| TFOWR · talkpage · dashboard · sandbox · monobook.js · monobook.css · sub-pages | WP:AIV · WP:RFPP · WP:SPI · WP:AN · WP:ANI |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
editAdministrative backlog
editAIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
edit- 81.170.111.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 58 (Long-term pattern abuse, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- 174.92.25.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2402:8100:2008:6f0::5612:d36e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Beluga732 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40e2:4:9ac9:8000:: (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- 93.138.241.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:58b:1601:8ed0:c4a9:cfa6:cece:166a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- Melanatural (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Amber Anning: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Repeatedly adding wrong/unsourced content to this article. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dr. Chance Padberg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Block evasion. Lynch44 (talk) 13:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- User is rapidly reverting other user’s valid edits and posting final block warning on their pages. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. This board is for blatant vandalism or blatant sock puppetry. You don't name the other account. The user has not been sufficiently warned. Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oxbowa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) this user changes information without first discussing it on the discussion page. Strong edit war. JackkBrown (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 16 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 7 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 3 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 39 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Eviloofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Clubamericafan44 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- FamilyMD91344 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Myphotographybypriscilla3689 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- BellatrixxxLestrange (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: bellatrickscksckslestrange" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Doomkiller6609 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sabeekazmiofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Peepeepoopoofarties (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "pee[- ]?pee" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- GrammarNazi69420 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Shanza tahir (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. The username is the same as the contact person for organicfoodi.com which was stealth-inserted for promotion at Talk:Orange juice and the user's own talk page. Zefr (talk) 03:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cabayi (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Platybot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Renewal6 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. The user seems to actually be creating a bot script; this isn't a violation as long as they submit it to the BAG for approval before operating it. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ongoing request Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Platybot – robertsky (talk) 13:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Allen, Simpson and Bevan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. spammy sandbox. Wikishovel (talk) 11:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring of IP users. Sciencefish (talk) 07:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Sciencefish: Do you mean WP:ECP (30/500 protection)? Semi-protection is all that is needed for IP users. However, a quick look does not show which edits are vandalism or which are edit warring. Please identify some problem edits with a brief explanation, preferably on article talk where the editors concerned have a chance of seeing it. Johnuniq (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ECP (30/500 protection), yes, but will take to talk as advised. Thanks. Sciencefish (talk) 10:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism SuperMightyBoy (talk) 08:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @SuperMightyBoy: Are you sure it is vandalism as defined at that link? A couple of edits I checked looked defensible (I'm not saying they were correct as I don't know, but they did not appear to be vandalism). Can you identify a couple of problems on article talk? Johnuniq (talk) 09:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please protect the page SuperMightyBoy (talk) 09:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – OP has failed to substantiate their request. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism/hijack attempts Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. @Cl3phact0: Please let me know, or post here again, if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 10:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I am writing on behalf of Reform UK. During the recent election campaign there have been some attempts to misrepresent the party on Wikipedia, including labelling the party as a neo-fascist political party. These disruptive edits should be limited and we would be grateful for your support. ReformUK2024 (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Declined @ReformUK2024: Quite a lot of edits are happening and very few have been reverted. That, and a quick check, makes it look like there is not a vandalism problem. Please discuss any proposed edits at the article talk page. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 10:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, arbitrary edits with poorly sourced and un-sourced drivelling Rustyshackelford (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and sock puppetry. Codenamewolf (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and sock puppetry. Codenamewolf (talk) 11:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and sock puppetry. Codenamewolf (talk) 11:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs don't understand WP: COMMONNAME, subject changed their name but is still best known by their birth name. Nswix (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additional of unsourced and promotional BLP information. Tacyarg (talk) 14:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Biya has recently received international media coverage (see below) over her coming out. She already has an article on the French Wikipedia, which I have translated at Draft:Brenda Biya. Coverage:
- https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj7dnm3elkdo
- https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/07/cameroon-presidents-daughter-brenda-biya-reveals-lesbian-status/
- https://www.them.us/story/anastasia-brenda-biya-cameroon-instagram-coming-out-layyons-valenca
- https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/07/03/brenda-biya-lesbian-lgbtq-layyons-valenca/
- https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/why-has-cameroon-president-daughter-instagram-kiss-post-sparked-an-lgbtq-debate-13789208.html
- https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2024/07/04/dochter-van-president-kameroen-brengt-vader-in-verlegenheid-met/
