User talk:Carletteyt/Archive 1

Archive 1

Edits at Autism

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Autism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Averixus (talk) 23:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@Averixus i has thought that the autistic people have digestive problems and it' s scientific checked, maybe i didn' t read the information into article

Thanks you for the information :) Carletteyt (talk) 23:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Louis Braille, you may be blocked from editing. TartarTorte 19:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, i have a question; if i want to protect a page without any protection... How i can ? Carletteyt (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey sorry, I did not realize you were trying to protect a page. You can request protection at WP:RPPI. Please do not add protection templates to pages that do not have protection as that is viewed as vandalism. I'll remove the warning I just left. Sorry about that. TartarTorte 19:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Carletteyt, you might want to go directly to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase/Form and fill out that form. Please {{ping}} me if you need any help. Sorry again for the misunderstanding! TartarTorte 19:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks :) Carletteyt (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Carletteyt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! BusterD (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop mass adding pages to requests for page protection

Please read the page protection policy. None Few of the pages you've put forward qualify for even the mildest protection we could apply. Please stop listing pages there so we can figure out how to help. BusterD (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

copyright laws?

Sorry, but copyright laws have nothing to do with Wikipedia editing so long as one does not add content copyrighted elsewhere to Wikipedia. Editing content attributable to Wikipedia's editors has no connection with a subjects copyrighted material otherwise. Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra i´m sorry for my repetitive behavior but i´ m a new wikipedian and i long my history in this encyclopedia saw thing that go changing and just to be pretend to better Wikipedia

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for engaging. Nobody's angry or even annoyed. We see worse every day. Mostly we just want to see any new Wikipedian get off on the right foot. Feel free to call on our friend User:Deepfriedokra or myself if we can be of service. BusterD (talk) 21:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified-- there is a significant amount of on-going disruption or vandalism. It is not done just in case or because it might be needed, except in specific cases.. --Deepfriedokra (talk)

What BusterD said. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, i detected a semi-protected page called The Zeitgeist Movement without lock symbol. Can you add it? Carletteyt (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

page protection versus protection templates

Hello. My name is Eggishorn and I've noticed you recently editing protection templates on pages such as Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and Stephen Hillenburg. These templates are simply status indicators. They tell readers and editors that a page is protected but they don't actually protect a page. Page protection or unprotection is a function that only administrators and the like can perform. There is generally no reason for regular editors to make any changes to such protection templates. Even if the the protection template is not correct for a page's current protection status there are bots that generally come along and fix it up. You should probably refrain from trying to add, remove, or alter protection templates in the future. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Let's discuss page protection for bit

I'm one of those editors trusted with the ability to protect pages when I see a problem or when requested. One of the criteria I must judge is whether the page is currently under attack or disruption. Let's use your latest request for example: Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. I do agree with your request in that this page is a likely target for disruption. So I begin by looking at the page's history. I see no edits to the page in the last three days. So normally that would be a decline. There might be circumstances which affect my judgment. For example, have we been seeing a long history of this kind of disruptive editing? Is there one contributor who seems to take issue with the page? Is this just a normal content disagreement which is NOT an admin's call? Normally editors don't need a referee. If I were you, I'd do a little bit of reading, starting with the five pillars, which explain what we're trying to do here and how we like to operate. I'm around today and can mentor if you need help. I started editing Wikipedia by getting in a bit of conflict but gradually found places on the pedia I enjoy working. A great place to start is to find stub-class articles in content area you enjoy. These pages usually really need some kind of wikilove. The Teahouse I linked in my welcome is a super place to get started and learn more. The link to Volunteer Center is a good place to find stuff we've identified needs doing. Let's not make any new RfPP requests now ok? BusterD (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry

I didn´t pretend that you were angry, i promise you read wikipedia politicy.

Have a nice day Carletteyt (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

• Now let's look at the one request you made today which I did choose to protect: Squidward Tentacles. I go to the page history, and notice three reverted edits by ip contributors in the last 48 hours. To my eyes, that's on the low side, but it is in the range of possible disruptions which might cause me to choose to protect. Notice I semi-protected the page, not full protection. This keeps ip editors (and extremely new accounts) off the page through the duration of the protection. Why did I choose one year of protection? I looked at the protection logs for the page, and see a one-year semi-protection on this article just expired last week. I might have chosen to indefinitely semi-protect but instead I just repeated the same one year period. Understand my process? BusterD (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  Yes, i´m start understanding... Carletteyt (talk) 22:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

• My point is that every page is worthy of page protection. If the page meets our standards for notability and verifiability then we want to support the page and not see it defaced. For the purposes of protection, I have no interest about whether page is about something really visible like Santa Claus or something extremely obscure. We choose page protection when the page is under active disruption. Got it? BusterD (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  Yes but for example, the article about Thomas Edison is indefinitly semiprotected but dont have any vandalism, is just a popular biography. Carletteyt (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  I have to say that maybe don´t neccesarily have a recent vandalism if this page wear a time semiprotected or protected Carletteyt (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

• Did I accidentally cut you off? What we call an "edit conflict"? It looked like you were trying task a question by I don't see it now. BusterD (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  No don´t worry dude Carletteyt (talk) 22:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  • Thomas Edison is a great example and I'm glad you raised it. That page is, like Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, is a highly visible page, which means lots of people read it every day. Lots of eyes see lots of things which might need changing. That's a good thing. Let's look at the page history: We can see the last reverted edit was in February. Notice the list of contributions: no ip contributors (because semi-protection screens those ip folks out). Lets click on the tiny "View logs for this page" blue link next to the wiki globe at the top of this page. Do you see it? Click it and tell me something about what you see. BusterD (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

    Yes, i see that should be protected because it´s modified a couple times in a month.

    But the people who realizes changes it´s just for short details and doesn´t causes vandalism.

    For this reason we don´t know if in a future could be change with bad intentions.

    It´s a really visited page for this reason needs a protection...

    ) Carletteyt (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

• Sorry for keeping you on the hook, if I did. Family stuff. Nice to be Spring. Look here. These are the logs I was asking you to seek. See the long list of entries dating before 2011? This application of increasing protection multiple times shows 2010 editors just like you requesting protection and the page getting protected. Since then, much less vandalism. Indefinite semi-protection keeps ip contributors out but allows anyone who has an account to edit. Indefinite semi-protection is not often applied; timed protection doesn't work in very rare cases. Anyway, that's the lesson for today. Sorry if I'm a boring teacher today. Thank you for your kind attention. BusterD (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 07:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

  I check pages that still having indefinite semi-protected but the same wear so much time without dissapear...

  Why? Carletteyt (talk) 08:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Barnett (March 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Carletteyt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong i feel sad but okey, i went to include the case of this person because it' s really fantastic and inusual and i just tried to add this article in English Wikipedia...

Thanks you Carletteyt (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

In order for an article’s subject to be considered notable by the Wikipedia community, we require that it receive significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject this is what you base an article on. Theroadislong (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase) for a period of 6 months for repeatedly requesting page protection conjecturally because the page might be vandalized after being repeatedly being asked/told not to. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@BusterD:.Courtesy ping. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, i just to want make changes to better, my intention is not disturbing your work in Wikipedia.

If i did it, yourselves have to know, i tried to realize changes of probably highly vandalized pages.

I don´t wait to you unlock me but i want to make you think that i never pretended be bad editor.

) Carletteyt (talk) 18:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note to User:Carletteyt: notice that User:Deepfriedokra has chosen to block you, because you continue to add pages to RfPP which don't qualify. But they haven't blocked you from Wikipedia, they've ONLY unblocked you from participating at RfPP. Let's find something else to occupy you where your clear interest in helping can be useful. When I got started, I quickly learned a place which always needed help was working on stub-class articles. So I read a bunch of pages and made small changes which helped the page (these days the most important things one can add are sources via citation). No offense but I get the impression that English is your second language. If this is true, you could be especially helpful helping to translate pages from the wiki in your native language to English Wikipedia, or even translate pages from here to your native language wiki. Nobody, even Deepfriedokra, wants you to stop helping. They just want you to gain some competence in how to make positive contributions. BusterD (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

  Hello @Busterd nice to help you in everything you need, yes, my native language is spanish but i prefer english Wikipedia because this more long than another.

  I have a question, the 2 pages Blue Whale Challenge and Sexting are semi - protected but for some reason doesn´t appear the lock icon...

  Why? Carletteyt (talk) 16:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

  Blue Whale has never been protected that I see, and I just added the missing template at sexting. Thanks for spotting this! BusterD (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jacob Barnett (mathematician)

The article Jacob Barnett (mathematician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Barnett (mathematician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jacob Barnett (mathematician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jacob Barnett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jacob Barnett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spark: A Mother's Story of Nurturing Genius. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 22:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Jacob Barnett (mathematician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jacob Barnett (mathematician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Carletteyt,

An article on this person has been deleted several times, most recently in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination). The page title was "salted" to prevent a future article from being created. But the administrator who deleted Jacob Barnett the last time stated that a draft article could be worked on so instead of deleting your article, I moved it to Draft space. Please submit it to Articles for Creation for review.

