Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 243
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 240 | Archive 241 | Archive 242 | Archive 243 | Archive 244 | Archive 245 | → | Archive 250 |
User:Alenarcic/All star wings and ribs flavours
I, Alenarcic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alenarcic (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:David Clifford Johnston-Bell (G13: Abandoned AfC submission
I, 128.184.132.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 128.184.132.83 (talk) 23:44, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Anil Laul
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anil Laul · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
2405:204:3201:EDB8:A416:493A:335E:E330 (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Anil Laul. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Ronny Wechselberger
The page happened to be about a racer who in fact broke Michael Schumacher's records in the Formula König Championship. The racer in question was also a multiple Guinness World Record holder of considerable repute. I can understand that the links to official websites were probably not needed, and so suggest that these links be deleted. But deleting the page, about a genuinely talented racer, who has valid accomplishments, two world championship titles and several Guinness World Records, makes no sense. -91.66.190.62 (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- In this case you should ask User:Y to restore, as Y deleted it. If there is no response then ask again here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Tom Haverford.jpg
Image broken by good faith edit on Tom Haverford now reverted -KylieTastic (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter
I, Willermoz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Willermoz (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
I have been jumping through the hurdles and returning to edit each time a Wiki editor/admin challenges the notoriety of the subject. I have provided sources and even procured a full magazine from NYU Library flat files. I have uploaded photos as well. This is an ongoing effort to document the life of a State Department employee, Special Forces soldier and Academic who was not only a prisoner of war but was an undercover operative involved in US Govt operations to undermine Che Guevara as well as operations in Florence, Italy. He was a close friend of William F. Buckley Jr. as well as Pedro Juan Labarthe, the Poet Laureate of Puerto Rico featured in Time Magazine. -Willermoz (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done Willermoz, I've restored this again since you did work on it after the last G13 restore. The thing to keep in mind here is that being active as a state employee, soldier, and academic is not automatically notable in and of itself. This is especially so if part of his work was done undercover, since this means that there might not be much coverage of him if the government isn't willing to cough up the details and Hunter himself was mum on the subject. The biggest problem that I could see as far as the prior declines go is that you don't have much on the article that actually goes into depth about Hunter (apparently some of it didn't even mention him) and was written in an independent and reliable source. You need to be very careful with sourcing, especially with self-published blog sources since these will need to be verifiable in some form or fashion. In this instance you have one of the sources posting a journal article which is OK to a degree, but I also note that Hunter is only briefly mentioned in the article as the president of an organization. Be careful, as holding office in an organization does not automatically grant notability - in most cases it does not and if this is one of the only features that has coverage then odds are that any article on Hunter would redirect to the organization's page unless you could show where he's independently notable. The same thing goes for most political office appointments - generally speaking it's only elected offices on the state level and above that would give notability. Beyond that some appointments do give notability, but they're very few and far between and would have to be top offices on the national level. Few of the other ones can be verified, but offhand I see that one is a routine database entry for one of his books, which won't give notability. Another one (which I can't verify) says that it's a directory - these don't always give notability because many directories of this nature are either written by the person themselves (or someone representing them, meaning they're WP:PRIMARY), the directory itself is part of an organization of which the person is a member, which would also make it primary, or the entry is so brief that it wouldn't be seen as more than a WP:TRIVIAL source. This is why this needs to be verifiable in some form or fashion. I'll repost this on the draft to make sure that you see this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 23:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Also be aware that notability is not inherited by Hunter being affiliated or friends with notable persons. (WP:NOTINHERITED) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 23:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Jesse & Julie Rasch Foundation
I, Arizonavegan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arizonavegan (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Arizonavegan: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Read Wikipedia:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Edwin Yeo Chee Hui
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aquasky78 (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia,
I think there has been a mistake made with the speedy deletion of the article "Edwin Yeo Chee Hui" as the issues raised previously have been resolved.
As such, I seek your kind understanding to restore this page.
Thank you.
- We do not link to, let alone cite, Facebook or random YouTube videos (we cite YouTube videos only when they are uploaded by professional news outlets), and we do not cite LinkedIn, blogs, or organisations/pieces that the subject has been involved in. The page seems less like an encyclopædia article and more like a résumé. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- editor has been blocked as an advertising-only account. DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done User has been blocked and the page was deleted as promotional, so there's no reason to keep this request open. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Eric Khoo Heng-Pheng.jpg
subject died two years ago, I can make a case for use that wasn't available when he was alive -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done Please provide permission or fair use rationale. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, will do!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett please check if I did it right, thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Continuing at User talk:Kintetsubuffalo Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Regina Nemni
I, Reginanemni, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reginanemni (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Please read WP:Autobiography if you're considering writing it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Dual language نطيطات للبيع
i will continue adding to the article and then click the "Save page" button below -Bassam tamour (talk) 05:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've moved this to the draftspace so you can have more time to work on it. Offhand though, I have to caution you that if this is something very new you will have to show where it's notable per coverage in independent RS, as things are not notable because they exist. I'm also curious as to how this is different from someone being bilingual. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- See Draft:Dual language نطيطات للبيع
- Ps mixing left to right and right to left characters together in a title is not a good idea! (It took me a while to link this) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- See Draft:Dual language نطيطات للبيع
- One thing I noted after moving it was that there's already a dual language article and I'm not entirely sure what they want to do with this new article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe
I am interested in improving on this writeup to highlight reliable sources and contributions of the subject -Ebubay01 (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Nakon (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Crestron Electronics
This is a major electronics company that employs roughly 5000 people globally. Unsure why the page was deleted entirely, it is definitely a significant enough company to warrant a Wikipedia entry. -98.109.32.143 (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Plini
Hi can you please restore Plini https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/ug_news/ug_awards_2015_top_12_guitarists_of_the_year.html - critial acclaim, ranked 8th in 2015 by Ultimate Guitar, that is the biggest guitarist website -Kaziqta (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plini, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. This page has been repeatedly recreated improperly afterwards. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:International Fall Workshops on Geometry and Physics
- Draft:International Fall Workshops on Geometry and Physics · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Iberian15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Iberian15 (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Syed Aawaiz
please most humble request don`t delete my page it`s takes alot time and I think it gives more fame to Syed Muhammad Aawaiz as you can read at full wiki of Syed Aawaiz and Syed will achieve his goal. thanks please accept it and don`t delete it Syed do great struggle in his playing age. please focus on it and publish it on wikipedia please please.. and then click the "Save page" button below -Syed Aawaiz (talk) 11:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- The page isn't deleted yet. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's deleted now. And it won't be restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Nicole London
This article was deleted during a mass removal because the original page creator was later blocked. The article met WP:NTENNIS. Is it possible to have the page restored or userfied into my userspace? Thanks. -Scottyoak2 (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging Ponyo since they were the deleting admin. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Scottyoak2, as long as Ponyo is OK with it then it could be restored. However since this was deleted because of sockpuppetry you'd really have to make sure that they would be fine with this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Tokyogirl79, thank you for your note. I also just saw your query on this project's talk page, and I hadn't considered that the original creator's information would become visible. Given that, I'd like to cancel my request to restore the G5'd article. I will recreate from scratch. Thanks again for helping me. Scottyoak2 (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Tokyogirl79 and Scottyoak2: In this specific case the editor in question is a sock of a prolific copyright violator, so it would be safest to recreate the material from scratch.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for checking, Ponyo. I will recreate the article. Scottyoak2 (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's no problem - it's something that honestly, isn't covered in the section above and it's something that could be controversial. Until fairly recently I hadn't really known about asking the deleting admin myself - I hadn't really thought about it and it's not something that would seem immediately obvious, so it'd be reasonable to have in the lead here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Edwin Van Os
I, Julie kitchen99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Julie kitchen99 (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" history restored, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Edwin_Van_Os&oldid=673657666 and earlier. I did not restore copyvio. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Saar Kashyap
Article is about Saar Kashyap, an actor who is currently roped into Life OK's Show Naagarjuna – Ek Yoddha, an Indian Television series. Reliable References are provided. References include articles from one of India's leading news paper / Channels, Times of India, ABP Live and DNAIndia. -Robert Antony 21:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done There is a page there so history merge has occurred. See for earlier version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Munir John Randhawa Advocate
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Johnjoefrazer (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Munir John Randhawa Advocate born in 1943 in Sahiwal,Punjab, Pakistan
- Johnjoefrazer There is no page with that title. What is the correct title? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- If you are talking about this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Randhawa&type=revision&diff=735735014&oldid=734838394 , please be aware that the practice of most lists of family names in Wikipedia, is to only include entries that have articles already written. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Common concerns over mass surveillance
I, Fixuture, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fixuture (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Zanata (Software)
I, Dychen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dychen (talk) 02:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:IT Ireland BR
I, Douglasdeodato, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Douglasdeodato (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Douglasdeodato: Not done. I see two problems with this:
- It is in Portuguese, and would be better in the Portuguese Wikipedia than here;
- More seriously, it does not seem to be suitable for Wikipedia at all: it is not an encyclopedia article, more a discussion forum for Brazilians in Ireland. Wikipedia is not a web host for activities not connected with the encyclopedia. Something like this would be better hosted on Wikia, or a social-networking site like Facebook; or you may get some ideas from Wikipedia:Alternative outlets.
- JohnCD (talk) 13:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mystifly
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mystifly · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Dipps13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dipps13 (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Dipps13: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Mystifly. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Billie Melman
I, OdedFire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. OdedFire (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note to admins: this page was actually deleted under G12 (copyvio). Joe Roe (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There were older revisions that were deleted under G13, so I've restored these. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Dev_(Leader)
This page is about a Real Leader of Farmer in Nepal. he works as volunteer in Farmers societies to develop farm and farmers -Dev4U (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- In this case you should ask @Deor: who deleted the page. There must be a claim of importance. I am confused by reading the writing, but being a volunteer or a leader in itself would not be a claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just stop writing an article about yourself even if you are the President! Remember Jimbo didn't write his own article. We have some policies we follow! VarunFEB2003 I am Offline 18:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Mythdon
Not sure this is the right place. But my userpage has been deleted and recreated numerous times over the course of its existence (and non-existance). I'm trying to draft what will be the contents of my new userpage (right now it redirects to my talk page), and a restoration of its page history in its entirety may be necessary to the production of my new userpage. —Mythdon 19:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mythdon indicates that you did once want to delete part of its history. Are there specific bits you want restored? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just go ahead and restore the entire history. That request was made during a time which I was overly concerned with trivialities, and is not something that absolutely cannot be viewed via page history. —Mythdon 19:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Mythdon: Done. The history of your user page has been restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just go ahead and restore the entire history. That request was made during a time which I was overly concerned with trivialities, and is not something that absolutely cannot be viewed via page history. —Mythdon 19:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
toarch page deletion
Can I request OC back so I can build the page up again before making it live again. Still learning so please don't be hating. Much love Jamiewazere (talk) 04:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done @Jamiewazere: There wasn't really anything worth restoring. The first page had content that looked like it was at worst vandalism and at best joke material. The second was just a link to an Instagram account. When writing content on here you have to use a serious tone. Stuff that's written in a tongue-in-cheek fashion is seen as vandalism on here, which is why the first version was deleted. The second one was just a link to an outside page, which isn't seen as substantial content. It looks like you were trying to write about a street artist, so I do have to warn you that artists are not automatically notable on Wikipedia. You have to show where their work has been covered in independent and reliable sources (WP:RS) and/or where their work has been displayed in a major art institution or museum per WP:CREATIVE. This can be fairly difficult to do, honestly, but especially for street artists since they typically don't get the type of recognition that their more "serious" counterparts might get. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- My recommendation is to work on a copy at WP:AfC, since that'd give you a bit more time to work on things, as an entry on someone that doesn't meet guidelines (or has other issues) will be very likely to get speedied, as you've found out. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
AES International
I am requesting this page be undeleted please, I wish to update the content it was deleted some time again and I now have more substance to add. -Elysiumgate (talk) 15:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Elysiumgate: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AES International, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Guerillero (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Jean Claude Billmaier
I, 207.41.188.211, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 207.41.188.211 (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Competitive Sniping
--Prisencolin (talk) 04:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC) -Prisencolin (talk) 04:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:The Magic Faraway Tree, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore.png
- File:The Magic Faraway Tree, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We received a valid permission, see ticket:2015073010004989 -Jcb (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @JCB: Done, please add the OTRS tag though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Should be @Jcb:. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:The Good Earth, Ulsoor, Bangalore.jpg
We received a valid permission, see ticket:2015073010004989 -Jcb (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Done, please add the OTRS tag though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Bruno Carlucci
looking to restore the page that isn't vandalism -Prisencolin (talk) 04:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Is there anything about that page that is worth restoring? I don't think so. @MusikAnimal, East718, and Smalljim:? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
User:GeneralJayko/sandbox
I, GeneralJayko, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GeneralJayko (talk) 23:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:UK Shaolin Temple
Due to unexpected circumstances the page as has not been maintained but we are in a position to do so now. -88.105.20.102 (talk) 22:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Duck Chart
(no text provided) Trhave (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Rareware classic.png
The original uploader of the logo file when it was a GIF has challenged the rationale behind the former logo's removal from the Rare (company) article. I agree with them that this historic logo has a place in the article, alongside commentary. -Cloudbound (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Historic logos tend to be brought up and deleted at FFD for violating WP:NFCC#8. You'll have to give a good rationale and discussion in the article for such a logo to stay. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I would have done but it was deleted over 5 years ago. Cloudbound (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am the original uploader mentioned. I do not personally believe use of the historical logo violates NFCC#8, but you say such content tends to be deleted on those grounds - on that note, is there a resource for explaining potentially ambiguous terms in this policy, such as "significantly increase readers' understanding", in greater detail? --79.75.136.194 (talk) 23:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- WP:NFCI is a list of uses which are normally OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:View of garden at The Magic Faraway Tree, South Bangalore.jpg
- File:View of garden at The Magic Faraway Tree, South Bangalore.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We received a valid permission, see ticket:2015073010004989 -Jcb (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Done, should the older revision be undeleted as well? Also, please remember to add the OTRS tag. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I think you can undelete it, this is no longer under a Fair Use claim. Jcb (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well, does the permission statement apply regardless of file size? I've seen some permissions which only applied to lowe resolution files. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The permission does not mention a file size. Also a CC license cannot be restricted to one specific file size. Jcb (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, that is done as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The permission does not mention a file size. Also a CC license cannot be restricted to one specific file size. Jcb (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well, does the permission statement apply regardless of file size? I've seen some permissions which only applied to lowe resolution files. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I think you can undelete it, this is no longer under a Fair Use claim. Jcb (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Windmills of Your Mind, Whitefield, Bangalore.png
- File:Windmills of Your Mind, Whitefield, Bangalore.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
We received a valid permission, see ticket:2015073010004989 -Jcb (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Done, please add the OTRS tag though. Should the older file revision be undeleted as well? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I think you can undelete it, this is no longer under a Fair Use claim. Jcb (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well, does the permission statement apply regardless of file size? I've seen some permissions which only applied to lowe resolution files. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The permission does not mention a file size. Also a CC license cannot be restricted to one specific file size. Jcb (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, that is done as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- The permission does not mention a file size. Also a CC license cannot be restricted to one specific file size. Jcb (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Well, does the permission statement apply regardless of file size? I've seen some permissions which only applied to lowe resolution files. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- I think you can undelete it, this is no longer under a Fair Use claim. Jcb (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
NCERT Text Book Solutions - Class VII Geography
This article is supposed to contain the NCERT solutions for class VII Geography text book. In the preface, I had given some information about NCERT which was extracted from NCERT page. I will change that altogether so that there isn't any duplication and this article will be focussed on the solution to the questions in NCERT text book -Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done I agree that the speedy deletion reason is invalid. However the page is obviously not intended to be an encyclopedia entry, and its scope suggests that it will also be a copyright violation. A partner site, Wikiversity may welcome such contributions however. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Greame,
Can I request you to remove the deletion and keep the page active for 1 day. This will help me in picking up the Questions and Answers for this subject, on which I had worked very hard and it will save my time. I will login to Wikiversity and ensure to update (create if unavailable) the solutions for these. Best Regards, Vikram Maingi Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
NCERT Text Book Solutions - Class VII Civics
This article is supposed to contain the NCERT solutions for class VII Civics. In the preface, I had given some information about NCERT which was extracted from NCERT page. I will change that altogether so that there isn't any duplication and this article will be focussed on the solution to the questions in NCERT text book -Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done I agree that the speedy deletion reason is invalid. However the page is obviously not intended to be an encyclopedia entry, and its scope suggests that it will also be a copyright violation. A partner site, Wikiversity may welcome such contributions however. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Greame,
Can I request you to remove the deletion and keep the page active for 1 day. This will help me in picking up the Questions and Answers for this subject, on which I had worked very hard and it will save my time. I will login to Wikiversity and ensure to update (create if unavailable) the solutions for these. Best Regards, Vikram Maingi Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
NCERT Text Book Solutions - Class VII History
This article is supposed to contain the NCERT solutions for class VII History text book. In the preface, I had given some information about NCERT which was extracted from NCERT page. I will change that altogether so that there isn't any duplication and this article will be focussed on the solution to the questions in NCERT text book -Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done I agree that the speedy deletion reason is invalid. However the page is obviously not intended to be an encyclopedia entry, and its scope suggests that it will also be a copyright violation. A partner site, Wikiversity may welcome such contributions however. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Greame,
Can I request you to remove the deletion and keep the page active for 1 day. This will help me in picking up the Questions and Answers for this subject, on which I had worked very hard and it will save my time. I will login to Wikiversity and ensure to update (create if unavailable) the solutions for these. Best Regards, Vikram Maingi Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Marius Toma
He received Meritul Sportiv Medal from Romania's President Traian Băsescu, as it can be seen here, on page 3. As of WP:ANYBIO, I think it fulfils the folowing criteria: „The person has received a well-known and significant award”. Meritul Sportiv is the highest achievment a sportsman can get from the Romanian state. -Ionutzmovie (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cyberbuddies Ltd. The First Onsite Web Development Company
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cyberbuddies Ltd. The First Onsite Web Development Company · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Idowuolayiwola, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Idowuolayiwola (talk) 13:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Robotics Creation Matters
I, 66.155.104.61, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.155.104.61 (talk) 03:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Right now, it reads very much like an essay so I'd like to see that rectified. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Juven
I have absolutely no clue what this article's content was prior deletion; I intend to create an article on a commercial product with this title using content from beta-Hydroxy beta-methylbutyric acid#Medical. Given that this was an advert article (as noted in the deletion log), I'd like to have the deleted content restored and userfied to User:Seppi333/Juven so that I can see if there is anything relevant to the product from the linked article that is worth salvaging and using when I recreate an article with this title. Thanks -Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 03:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done The text looks copied to me, and indeed it matches http://web.archive.org/web/20070418143742/http://www.prosure.com:80/Juven/FAQ.asp?ItemID=1 almost entirely. Fairly likely that it isn't a backwardscopy seeing as http://web.archive.org/web/20050412094900/http://www.prosure.com/Juven/FAQ.asp?ItemID=1 while not identical is very similar to the late website text. You'll have to use that link, not that I'd expect such a link to be acceptable in a FA. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- If it's a copyvio then it's best that it stay deleted. Thanks for the link; I'm not sure I'd use that as a source though. I only intended to use the content for the Juven article, not the one on the chemical that I linked above. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 10:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Johannes Eggestein
Now passes notability guidelines having made professionals debuts in 3. Liga and DFB-Pokal. -Robby.is.on (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Eggestein (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually did read about the procedures but I found it quite confusing so I ended up here. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Armani Versace
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Quanfrank (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
reliable sources and relevant to social media
- @Quanfrank: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armani Versace, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people), especially the section WP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Mohammed Saeed Dergham
Sources are avialable: www.aliqtisadi.com/شخصيات /محمد -درغام -Msdergham (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7 and G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:ArrayExpress
I, Spiderplant pro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spiderplant pro (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
CART:1995 cars by season
it needs more development -92.21.243.212 (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- I cannot see such an article, but we do have one called 1995 PPG Indy Car World Series. Which is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Fête (mobile app)
Article was totally objective and based on secondary sources available to the public. App is notable because it actually was the first event invitation app to use text messaging as an rsvp medium, and also the first to have full functionality and feature access across mobile and sms platforms. Sources included well known and regarded publications, and were not produced by company itself -Sonnybynight (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Medalion Rahimi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bwangc (talk) 01:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Original post was deleted due to lack of references.
- IMDb, like all other wikis, isn't a reliable source. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
References & Notes
1. Medalion Rahimi cast in "Still Star-Crossed" for ABC. [1] 2. Medalion Rahimi guest star in "The Catch". [2] 3. Medalion Rahimi "Before I Fall" gets April 2017 wide release in theaters. [3] 4. Medalion Rahimi biography and filmography. [4]
- ^ http://deadline.com/2016/03/kevin-zegers-abc-pilot-notorious-medalion-rahimi-still-star-crossed-1201720716/
- ^ http://www.thewrap.com/the-catch-casts-medalion-rahimi-in-recurring-role/
- ^ http://deadline.com/2016/07/before-i-fall-release-date-from-open-road-films-1201792939/
- ^ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4279413/
Cascade Mountain (ski area)
The page was deleted for an advertisement, which is fair. However, I find the statistics useful. If undeleted, I can edit the page to be more factual and still include the stats. (link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascade_Mountain_(ski_area) -Stsievert (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Stsievert: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have also gutted it, removing all the spam (which I suspect to be copyvio, but as the website isn't answering I couldn't check), and some unencyclopedic detail about opening hours. If it's to be kept, it needs references other than its own website. JohnCD (talk)
Omer Farooq
I am a huge fan of this person who is an actor and I couldn't find him on Wikipedia so I decided to make a page for him, he is very famous in my Country Pakistan and people need to have a way to find information about him, like myself -Pasha9991 (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. See WP:NACTOR for actor notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, and see Wikipedia:Golden rule to get an idea of what is expected of an article before it is accepted. The fact that it was already deleted as a result of a previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Farooq disqualifies the article from being restored. Please work on Draft:Omer Farooq instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
NCERT Text Book Solutions
This article is supposed to contain the links to the solution of various NCERT text books from class VI to class XII. In the preface, I had given some information about NCERT which was extracted from NCERT page. I will change that altogether so that there isn't any duplication and this article will be focussed on the links to the pages containing the solution to the questions in various NCERT text book from class VI to XII -Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Declined. First of all Wikipedia is not a directory of external links and should not be used for that purpose. Secondly, Wikipedia is not a "how-to" guide and doesn't need to link to solutions to questions. Third, Wikipedia:Notability requires that a stand-alone article be about subjects that have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I am not seeing how this article as you envision it would be compliant with those two policies. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Draft:DeZign for Databases
I, GerardB1968, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GerardB1968 (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- @GerardB1968: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
bugsbin
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bugsbin (talk) 17:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning websites will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Power Rangers Ninja Steel
Not sure if this is entirely the proper venue for such requests as this. I understand this page was deleted multiple times due to it being a creation by a banned user, that noting the notes within the deletion logs, must be the reason this page is protected from re-creation. I attempted to re-create this page, only as a redirect to Power Rangers, because its been confirmed that Power Rangers Ninja Steel exists (or will since it hasn't premiered yet), but doesn't have enough information to justify its own article just yet, but would serve as a useful redirect for the time being if one were to search "Power Rangers Ninja Steel" within their search box. That being said, don't restore any of the revisions, but could an administrator re-create this page to redirect to the main Power Rangers article, and then re-protect the redirect from further editing until a time comes when new information circulates when there'll be enough content to justify its own article? -—Mythdon 08:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am inclined to grant this request. MelanieN? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that, since there is now sourced information at the main article, it would make sense to create and protect this redirect, and Power Rangers: Ninja Steel (with colon) as well. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Should be noted that most of the deleted versions were simply redirects to Power Rangers. —Cryptic 09:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Aye, they kept being restored by a block evader. A request made by a non-sockmaster is more reasonable to follow. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think recreating it as a redirect would be fine. When you say "protection", are you talking about full protection - to keep the redirect from being expanded until an admin agrees it is time? Or do you think semi-protection would be sufficient? I incline toward full protection for now. --MelanieN (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've recreated it as a redirect and fully protected it to prevent more footwear from showing up. One year protection since the work will debut then, and a look at Power Rangers indicate an article will be justified then. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- ...and I have done the same for Power Rangers: Ninja Steel (with colon). JohnCD (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've recreated it as a redirect and fully protected it to prevent more footwear from showing up. One year protection since the work will debut then, and a look at Power Rangers indicate an article will be justified then. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think recreating it as a redirect would be fine. When you say "protection", are you talking about full protection - to keep the redirect from being expanded until an admin agrees it is time? Or do you think semi-protection would be sufficient? I incline toward full protection for now. --MelanieN (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Aye, they kept being restored by a block evader. A request made by a non-sockmaster is more reasonable to follow. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Fannin Innovation Studio
The concerns about notability had been adequately addressed by other editors with new references. If more references are needed, there are plenty more in unbiased media publications which can be included. Since page was deleted without any prior flag or warning, assuming this is an error. -216.136.62.130 (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user David Gerard (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. The problem with the article was the spammy tone, not the sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- The editor has contacted me, though it was indeed deleted as clearly promotional. If there really is good reason for a Wikipedia article, I suggest a version that meets the highest standards of WP:RS and WP:CORP be created at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and quite definitely have acerbic Wikipedian eyes look over it with helpful suggestions before it goes live - David Gerard (talk) 22:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)