- https://information.tv5monde.com/afrique/brenda-biya-fille-du-president-du-cameroun-affirme-son-homosexualite-2728277 ―Howard • 🌽33 17:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is this not WP:BLP1E? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I imagine that article would become a lightening rod for BLP-violating content. I agree even the draft is WP:BLP1E; any coverage is due to her being the daughter of Paul Biya.-- Ponyobons mots 18:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I believe the article covers several notable aspects from her life. The fact that she is the daughter of a world leader, the accusations of lavishness according to the press, her eviction from the Parisian hotel by the anti-Sardinard Brigade, her controversial comments as noted in the press since 2020, and her coming out which has been noted in the international media. As far as I am aware, this figure has consistently received attention from reliable sources for several years now. ―Howard • 🌽33 11:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- So I don't understand how the person is to be considered as only having 1 notable event. ―Howard • 🌽33 11:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- How much of this coverage would she have received if not for her parents? Being the daughter of a world leader is not itself grounds for notability, accusations of lavishness are par for the course for the families of top politicians, and coming out of the closet is something the LGBTQIA+ community does regularly enough that it's only news because of her parents. That leaves the hotel eviction as the only event involving her that could possibly help for notability, and in cases like this where the subject is and remains a private person we err towards not having an article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is this not WP:BLP1E? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
edit
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
| 18 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
edit- Xegma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Could anyone look into my request ? It is now been couple of days of the request ? Xegma(talk) 06:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Re-send the request SuperMightyBoy (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sir MemeGod (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created over 85 (or something like that) articles in the last few months, and am requesting the autopatrolled right. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- GMB205 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created over 105 articles in total and I am requesting the autopatrolled right. GMB205 (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- AjayDas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
They have created 67 articles, please give the right SuperMightyBoy (talk) 10:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
edit
- PadFoot2008 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Done for three months. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- KingSkyLord (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- MikeM2011 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'm writing to request this privileged role, despite being under the threshold for number of edits, given my demonstrated history of moving pages, particularly disambiguations and maintaining WP:MOS. The main reason being to move articles over others (i.e. redirects). Having this right would have eliminated creating an RfM discussion for something that was formally renamed, for instance, Sound Recorder (Windows) Thank you in advance. MikeM2011 (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
edit- 48JCL (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer permissions to support the review and validation of pending changes on Wikipedia. With 1,057 edits and experience in trust articles and music, I am confident in my ability to accurately review and approve pending changes. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and accuracy of Wikipedia's content and am committed to upholding the highest standards of quality and neutrality. Thank you for considering my request. 2RDD (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 15:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done This request appears to be AI-generated. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Martinc021 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges for a while. I see a lot of pending changes that needs to be reviewed. I request this permission to improve myself and help the community. Martintalk(sign) 01:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 56 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 01:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done 176 edits is not a sufficient track record to be granted advanced permissions. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- CrazyPredictor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been actively editing in different topic areas (mainly politics/civics) on Wikipedia for a few years and have created some new article pages. In this time I have gained a strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines and would like to apply that to review edits to articles to identify vandalism / inappropriate edits. CrazyPredictor (talk) 01:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
edit- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I hereby tender my application for the distinguished role of Rollbacker, having accomplished a notable volume of contributions exceeding 500 edits and consistently demonstrated a steadfast commitment to maintaining the highest standards of content quality through the diligent reversion of vandalized pages. I am confident that my expertise and unwavering dedication render me an exemplary candidate for this position, and I eagerly anticipate the opportunity to further serve the community in this capacity. 2RDD (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- In your own words, would you please explain what vandalism is? Using that explanation, please evaluate whether the following edits are vandalism, and provide an explanation as to why or why not:
- — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done This request is pure, possibly AI-generated, puffery that shows no understanding of what rollbacker even is. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- S-Aura (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been editing on Wikipedia for more than three years and i have developed the expertise to identify vandalism and familiarize myself with Wikipedia's content policies and copyright laws. I'm requesting the rights and responsibilities that come with this experience. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively editing about a week ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month gaining experience editing Wikipedia before assigning you advanced permissions. Thanks, Fastily 20:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Garsh2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Good day! I am requesting rollback rights to speed up the process of reviewing recent changes. I meet the mainspace edit count requirement and have been patrolling recent changes for over month. My track record of reviewing shows that I can quickly and effectively differentiate between vandalism and good faith contributions. Thank you. Garsh (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
edit- Jackdude101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am heavily involved with editing route diagram templates and adding new items to template:rail-interchange, with a special focus on rail lines in France for the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris starting later this month. I have made multiple edit requests there in the past, and very recently after refamiliarizing myself with the process, I've started to do it again. I would like the ability to edit that template directly so I don't have to rely on others to do it for me. Jackdude101 talk cont 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Footer
editPolicies and links