Please do not get disappointed if your draft is declined. You are still a very new editor and writing a new article from scratch is the hardest task you can take on, you need to have solid references from reliable sources, especially on a subject who has had their article deleted several times. There is a high bar to reach to get this article moved into main space of the project.

If you have questions about article creation and Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse where more experienced editors can offer you advice and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

I'll ping BusterD to let him know about your recent efforts as it looks like he has been mentoring you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

I think everybody has been pretty kind around here

But I have no clue why you seem to be manually editing page protection templates (1, 2, 3). Please don't do that. Can we try some page editing? Fluffing around with admin areas and tools is going to get negative notice from contributors not as gentle as Liz and myself. And another thing: If you're going to start a new conversation, like you did today in the March 2022 thread above, please create a new thread or ping me. See WP:PING. BusterD (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

PAGES WITHOUT LOCK ICON BUT ARE SEMI-PROTECTED @busterd i find another pages without lock symbol, like Furry fandom, bigfoot, Obsessive–compulsive disorder, Marie Curie and midget if i find more pages, i´m gonna tell in case that were enough.

Please remember to sign your posts, even on your own talk. Making list of pages which are protected but are NOT tagged would be useful. Seems like easier ways to make friends and influence people. I'll look at and adjust tags on the pages you've linked. BusterD (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

How i check my publications? Carletteyt (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

@BusterD if you see again, the Blue Whale Challenge is semi protected but doesn´t appears lock symbol. Carletteyt (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

You are correct. Sorry. What I'm seeing is that the tags were properly applied at some point (over ten years ago in some cases) and they were inadvertently or otherwise removed in good faith. I've repaired the tags you've listed above this post. I do not comprehend "How i check my publications?" BusterD (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, i went to say " sign " im need to spend time speaking this new language. Carletteyt (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

I published three pages without lock symbol. Carletteyt (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

One question, pages that have just registered user could be protected indefinitly?

In this case, we should semi protect Omar Mateen, 2014 Isla Vista killings and James Holmes (mass murderer).

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

A registered user might apply for user page protection at RfPP if their user page is being edited by unauthorized editors. A user might request their talk page be semi-protected if their talk is being vandalized or disrupted by new or ip editors. Full protection on a talk page would prevent EVERYONE from editing, which would defeat the purpose of the talk page. Does that answer your question? BusterD (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

No, i pretend to edit extended protected pages like same to semi protected pages in Wikipedia.

For example: Shakespeare authorship question

I wear a month and i realized 500 edits in Wikipedia.

I promise you that me don´t vandalize anyone pages.

Thanks Buster :) Carletteyt (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Is the second one that i find today: North Pole Carletteyt (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

I find another page without lock symbol but protected it´s in our list Carletteyt (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, i find another page without lock symbol. Democritus

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

List of articles which may need protection tags

• Dyslexia
• Doug Emhoff
• reptilian humanoid
• 2014 Isla Vista killings (correct pending changes tag seems to be applied)
• James Holmes (mass murderer) (correct pending changes tag)
• Omar Mateen (correct pending changes tag)
• IQ (correct pending changes tag)
• dodo
• The Zeitgeist Movement
• Democritus
• North Pole

My permission to change protection in pages

Hi @busterd i just want to know when me gonna can modify pages on Wikipedia and the protection. Thanks And just find two pages that are extended protected but i can´t understand why not " Killing of Gabby Petito " and " Sad Puppies " are extended and not " confimed " . Bye :)

• I waited almost 16 years before I was granted those administrator rights. Seeking admin rights prematurely isn't effective. Why are you editing Wikipedia? I'm beginning to wonder. This is a serious place. You're continuing to ignore my requests to sign your own posts properly. You are still making test edits outside of sandbox space. Please demonstrate improvement if you wish to be taken seriously. Right now most of your edits are to this talk page or to the draft page. Gotta walk before you can run. WP:COMPETENCE is becoming an issue. For the record, both the articles you linked are correctly tagged as extended confirmed. BusterD (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

I don´t know how sign a post Carletteyt (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

I want to be wikipedian ans i promise to to take myself seriously. Carletteyt (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Show us. Work nicely in pagespace doing gnomish tasks for a bit. Spelling, punctuation, finding sources. A little less worrying about other editors and more concern about the work (because this is not a play space) you are doing here. I can help, but at this point you're pushing my patience. This new list of untagged but protected pages is helpful to me and the whole pedia. Keep doing that. Show us you can help us and we will help you help us. Don't be discouraged by my critique. I'm just hoping you grow into this. BusterD (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi @BusterD i wear ready a longf time in Wikipedia and i think that i could have permission to extended protected pages, i promise you don´t vandalize anyone page.

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 07:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

@Carletteyt: what do you think an "extended protection page" is? And in any case, only Administrators can protect pages. But I don't think you understand protection. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

For example: Donald Trump

Its a extended protected page, maybe can edit these pages. Carletteyt (talk) 15:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

I refer to the pages with blue icon. Carletteyt (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

@Carletteyt: I mean who is prevented from editing those pages. Doug Weller talk 15:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

But in a future maybe i will get access for administrator of pages with blue icon.

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

I don’t think this is going to happen and you should abandon this goal at least for now. You need to show that you can edit articles competently. Doug Weller talk 18:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Can you add lock symbol to the two last articles of my list? Carletteyt (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Language issues

Carlette, please use Google Translate (https://translate.google.com/) before you post comments. It is almost impossible to understand what you are writing. Google Translate does a pretty good job. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks you but you don´t delete my last point in my page. Carletteyt (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't know what you're talking about. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

About the Drayke Hardman's case Carletteyt (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

That has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Don't take that deletion personally. A lot of other entries were also deleted because they violated our inclusion criteria for list articles. If you want Drayke Hardman included, then create a successful article. The same goes for all the others that were deleted. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 06:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Okey, i´m writing two different articles in the same period and i´m gonna add this think to my list.

Thanks you! Carletteyt (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Competence

diff. Two problems: 1) the edit summary "Added links" is not true at all. Why are you making false edit summaries? It is a trend see diff. 2) "Dicks out for Haramabe" the word "Dicks" is not "Dick's". The linked source shows that, and, it's improper English grammar. And to add a third problem, in that second diff you basically vandalized the page adding whitespace with a false edit summary. -- GreenC 12:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

I agree that edit summaries are important. Please attempt to a accurately describe your change so that other editors can see how you're helping. Both of the edits GreenC describes could have been summarized as "ce" for "copyedit". Please try to remember to sign your posts on talk. BusterD (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Solution

I saw what was going on here through an administrator's talk page, and I want to help as much as possible. I was initially optimistic that I could help you, but the two edits you made today, make me believe that altering the content of articles is too difficult for you for now. Many articles about animals have not been categorized correctly. Are you willing to spend time changing the categories for various species of moth? Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

If you'd like to do the work I am going to need to set up some tools first. Click on the "preferences" button on your screen. Then, I need you to click on the button that says "Gadgets." Lastly, in the "Editing" section, I need you to check the box that says "HotCat." and then click "Save." Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

@Scorpions13256 Yes i want it! :D Carletteyt (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping. However, I am really tired, so I have to go to sleep right now. Furthermore, I have to work tomorrow, so I won't be available until 4:30 Eastern Standard Time. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

It appears that I have woken up 4 hours before I'm supposed to leave. Please tell me when you have turned WP:HOTCAT on. Scorpions13256 (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

It´s on ready!

D Carletteyt (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Excessive wikilinks of common words

Stop wikilinking common words. Save it for special terms not commonly understood. Far too many of your edits are being reverted as of dubious value. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Despite repeated warnings and a final warning you continue to add links to common words at Albert Einstein, you are likely to be blocked, if you carry on. Theroadislong (talk) 10:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Please see this discussion. Consider this reply as a warning you will be blocked if you can't or won't work with other editors, as seem to be the case judging from this talk page. Oz\^InterAct 11:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Oz\^InterAct 12:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Now, I've blocked you for 1 week Carletteyt. This means you are unable to edit any article here for 1 week. I understand you are young and you seem to want to help, but you also have to understand that if you can't or won't understand the advice and suggestions other more experienced editors here give you, either by language barrier or otherwise, then you end up doing more harm than good.

By only blocking you for a week, I hope you understand we, like you, are doing this in good faith. When the week is up, engage with the other editors, ask them what to do, read all the help articles here on Wikipedia, look at edit histories of the articles you are interested in and see what others have done. Learn as much as you can.

If you can't, I am afraid we will have no choice but to set harder blocks, which is a shame, since it does seem like you want to help.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carletteyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My block expired Carletteyt (talk) 11:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My block expired dude! Ready to continue editing Carletteyt (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Please unlock me Carletteyt (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Inter i promise you don' t repeat my actions more, i didn' t know how talk with the administators about editing.

Please unlock me, if i repeat this in just one more page, you lock me more time, but please unlock me now :( Carletteyt (talk) 13:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

And not all my editions are bad, okey Carletteyt (talk) 14:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Carletteyt Read what I wrote above where I said you could appeal the block: Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. You seem to want to help, but you also seem unable to understand instructions. That is, I'm afraid, not a good sign. Might I suggest you redirect your efforts to the Wiki in your native language? Oz\^InterAct 14:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Sufficient of your contributions are disruptive that you've been blocked. Only you can help you here. I informed you that improvement would have to be shown and right now, you are not showing us. Your words and promises mean little without action. I was blocked once myself, and it made me mad. I encourage you to spend the week just reading. Start with WP:FIVEPILLARS. Try to understand what we're doing here. Actions have consequences, much like in real life. PLEASE don't clutter this talk page with more chatter; your talk page editing may be removed as well. Take the week off. Come back next Monday and let's try again. I'll be here. BusterD (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

  Please give me a second chance, i feel so sorry and my dream is still editing Wikipedia.

  You and me have a little relationship into this web and since today i´m gonna question to administrator before any editing.

  Please, make dissapear the temporal lock today and believe that i can change.

  Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• I second the suggestion that you redirect your efforts to the Wiki in your native language. You already have significant issues that are creating problems for you and Wikipedia, and adding the language barrier is just too much. Only a tiny number of your edits are kept here, so you are a net negative for the project. Please try the Spanish version of Wikipedia. Maybe you'll do better there. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me)
• I was checking your talk page to see if you responded to my suggestion, but I see you were blocked. I'm sorry to see that. I agree with what Valjean said. I think you should try editing the Wikipedia of your first language. I was considering mentoring you, but I no longer believe that this is possible. Again, I am very sorry to see you blocked. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

  Listen to me very carefully. I'm sorry for the hasty comment above. I was late for work, and now my shift is over. I'm still going to try to help you out. When your block is over, ping me. Do not make any other edits until we talk again. I will do my best to find simple repetitive tasks for you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

  I am so nervious because tomorrow my account will be unlocked for edits!!!

  Thanks and myself promises realizes good contributions.

  Have a nice sunday Carletteyt (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

• I think Carletteyt is a good faith editor and has shown politeness and kindness to me on my talk page. I think they have the potential to usefully contribute to Wikipedia, and I hope they do so once this 1 week ban has expired, but they would need to follow all the advice they have been give. It does appear they may be new to English, and I'm going to agree with Valjean that they they may be a more beneficial contributor at the Wikipedia of their native language. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Unlock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carletteyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understoond my lock´s reason and will never repeat my actions. The next time that i do a edit in Wikipedia, gonna talk before with some administrator. Thanks, i wait your compression Carletteyt (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I agree with the blocking administrator's reasoning here. You have unfortunately so far not been able to work with other editors who are trying to help you edit in a productive way. You are only blocked for one week. Please use this time to carefully consider the advice you have been given on this page. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Advice

I saw on your userpage that you are only 17. The pieces of the puzzle are now starting to come together for me. It seems like you just might not be ready for Wikipedia yet. I personally have had my account since I was 13, but I didn't start actively editing until I was 20. If I edited Wikipedia regularly when I was only 17 (Or even 19), I would have been blocked for some of the same reasons you were. Editing Wikipedia requires real-life skills that you might not acquire until you are well into college. I personally was not mature enough to talk to people on here until I was 22. You can check my earliest interactions with others for proof.

Nonetheless, I will try to help you with categorizing pages (Please ping me when your block expires). If this doesn't work out, I would recommend staying off Wikipedia for at least a year (preferably 2) and trying again when you are in college. If it never works out, don't feel bad! Wikipedia is not a good fit for everyone. People get blocked for much worse reasons than you. I hope one day you can be a productive editor on here. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced addition

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mark Zuckerberg, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Which errors there are in my change? Carletteyt (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The error was that you failed to provide a citation as required by WP:CITE for this edit. It's not sufficient that the information you add is true, it must be cited with a reliable source (see WP:RS) and this is your responsibility. Note that you may want to stop editing until you've had a chance to read our most important policies; see WP:5P. You've had an awful lot of warnings so far and it's clear you don't yet understand how Wikipedia works. --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I agree with User:Yamla. I found your contribution at Mark Zuckerberg well-written and useful. But I can't tell from reading your change whether it is true or not, because such changes must be sourced. I have asked before, and continue to urge you to find some stub-class articles in your field of interest and learn to work there. Applying a change to a very visible article like Mark Zuckerberg, no matter how accurate, is unhelpful unless you can provide citation from reliable sources. I don't want you to give up, and I am willing to help teach you about editing, but I urge you to meekly accept Yamla's critique and find sources for such changes. If I can help you with sourcing, just apply the url here and I can show you how to make citation out of them. BusterD (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

[1] Carletteyt (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I´m going back to edit page but with the correct verfications Carletteyt (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I suggest you NOT do that yet. I'd suggest you post a draft of your change here and we source it here before inserting on the subject page. For now, I wouldn't make any change to Mark Zuckerberg yet. I don't want to see you blocked again, and it would waste your time as well as mine. BusterD (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The New Yorker is a terrific source and will make an excellent citation! Let's do it here. BusterD (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

At Ardsley College High School, Zuckerberg excelled in class demonstrated skill in electronic game design. He transferred to Phillips Exeter Academy, a private school in New Hampshire, in his junior year, where he won awards in science (math, astronomy, and physics) and classical studies. In his youth, he also attended the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth summer camp. On his college application, Zuckerberg claimed he could read and write French, Hebrew, Latin, and ancient Greek. He was captain of the fencing team. [2] Carletteyt (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

This part should be in section " Mark Zuckerberg´s Early life ". Carletteyt (talk) 15:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Great! Glad to work with you for a bit. Hold on, I'm getting a cup of tea and I'll be back in a few minutes. While I'm gone, post the article author name, the date the story came out and the title of the article. Back in five minutes. Thanks for working with me; this is fun. BusterD (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

- Author´s name: John Cassidy

- Date: 7th May 2006

- Name of article: How hanging out on the Internet became big business.

Same to me! I think that this really funny! Carletteyt (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Do me a favor while I get myself organized. Please go over to Template:Cite magazine and look at the tool we'll be using. I'm going to create an empty cite magazine template and let you fill in the blanks. BusterD (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Now paste the correct content into the right spots. BusterD (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{cite magazine | last = Cassidy | first = John | date = | title = | url = | magazine = | location = | publisher = | access-date = }}

I haven't heard from you in the last little while. I'm out walking my dogs and should be back about 30 minutes after this date stamp. We may to do this over a couple of posts because I go into work in a few hours. While I'm gone doublecheck everything your assertion says is TRUE, ex. he went to Adrsley High School not college. Let's be certain we're saying accurate things about a living person. Edit you draft to create the better version. And I'm not seeing Cassidy make assertions about how well he did at ardsley. BusterD (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

So I see instead of working here you decided to post what we've agreed is NOT ready to a separate sandbox and apply for AFC. This was a silly idea and it made me feel foolish. I'm working with you here and you're not working back. BusterD (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Solved, thanks for help me, i believe that don´t needs more revisions. Thanks you for help :) I consider you a big friend

Not at all solved. You just applied our draft to AfC while I was afk. Not a nice thing to do, knowing I was on my way back. If you don't need my help, I've done my part. If you got it alone, I'm afraid you'll find yourself blocked again, and I'll have to remind myself when you're about to be unblocked. BusterD (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Note to the next blocking admin

If this user needs to be blocked, please consider a block no longer than a week and I would prefer a 31 hour block, non-escalating. IMHO this user is trying but lacks certain skills we've gained like patience and competence. It would be a tragedy if this user could be trained and coached, but found themselves indef blocked for WP:COMPETENCE. This may not work out to anyone's satisfaction. Appreciate any forbearance, know my eyes are clearly fixed on this situation. BusterD (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Carletteyt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Carletteyt/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Carletteyt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Carletteyt/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Continued disruptive edits after block

Submitting this User:Carletteyt/sandbox for review was absolutely pointless and disruptive. WP:NOTHERE seems to apply. Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

overlinking. again.

I'm not sure how many more times this can be said before it becomes clear but stop WP:OVERLINKing stuff. I just undid yet another edit here. Before you link words, check the article to see if they are already linked and whether it's remotely related to the subject or a common word. Seriously, we've talked about this endlessly and I'm at a loss for how to help you. It doesn't appear that mentoring is helping, it doesn't appear that explaining it helps, so perhaps you should consider not wikilinking stuff until you can get a grasp of how to do it properly. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The last time sorry Carletteyt (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You said that before. What assurance do we have going forward that this won't continue? Because you're wearing down patience of many editors and if it happens again, it's likely to be taken to WP:ANI as competence is required. And I know it's not pleasant to hear but there's no more time to beat around the bush. You need to listen to what other editors are telling you and cease doing the things that they're asking you to stop doing. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

And no you're adding unintelligible promo with photos to String theory after this warning. BusterD can you please assist before this gets taken to ANI because their next edit is where this is headed. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I love these topic and i misunderstand why you want to delete my part

It´s true Carletteyt (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I think perhaps you need to take a few month long break from Wikipedia until you can fully grasp what's being asked of you and what the encyclopedia's purpose is. A love of knowledge simply isn't enough. You need to be able to collaborate, take advice and edit properly. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Brian Greene is one of the most important physics but i´m gonna do a question...

Can i add a reference about this person?

Since this moment myself knows that the administrators should see previously my edits. Carletteyt (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

If you can write a legible sentence that is well sourced, no one is stopping you but that doesn't seem to be the case with 98% of your edits, as evidenced by the fact that out of your hundred or so edits, less than ten remain unreverted. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You are about to be blocked again

Based on what I'm seeing, there's a lot of consensus towards another block on this account. The next block is usually "escalating" referring to the longer length of the block. While I have requested a more moderate solution, I have zero problem with an administrator protecting the pedia from your unfocussed editing by blocking as THEY deem appropriate. Please consider you and I strictly editing in draft or sandbox space. It's clear you are intelligent and interested in high-order subjects. Your rash actions are betraying you. Your promises and assurances have not made you look very good, because you aren't backing them up with action. Please stop making assurances. BusterD (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, i´m just a 17 years old boy interesed in a lot of topics.

I wish still editing in this platform a long time.

You are the person that most helped me.

Bye Carletteyt (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

(edit conflict) We are wikifriends, and I'm loyal to my friends. In order for us to work together, you need to stay out of trouble here. I don't give up easily. I have been where you are, seeing a world of ideas you are ready to explore. We won't say goodbye, we'll say aloha, which has thousand meanings but to me means "I miss you when we are not together". Stay with me by blocking yourself. Say: I'm not going to edit until tomorrow morning. And prove it by just reading pages and not typing. Just until tomorrow. If you can do this, I'll continue to help. If not, I'll wait until you are ready. BusterD (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Plenty of our editors are younger than you and do not have this issue. Stop using your age as an excuse. It does not help and makes things look even worse. Simply stop doing what you're doing. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• BusterD it doesn't appear your words have sunk in, as he's still editing poorly and making silly mistakes requiring clean up behind him. I'm afraid I'm left with no choice but to take this to ANI. I'll be opening a thread shortly. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

  No please Carletteyt (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

  I just added references i didn´t change text. Carletteyt (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

No, you added content namely "Actually this word refers to a person with a big sexual desire." which was not supported by the existing source. Theroadislong (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

That was a terrible and deeply offensive addition, by the way. I have no idea what on earth you were thinking. --Yamla (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Im so innocent, sorry

I just want to change the world with my actions Carletteyt (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

If you can't tell what is right and wrong your actions can be harmful. See WP:COMPETENCY. -- GreenC 21:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I am disappointed to see that you did not ping me when you were unblocked. I will ask you one more time. Please do not make any more edits. The only solution I have is that he goes to me to approve his edits before he makes them. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry can you give e instructions? Carletteyt (talk) 05:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Look at the page Sufetula alychnopa. Below the bar on the infobox that says "Binomial name" you will find a blue link. If you put your mouse over it you will see that it links to Alfred Jefferis Turner. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and add the category Category:Taxa named by Alfred Jefferis Turner. You do this by typing it into the search bar and then click on it when it comes up. On Sufetula bilinealis, you will do the same thing but instead use the category Category:Taxa named by George Hampson because that is the name of the person who is below the "binomial name" bar on the infobox. The name of the person you will categorize will change for every species. I would like you to do this for as many species on the below list as you like.

Here is the list:

Sufetula alychnopa

Sufetula bilinealis

Sufetula brunnealis

Sufetula carbonalis

Sufetula chagosalis

Sufetula choreutalis

Sufetula cyanolepis

Sufetula diminutalis

Sufetula dulcinalis

Sufetula grumalis

Sufetula hemiophthalma

Sufetula hypocharopa

Sufetula hypochiralis

Sufetula macropalpia

Sufetula melanophthalma

Sufetula minimalis

Sufetula minuscula

Sufetula nigrescens

Sufetula nitidalis

Sufetula obliquistrialis

Sufetula polystrialis

Sufetula pygmaea

Sufetula rectifascialis

Sufetula sacchari

Sufetula sufetuloides

Sufetula sunidesalis

Sufetula sythoffi

Sufetula trichophysetis

You can do as much as you like, but you are just going to need me to verify that you did it correctly. Also, I would recommend not editing any articles other than the ones I linked for now unless someone else tells you to. I only added links to the first three, but I think you will be able to locate the rest of the pages yourself. Specifically, you can get to the rest by typing them into your search bar. I hope this works out. Scorpions13256 (talk) 05:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I added a new space in my sandbox. Read it!

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 10:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I forgot to mention. If there is no blue link on the article, do not add any categories. Scorpions13256 (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect categories

Just a note to tell you that you added a non existent category to Sufetula carbonalis and Sufetula chagosalis and miss-spelt one on Sufetula brunnealis. Theroadislong (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Please STOP

Please stop adding seemingly random categories to articles. Theroadislong (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

This categories are relationed Carletteyt (talk) 08:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Adding Toilet training category to Toddler is not required. Theroadislong (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

• Carletteyt, I already final warned you, so did your mentors and other experienced editors. My final and last request is that you just stop editing mainspace until you can understand what is necessary. Any further edits of yours needing reverts, I will take this to WP:ANI and ask for an outright lengthy block as you don't appear to be getting it or are unwilling to follow directions. I won't leave another message here letting you know or warning you, instead the next edit will be a notification about an ANI thread. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

  Of my edits, not all are incorrect. Carletteyt (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

  Okey to which person i have to question it?

  Actually sent a message to BusterD for see my draft space.

  In this part you look my possible edits Carletteyt (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

  I don´t understand the reverted edit of Bob Ross and Neil Degrasse Tyson.

  Another one is for the detail of a city in Ted Bundy´ s page. Carletteyt (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

We don't generally wikilink words that are in quotes. Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

And now more overlooking of common words at Cannibalism, Child pornography and Sexual assault and just plain pointless linking at Virginity. This is only going one way. Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

What happens with these words? Carletteyt (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I'll note that Carletteyt has refused to stop mainspace editing, despite a clear warning to do so. See for example, this edit. I'm not claiming the edit was necessarily bad, only that they were told to stop editing and have refused to follow this direction, as they have refused to follow most directions given them. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the problems continue, and they need to be stopped completely as soon as possible. A full siteban is necessary. The rare occasions where a minor edit is okay do not justify them functioning as a huge time sink. Carlos, edit your own language's Wikipedia, not this one. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.PRAXIDICAE💕 15:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Actually i din´t change nothing Carletteyt (talk) 15:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

That is demonstrably untrue. Are you saying you did not make this edit after you were thoroughly warned by myself and Yamla, Valjean and buster? PRAXIDICAE💕 15:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Or this one after you were notified of the ANI thread AND responded? This is literally already linked in the lead. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I just want to edit i am a loneliness boy that dreams with help pages please sorry i need compression Carletteyt (talk) 15:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Do it in your own language, and that is not the purpose of Wikipedia, even the one in your own language. You could join an internet discussion support group, although I fear their reaction. In the mean time, STOP ALL EDITING!!!!! -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I prefer english Wikipedia because it´s more general than my native language Carletteyt (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022 (2)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing which have raised serious questions regarding your ability to constructively contribute to the project at the present time. It is assumed your editing is is intended to be helpful but your failure to accept criticism and instruction from experienced editors, compounded by your apparent lack of competency makes it necessary to revoke your editing privileges. This block is without prejudice to a possible future WP:STANDARDOFFER..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carletteyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I dream with still making good editing in this platform i feel really sad for this, was one of my main passions and my life is ruined completely Not all my edits are incorrect please don´t do it i feel depressed for your action please

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unlock me Carletteyt (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I will let another admin review your unblock request. But I would only consider an unblock if you agreed to limit your editing to draft space for at least three months. For now I suggest you practice your editing elsewhere. Perhaps on Simple English. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I promise you i learnt suffering at the third time lucky.

I am so regretful. Carletteyt (talk) 16:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Since today, all my edits are to draft/space forever.

Excuse me Carletteyt (talk) 16:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)