Welcome!

edit

Hi Amanatadverse17! I noticed your contributions to List of Delhi Public School Society schools and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Amanatadverse17! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Delhi Public School, Dooars moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Delhi Public School, Dooars. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

can you please tell me atleast how many citation we need to provide and specifically on which topics.. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Amanatadverse17, to start off, you have linked the YouTube channel of that school. Do you work there or in any way related with the school?
Source Analysis:
  • YouTube channels are not reliable sources and do not contribute towards notability.
  • The sources Jagran and Ayudh appear to be more like press releases and blog posts.
  • The article from The Statesman may be reliable AFAIK.
  • Listing websites such as saras.cbse.gov.in, dpsdooars.com, cbse.gov.in, dpsfamily.org and ncert.nic.in do not contribute towards notability.
You would require in-depth coverage in reliable and published third-party sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I understood what you are trying to say but may I please know atleast how many citations do we need to provide as I have also seen many school's wikipedia pages with only 3 to 4 citations. Thank you for your valuable Time. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I believe you must have missed my initial question. Do you work there or have any connection with the school? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am sorry for it. I am a Student there in that School. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 06:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
could you please elaborate a bit what you wanna say? And also atleast how many citations we need to provide. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Amanatadverse17 we'd usually need a minimum of three independent sources. Qcne (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Mr Grazing I have provided 3 - 4 notable websites (as told to me by another editor QCNE) talking about the school, excluding the school's own website. So what's the problem also if there's some problem please explain it to me in detail also please let me know how to fullfil the notability criteria by giving some example. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your draft cites the following sources:
  1. The school's own website
  2. Ditto
  3. Can't check this at the moment as it returns 502 error, but from memory it doesn't provide significant coverage of the subject
  4. Primary source (government website)
  5. Primary, non-reliable and non-independent source
  6. Ditto
None of these counts towards notability per WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Jha (August 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 331dot were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Manish Kashyap moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Manish Kashyap, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ajay Kumar Jha moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ajay Kumar Jha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Aviram7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
--- ᗩvírαm7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manish Kashyap (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deb were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Deb (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Jha (August 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Deb was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please read the guidelines on notability. Deb (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Deb (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manish Kashyap (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Deb was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No significant improvements have been made since the last review failed.
Deb (talk) 07:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Manish Kashyap

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Manish Kashyap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- ᗩvírαm7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 08:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Khan Sir, you may be blocked from editing. The unsourced material you added is also blatantly promotional. Bbb23 (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashish Chanchlani (youtuber) (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The only new thing since previous AfDs, AfC submissions, recreations, and saltings (see User:Bonadea/Long term disruption#Ashish Chanchlani for a list of 13 previous titles in article and draftspace) is a trivial mention in a short press release about another Youtuber.
bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please don't use AI generated text in your communication. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 20:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shehzad Poonawalla (October 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shehzad Poonawalla (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 

Hello AstuteFlicker. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AstuteFlicker. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AstuteFlicker|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear bonadea,
Thank you for your message. I would like to clarify that I am not receiving any compensation, direct or indirect, for my edits related to this topic or any others on Wikipedia. My contributions are entirely voluntary. It's just that I am new to Wikipedia and trying to learn new things. Out of interest and passion, I am trying to create and improve articles on topics that don't already exist.
I appreciate your guidance and will continue to follow Wikipedia's guidelines as I learn.
Regards, AstuteFlicker (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! AstuteFlicker, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply