User talk:A Thousand Doors/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:A Thousand Doors. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Zoe Lyons Cigar Wink High Res.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Hello
I replied to you at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Leona Lewis/archive1. Aaron • You Da One 18:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Whoops, sorry, I've been meaning to respond to this, it just completely slipped my mind. I'll do it now. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 19:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- haha. okay thanks. Aaron • You Da One 19:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Aaron • You Da One 19:54, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for supporting :). Aaron • You Da One 16:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Aaron • You Da One 19:54, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- haha. okay thanks. Aaron • You Da One 19:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
UK Albums Chart One Hit Wonders
Hello. It's me. Maybe they should change the criteria to "artists who have released a #1 album and released at least one album since that has not made the top 40". Seeming as you take such an interest in album charts, you should do something about it.
P.S: Platypus? Really?
P.S.S: I am a new user, so you should be welcoming (i.e: not critical)
- Hello again. The definition of a "one-hit wonder" is obviously quite contentious, but the one given by reference texts such as The Guinness Book of British Hit Singles and the website everyHit is an artist who has had one #1 album and no other Top 40 entry on the UK albums chart, either before or after. To change this definition to suit our own agendas would count as original research, and would go against some key Wikipedia policies. Also, yep, the platypus. I like how it has the head of a duck but the body of a beaver, and how it lays eggs, despite being a mammal. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks very much, and welcome to Wikipedia - I hope that you enjoy editing here. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
You seem like quite a nice person. I was a bit harsh, saying you were critical and all. Sorry. Really, I am. (Oh, and it's good to see a Feist/Arcade Fire fan around. The Suburbs and Metals are two of my favourite albums.) 78.148.240.9 (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, don't worry about it, I didn't think you were being harsh. Your question about one-hit wonders was a fair one, and you own definition makes sense. The problem is that, for example, I don't believe that Ray Quinn ever released a follow-up to his album, which, by your definition, would mean that he isn't a one-hit wonder, although I think we can both agree that he most definitely is. (Heh, nice to hear you're an Arcade Fire and Feist fan too. The Reminder's probably my favourite Feist album; couldn't pick my favourite AF record though - there are things that I love about all of them.) A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 11:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. When you recently edited Colour (The Christians album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Christians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
perhaps? the reference was pointed to me by a person who knew the scriptures well, and the reference is a biblical detail, not a personal script — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.92.201 (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello there. For the information to be included in the article, we would preferably need, for example, a book or article that Dr Arrupe had written where he concluded that Jesus would have appeared "common looking" since Mary Magdalene had failed to recognise him initially. If you know of any such source, feel free to re-add the information with an appropriate citation to this reference. If it is removed again, it may be necessary to seek further response on the article's talk page. Hope that this helps. Happy editing! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, I don't know if he wrote that comment in any of his writings. It was made during a spiritual excercise perhaps to take away the mundane interest or dissuade of distracting from the person of Jesus to the body of Jesus. But I noticed he said it not casual, but as if long ago studied and well sifted through the scriptures for it. I do not know what is the discipline of the Jesuit Company on this topic, but they seem to have taken it into consideration at some point in their history and follow some disregard to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.92.201 (talk) 22:40, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DYK for Official Record Store Chart
On 4 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Official Record Store Chart, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Alabama Shakes were the first act to top the Official Record Store Chart, with their album Boys & Girls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Official Record Store Chart.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for List of songs recorded by Guillemots
On 22 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of songs recorded by Guillemots, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "21st May", a song recorded by Guillemots, was described by The Times as "gleefully [marrying] a hip-shaking reggae beat to jazz sax"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of songs recorded by Guillemots.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Column headers in the middle of the table
Hi. I replied to you at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial, and suggested a solution. Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Sing
Thanks for that mate! I didn't even realise it was called Sing, thanks again. Best, Yids2010 (talk) 21:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Strang at FPC
