Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Assessment/Archives

This page houses archived assessment requests. Please do not edit the entries.


2009

edit
  • I would have to say that while it could probably pass as a bad Start, it should probably be labeled a Stub. There are some sources, but things are just not arranged very well. I gleaned very little meaningful information about the story from that article. --TorsodogTalk 14:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Finished with some final tweaks. Does it qualify for B-class? bamse (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article is a good article now. bamse (talk) 03:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010

edit
  • Greeeen - I am requesting an importance level assessment. An editor recently changed the importance from Low to Mid, and while I don't believe it quite meets mid-importance, I'd like another opinion. Sorafune +1 18:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Assessed as "C" and "Low"
  • Foujita - please give this an importance level assessment. Much work needs still to go into the article - bu tthe importance of Foujita as a leading memeber of the Schoolof Paris and Japan's most successful artist in the Western style should not go unrecognised. His influence on other artists such as Mogdiliani and Picasso is recognised (although not in the srticle) by notable sources. I would consider this to be an 'important' subject - and will try to put more time into it over the coming months Kunchan (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011

edit

2012

edit
Still C-class, for lack of in-line citations. There are huge portions of un-referenced material. Boneyard90 (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013

edit

2014

edit
  • Funkist - This article is translated directly from Wikipedia Japan. So some user have put some notability but are not enought to qualify as good content article. I really want to make this article at least for B-class. SNN95 (talk) 00:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article is definitely still a Start-class. It has a summary in the form of a bullet-list, instead of full-text description, lacks sources, and supporting materials. - Boneyard90 (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2018

edit

2019

edit

2020

edit
  • Takamagahara - I added a lot of new paragraphs and relevant images. Also, I gathered great amount of academic articles as references; I tried my best to collect sources written in English but some of them are in Japanese. The stub had only a few sentences before my edit, so I would deeply appreciate it if someone could reassess the stub and see what class it is currently in. Thank you very much for your help and corrections! Wiki3689 (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mizuage - I've tried my best to improve this article, and though it's only got five sources, I think I've lifted it above start-class now. I've included some relevant inline citations to back up certain important points (this being an article about a tetchy subject related to historical sex work), and one blockquote which I feel serves well to drive the point of the article home - also well-served by being a first-hand account of the article's subject and discussing the changes that have taken place in the karyukai since WW2 in relation to mizuage.
    I'm unfamiliar with article assessment and don't truly know what someone else would put this article down as, so I'd really appreciate some input. Thank you! --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wagakukodansho - Quite unfamiliar about how assessment work. I was just starting to work on the article and it got put into a Draft:Wagakukodansho to incubate for lack of reference before I even had time to put any efforts in it (it was a single sentence at the time). Anyway, I did spend some time after that to make it as readable as possible, it's probably even more referenced than the Japanese wiki article now. I'd really like an external opinion/review about it as it is a first starting point for some further input on Education during Edo period. I am not sure if the format for Japanese is correctly used. Thanks for your help and corrections.Tensaibuta (talk) 13:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021

edit
Assessed "B Class"JKVeganAbroad (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Was assessed as B class on 27 January 2021 with this edit and the edit after that  theomached  (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jurina Matsui - This article was assessed as Start in 2014. I overhauled and basically rewrote everything and fixed all citations so it meets Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I believe it deserves at least to be rated B, but feel free to leave some suggestions how to improve it. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 09:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed as B class on 25 September 2022 with Special:Diff/1112343513. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Assessed as C class on 14 January 2022 with Special:Diff/1065702315. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023

edit
Assessed as Start class on 23 February 2023 with Special:Diff/1141083466. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kunisada Station First time trying to upgrade an article. Looking for assessment to understand a bit better where it stands --Aziretan (talk) 2:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Assessed as C class on 9 April 2023 with Special:Diff/1149021287. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]