User talk:Another Believer/Archive 45
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | ← | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | → | Archive 50 |
Oregon Community Credit Union
Why did you delete most of my edits? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- History, services, assets all existed on that page for over a decade. I simply added current information. Why would you delete that? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- On a separate note, I don't know how to change the logo. I'm somewhat new to this. There is a new logo on their website. Can you change? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Are you able to tell me why you deleted the other information? Uplinkspyder (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- For the reasons mentioned in my revert's edit summary. Please do not add back any unsourced or promotional text, or unnecessary detail. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Are you able to tell me why you deleted the other information? Uplinkspyder (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- On a separate note, I don't know how to change the logo. I'm somewhat new to this. There is a new logo on their website. Can you change? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
@Bri: You might be interested, given your question here. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- My pleasure. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work,
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer, I just came across this draft looking over the list of "expiring drafts" for the next few hours. I delayed the deletion but I was wondering if you had any interest in polishing this draft up enough to warrant a move back to main space. If not, that's fine, just thought I'd ask given your expertise in creating articles on Portland, OR landmarks. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023). 
|
Nomination of Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Hey all you cool cats and kittens! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Drag queens
Extended content
|
|---|
|
What I'm doing is an AWB run of pages that are in the Category:Canadian LGBT people by occupation tree, but are not simultaneously in the Category:Canadian LGBT people by century tree. This means that everybody I'm editing is already in one or more LGBT X categories anyway, because they would never have shown up in my batch job at all if they weren't — and because AWB is just a tool for performing automated edits and not a tool for evaluating or reviewing content, I have no way to tell if any given category is problematic or not. So if there is a problem with anybody not being properly sourced as LGBT, that's not a "me doing bad things now" problem, it's a "somebody else did bad things before" problem.
|
A WCNA Barncompass for you!
|
WCNA 2023 Barncompass | |
| Thank you for all your contributions made towards Toronto as a result of WCNA 2023. I am awarding this barncompass to you. (Barncompass originated in Wikivoyage as a response to Wikipedia's barnstar. Since everyone travelled long distance for the conference and would have no doubt pulled out a map app at some point, awarding a barncompass is probably as fitting as a barnstar.) OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC) |
- @OhanaUnited Thank you! Likewise, your contributions related to Toronto have not gone unnoticed :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
Loosey LaDuca
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Loosey LaDuca at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978 Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Central Building (Seattle) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Building (Seattle) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
I followed the AfD but it didn't look like it needed more keep votes. FYI there were some images and a little bit of text at MOHAI and UW's digital collections, I will put the links on the article's talkpage. If I make it over to the Seattle Public Library, I'll check the Seattle Room special collections. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invite template for WP:LGBT (part 2)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi Another Believer, I return to our discussion about an Invite template for WP:LGBT. Please have a look at User:Peaceray/sandbox/Wiki Loves Pride invite. This is agnostic enough that it could be moved either into the Template namespace or as a subpage to WP:WLP. Once moved, the only change that would need to happen would be to remove the Let me know about any changes that you have to suggest. Or should I start up a discussion at WT:WLP? Peaceray (talk) 05:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Statue of Süreyya İlmen moved to draftspace
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Thanks for your contributions to Statue of Süreyya İlmen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Single source only says "His statue was erected in Yoğurtçu Park, for which he made great efforts", no significant coverage.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reywas92Talk 18:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
- Please leave me alone. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 59
Extended content
|
|---|
 The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red December 2023
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Extended content
|
|---|
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Recent edit reversion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy. I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask. I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 02:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Resolved
The redirect Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs until a consensus is reached. Or-Shalem (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
LGBT and Wikipedia
Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.
|
Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia
The article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia for comments about the article, and Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Shushugah Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Good to see this is now GA. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ipigott Thank you! Following this article's development has been interesting. Much appreciation to the many editors who have contributed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Good to see this is now GA. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.JPG)
Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain
Your GA nomination of Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain
_-_3.JPG)
ResolvedHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 05:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain
The article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain for comments about the article, and Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @APK Thanks again for reviewing, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter August 2020
Resolved
Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter August 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I apologize for making some errors lately, I'm not trying to do it intentionally, I swear. I guess I'm just not as used to working with huge blocks of text and sfn as I could be. Anyways, I've been trying to fix the CS1 errror that this edit apparently created and I can't for the life of me figure out what I messed up. I used the find feature in my browser and it doesn't look like I have any empty title parameters which would be the most obvious solution, at least to me? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
|
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
|
Just leaving this here because i know some people have turned off pings ...
Any thoughts on User_talk:Sheila1988#April_TFAP? You were a co-nom at the FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dank Thanks! Replied (I don't feel strongly either way.) Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Stacy Layne Matthews
Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews
.jpg)
ResolvedHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews
The article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews for comments about the article, and Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: November 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Fat's Chicken and Waffles
Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles
.jpg)
ResolvedHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles
The article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles for comments about the article, and Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Since you're quite the expert on local restaurants, does this article look promotional? I tried to avoid that, but every source was very positive. APK hi :-) (talk) 01:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- @APK I'm more of a content creator than a reviewer, as evidenced by my many GAs but lack of GA reviews. I've been accused of not including negative info in restaurant articles, but as long as the summary is representative of coverage then you should be fine. I would recommend asking for feedback, or even review, at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. I think the project is generally active and there might be reviewers familiar with standards for NRHP-related restaurants. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Netflix original programming by language has been nominated for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
|
Seattle Coffee Works
Speedy deletion nomination of Seattle Coffee Works
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 A tag has been placed on Seattle Coffee Works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DrowssapSMM 16:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Coffee Works has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DrowssapSMM 16:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)- Thanks! Much appreciated and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 02:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works
The article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seattle Coffee Works for comments about the article, and Talk:Seattle Coffee Works/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @TrademarkedTWOrantula Thanks again for reviewing! Happy Holidays and New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
ResolvedAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luna DuBois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Tin Shed Garden Cafe
Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe
_-_2.jpg)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Looking forward to addressing your concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe
The article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- @TrademarkedTWOrantula: Thanks again. I have a few more articles at WP:GAN if you're interested, otherwise happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Regent Bakery and Cafe
Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe
The article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Seasons Greetings!
.JPG)
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Thank you, and likewise! Happy New Year ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Mistress Isabelle Brooks
| | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mistress Isabelle Brooks at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| You do great work with making articles better! Keep it up! DrowssapSMM 12:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
- @DrowssapSMM Thank you! Much appreciated. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Nice work on Seattle Coffee Works! BuySomeApples (talk) 11:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
- @BuySomeApples Thanks! I've nominated the article for Good status, which User:TrademarkedTWOrantula is currently reviewing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
DiDa Ritz
_(cropped).jpg)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article DiDa Ritz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The article DiDa Ritz you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:DiDa Ritz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Thecheeseistalking98: I hope you'll engage in the talk page discussion I've started, since I didn't even get a chance to address any of your concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've re-nominated because I believe the article meets GA criteria. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Blocked for sockpuppetry. Sigh... ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've re-nominated because I believe the article meets GA criteria. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
Happy Holidays
.jpg)
★Trekker (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec11}} to your friends' talk pages.
★Trekker (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker Thanks! Happy holidays and New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Meetup in Seattle on 16 January 2024
Extended content
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Hi! Sorry for the Spanish: En la Wikipedia en español nos pusieron una plantilla de borrado en este artículo, lo que nos obligó a aumentar el contenido y referencias. ¿Podrías traer esa información aquí? Saludos! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MiguelAlanCS No need to apologize, but I'm limited in my ability to help. You might post a similar request for assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drag Race. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Daily Dozen Doughnut Company
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Dozen Doughnut Company has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- For sure, and feel free to add back the content I removed. It wasn't bad or anything I just sort of felt it was a bit much but also didn't know if I should cut just a little or what. I hope I can visit that place next time I'm in the area. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes Thanks, but I will let other editors worry about the Reception. I see User:7&6=thirteen might be restoring select text. I'm fine with whatever others think is best! Thanks again ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- For sure, and feel free to add back the content I removed. It wasn't bad or anything I just sort of felt it was a bit much but also didn't know if I should cut just a little or what. I hope I can visit that place next time I'm in the area. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Good job.
Keep your eye on the doughnut and not the hole. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @7&6=thirteen Thanks for your work on the article. I see the same couple of editors are already trying to crash the donut party. Disappointing and frustrating, but not surprising. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- WP:GNG should end the debate.
- They lose sight of the benefit to readers. Endian controversy. Sad. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @7&6=thirteen Thanks for your work on the article. I see the same couple of editors are already trying to crash the donut party. Disappointing and frustrating, but not surprising. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
My plot to bribe you for doughnuts was foiled by @Dr vulpes. :( S0091 (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
You get a donut, you get a donut! - Next wiki conference I go to, I should bring dozens of donuts! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I support your proposal even though I will not personally benefit. I guess I must craft another plot to obtain some delicious fried dough. :) S0091 (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes and S0091: Hoping you can keep an eye on the article and talk page. Seems the same couple editors are trying to cancel the donut party already. Also putting this on User:Bbb23's and User:Liz's radar since they may recall how things unfolded last year. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, Bbb23, I meant to ping User:Blablubbs. My mistake. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes and S0091: Hoping you can keep an eye on the article and talk page. Seems the same couple editors are trying to cancel the donut party already. Also putting this on User:Bbb23's and User:Liz's radar since they may recall how things unfolded last year. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I support your proposal even though I will not personally benefit. I guess I must craft another plot to obtain some delicious fried dough. :) S0091 (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Yet another Daily Dozen Doughnut Company thread
Can scarcely believe it's been more than a year since that surreal AfD... I'd placed the article on my watchlist and am glad to see it back in the mainspace again. Scope_creep's suggestion that you're an undisclosed paid editor (unless he had something or somebody else in mind when he said "The more time passes the more I think this editor is a UPE.") is definitely deserving of censure (at the very least!). Anyway, kudos to you and happy new year! KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 20:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce Don't hold your breath. This editor has made many similar comments about me in the past. I've been documenting and have plenty of receipts, and I've also told them to leave me alone many times. I'm not holding my breath the community will do anything about it, so I just ignore the BS and keep editing. Who knew little donuts could cause so much drama!? Happy New Year and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pings to ChristieBot
Hi -- I just got a ping (well, ChristieBot got the ping, and that pings me) from this edit, but I'm not sure what you were doing there -- are you just moving the notifications around? If so, it would be helpful if you'd drop (or {{noping}}) the mentions of ChristieBot to avoid pinging me unnecessarily. Thanks (and Happy New Year!) -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie Sorry! I was just merging sections for organizational purposes, before an end-of-the-month archive. I thought "pings" only happened when new signatures were added, so apologies for the false alarms. Happy New Year and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- You know, you're right -- they should only happen when new signatures are happening. My guess would be that if you move the section the algorithm doesn't realize it's only moving it and things you're actually writing a whole new section, so it adds a ping. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Comeback Seattle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Comeback Seattle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)