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I closed your nomination, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gilbert Strang, as "Not promoted". We welcome your contributions to featured picture candidates and I encourage you to nominate more images. Before you do so, you may want to review the featured picture criteria. If you're unsure if a picture meets the criteria, feel free to add the image to picture peer review where experienced users will comment on it. Thanks. I hope to see you at FPC again. jjron (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well that's the template, but just thought I'd let you know about this in case you haven't been checking up. Looks like the deletion has gone ahead. Bad luck, but keep looking around. It's always good to have new and different contributors at FPC. --jjron (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Kriss Kross / Clarion
On 22 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kriss Kross / Clarion, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Kriss Kross" / "Clarion", a 2008 single by multinational band Guillemots, featured a live cover of "Black and Gold" by Sam Sparro as its B-side? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kriss Kross / Clarion. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the DYK team of Wikipedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
RE: Table example
Hi there Dodoïste. I've been thinking a bit about the table that you proposed at Talk:List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2000s (U.S.). I quite like it, and it works well, but I've been wondering whether there might be a stronger way to indicate where one year ends and another begins. Would having a single, empty cell that spans all seven columns meet the MOS:DTT requirements? It'd look something like this:
# | Reached number one | Artist(s) | Single | Record label | Weeks at number one |
Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
851 | January 15, 2000 | Christina Aguilera | "What a Girl Wants" | RCA | 2 | [ref] |
852 | January 29, 2000 | Savage Garden | "I Knew I Loved You" | Columbia | 4 | [ref] |
853 | February 19, 2000 | Mariah Carey & Joe & 98 Degrees | "Thank God I Found You" | Columbia | 1 | [ref] |
868 | February 3, 2001 | Shaggy & Ricardo 'Rikrok' Ducent | "It Wasn't Me" | MCA | 2 | [ref] |
869 | February 17, 2001 | Outkast | "Ms Jackson" | Arista | 1 | [ref] |
870 | February 24, 2001 | Joe & Mystikal | "Stutter" | Jive | 4 | [ref] |
882 | February 23, 2002 | Ja Rule & Ashanti | "Always on Time" | 2 | [ref] | |
883 | March 9, 2002 | Jennifer Lopez & Ja Rule | "Ain't It Funny" | 6 | [ref] | |
884 | April 20, 2002 | Ashanti | "Foolish" | 10 | [ref] |
My reasoning is that, since the cell would be empty, there would be nothing for a screen reader to read, but I'm not entirely sure. Let me know what your thoughts are. Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. Sorry for not responding earlier.
- I can't approve it since this proposal is less accessible than the one I suggested. But if you really need something like this in order to improve the bad table with headers in the middle, it's fine as it is a significant improvement.
- But something is been bugging me. How come a thin blank line is a clear indication for a change in years for normal users? How come a "2009" followed by a "2010", shown in a wide cell on the left, would not be understandable? Aren't we trying to find solutions to nonexistent problems? If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, don't worry about it. I guess my only issue with displaying the years in wide cells on the left is that, because they are centre-aligned vertically, they can sometimes not be displayed on tables with many rows. For example, the transition between 2000 and 2001 on List of number-one albums from the 2000s (UK) is dislayed on my computer like this. Here, where 2000 ends and 2001 begins is indicated by a very thin, single-pixel line in between where it says "638" and "re". To me, this seems like something that a reader could quite easily miss. My thinking was that a larger blank row would be a clearer indication of a change in years. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs)
- Now that you mention it... There is a need for a better solution. In long tables, table headers are very often out of the screen, and that's a common problem. The best solution I can find is to not merge all rows. For example, the first year rows could be repeated.
- Hi there, don't worry about it. I guess my only issue with displaying the years in wide cells on the left is that, because they are centre-aligned vertically, they can sometimes not be displayed on tables with many rows. For example, the transition between 2000 and 2001 on List of number-one albums from the 2000s (UK) is dislayed on my computer like this. Here, where 2000 ends and 2001 begins is indicated by a very thin, single-pixel line in between where it says "638" and "re". To me, this seems like something that a reader could quite easily miss. My thinking was that a larger blank row would be a clearer indication of a change in years. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs)
Year | # | Reached number one | Artist(s) | Single | Record label | Weeks at number one |
Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 851 | January 15, 2000 | Christina Aguilera | "What a Girl Wants" | RCA | 2 | [ref] |
2000 | 852 | January 29, 2000 | Savage Garden | "I Knew I Loved You" | Columbia | 4 | [ref] |
853 | February 19, 2000 | Mariah Carey & Joe & 98 Degrees | "Thank God I Found You" | Columbia | 1 | [ref] | |
2001 | 868 | February 3, 2001 | Shaggy & Ricardo 'Rikrok' Ducent | "It Wasn't Me" | MCA | 2 | [ref] |
2001 | 869 | February 17, 2001 | Outkast | "Ms Jackson" | Arista | 1 | [ref] |
870 | February 24, 2001 | Joe & Mystikal | "Stutter" | Jive | 4 | [ref] | |
2002 | 882 | February 23, 2002 | Ja Rule & Ashanti | "Always on Time" | 2 | [ref] | |
883 | March 9, 2002 | Jennifer Lopez & Ja Rule | "Ain't It Funny" | 6 | [ref] | ||
884 | April 20, 2002 | Ashanti | "Foolish" | 10 | [ref] |
It looks messy in my small table, but I'm sure it will be fine in a large table. The second solution is to display the row "2002" at the top of the line. Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 21:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Of those two options, I definitely think that having the year aligned at the top (as in the 2002 example) is the better choice. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 23:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I also believe the second option is best. I had forgotten this technique, that's why. And it's simple to do, just add
