Bershya

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
3,883		Bosnian War (talk)	Add sources
13		Iran–America Society (talk)	Add sources
10		Iranzamin School (talk)	Add sources
169		Operation Credible Sport (talk)	Add sources
14		Persian Gulf Command (talk)	Add sources
112		Operation Prime Chance (talk)	Add sources
6,690		Iraq War (talk)	Cleanup
3,579		Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran (talk)	Cleanup
65		Tawakalna ala Allah Operations (talk)	Cleanup
53		Soviet Union during the Iran-Iraq War (talk)	Expand
104		Iraqi chemical weapons program (talk)	Expand
11,915		Saddam Hussein (talk)	Expand
55		Tahrir al-Wasilah (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
90		Three Alls policy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
97		1979 Kurdish rebellion in Iran (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
389		African empires (talk)	Merge
23		Republican Spelling System (talk)	Merge
6		Reputation and Rarities (talk)	Merge
58		First Battle of al-Faw (talk)	Wikify
30		Battle of Sulaymaniyah (1991) (talk)	Wikify
91		Anti-Kurdish sentiment (talk)	Wikify
4		Osman Ahmed (artist) (talk)	Orphan
3		Baker Branch (talk)	Orphan
2		Bahman Amiri Moghaddam (talk)	Orphan
28		Qaladiza (talk)	Stub
7		Mangesh, Iraq (talk)	Stub
12		Ali Shakeri (talk)	Stub
15		Zangana (tribe) (talk)	Stub
16		Iran Freedom and Support Act (talk)	Stub
32		Overthrow (book) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bershya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am a bit confused to why i have been blocked for evasion. I have never been blocked on any wikipedia account. I have been trying to do more editing such as I did on the XouZian page. I noticed on there was some editing chaos including some ip editors on the 1991 Iraqi Uprisings and simply restored it to the long standing version which was changed by an IP with no reasoning provided. MrOllie called me a block evader and then 40 minutes later I was blocked . I assume he mistook me for this IP edtior who tried to make a similar edit. I must have then been reported and blocked. To reiterate, I have never been blocked on Wikipedia and can not evade one. I believe I was blocked in confusion with the IP editors making the recent disruptive edits, which I was just trying to revert and help fix. Bershya (talk) 10:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed to CorrectingWarPage. Yamla (talk) 12:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bershya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That account is not a sockpuppet, it was an old account I lost access to and it was an SPA which I realised was wrong. There was no misuse of it in any bad faith. I no longer have access to the account, I cannot use it. It had one or 2 talk page comments which were incorrect use of Wikipedia. I have learned from my mistake and have been following the rules since and contributed minor edits to a few pages . These 2 accounts never talked to eachother on the same thread. There was no manipulative use. Another thing this was a separate appeal over my account being a block evasion which was not responded to. The allegation of sockpuppetry is different. I believe this allegation is incorrect as the account claimed to be the sockpuppet has been inactive for months. I will never use the other account and can mark it in my user page the name of my old account. Bershya (talk) 13:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Bershya has been active 29 Sept - present. CorrectingWarPage was active 30 Sept. Both edited the same article within 14 hours of each other. Your "lost password" excuse does not hold water. Declined. Cabayi (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes this is the one I have access to, I said the other one was inactive (hasn't been used for multiple months) There is one edit linking them. Also it wasn't misleading, it's quite clear when I lost access and the edits were the same. I was not hiding this was my account. Bershya (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Third appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bershya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologise for the SPA sock puppetry using correctingwarpage, it was not intended in any way and it was poor thinking combined with me going into editing with a lack of wikipedia knowledge and my disagreement with how the iran iraq war page was written I had not thought much about it. I would like to properly contribute to wikipedia beyond an SPA. The edits were just poor thinking, I had lost access and recklessly reiterated my edit on another account as I wanted to keep discussing and trying to change the result without realizing the possible manipulation that could come from using 2 accounts. I knew it was on a different account but simply didn't think much of it. I know do realise my mistake. Bershya (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I find this requested unblock reason to be disingenuous considering the various falsehoods in the two prior unblock requests, and still showing a failure to understand that not just sockpuppetry was the reason, but also just being generally disruptive. Unblock declined. Daniel (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.