User talk:Another Believer/Archive 43
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | → | Archive 50 |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
Nomination of Statue of Zhang Side for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Zhang Side until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hey, AB (or any TPS) -- a little input? I started this because I was fascinated by the idea of dusties, and there's plenty of sources. As I wrote it I couldn't quite figure out how to organize, which always makes me wonder if I'm approaching from the wrong direction. And even if I'm not approaching it the wrong way, I wasn't sure it should be moved to article space under that title...Vintage Liquor Collecting, maybe? I believe it's a thing, I believe it's a notable thing, but I'm just not thinking I'm getting it right. Valereee (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 11:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Restaurants at AfD
ResolvedSigh, more restaurant entries at AfD...
Alexis RestaurantKEPTAskatu BakeryPost Alley PizzaDeletedRistorante MachiavelliKEPTRubinstein BagelsKEPT
---Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Liz: If the hounding and trolling doesn't stop, I'll look into an interaction ban. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
Cherry Valentine scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 14, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you today for your share in the article "about an English drag queen and mental health nurse who competed on the second series of RuPaul's Drag Race UK."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: My pleasure! Working to make Wikipedia gayer and greater all the time :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexis Restaurant for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Restaurant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Please leave me alone. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: June 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Resolved
The redirect A Catfishing with a Happy Ending has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 11 § A Catfishing with a Happy Ending until a consensus is reached. BOVINEBOY2008 01:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello Another Believer!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
"Failsafe (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
Resolved
The redirect Failsafe (film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 12 § Failsafe (film) until a consensus is reached. BOVINEBOY2008 12:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article Statue of Charlie Chaplin, Shanghai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Statue of Chen Yi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Statue of Ma Zhanshan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Statue of Ma Zhanshan for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Ma Zhanshan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nomination of Statue of Charlie Chaplin, Shanghai for deletion
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Charlie Chaplin, Shanghai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
DYK for Egghead & Twinkie
On 15 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Egghead & Twinkie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Egghead & Twinkie claims to be the first feature film crowdsourced on TikTok? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Egghead & Twinkie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Egghead & Twinkie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The article The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has failed |
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 57
Extended content
|
|---|
 The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) |
Seattle Wiknic 2023
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
01:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.
|
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Post Alley Pizza logo.png
Extended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon)
The article The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Queen's Head (Portland, Oregon)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 22:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Statue of Josiah Quincy III for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Josiah Quincy III (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Women in Red August 2023
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Human Access Project logo.png
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
Your GA nomination of Shut Up and Eat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shut Up and Eat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Looking forward to collaborating. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Shut Up and Eat
The article Shut Up and Eat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shut Up and Eat for comments about the article, and Talk:Shut Up and Eat/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe
The article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 11:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos Bummer, didn't even get a chance to address your concerns, but thanks for reviewing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Purr Cocktail Lounge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Purr Cocktail Lounge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 23:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Purr Cocktail Lounge
The article Purr Cocktail Lounge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Purr Cocktail Lounge for comments about the article, and Talk:Purr Cocktail Lounge/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk Thank you for reviewing! I've nominated a few other restaurant entries for GA status, if you're interested, otherwise take care for now. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Holy Trinity Barbecue
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Holy Trinity Barbecue you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 19:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Kasama (restaurant)
On 7 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kasama (restaurant), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chicago's Kasama is the world's first Filipino restaurant to be awarded a Michelin star? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kasama (restaurant). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kasama (restaurant)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Holy Trinity Barbecue
The article Holy Trinity Barbecue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Holy Trinity Barbecue for comments about the article, and Talk:Holy Trinity Barbecue/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MyCatIsAChonk -- MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
|
This Month in GLAM: July 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Your GA nomination of LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lucier (restaurant)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lucier (restaurant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta
The article LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Bummer! I would have been willing to address your concerns further, but thanks for reviewing. Eventually, I would love to see a Good article on Wikipedia about LGBT culture in a specific locale. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- It might actually help me improve the article if you want more Spanish-language sourcing. I just couldn't in good conscience approve an article where 24 of the 104 or so references were business listings. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lucier (restaurant)
The article Lucier (restaurant) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lucier (restaurant) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Shed Garden Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Essential Workers Monument for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential Workers Monument until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Your GA nomination of Spella Caffè
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spella Caffè you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
Your GA nomination of Spella Caffè
The article Spella Caffè you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spella Caffè for comments about the article, and Talk:Spella Caffè/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Café China, et al
Hi @Another Believer - I initially tagged your article Café China for speedy deletion as it didn't appear have a claim of significance at first glance. Then, I saw it had been categorised as a Michelin starred restaurant, so I have removed the CSD notice and added said claim of significance. The same is true of Faro (restaurant), minus the CSD tagging. I hope you find this a more useful outcome. Osarius 14:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I am creating stubs for Michelin-starred restaurants. No tags needed, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Invite template for WP:LGBT?
Hi Another Believer. Is there an invitation template for WP:WikiProject LGBT studies? I was unable to find one at Category:WikiProject LGBT studies templates. Peaceray (talk) 03:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Peaceray I'm not finding one in the WikiProject category or Category:WikiProject invitation templates. I don't use WikiProject invitations much but I would support creating one if project members find it helpful. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- I could do that! I have done that for other WikiProjects. But got a lot on my plate for the next few days. Attending Wikimania online for about four hours in the evening & also doing my day job. Peaceray (talk) 04:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Skyline Restaurant
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skyline Restaurant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Spella Caffe logo.png
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Skyline Restaurant
The article Skyline Restaurant you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Skyline Restaurant and Talk:Skyline Restaurant/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 04:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ristorante Machiavelli
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ristorante Machiavelli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 09:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ristorante Machiavelli
The article Ristorante Machiavelli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli and Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 21:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ristorante Machiavelli
The article Ristorante Machiavelli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli for comments about the article, and Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 22:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of YouTube headquarters shooting for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube headquarters shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Skyline Restaurant
The article Skyline Restaurant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skyline Restaurant for comments about the article, and Talk:Skyline Restaurant/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 02:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Adminship, again
Hi Another Believer, based on looking through your talk page archives I'm the latest in a very long line to ask this question; why aren't you an admin yet? With a record as long as yours I really don't think an RFA would be very controversial, and there are useful things you could do with the tools that aren't very different from what you already do. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93 Thanks! You're right, I've been asked to apply for adminship many times over the years, both on- and off-wiki. While I think the tools would be helpful (and I'd like to think I'd get community support), I am not a fan of the RfA process and I fear editing as an admin might make Wikipedia feel more like a job than a hobby. Also, I'm harassed and hounded way too much already, and I think being an admin would just make things worse. I appreciate your kind words, though! Thanks again and happy editing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I can understand that; given our admin shortage I hope you'll reconsider, but I won't press you. Let me know if you do ever change your mind. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93 Will do! Much appreciated. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I can understand that; given our admin shortage I hope you'll reconsider, but I won't press you. Let me know if you do ever change your mind. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I came across another editor's essay concerning my own RfA and it made me feel morose all over again. I would not recommend the process to anyone with a substantial track history. Only for the ppl who have kept a squeaky clean, non-controversial history of 80% vanilla article creation and 20% admin-ish background tasks, while planning for a future RfA. If you're seen as having strong views on any wiki-process (inclusionism in two or three topic areas, in AB's case), you are a potential AfD lightning rod. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly. It'd just be fodder for the trolls, unfortunately. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would respectfully disagree. Overly strong views about COI editing and about keeping restaurants in Oregon are not, I believe, in the same ballpark for the opposition they would generate: though I would have a care as to who you describe as a troll. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: Pick your poison! There are the editors who follow me around and check every single page I create. Others who like to tag, PROD, and AfD one article after the next. Those who go to AfD just to vote delete and make article rescue more difficult. Others who email me threats because I work on LGBT-related content. Those who think I'm paid for every edit I make to Wikipedia because they've been lied to by a now-blocked sockmaster. Those who don't like my edits related to Trump, or the fact that I started the January 6 U.S. Capitol attack entry. I can keep going... ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I recognize that, and I don't mean to trivialize it. I've worked for ten years on South Asian politics, believe me, I understand what nasty harassment can be like. My point is that RFA, more than most processes on Wikipedia, is a referendum among editors in good standing, and trolls have much less of a say as to the eventual outcome. I'm not endorsing or rejecting the issues brought up during Bri's candidacy, but those were substantively more central to suitability for adminship, and were mentioned by many admins and functionaries in their opposition. That said, I did just see that you've had 400+ mainspace creations deleted; even discounting some G7s, you may be right that this could generate substantial opposition, and it would certainly be something you would need to address. So I won't press you further; I just wanted to note that activity which pisses of genuine trolls isn't necessarily fatal or even a bad thing at RFA. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93 Understood. I appreciate your additional feedback, but I won't be taking the plunge soon. Wow, 400 mainspace creation deletions sounds remarkably low to me!, given the tens of thousands of pages I've created. I create redirects all the time for subjects like songs, albums, TV episodes, fictional characters, etc. I imagine these sorts of edits would explain the hundreds of deletions, but I'm not concerned about that at all. Anyways, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:16, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I recognize that, and I don't mean to trivialize it. I've worked for ten years on South Asian politics, believe me, I understand what nasty harassment can be like. My point is that RFA, more than most processes on Wikipedia, is a referendum among editors in good standing, and trolls have much less of a say as to the eventual outcome. I'm not endorsing or rejecting the issues brought up during Bri's candidacy, but those were substantively more central to suitability for adminship, and were mentioned by many admins and functionaries in their opposition. That said, I did just see that you've had 400+ mainspace creations deleted; even discounting some G7s, you may be right that this could generate substantial opposition, and it would certainly be something you would need to address. So I won't press you further; I just wanted to note that activity which pisses of genuine trolls isn't necessarily fatal or even a bad thing at RFA. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: Pick your poison! There are the editors who follow me around and check every single page I create. Others who like to tag, PROD, and AfD one article after the next. Those who go to AfD just to vote delete and make article rescue more difficult. Others who email me threats because I work on LGBT-related content. Those who think I'm paid for every edit I make to Wikipedia because they've been lied to by a now-blocked sockmaster. Those who don't like my edits related to Trump, or the fact that I started the January 6 U.S. Capitol attack entry. I can keep going... ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would respectfully disagree. Overly strong views about COI editing and about keeping restaurants in Oregon are not, I believe, in the same ballpark for the opposition they would generate: though I would have a care as to who you describe as a troll. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly. It'd just be fodder for the trolls, unfortunately. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women In Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Your GA nomination of Bipartisan Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bipartisan Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 22:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bipartisan Cafe
The article Bipartisan Cafe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bipartisan Cafe and Talk:Bipartisan Cafe/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 23:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Bipartisan Cafe
The article Bipartisan Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bipartisan Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Bipartisan Cafe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 02:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Voorts Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
Holy Trinity Barbecue
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Holy Trinity Barbecue at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 17:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
What exactly is the holy trinity of barbecue?
(talk page stalker) I got curious about the question above, and not finding it on Wikipedia, found an answer in a German language book of all things [1]. Beef brisket, pulled pork, and spare ribs, apparently. Maybe this factoid should go somewhere? ☆ Bri (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bri: I think ideally there'd be a source verifying the business is named after the food industry phrase of the same name, no? That being said, if you feel the article would be improved by noting the industry phrase using a source which is not specific to the business, I'd invite you to update the entry as you see fit! (Side note, I've reviewed a few sources about the restaurant and I'm not finding one which explains the business name, though I do recall at one point learning about what "holy trinity" meant so perhaps verification is buried somewhere in one of the inline citations.) Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Will try to find the lost citation, when time permits. By "somewhere", I meant maybe Barbecue in the United States, not necessarily this article. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bri I see what you mean, I thought you were suggesting an update to the restaurant article, to help explain the business' name (which I am not opposed to). Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Will try to find the lost citation, when time permits. By "somewhere", I meant maybe Barbecue in the United States, not necessarily this article. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
It was named for the three core items Rensmeyer would always sell: smoky, spicy sausage; delicate, pink-hued ribs; and an incredible 14-hour smoked brisket.
— Eater, 2021-10-14
- Is this the source you were thinking of? ☆ Bri (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bri I think so, which is why I thought "holy trinity" was more of a personal/business decision than an industry concept. I have no problem with the changes you've made to the entry. Thanks for the feedback! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)