style="vertical-align:top;"
to the rowspan. :-) Cheers, Dodoïste - from my cell phone, addicted to Wikipedia early in the morning. :D 213.55.176.138 (talk) 04:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I also believe the second option is best. I had forgotten this technique, that's why. And it's simple to do, just add
Thanks for your comments, please see Template:Did you know nominations/This Is the Six for my response. REZTER TALK ø 16:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK for The Joy of Text
On 30 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Joy of Text, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 2001, the BBC devoted an entire night of its programming exclusively to text messaging? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Joy of Text. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the DYK team. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Planet PC
Hello,
Stumbled upon your Planet PC article and noticed the scanned cover of issue 1 you had uploaded. Do you still own any of these magazines/cds because I can't seem to find much reference to them anywhere online and would love to rediscover this series. (1337LTD (talk) 00:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC))
- Hi there! Yep, I've still got issues 1 through 11 of Planet PC (except issues 6 and 10). Have since lost all the CDs though, unfortunately. Is there anything is particular you'd like to know? A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Haha brilliant! I'm glad there are still copies out there. I wasn't looking to know anything in particular, I was looking for a way to get a hold of the original magazines or possibly scans but Ebay didn't turn up any results. I'm sure I still have some of the CDs somewhere myself, I recall many hours playing the Croc 2 demo and attempting to create games using the Klik and Play studio. (1337LTD (talk))
Talkback
Message added 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The 'cast' section has been rewritten, in a style recommended by RexxS. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I've replied to your new comments. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Lists of songs.
Reading the talkpage of WP:SOngs I note, Father McKenzie wrote, (I have struck out three words and highlighed one) . "List of [Artist] songs" can be reasonably and unambiguously interpreted as a complete, general list of songs recorded by an artist during their career. It seems, inadvertently perhaps, that the Good Father agrees that the phrases needs interpreting, in which case it cannot be precise or defining! Let's see if we can get more to agree with us and put this baby to bed once and for all. I post this here rather than on the page because I am expecting others to make the same mistake. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
List of best-selling albums
Hello A Thousand Doors! I saw your article List of best-selling albums in the United Kingdom being listed as FL and I was wondering if I could use the basis of the article for another list of best-selling albums? Thanks, Erick (talk) 00:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead! What article are you planning on creating/expanding? A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! The article is List of best-selling Latin albums in the United States. Right now, the article is directionless and would confuse readers who are unfamiliar with the subject. I'm don't even know what the minimum should be, though I'm leaning towards at least 1 million copies instead of 500,000 copies. Erick (talk) 00:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For writing One Day in History; it's a brilliant article! Ironholds (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
- I meant to say this earlier, by the way, but if there's any help/information I can provide from the BL end, do let me know! Hope GAC goes well; it's a nice article. Andrew Gray (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the encouraging words, Andrew! To be honest, I think the article may be a bit of a punt at GAN due to its length, although there are hundreds of good articles that are much shorter. I'd definitely like to take you up on your offer of help from the BL end of things – having looked over it, is there anything that you think I could add or improve? Do you happen to know, say, if the BL still holds the collection, or how many people view it? That seems like it would be relevant to the article... Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm out at a workshop on Monday, but I'll see what I can dredge up when I get back... Andrew Gray (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- That'd be great, thank you very much! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 22:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm out at a workshop on Monday, but I'll see what I can dredge up when I get back... Andrew Gray (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the encouraging words, Andrew! To be honest, I think the article may be a bit of a punt at GAN due to its length, although there are hundreds of good articles that are much shorter. I'd definitely like to take you up on your offer of help from the BL end of things – having looked over it, is there anything that you think I could add or improve? Do you happen to know, say, if the BL still holds the collection, or how many people view it? That seems like it would be relevant to the article... Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- The short answer is, "not much". Looking at various pages, it seems the project ended up on the UK Web Archive (linked at the bottom of your article) which is a British Library project, but I don't think there's any active curation of it outside the web archive system. "Modern British Collections" no longer exists as a unit in the BL (there was a big reorganization a couple of years ago) so it's probably not curated by them any more ;-). It's definitely retained in UKWA and will be in perpetuity, though!
- I'd suggest switching the text in the article to "before being archived in the UK Web Archive at the British Library..." or something similar. We don't have an article on UKWA specifically, though there is one on the UK Web Archiving Consortium that preceded it. Andrew Gray (talk) 12:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Well thanks for looking into that for me and letting me know – I've made the change to the article that you suggested. Let me know if you think of any more ways that it could be improved. Thanks again! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 23:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DYK for One Day in History
On 17 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article One Day in History, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the British Library (pictured) has records of what 46,000 people did on 17 October 2006? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One Day in History. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Talkback
Message added 15:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 12:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For your efforts to get One Day in History to GA status. Great work! :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC) |
triple crown
Main Page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of UK Albums Chart Christmas number ones know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on December 24, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/December 24, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
The UK Albums Chart Christmas number ones are the records that have been at the top of the UK Albums Chart on Christmas Day. Typically, the Christmas number one is the album that was announced as number one on the Sunday before 25 December. When Christmas Day falls on a Sunday itself, the official number one is the one announced on that day's chart. The most successful act is The Beatles (pictured), who have topped the Christmas chart with seven different albums. With the exception of 1966, they reached number one on every Christmas chart from 1963 to 1969, and also topped the chart in 2000 with their singles collection, 1. The only other act to release more than three Christmas number one albums is British singer Robbie Williams, who topped the chart with three solo albums in the early 2000s, and also featured as part of Take That on their 2010 album, Progress. In 2011, Christmas by Canadian singer Michael Bublé became the Christmas number one.
Template:Envy & Other Sins has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Category:Envy & Other Sins
Category:Envy & Other Sins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Debden incinerator robberies
On 23 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Debden incinerator robberies, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an employee of the Bank of England's incinerator plant in Debden helped to steal more than £600,000 over four years by stuffing banknotes into her underwear? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Debden incinerator robberies. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for HMV's Poll of Polls
On 11 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HMV's Poll of Polls, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Canadian band Arcade Fire are the only act to have topped HMV's Poll of Polls more than once? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMV's Poll of Polls. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Talkback
Message added 17:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 01:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 00:37, 26 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for your comments. I have responded to several of your concerns if you wish to take a look or add additional feedback. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Still working, but I've responded to a few of your comments. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Would you mind revisiting this review? If there are particularly words in the lead you are concerned about, please let us know. Personally, I think the lead is linked appropriately, but I am happy to discuss further. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Chopra FLC
Hi, I have nominated Chopra's awards and nominations list for FLC. Please, feel free to represent your though on it. The list was successfully reviewed for one month and have improved a lot. I'll be grateful if you can represent your suggestions here...Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2 as fast as you can. Thank You.Prashant ✉ 11:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
Hi Thousand Doors,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Grant, Cary (Suspicion) 01 Crisco edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 17, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-17. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 23:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Everything has been done now. There is only one of the three B-sides which the writers are unknown now, Status found the other two. — AARON • TALK 23:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of best-selling music downloads of the 2000s (UK), A Thousand Doors!
Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for the article. Just reviewed it! cheers.
To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nomination of List of UK Rock Chart number-one singles of 2013 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of UK Rock Chart number-one singles of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Rock Chart number-one singles of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2009 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2009 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2009 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2010 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The article List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2011 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Largely based on Official Charts Company data, over which they assert Database Right, see Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Chartarchive.org, PROD as potential copyvio.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The article List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Based on Official Chart Company Data, over which they assert Database right, see Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Chartarchive.org , PROD as potential copyvio.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The article List of UK Rock Chart number-one albums of 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article is largely based on OCC data, over which they assert Database right see Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Chartarchive.org. PROD as potential copyvio.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Pink Martini
Please let me know if you have any other comments or if your concerns need to be addressed further. Thanks so much! -Another Believer (Talk) 18:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Kelly Clarkson FLC
Hello A Thousand Doors, I nominated the List of songs recorded by Kelly Clarkson to FL status. I hope you can review it and post your comments in the discussion page if you're available. Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 09:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi, I edited the article according to your comments, please check it if you have time. I'm not so sure if I get the last comment. Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 09:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Thousand Doors, just checkin' if you received my response. You can check the FLC whenever. Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of best-selling music downloads in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Someone Like You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:A Thousand Doors. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |