems to remove the necessity of the existence of Electric charge. The magnetic field of a photon rotating in the toroidal loop presents a Electron magnetic moment that appears like the spin we observe in physics. Similarly, the electric field of the photon rotating in a torodial loop presents an Electric field that appears like that observed around an electron.
In summary, Dr. Williamson work proves that a high energy photon in a torodial loop produces the observable attributes of electron, including it's rest mass and size. These properties of an electron were also derived byhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/273418514_Is_the_electron_a_photon_with_toroidal_topology Leigh Page in 1922 [9] where he derived a complete electromagnetic theory, including Maxwell's equations, from only Coulomb's law and the Lorentz transformation.[10]
Williamson shows that a new Pivot force is produced that rotates the photon into it's torodial trajectory.
References[edit source] Jump up ^ R.P. Feynman, The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics, Nobel Lecture. Science 153,699 (1966), p. 9. Jump up ^ Jagdish Mehra, The Beat of a Different Drum, 1994, Char, 15 p,326 Jump up ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273418514_Is_the_electron_a_photon_with_toroidal_topology Jump up ^ http://ffp14.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/DOCUMENTS/PREPRINTS/WILLIAMSON_John_preprint.pdf Jump up ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281749660_Absolute_relativity_in_classical_electromagnetism_the_quantisation_of_light Jump up ^ http://www.ccaesar.com/eng_structure_of_the_electron.html Jump up ^ http://frankwilczek.com/electronTakeThreeB.pdf Jump up ^ http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/Einstein/Talks/Wolff.pdf Jump up ^ https://archive.org/details/introductiontoel030885mbp An Introduction to Electrodynamics from the Standpoint of Electron Theory], D. Van Nostrand Co., link from Internet Archive Jump up ^ Leigh Page (Jul 1912). "A Derivation of the Fundamental Relations of Electrodynamics from Those of Electrostatics". American Journal of Science. 34: 57–68. doi:10.2475/ajs.s4-34.199.57. Amatulić (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
File:ABC News Australia.png
File was deleted as it breached WP:F5. However, this was only due to the fact that a user removed the image from its only article with no clear reasoning, but it needs to be reinstated as it was used in the infobox to serve as primary means of visual identification for the article's subject. -– Nick Mitchell 98 talk 04:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Tlanders09/Pacific Power Group
I created an article in my user space since I was still drafting. I got a message to submit it in Teahouse for help about editing. And my page was deleted. I obviously didn't cite the works properly, but I would like to edit my cites. I thought it was a draft. Please consider undeleting as I spent a lot of time finding sources. -Tlanders09 (talk) 05:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done It was deleted because it copied text from http://www.pacificpowergroup.com/ and http://www.pacificpowergroup.com/about-us. All our articles must be original writing. You may start again without copying text from websites. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:No Fibs
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Muckadillo (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
FSUU Morelos Gym
The sport hall of the university has a sources in this article -KatorseNiAmang (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done This is up for a proposed deletion and hasn't been deleted yet. KatorseNiAmang, you can contest the PROD and remove it from the past (the only form of deletion where you can do this) but you will need to add sourcing to show where this hall is notable outside of the main university. Most university buildings are not independently notable unless they are considered to be architectural achievements and/or are registered as a historical landmark. The sourcing you currently have in the article cannot establish notability as Facebook is not a WP:RS since it's a social media outlet and press releases are considered WP:PRIMARY. I wasn't sure what the deped.gov.ph site was since it came up as a dead link for me, but this news story isn't about the gym - you need to have coverage that's about the gym in specific as it doesn't automatically inherit notability from the school being notable. The event in the story also doesn't appear to be the type that would help give notability for the venue either - it's fairly rare that an event would do this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- how did you get that (｡◕‿◕｡) thing? What was that for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KatorseNiAmang (talk • contribs) 10:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I saw it at the end of someone's signature and asked if I could use it. You can alter your signature in your preferences section. I can't remember who I took it from to direct you towards them, but if you want to use it feel free. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
kuei kuei
My page is highly credible. my client has multiple reliable sources -LowKeyFame (talk) 09:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done The AfD was closed early after a couple of people pointed out that many of the sources were for a completely separate person, making the article as it was written a complete and total hoax. Not only is this story not about anyone by that name, but it's also far from the award that you tried to claim that it was. It's a news story about some moron shooting himself in the face for Internet fame, something they write on a slow news day. It's not an award in the slightest. Since you seem interested in re-adding this to Wikipedia, I'm going to issue a WP:NOTHERE block for this and another account that edited the article, since that made up their sole edits. Given that the article was most certainly a hoax, I can only assume that they're here to perpetuate said hoax. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note - this account has been found to have abused sockpuppets, so marking this here for the record if/when they try to return. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
ICON Engineering Pty Ltd
I have been working on improving the List_of_oilfield_service_companies. This is an important list. To anyone working in this business area, the list very obviously requires addition of missing companies on the list AND creation of corresponding articles of the missing notable companies. The List is very out of date. Two of us initially saw this problem while investigating heave compensators. We were initially working on the project from the same network and I was accused of creating a 2nd user in the same IP address. This was not true and I have explained this in several talk pages, including the users who I believe deleted the page, but the explanation seems to have been ignored. The page went up for speedy deletion and was then deleted. I did not seem to get the chance to respond / discuss or fix any errors. I'm actually not sure if this should be a deletion review or a request for undeletion, as the two are very closely related. I doub't that the person deleting the page has actually spend time looking at the context of the list from which the page is referenced. So, In short can I have the page undeleted so I can fix whatever edits need to be done to make the content notable, or at least get the contrinution back somehow. Rgds John21rope (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC) -John21rope (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title is correct? Draft:ICON Engineering Pty Ltd still exists, however, and should be where you focus your efforts. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- No jest, a page did exist at ICON Engineering Pty Ltd which was already undeleted by Ritchie333 and moved to Draft:ICON Engineering Pty Ltd in the meantime. So, Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- The original request has some transposed characters. This one works:
- ICON Engineering Pty Ltd · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- ~Amatulić (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Didn't even notice that; my apologies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- No jest, a page did exist at ICON Engineering Pty Ltd which was already undeleted by Ritchie333 and moved to Draft:ICON Engineering Pty Ltd in the meantime. So,
Martella Wines
Deleted via PROD for only having 1 source in 2008. Please userfy. I'd like to work on this article as there appear to be plenty of WP:RS now. -Toddst1 (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done, now at User:Toddst1/Martella Wines. Remember to move the talk page as well when you push it back to mainspace. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Toddst1 (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Savarapu Vijaya Kumar
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Okcygenio (talk) 08:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
We have already provide the reference links that are supporting the claims made in the original article. We sincerely request you to consider these links as they are genuine and dated as per our claim.
Extended content
|
|---|
|
NOTE: Savarapu Vijaya Kumar AND S. Vijaya Kumar are same individuals.
IMAGE/PHOTO SCREENSHOTS OF Savarapu Vijaya Kumar ON VARIOUS NEWSPAPERS ARE AAILABLE BUT COULD NOT BE UPLOADED HERE DUE TO FOLLOWING ERROR "{{autotranslate|base=Abusefilter-warning-baduploads}}" HENCEFORTH INSERTING THE EXTERNAL LINKS WITH IMAGES, KINDLY CONSIDER THE SAME - LINK TO IMAGE FOLDER
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS GENUINE TO BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND HAVE GOT NO ANY KIND OF VOILATIONS. |
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savarapu Vijaya Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Also collapsed the long explanation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Larry Y. Wilson
Deseret News has been established by consensus decision to be a reliable source for information on Church leaders. The lack of that consensus is why the article was deleted in the first place. Aside from being generally significant as a leader in the LDS Church, Wilson now serves as the Executive Director of the Church's temple department, a position which involves participation in every major temple event of the Church. I know there are some who still contend that since the primary sources on his article come from the Deseret News, but the source announcing Wilson's new assignment in the Church didn't come from a source tied to the Church. It came from a Philly newspaper. Please click here to read this news story. I would ask that Larry Y. Wilson's article be restored in light of this new information. In the same breath, I am also requesting the restoration of all articles for general authorities that have before been deleted. The contention for deletion of all of those was that the assignment to serve in the Second Quorum of the Seventy was only temporary, not making them notable enough. But in a recent change of Church practice, there is now no differentiation between those of the First or Second Quorums of the Seventy, and no set tenure length, with each GA Seventy only being released from active service and granted emeritus status at age 70, except in cases where their health necessitates otherwise. This move is why I am requesting that all such articles be restored. Thanks for taking time to read this. I so appreciate the work you do. -Jgstokes (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Y. Wilson, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- This is something you'd have to bring up with Salvio and/or DRV. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Especially given that you're asking for such a large thing - I'd wager that you'd almost certainly have to go through WP:DRV since you're essentially asking for a large amount of pages to be restored, beyond the one that Salvio giuliano deleted at AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I have contacted the editor about this specific article and will start a DRV for the others. Thanks again. --Jgstokes (talk) 09:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
SecurityMetrics
SecurityMetrics is a valuable company to the data security realm, and a leader in data security technology and validation -Msbaxter22 (talk) 15:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecurityMetrics (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:David M. Schwartz
I, Vsheldon94, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vsheldon94 (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Vsheldon94: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Rana Arslan Subhani
Rana Arslan Subhani · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Rana Arslan Subhani is a Pakistani Singer, Naatkhawan, Poet and Lyricist of Punjabi origin. He is best known for his lyrics for the Punjabi singers of Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rana Arslan Subhani (talk • contribs) 15:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- This is a not done for me, as I don't see where this person is ultimately notable enough to pass notability guidelines for entertainers. I'm going to guess that this is the youth himself, but the comments in the third person are a bit concerning. This looks like his only goal for being here is to try to write about this person/himself and there's question as to whether or not he's the person in question, so I think I'm going to issue a WP:NOTHERE block since they don't seem to really be interested in editing anything else and I honestly think that if left unblocked, they'd just try recreating this in other places. It also doesn't help that they're reminding me pretty hard of this sockpuppeteer. I don't think that they're the same person, but they seem to have the same basic goal in the end: to add themselves to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Rana Arslan Subhani (2)
Mistake -Rana Arslan Subhani (talk) 03:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Also, it is very ill-advised to write a page about oneself, generally you won't meet significance criteria. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I figure I'll post it again here for posterity. I'm declining to restore this in any format, as this looks to be a young teenager trying to add himself to Wikipedia after he launched his own music career earlier this year. There's nothing to suggest notability, so I think that any attempts to try to add himself to Wikipedia will be fruitless. I've also blocked him as a WP:NOTHERE account, given that this looks to be his only goal on Wikipedia and he hasn't shown any sign of trying to stop adding himself despite clear signs that the person is non-notable. (And despite a decline on this page only hours earlier.) They also seem to talk about themselves in third person, so it's possible (albeit unlikely) that this is someone else trying to create a page for him. It also doesn't help that he reminds me of a sockpuppeteer that tried claiming similar things. The two accounts look to be unrelated, but it's never good to bear that much similarity in motives to a now blocked sockpuppeteer. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Endeavor (non-profit)
Endeavor is a two decades old non-profit that employs over 300 people worldwide. It is a legitimate NGO that has received recognition from institutions and business leaders worldwide. -71.183.228.18 (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Happy Perez
I, Seif.hussain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Seif.hussain (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. And given that the draft has been rejected a number of time, a fair warning that if it's deleted again chances are it won't be restored. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Drissa Diarrassouba
He played 2 games for Padideh F.C. in Persian Gulf Pro League. (Against Naft Tehran and Saipa.) -Abiii13wp (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drissa Diarrassouba (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lower East Preservation Initiative
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lower East Preservation Initiative · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, RDM999999, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RDM999999 (talk) 22:19, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
electron internal structure
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pete.delaney (talk) 08:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC) The Dirac Point Electron[edit source]
--post of article excised...
- I was resolving issues and clearly working of fixing the issues when my article was deleted. I only didn't delete the request to delete the article. I removed an objection and wrote on my talk page to the author about my working on the issue. I spent a couple hours on the paper this evening and then just before removing the delete request it got deleted. Please restore it so I can continue to address the issues being raised.
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see Electron internal structure. There is no need to post the whole article here. We need independent references that show that others support the theory, but otherwise there should be content about the lack of electron internal structure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Laurent Landi
Page was deleted as expired prod for notability. He meets notability as coach of world/Olympic champion. His gymnast, Madison Kocian, was already a world champion (2014) when this page was deleted in 2015. -—МандичкаYO 😜 08:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Wikimandia: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Sulfurboy (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 08:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith St John
I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keith St John (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Keith St John:
Declined pending further information. This was restored for you after this request in February 2015; but you did almost nothing with it and did not submit it for review, so it was deleted again. When you asked again for restoration here in September 2015 we asked for an assurance that you actually intended to work on it with a view to submitting it, but you did not reply.
.jpg){kind=link}
- As it stands, there are no text and no references, only a skeleton infobox. Before you reply to this, please read:
- Wikipedia:Your first article
- Wikipedia:Notability (people), noting the need for references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources
- Wikipedia:MUSICBIO
- Wikipedia:Autobiography
- The draft will be restored only if you then assure us that you actually intend, in the reasonably near future, to develop it into an article meeting our standards and submit it for review. JohnCD (talk) 19:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Keith St John: Done - following your assurances on my talk page, the page has been restored to a new location at Draft:Keith St John. Please edit it to meet article standards and, when ready, submit it for review by clicking the blue "Submit" button; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Keith St John:
Draft:Time and Date (website)
I would like this draft to be restored and userfied to User:GeoffreyT2000/Time and Date (website). -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Kingjeff/Patrick Weihrauch
It's under my userspace so I could create the article since he met the minimum standard for notability. -Kingjeff (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- So restored. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Safer Living Foundation
Heljane (talk) 12:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Quae ipso usu consumuntur
Page was deleted with the argument it doesn't make sense and is not an asset, yet there are many other similar pages about blurry latim phrases. It was created because there was no explanation and it is used elsewhere. Users should help improve it, not arbitrarily remove it because they don't make sense out of it. -Gianmariot2 (talk) 21:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Mako (duo)
I, XPanettaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Although one tagger reckoned it is better to start from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Alok Bhargava
There seems to have been a misunderstanding as the University of Maryland had reproduced some material from the Wikipedia article about Alok Bhargava. The University has now modified its website. Please reinstate this page that was deleted without discussion. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakunneed (talk • contribs) 19:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Guardians of the Galaxy - Mission, Breakout Concept Art.jpg
- File:Guardians of the Galaxy - Mission, Breakout Concept Art.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File was claimed to have been deleted due to speedy deletion criterion F1, but the file was the original one & the one in use on Guardians of the Galaxy - Mission: Breakout! -Elisfkc (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted by RHaworth. Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done @Elisfkc: Please use to avoid deletion again Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Central Ward (Brisbane City)
All of my facts have been verified from reputable sources such as ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) and are current. Also none of the content is controversial or favouring any political party so therefore, it is just a statement about an electorate. If this article is restored, I will work on it to fit the user who requested deletion's needs. -Laborrules8 (talk) 23:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- The page has not been nominated for deletion (yet) or deleted.
User:Colonel Wilhelm Klink has made a blunder by informing you on your talk page, but not tagging the article.I suggest that you keep adding content to the article, and also include more sources. ———— However I do have a concern about your username that looks as if it is promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I tagged it for speedy deletion as having no content, as, when I found it, it was empty except for the letters "df" (This was the page I tagged, by the way, and it was deleted). Laborrules8, feel free to work on the article; the only reason the original was deleted was because it was empty. If you want to work on an article without worrying about it being deleted, try the draft namespace. Sorry for any trouble. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 14:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry Colonel Wilhelm Klink, the nominated one was Central Ward, City of Brisbane, a different page. That is why I struck my comment, as it was wrong. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I tagged it for speedy deletion as having no content, as, when I found it, it was empty except for the letters "df" (This was the page I tagged, by the way, and it was deleted). Laborrules8, feel free to work on the article; the only reason the original was deleted was because it was empty. If you want to work on an article without worrying about it being deleted, try the draft namespace. Sorry for any trouble. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 14:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- The page has not been nominated for deletion (yet) or deleted.
World Kickboxing Network
The organization plays a significant role for the sport since 1994. I have suggested the undeletion to the admin who deleted it, however he is presumably based on the personal opinion with a little knowledge of the particular industry, rather than on the provided facts in references. The following link points to the request made on his talk page World Kickboxing Network Thank you. -Parviziskender (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
17 August 1779
I created this article yesterday as a little stub that I could expand later, but today someone tagged it as a copyright violation and it got deleted in under ten minutes, before I could say or explain anything. So here the explanation: that material is NOT a copyright violation, I based it on the content at HMS Ardent (1764) and its sources that are on Wikipedia long before the publication of the journal they said I copied it from. Actually if they made any research before accusing me they would see that the writer had copied almost all the Ardent article and published as his. I sourced it and gave proper attribution so no one can accuse me of plagiarism, so please restore it so I can continue to expand it. Thanks -Nick 264 (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed the restore link and pinging Hut 8.5 who has already been asked on their talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've restored the article, added attribution, and added a note asking the creator to do so in future per WP:CWW and the CC-BY-SA licence. Hut 8.5 20:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Color of Your Life (cover art).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Image became not used on Color of Your Life because of this bad edit that is now reverted -KylieTastic (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Done. I sometimes wonder if such deletions merit an automatic warning by the User:ImageRemovalBot, i.e if it removes a file that was deleted under F5 it puts a warning somewhere. Probably not too common (Carnildo?) but such a double check may be worthwhile. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's a rare event, but it's also something the bot should be able to spot. I'll see about adding a check to the bot's routine -- do you have any suggestions about where it should put the notification? --Carnildo (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- My personal recommendation (probably needs a WP:BRFA) would be to post it here at WP:REFUND. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's a rare event, but it's also something the bot should be able to spot. I'll see about adding a check to the bot's routine -- do you have any suggestions about where it should put the notification? --Carnildo (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Nightgaladeld's United States of America
I believe it was deleted as an accident, since the page means a lot to over 130,000 people. -Samil11224 (talk) 20:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Samil11224, the page was deleted per user request since you created a blank page and there was no substantial content when the page was marked as G7. You did add some content a little bit later, but I'm concerned that the group isn't notable enough for an entry on Wikipedia. In other words, even though it looks like you weren't requesting deletion I'm not so certain that it didn't qualify for another speedy deletion category, WP:A7 - no assertion of notability. Can you give us any sort of sourcing to show that this group is notable enough for an article? Just existing as a group isn't enough - can you show where the group has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles? The reason here is that even if I did restore the article I'm afraid that it would still be at risk of getting quickly deleted again shortly after. It might not be that Wikipedia is the best place for this, to be honest. I'd more recommend that you look into starting a wiki on Wikia or similar, as they're more permissive with their content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
priscilla corner
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Soumen491 (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC) respected sir nyttend the page u put PROD on ground of still nothing actually confirming her own independent notability.but me as soumen 491 was her client and we did many photoshoots.i personally gurantee it she public figure and i can gurantee her notability
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've restored this, but I must warn you that it's still possible that SwisterTwister (or another user) could seek further deletion if they so chose. You need to provide more sourcing to show her notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Sithu Aye
That artist is widely renown and is featured in several online magazines: It Djents, Djent Mag, Sputnik Music. He recently toured with Intervals and Plini, who are massive prog artists and he is not less renown. He is regarded as one of the most talented musicians lately. I have contested a A7 deletion with links to renown online magazines, but it was rejected, as the person said it is a self-promotion and most definitely it is not. http://www.sputnikmusic.com/bands/Sithu-Aye/34429/ http://www.mondaq.com/x/488494/new+technology/A+Day+In+The+Life+Of+Sithu+Aye Ultimate Guitar : https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/upcoming_releases/today_in_young_guitar_heroes_sithu_aye_and_plini_join_forces_on_spiral_jazzy_explosion.html?no_takeover-Kaziqta (talk) 18:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- None of those sources are usable. The first one is a profile likely written by Mr. Aye, the second one is unambiguously written by him, and the third is a blog. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- See discussion on my talk page. I directed Kaziqta here, musicians is not really my thing. If anybody here feels that there's a convincing case, I don't object to undeletion. --Randykitty (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like he did get some staff reviews from Sputnik (Cassini, Invent the Universe), which are usable to show notability, although of course user reviews and just a profile page on Sputnik would not. This is enough to overturn the A7, although the overall notability is still somewhat in question. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- This is a Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. since Randykitty has given permission, however overall notability will still need to be proven - reviews from one website will not be enough to pass ENTERTAINER. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Umar_Daud_Khattak
I, 180.94.84.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 180.94.84.218 (talk) 14:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done history restored, for older version see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Umar_Daud_Khattak&oldid=730318632 or click the history tab. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Hervé Larren
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Swell.mason (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note that we do not do "official" pages, and that if you work for Mr. Larren you must disclose this on your userpage somewhere. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Restore is not needed. You moved the page to Wikipedia:Hervé Larren and then blanked it. But the current draft is nearly exactly the same anyway. So just keep on with the current draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Asian Institute of Diplomacy and International Affairs (AIDIA)
- Asian Institute of Diplomacy and International Affairs (AIDIA) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I will work more for the referncing of that article and then click the "Save page" button below -Sameeraayam (talk) 10:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done This was speedy deleted as WP:G11, Unambiguous advertising or promotion, and WP:G12, Unambiguous copyright infringement. Wikipedia will not restore copyrighted content at all. The page was also fairly promotional, likely a result of using copyrighted material, so it'd require an almost complete re-write to meet guidelines. I'd actually recommend that you work on a copy at WP:AfC, since I have a feeling that you might have a conflict of interest here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Henry Doughty
I, Misterdoughty, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Misterdoughty (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:George Henry Doughty Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
DhavalAmin001 request
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) DhavalAmin001 (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:NavGujarat College Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Linda Ann Loo
I am hoping to work on this to make it notable as possible. -Pyrusca (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Corn Kitchen
To be archived for Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Also, do not forget a HISTMERGE from the April 10, 2011 article. -2601:584:202:200:68D9:509A:BE18:96E0 (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done There is a qualification to appear on this list: "it evaded detection for more than one month or was discussed by reliable sources in the media". So how is Corn Kitchen eligible? It was deleted 7 minutes after creation. Also I don't know what you mean about the April 10, 2011 article, which is now a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:FundedHere
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 42.61.208.26 (talk) 02:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" see Draft:FundedHereGraeme Bartlett (talk) 08:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Terminalfour
Would like it userfied so improvements can be made -Ptintori (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Would it be possible for the article be userfied so that improvements can be made based on the feedback provided by others. Thank you.
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I believe you can move it to userspace yourself. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Georg Kraus
I, Wynton1989, request the undeletion of the article "Georg Kraus" for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the article as I intend to work to improve it. Thank you. Wynton1989 (talk) 11:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Wynton1989: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Kraus, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kudpung (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- This page has been deleted a total of three times. The most recent deletion was on August 16, 2016 by Hut 8.5 as G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Kraus. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Yvonna Sessions Lincoln
I, Glennallenphillips, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Glennallenphillips (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Glennallenphillips: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Templates in my userspace
Also requesting undeletion of User:Pppery/t, User:Pppery/s, and User:Pppery/w. These CFDS-related templates in my userspace are needed again as the article whose categories I was speedy renaming was moved -Pppery (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Tokyogirl79: I wanted User:Pppery/m undeleted too. Pppery (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done, sorry about that! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Pppery/m
Missed a template in my previous request -Pppery (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Pppery: Already Done by Tokyogirl7. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)