Talk:Gardevoir

Latest comment: 2 days ago by Kung Fu Man in topic Pornography section
Former good articleGardevoir was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 3, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

In the games

edit

Fixed an inaccuracy stating Gardevoir cannot learn firepunch. Added psychic to the moves "thunder bolt and ice punch" as moves popular as a sweeper, since it's unlikely a sweeper will pass up same type attack bonus. 82.41.225.84 11:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Intro

edit

The intro is describing Pokemon in general, not Gardevoir... it's not very good. 65.101.174.127 23:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's decsribing what Gardevoir's job is in the series, it just happens to have the same job as other Pokémon. It's fine, and what is expected of any decent article. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

In Japan

edit

Gardevoir is popular in Japan like Jigglypuff.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.18.115.227 (talkcontribs) .

Have a source for that? Highway Rainbow Sneakers 22:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well I found a Japanese fanart website about Gardevoir,Kirlia, and Ralts Fans so I thought wow. Gardevoir is popular in Japan. Here's the site [1]—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.18.115.227 (talkcontribs) .
It looks like a fansite, which isn't a reliable source. Sorry, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 06:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation

edit

Why is there no mention of the word 'gar'? Gar means to compell, and the Pokedex clearly mentions Gardevoir's complusive nature when it comes to protecting its trainer. So I believe that Gardevoir's name is a combination of 'gar' and 'devoir' for 'compelling duty'. Bliksem 17:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Probably. There are a dozen possiblities, and they'll probably all eventually be removed because a lack of citations, but add it anyway and I'll see which is referencable. I can easily just reference a web dictionary, saying there are numberable possibilites. Cheers, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 17:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I edited out the part about the definition of it's name being a combination of "Garden" and "Resevior"(I didn't complete what I said because I'm new to editing pages and accidently hit enter out of habit) because if that were the case, it's type would be far from psychic(most likely water/grass)and it's dex entry would be different. Natch42 18:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

You know, when I first saw Gardevoir, I thought it was a Grass-type and it's hair was a leaf or something.

SSBB characters list

edit

Gardevoir is the only Pokemon on the japaness SSBB characters considering list.

I really hope so! Gardevoir rocks! But could we dod something to fix up the article just a bit?Cherimu is beautiful! 16:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Japaness? Last tim I check it was still Japanese.
Be nice! You could use some spellchecking yourself! Floramage! 23:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
So?HHS.student
Ugh. Floramage! 16:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Where is this list? I'd love to see that. :o Oubliette 00:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA nom

edit

I've cleaned up this article and nominated it for a GA. Please improve it further if you can. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 16:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

I have reviewed this article in accordance with the Good Article (GA) criteria. There are seven main criteria that the article must comply with to pass:

  1. Well-written: Pass
  2. Factually accurate: Pass
  3. Broad: Pass
  4. Neutrally written: Pass
  5. Stable: Pass
  6. Well-referenced: Pass
  7. Images: Pass

In my opinion for this GA Review, this article has passed all the necessary GA criteria categories. If no one has a problem with this, I will award it GA status in a few days. Please give me your feedback/comments/complaints (if any), so we can improve on this article if needed. INFORMATION CENTER (TC) 22:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 22:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem. This is now a GA. INFORMATION CENTER (TC) 03:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA removal

edit

Far too much of the video game section is unnecessary opinions and guide content - okay, so it's commonly known to be a special sweeper, but that's just an opinion. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed some extraneous details. In any case, try to fix the problems before complaining about them here. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 23:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
It was after a small amount of looking through the article, meaning that there could very well be other similar problems.
Also, I'm simply reviewing the article - no more my job to fix the article than it is to fix a game. - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pornography section

edit

It's is necesary to have a quarter of the page be about it's pornography? Wouldn't a slight mention be more fitting? Afterall that image is the one that shows in google when visiting this page... 88.8.235.164 (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

A lot of the character's notoriety is about porn. If that makes you uncomfortable, welcome to wikipedia. As for the google image, that's an issue with it not using the infobox image: the section's size has nothing to do with it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply